Privacy-friendly analytics help us see which jobs people explore. They stay off unless you agree.Analytics off unless you agree. Details

Read the record
Back to the river
Skip to sources
Time Machine

Purchasing managers

Also called Procurement manager, Director of procurement, VP of procurement, Chief procurement officer, Strategic sourcing manager

In brief

In May 2025, BLS counted 84,320 US purchasing managers, with median pay of $148,080 a year. Of the BLS counts since 2003, the highest was 91,060, in May 2003. The earliest figure here is a Census count of 68,000 from 1940, not measured the same way as today's count. The last full technology era for purchasing managers: Ariba and e-procurement marketplaces, 1996 to 2015.

What the sources say

Official outlook

BLS projects employment to grow 4% from 2025 to 2035.

BLS Employment Projections 2025-35

AI exposure studies

Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. BLS publishes these counts as yearly survey snapshots and cautions against reading them as a precise trend. In May 2021 BLS changed how it estimates these counts (a model-based method using three years of survey data) and moved fully to the 2018 occupation codes, so part of a change across 2021 can come from the method rather than the work.

Last updated .

Cite this page
APA

Future History. (2026, October 11). Purchasing managers: jobs and pay since 1940 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/11-3061

Chicago

Future History. "Purchasing managers: jobs and pay since 1940." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 11, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/11-3061.

BibTeX

@misc{futurehistory_11_3061, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Purchasing managers: jobs and pay since 1940}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/11-3061}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-11. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }

The access date is today's date on your device.

drag to travel through time
187519001925195019752000now
Country
2026
Known then as Chief Purchasing Agent / Supplying Department Head (railroad era)
Known then as Purchasing Agent / Head Buyer (early industrial era)
Known then as Purchasing Manager / Chief Buyer (post-war industrial era)
Known then as Purchasing Manager / Materials Manager (JIT and MRP era)
Known then as Purchasing Manager / Director of Procurement (supply-chain terminology shift)
Known then as Purchasing Managers (BLS SOC 11-3061)
Known today as Purchasing Managers (BLS SOC 11-3061)
Projected to still be called Purchasing Managers (BLS SOC 11-3061)
Data from the May 2025 survey
US Employment
84K

Stated in source: BLS OEWS

Official statistic
Report an error
Median Annual Wage
$148,080
Est.

≈ $144,284 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)

Official statistic
Report an error
Beat · 1866

February 7, 1866: The Pennsylvania Railroad creates a new Supplying Department in its Transportation Division, placing a Purchasing Agent at its head. This is the first instance of purchasing achieving formal departmental status at a major American corporation. The head purchasing agent will soon report directly to the company president, a reporting line that reflects how much capital the position controls. The Pennsylvania Railroad is at this moment the largest private employer in the United States.

Beat · 1887

Marshall Monroe Kirkman, comptroller of the Chicago and Northwestern Railroad, publishes "The Handling of Railway Supplies: Their Purchase and Disposition" -- the first book dedicated entirely to purchasing practice. Kirkman argues for technical expertise in purchasing agents, centralized vendor relationship management, and systematic price record-keeping across multiple suppliers. A supplement on requisition rules and regulations follows in 1888. This is the foundational text of purchasing management as a professional discipline.

Beat · 1915

Elwood B. Hendricks, a salesman for Thomas Publishing Company, organizes the National Association of Purchasing Agents (NAPA) in New York City, incorporating chapters from New York, Pittsburgh, and Columbus. NAPA is the world's first national professional association for purchasing practitioners. By 1920, more than 30 local affiliates have joined. NAPA will change its name to the National Association of Purchasing Management (NAPM) in 1968 and to the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) in 2002. Today ISM serves over 50,000 members in more than 100 countries.

Beat · 1917

Harvard University offers the first academic course specifically in purchasing, reflecting the profession's growing prestige during wartime industrial mobilization. The US entry into World War I in April 1917 had created enormous government procurement demands and highlighted the shortage of trained purchasing professionals. The War Industries Board, established in 1917, set up the General Purchasing Board with General Charles Dawes as General Purchasing Agent to centralize and coordinate military supply procurement.

Beat · 1931

NAPA creates a Business Survey Panel that polls members on commodity purchasing activity. The Federal Reserve and the US Chamber of Commerce begin using the data. This panel eventually evolves into the ISM Report on Business, which when ISM introduced the Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) in 1982 became one of the most widely watched leading economic indicators in the United States. A PMI above 50 signals manufacturing expansion; below 50 signals contraction. The ISM PMI is released on the first business day of each month and market-moving in its impact on bond and equity markets.

Beat · 1973

The OPEC oil embargo of October 1973 triggers raw-material shortages across the US manufacturing economy. For procurement professionals, the embargo is a watershed: organizations that had previously treated purchasing as a clerical function discover that supply disruptions in one input can halt entire production lines. The experience reshapes how executives think about vendor relationships, inventory buffers, and supplier diversification. It also sets the stage for the 1980s JIT revolution: the Toyota Production System's emphasis on lean inventory and supplier reliability was partly a direct response to the scarcity conditions of the 1970s.

Beat · 1982

NAPM launches the Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) as a monthly survey of manufacturing purchasing managers' buying intentions and activity levels. The PMI is a composite of five sub-indices: new orders, production, employment, supplier deliveries, and inventories. It is released on the first business day of each month. Within a few years the PMI becomes one of the most closely watched leading economic indicators in the United States: a PMI reading above 50 indicates manufacturing expansion; below 50 indicates contraction. The Federal Reserve, Treasury, and financial markets track it as a real-time gauge of industrial economic conditions. A purchasing manager's index is now market-moving.

Beat · 1999

Ariba goes public on the NASDAQ on March 22, 1999. The stock more than triples on opening day, valuing the three-year-old procurement software company at $4 billion. By 2000, Ariba's market cap reaches $40 billion. The company's bet -- that internet connectivity would let buyers access electronic vendor catalogs from any browser and eliminate paper purchase orders for indirect goods -- proves largely correct for the MRO and office-supplies categories. SAP acquires Ariba in 2012 for $4.4 billion, integrating its supplier network into the SAP procurement ecosystem. The Ariba arc -- $40 billion peak to $4.4 billion acquisition after the dot-com bust -- illustrates both how real the procurement digitization opportunity was and how much market exuberance preceded the actual adoption curve.

Beat · 2020

COVID-19 supply chain disruptions of 2020-2022 produce the most significant shock to global procurement since World War II. Semiconductor shortages halt automotive production lines; personal protective equipment procurement failures expose supply-chain fragility in healthcare; shipping container imbalances create multi-month lead times for manufactured goods. The crisis elevates the organizational standing of Chief Procurement Officers and purchasing managers across industries: boards and CEOs who had treated procurement as a back-office cost-center function discover it is a strategic capability. ISM surveys from 2021-2022 document record-high procurement difficulty indices and the longest supplier lead times in the survey's history. The resilience management, dual-sourcing investment, and supplier geographic diversification projects that followed the COVID shock represent the largest expansion of strategic purchasing scope since the 1970s oil crisis.

How to read this number

OEWS is a point-in-time survey snapshot, not a continuous time series; BLS advises against using it for year-over-year trend comparison.

Each dot is a cited figure over time; the dotted line only links them (values between aren't measured). Hollow dots are estimates.

Official statistic: Copied by a script from a statistics agency table or a published study's table, not retyped by hand. BLS figures and the forecast and exposure tables are also re-checked against that table on every data run. Researched context: Researched from the cited source rather than copied from it by a script, so it is not machine-checked yet. Spot a mistake? Each figure has a “Report an error” link.

Cited forecasts · present → 2035

Will AI replace purchasing managers? What the research says

Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.

Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.

What published forecasts say
Forecast change in the number of people doing this work, as published by each named source. Bars share one scale on every role, centred on zero and reaching the end at ±30%. Grey marks a small change, 3% or less either way.
BLS Employment Projections 2025-35
→ 2035
+4%
BLS National Employment Matrix, 2025-35 cycle, line for SOC 11-3061 (Purchasing managers): 88.3 thousand jobs in 2025, projected 91.8 thousand in 2035, a change of +3.5 thousand (+4.0%). Matrix employment counts all jobs in the occupation, including self-employed workers (3.5% of this occupation in 2025). The average for all occupations in this cycle is +3.5%.
Official statisticReport an error
How exposed is this work to AI (research measures)
Scores as published by each study. Each row says what it measures. These measure what AI could technically do, not forecasts of jobs lost.
Eloundou et al. (2023), "GPTs are GPTs"
2023 study · Share of tasks exposed to LLMs (β, human-rated)
47.1%
of tasks
What this measures

Published occupation-level exposure from the paper's occ_level.csv for O*NET-SOC 11-3061.00 Purchasing Managers. Shown: human-rated β = 0.471, the share of the occupation's tasks an LLM could do in at least half the time at equal quality, counting tasks that need LLM-powered software at half weight (β = E1 + 0.5 × E2). Other published measures for this occupation: human-rated α (LLM alone) 0.114 and γ (all LLM-assisted) 0.829; GPT-4-rated β 0.586. This measures how much of the work an LLM could touch, not how many jobs disappear.

Official statisticReport an error
Today, in this role

What's changing day to day for purchasing managers

Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.

AI is sitting alongside you hereOversee AI-automated PO routing and approval workflows in Coupa or SAP Ariba: configure spend-authority thresholds and policy rules that govern which POs auto-approve versus which require human review

Oversee AI-automated PO routing and approval workflows in Coupa or SAP Ariba: configure spend-authority thresholds and policy rules that govern which POs auto-approve versus which require human review; audit the AI decision log weekly for policy deviations, supplier anomalies, and maverick spend patterns; authorize exceptions and escalate policy violations. Pre-AI, this task consumed significant manual review time; in 2026, AI handles compliant PO routing end-to-end: the Purchasing Manager's value shifts to configuring the guardrails correctly and reviewing the exception queue, not processing the queue itself.[6],[7],[4]

Where your edge is

Routine PO processing is now substantially automated, which is a productivity gain, but misconfigured rules or missed exception patterns can allow maverick spend and compliance violations to accumulate undetected. Build deep expertise in procurement policy design and spend controls; the manager who can both configure the AI ruleset and interpret its exception log is far more valuable than one who only knows how to process approvals manually.

AI is sitting alongside you hereGovern category-level spend analytics using Suplari or Sievo AI: review AI-generated spend visibility reports that classify unmanaged and tail spend, identify compliance leakage (purchases outside contracted suppliers), surface consolidation opportunities across business units, and develop category-level savings targets for the annual procurement operating plan

Govern category-level spend analytics using Suplari or Sievo AI: review AI-generated spend visibility reports that classify unmanaged and tail spend, identify compliance leakage (purchases outside contracted suppliers), surface consolidation opportunities across business units, and develop category-level savings targets for the annual procurement operating plan. Pre-AI, comprehensive spend cube analysis required significant analyst time; in 2026, AI spend analytics platforms deliver it continuously: the Purchasing Manager's role is interpreting the output, setting savings priorities, and driving cross-functional alignment to act on the findings.[8],[9],[3]

Where your edge is

Spend analytics platforms surface what is happening; the Purchasing Manager must determine what to do about it and secure buy-in from budget owners who often resist procurement-led consolidation. Develop strong business-case framing skills, translating spend-leakage findings into CFO-friendly savings projections with realistic implementation timelines. Category managers who present savings opportunities with credible execution plans get funding; those who present data without context do not.

AI is sitting alongside you hereDiscover and qualify new suppliers using ScoutBee AI supplier discovery: task the platform to surface alternative suppliers matching category technical specifications, geographic diversity targets, and sustainability criteria

Discover and qualify new suppliers using ScoutBee AI supplier discovery: task the platform to surface alternative suppliers matching category technical specifications, geographic diversity targets, and sustainability criteria; review AI-generated shortlists, issue RFI questionnaires through the platform, and apply judgment to select qualification candidates based on strategic fit and relationship potential that the platform's scoring model cannot capture. In 2025, supplier discovery that previously required weeks of manual research and trade-show attendance can now be initiated in hours, but the qualification selection judgment and the first relationship conversation remain human.[10],[4]

Where your edge is

AI supplier discovery platforms dramatically expand the universe of potential suppliers you can evaluate in a sourcing cycle: use this to build geographic redundancy and sustainability-certified alternatives for critical categories before you need them. The first relationship-building call with a newly discovered supplier is irreducibly human; use AI to do the discovery and qualification research, then invest your time in the relationship investment that converts a supplier shortlist entry into a strategic partner.

Get started with these tools

Where purchasing managers go next

Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.

What each move takes

A direction you could grow

General and Operations Managers

Purchasing Managers who have run cross-functional savings programs, managed large supplier portfolios, and owned procurement P&L accountability naturally qualify for General and Operations Manager roles: the scope expands from procurement to broader operational governance. The transition is most natural in manufacturing, distribution, and retail organizations where procurement spend represents a large fraction of COGS, giving the Purchasing Manager deep visibility into operations beyond the function. BLS projects growth for G&O Managers through 2032. The skill delta is people management breadth (beyond procurement teams), P&L ownership across multiple functions, and the executive communication skills to lead general business-unit reviews.

What you'd add
  • · Multi-function P&L ownership: budgeting and variance analysis across operations, logistics, and procurement
  • · People leadership at scale: hiring, org design, and performance management for large cross-functional teams
  • · Operational strategy: capacity planning, make-vs-buy decisions, and capital allocation for operations
  • · Executive stakeholder management: board-level communication, investor relations, and M&A due diligence
  • · Change management: leading organizational transformation through AI adoption and process redesign
What it takesSome new skills to pick up
Tools of the era

How has the work of purchasing managers changed since 1866?

The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.

  • Paper ledgers, telegrams, and manual purchase orders (railroad era formalization)

    The first institutionalized purchasing departments operated entirely on paper: handwritten purchase orders, vendor ledgers tracking price and delivery histories, and telegrams for urgent orders from distant suppliers. The Pennsylvania Railroad's Supplying Department of 1866 used standardized requisition forms that divisions submitted to the central purchasing agent, who maintained commodity price histories across multiple vendors. Marshall Kirkman's 1887 book described the ideal purchasing agent as someone who kept meticulous price records and cross-compared vendor bids before committing to any purchase. The efficiency innovation of this era was not a machine but a process: centralizing vendor relationships and price information in one department head rather than scattering it across division superintendents who dealt with local suppliers without comparative benchmarks.

  • Professional associations, standardized contracts, and typewriter-era documentation (NAPA / ISM era)

    The founding of the National Association of Purchasing Agents (NAPA) in 1915 transformed purchasing from a company-specific practice into a codified profession with shared standards, professional journals, and certified training. NAPA established the first national forum for sharing vendor intelligence, negotiating standard contract terms, and benchmarking prices across industries. Harvard offered a purchasing course by 1917. The Business Survey Panel NAPA created in 1931 eventually evolved into the ISM Report on Business, which became one of the most widely watched leading economic indicators in the United States. The typewriter and later the Dictaphone accelerated correspondence volume; carbon-copy purchase orders in triplicate became the bureaucratic backbone of the purchasing department through the 1950s.

    Effect on the work

    NAPA membership grew from a handful of New York-area members in 1915 to a few dozen local affiliates by 1920, reflecting rapid professionalization.

  • MRP (Material Requirements Planning) and mainframe purchasing systems

    Material Requirements Planning, formalized by Joseph Orlicky at IBM in the early 1960s and widely published in his 1975 book, introduced the first computational tool that changed what a purchasing manager actually did each day. MRP systems connected the bills of materials in engineering to the purchase-order generation in procurement: when a production schedule changed, the system calculated the downstream replenishment orders that needed to be placed with suppliers. For the purchasing manager, MRP was the first technology that shifted work from reactive order-placing (buying when inventory ran out) to time-phased proactive purchasing (buying in advance of scheduled production). IBM's System/360, introduced in 1964, provided the mainframe platform on which early MRP systems ran. By the early 1970s, IBM was the largest supplier of MRP software and the technology was reaching medium-size manufacturing companies.

    Effect on the work

    MRP systems enabled purchasing managers to manage larger supplier portfolios without proportional headcount increases, as the system handled the quantity and timing calculations that had previously required manual effort. The net effect was to elevate the skill requirements of the role (familiarity with production schedules and inventory logic) without dramatically shrinking employment.

  • Just-in-time (JIT) philosophy and strategic sourcing (oil crisis response era)

    The 1973 OPEC oil embargo and the raw-materials shortages of the mid-1970s forced American manufacturing executives to pay attention to procurement in ways they had not since World War II. When Toyota's production system and its just-in-time philosophy became widely studied in the early 1980s, purchasing managers were at the center of the transformation: JIT required deeply coordinated supplier relationships, precise delivery scheduling, and quality guarantees that could not be managed by order-placing clerks. The purchasing manager became a supply-chain architect, selecting suppliers not merely on price but on delivery reliability, defect rates, and collaborative product-development capacity. NAPM itself reflected this shift: the organization renamed from the National Association of Purchasing Agents to the National Association of Purchasing Management in 1968, and the PMI (Purchasing Managers Index) was launched in 1982 as a real-time signal of purchasing activity so economically significant that the Federal Reserve followed it.

    Effect on the work

    JIT philosophy elevated the strategic standing of purchasing managers and supported above-inflation wage growth through the 1980s. The profession's shift from order-placing to supply-chain strategy made the role meaningfully harder to automate with the technology of the era and contributed to sustained employment through the decade.

  • SAP R/3 and Oracle ERP (enterprise-wide procurement integration era)

    SAP launched R/3 in 1992 as a client-server ERP system whose Procurement and Materials Management modules integrated purchasing with inventory, accounts payable, and production scheduling in a single platform. For the first time, a purchasing manager could see the full order-to-payment lifecycle in one system: requisitions from business units, RFQ issuance to suppliers, purchase order creation, goods receipt, and invoice matching in one integrated data environment. SAP R/3 became the dominant enterprise procurement system for large manufacturers through the 1990s, with Oracle Procurement Cloud following in mid-market segments. The ERP era eliminated an enormous amount of clerical procurement work (manual re-keying of vendor invoices, manual three-way match, manual PO routing) but preserved and elevated the managerial role of vendor negotiation, category strategy, and spend analytics.

    Effect on the work

    ERP adoption compressed transactional procurement headcount significantly, reducing the ratio of purchasing agents to managers in large organizations. The manager tier was largely preserved as organizations still needed human judgment to govern vendor relationships and strategic sourcing events, but the individual-contributor buyer population shrank as ERP automated the transaction layer.

  • Ariba and e-procurement marketplaces (internet-era supplier networks)

    Ariba was founded in 1996 on the premise that procurement was still paper-based and internet connectivity could transform it. The company went public in 1999 and at its peak in 2000 was valued at $40 billion, reflecting the enormous market expectation for procurement digitization. Ariba built electronic catalogs vendors could maintain online and buyers could access from any browser, eliminating the paper catalog and phone-order system that had characterized indirect procurement since the 1950s. By the mid-2000s, Ariba's network connected millions of buyers and suppliers. SAP acquired Ariba in 2012 for $4.4 billion, integrating it into the SAP procurement ecosystem. The Ariba era created the first generation of purchasers who negotiated and transacted entirely within a digital supplier network rather than through personal vendor relationships, phone calls, and paper contracts.

    Effect on the work

    Internet-based e-procurement platforms accelerated the automation of routine indirect purchasing (office supplies, MRO consumables, travel) and reduced the headcount needed to manage tail-spend categories. Strategic sourcing and direct materials management remained human-intensive, preserving the core of the purchasing manager role.

  • AI sourcing optimization and autonomous procurement agents (Coupa Navi, SAP Joule, Keelvar era)

    The current AI wave in procurement differs from ERP and e-procurement in scope: whereas SAP R/3 automated the transaction-recording layer and Ariba automated the catalog-browsing layer, platforms like Coupa Navi, SAP Ariba with Joule, GEP QUANTUM, and Keelvar are automating the decisional layer. Keelvar's Autonomous Sourcing Bot generates and publishes RFQ events, analyzes bids, and recommends award splits for complex sourcing events. Art of Procurement's 2026 state-of-the-field survey found that 94% of procurement executives use generative AI weekly. KPMG estimates AI can automate 50-80% of current procurement work. The purchasing manager's role in this environment is shifting from executing transactions to governing AI-generated decisions: configuring the policy rules the AI operates within, reviewing the exception queue the AI cannot resolve, and retaining authority for contract negotiation and supplier relationship investments that no AI platform is designed to hold.

    Effect on the work

    AI adoption has not yet produced measurable purchasing manager employment declines. BLS OEWS shows the role at 81,240 in 2024, above its 2010 level and the post-recession trough. The profession's resilience mirrors a pattern seen across other management occupations: AI compresses the work of individual contributors more rapidly than it eliminates manager-tier oversight roles.

Part of Management · see all 36 roles →
Different role?

See the same long-arc view for your own profession.

Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.

Browse all roles

Purchasing Managers employment and pay by year

On record since1866
Latest US employment84,320 (May 2025)Source: BLS OEWS May 2025Official statisticReport an error
Latest US median pay$148,080 (May 2025)Source: BLS OEWS May 2025Official statisticReport an error
Outlook+4% by 2035Source: BLS Employment Projections 2025-35Official statisticReport an error

In other countries

The latest figure each country's statistics agency publishes for this job. Each uses its own occupation definition, survey basis and currency, so the numbers are not directly comparable with each other or with the US figures.

  • Canada (NOC 10012)

    Employment, 2020
    26,670, Statistics Canada Census 2021 Official statistic Report an errorStatistics Canada Census of Population 2021: number of persons with employment income in NOC 10012 Purchasing managers, Canada, reference year 2020. A recipients basis (anyone with employment income during the year), slightly broader than a point-in-time employed count. Statistics Canada Open Licence.
    Median pay, 2020
    C$99,000, Statistics Canada Census 2021 Official statistic Report an errorStatistics Canada Census of Population 2021 (Table 98-10-0586): median employment income for NOC 10012 Purchasing managers, Canada, reference year 2020, full-year full-time workers (the basis comparable to the US OEWS full-time median). Statistics Canada Open Licence.
View all 28 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
YearUS employmentAnnual pay (median unless marked)SourceReport
194068,000n/aDecennial Census 1940 Researched contextReport
195092,000n/aDecennial Census 1950 Researched contextReport
1960n/a$8,500Est., University of Missouri Libraries Researched contextReport
1980215,000$26,000Decennial Census 1980 (employment) Researched contextEst., Reference for Business Encyclopedia (pay) Researched contextReport
2000126,030$53,030BLS OEWS 2000 Official statisticReport
200391,060$64,930BLS OEWS May 2003 Official statisticReport
200473,480$72,450BLS OEWS May 2004 Official statisticReport
200569,300$76,270BLS OEWS May 2005 Official statisticReport
200666,490$81,570BLS OEWS May 2006 Official statisticReport
200765,600$85,440BLS OEWS May 2007 Official statisticReport
200867,150$89,160BLS OEWS May 2008 Official statisticReport
200965,080$91,440BLS OEWS May 2009 Official statisticReport
201065,220$95,070BLS OEWS May 2010 Official statisticReport
201166,990$97,130BLS OEWS May 2011 Official statisticReport
201269,400$100,170BLS OEWS May 2012 Official statisticReport
201369,620$103,780BLS OEWS May 2013 Official statisticReport
201470,840$106,090BLS OEWS May 2014 Official statisticReport
201572,600$108,120BLS OEWS May 2015 Official statisticReport
201671,750$111,590BLS OEWS May 2016 Official statisticReport
201770,430$115,760BLS OEWS May 2017 Official statisticReport
201869,490$118,940BLS OEWS May 2018 Official statisticReport
201972,100$121,110BLS OEWS May 2019 Official statisticReport
202070,960$125,940BLS OEWS May 2020 Official statisticReport
202169,310$127,150BLS OEWS May 2021 Official statisticReport
202275,070$131,350BLS OEWS May 2022 Official statisticReport
202377,530$136,380BLS OEWS May 2023 Official statisticReport
202481,240$139,510BLS OEWS May 2024 Official statisticReport
202584,320$148,080BLS OEWS May 2025 Official statisticReport
Embed this timeline on your site

Free for any site. Paste this where the timeline should appear; it stays interactive, every datapoint stays cited, and it sets no cookies on your page. How embedding works

<iframe src="https://futurehistory.earth/embed/11-3061"
  width="100%" height="430" style="border:0"
  title="Purchasing Managers, a Future History timeline"
  loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:13px;margin:4px 0 0"><a href="https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/11-3061">Purchasing Managers: jobs and pay over time</a>, from Future History</p>

See all roles in Management