Business professors
Official title Business Teachers, Postsecondary (SOC 25-1011)
Also called MBA professor, Business school faculty, Management professor, Marketing professor, Finance professor
In brief
In May 2025, BLS counted 82,150 US business professors, with median pay of $99,080 a year. Of the BLS counts since 2003, the highest was 85,220, in May 2013, close to the May 2025 count. The earliest figure here is an estimate of 1,500 from 1920, not measured the same way as today's count. The last full technology era for business professors: Learning Management Systems and online delivery, 1998 to 2015.
What the sources say
Official outlook
BLS projects employment to grow 5.9% from 2025 to 2035.
AI exposure studies
- 42% of this job's tasks are exposed to large language models. Not a forecast of job losses. Eloundou and others, 2023
Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. BLS publishes these counts as yearly survey snapshots and cautions against reading them as a precise trend. In May 2021 BLS changed how it estimates these counts (a model-based method using three years of survey data) and moved fully to the 2018 occupation codes, so part of a change across 2021 can come from the method rather than the work.
Last updated .
Cite this page
Future History. (2026, October 11). Business professors: jobs and pay since 1920 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/25-1011
Future History. "Business professors: jobs and pay since 1920." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 11, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/25-1011.
@misc{futurehistory_25_1011, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Business professors: jobs and pay since 1920}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/25-1011}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-11. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }
The access date is today's date on your device.
≈ $96,540 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)
Joseph Wharton donates $100,000 to the University of Pennsylvania to establish the Wharton School of Finance and Economy, the world's first collegiate business school. The founding curriculum covers accounting, mercantile law, and the economic resources of the United States. The first class enrolls thirteen students, taught by a small faculty drawn largely from the commercial and legal professions. Wharton's founding motivation is explicit: American colleges produce graduates who cannot read a balance sheet or manage a commercial enterprise.
Harvard University Graduate School of Administration (later Harvard Business School) opens with a faculty of 15 and a class of 80 students, offering the first MBA degree program. The first dean is historian Edwin Francis Gay. Initial curriculum covers accounting, commercial contracts, and economic resources. Harvard's program would become the global template for MBA education, and its 1920s development of the case study method would reshape how business professors teach worldwide.
The American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) is founded by 17 universities, including Harvard, Yale, Penn, Columbia, Dartmouth, Berkeley, and Northwestern. Its first accreditations are granted in 1919. The AACSB becomes the dominant accrediting body for business schools, eventually establishing standards that drive faculty hiring requirements, doctoral program design, and research expectations across the field. By 2025, AACSB accredits over 1,055 institutions in 69 countries, covering fewer than 6% of all business programs.
The Ford Foundation publishes the Gordon-Howell Report, coauthored by Robert Aaron Gordon of UC Berkeley and James E. Howell of Stanford, which delivers a damning verdict on American business education: academic standards are too low, faculty too often lack doctoral credentials, and curricula are too narrowly vocational. The Ford Foundation backs the report with major grants to reform business school faculties. The report launches a two-decade transformation of the business professor from practitioner-instructor to research-active scholar.
Business overtakes education as the most popular undergraduate major in the United States. The 1980-81 academic year produces 200,521 bachelor's degrees in business (NCES), up from 115,396 in 1970-71. MBA programs expand rapidly through the 1980s, with elite MBA credentials commanding significant salary premiums. The decade also sees business faculty salaries diverge upward from the all-faculty median, driven by competition from investment banking, consulting, and corporate finance for PhD graduates in finance and economics.
AACSB International formally adopts "AACSB International" as its name, reflecting its shift from a US-only to a global accrediting body after its first non-North-American accreditation (University of Alberta, 1968) and first European accreditation (ESSEC France, 1997). By 2001, AACSB accreditation is widely sought internationally, and American business faculty increasingly teach in global programs, executive education, and cross-border partnership programs.
Business remains the most commonly conferred bachelor's degree field in the United States: 375,418 business bachelor's degrees in 2021-22 (NCES), up from 249,165 in 1990-91. The growth in business degree conferrals has substantially outpaced faculty hiring growth, contributing to increased class sizes, higher adjunct use, and the expansion of online instruction. Graduate business enrollment faces a different trend: applications to full-time MBA programs have declined at many schools, while specialized master's programs (MS in Finance, MS in Data Analytics, MS in Marketing) have grown, reshaping the demand mix for business faculty expertise.
Will AI replace business professors? What the research says
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.
What's changing day to day for business professors
Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.
AI is sitting alongside you hereGrade and provide feedback on student problem sets, case write-ups, and exams: using AI-assisted grading tools (Gradescope answer grouping, AI rubric matching) for quantitative assignments in accounting, finance, and operations courses, then applying professional judgment to the qualitative reasoning and argument quality that AI scoring cannot reliably evaluate.
Grade and provide feedback on student problem sets, case write-ups, and exams: using AI-assisted grading tools (Gradescope answer grouping, AI rubric matching) for quantitative assignments in accounting, finance, and operations courses, then applying professional judgment to the qualitative reasoning and argument quality that AI scoring cannot reliably evaluate.[6],[1]
Adopt Gradescope AI-assisted grouping for quantitative problem sets, documented time reductions for cohorts apply directly to accounting or finance courses. Reinvest saved time into richer commentary on students' analytical reasoning quality, which is both where MBA students learn most and where AI cannot reliably assess. Use Turnitin AI detection as a flag for deeper review only, not as standalone evidence.
AI is sitting alongside you hereDesign, update, and deliver course syllabi, assignments, and instructional materials for business courses: using AI tools (ChatGPT Edu, NotebookLM) to draft first-version slides, case discussion guides, and assessment rubrics, then editing with domain expertise to ensure relevance to current industry practice and alignment with program learning objectives.
Design, update, and deliver course syllabi, assignments, and instructional materials for business courses: using AI tools (ChatGPT Edu, NotebookLM) to draft first-version slides, case discussion guides, and assessment rubrics, then editing with domain expertise to ensure relevance to current industry practice and alignment with program learning objectives.[4],[1]
Use ChatGPT Edu to generate an initial 60-slide lecture deck or a case discussion guide, then spend your effort sharpening it with current industry examples and your own professional experience: this is where your credibility as a former practitioner or active researcher multiplies AI output. The Gies Business "build to learn" AI model (AACSB May 2026) confirms faculty who integrate AI into prep workflows produce richer course materials in less time.
AI is sitting alongside you hereStay current with developments in business disciplines and AI's impact on industry, reading management journals, trade press (Harvard Business Review, Wall Street Journal, McKinsey Quarterly), monitoring AI tools disrupting the sectors you teach (finance, marketing, operations), and translating that intelligence into updated course materials and relevant examples for students entering AI-transformed careers.
Stay current with developments in business disciplines and AI's impact on industry, reading management journals, trade press (Harvard Business Review, Wall Street Journal, McKinsey Quarterly), monitoring AI tools disrupting the sectors you teach (finance, marketing, operations), and translating that intelligence into updated course materials and relevant examples for students entering AI-transformed careers.[1],[4]
Use NotebookLM to upload and synthesize a month of key trade publications and research preprints: it can map connections across many documents in minutes, giving you a richer literature map than manual reading alone. However, the judgment call of "what is actually important for my students to know about how AI is reshaping their future industry" requires your professional expertise and currency. Treating AI as a research accelerator, not a content authority, is the sustainable posture.
Where business professors go next
Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.
- Education Administrators, Postsecondary
- US median pay
- $104,590 (May 2025)
- BLS outlook 2025-35
- +1.8%
- Management Analysts
- US median pay
- $101,860 (May 2025)
- BLS outlook 2025-35
- +10.1%
- Training and Development Specialists
- US median pay
- $69,280 (May 2025)
- BLS outlook 2025-35
- +10.8%
What each move takes
Education Administrators, Postsecondary
Business faculty frequently move into department chair, associate dean of business, or dean roles, particularly those who have demonstrated leadership in curriculum redesign, accreditation, and strategic planning. The transition is natural for faculty who enjoy committee work and institutional governance, and business schools urgently need administrators who can articulate AI's implications for management education to boards, accreditors, and external stakeholders. The AACSB AI accreditation framework (2025) has created demand for administrators with both business domain depth and AI policy fluency.
- · Higher education budget management and resource allocation across faculty lines and program investments
- · AACSB accreditation self-study coordination and continuous improvement documentation
- · Faculty performance review, promotion/tenure process facilitation, and hiring committee leadership
- · Strategic enrollment management: MBA program positioning, tuition benchmarking, and yield analysis
- · University AI governance: policy development, vendor evaluation for institutional AI tools, and faculty development planning
How has the work of business professors changed since 1881?
The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.
Chalk, ledger, and lecture, pre-textbook collegiate business era
The first business professors at Wharton taught from practitioners' experience and rudimentary lecture notes. No dedicated business textbooks existed for collegiate-level instruction. Accounting was taught from hand-maintained ledgers; law and economics from primary legal and trade documents. The classroom was a lecture hall where an instructor with industry experience transmitted what they knew from practice. The pedagogical technology was essentially oral tradition formalized with a blackboard.
Case study method (Harvard Business School, 1924 formal adoption)
Harvard Business School formally adopted the case method as its primary pedagogical approach in 1924, distributing written accounts of real business situations for students to analyze and discuss in class. The case method transformed the business professor's work: instead of transmitting knowledge through lecture, the professor's skill became facilitating a Socratic discussion among students who had read the same materials and arrived at different conclusions. Writing and distributing cases required new research infrastructure, and a cottage industry of case writers developed at HBS and later at IVEY, Darden, and other case-heavy programs. The method spread widely through the mid-20th century and remains the signature pedagogy at top MBA programs today.
Effect on the workThe case method reshaped the hiring profile for business faculty. Schools adopting it needed professors who could facilitate discussion under uncertainty rather than simply transmit information. This favored a different personality type than the lecture model and created the first real intellectual differentiation between business teaching and business doing.
PhD as the entry credential, the Gordon-Howell research-professionalization turn
In 1959, the Ford Foundation published the Gordon-Howell Report, a sweeping critique of American business education that found academic standards too low, curricula too vocational, and faculty too often lacking doctoral credentials or scholarly rigor. The report recommended that business schools hire research-active PhDs, establish rigorous doctoral programs, and build ties to the underlying disciplines of economics, mathematics, psychology, and sociology. The Ford Foundation backed the recommendation with millions of dollars in grants to reform business school faculties. The effect was decisive: over the following two decades, the practitioner-instructor model gave way to the research-professor model, and a PhD in economics, finance, or a related discipline became the de facto entry credential for tenure-track business school positions.
Effect on the workThe Gordon-Howell transition professionalized the business faculty market dramatically. Tenured positions at research universities became inaccessible without a doctoral degree and a publication record, creating a sharp labor market bifurcation between research faculty and practitioner instructors that persists today. The shift also created an oversupply risk for doctoral graduates that would surface in subsequent decades.
PC, spreadsheet software, and quantitative methods, the MBA boom computation era
The personal computer arrived in business schools just as the MBA was becoming the most prestigious professional credential in the United States. VisiCalc (1979), Lotus 1-2-3 (1983), and Excel (1985) transformed the teaching of finance, accounting, and operations management: problem sets that had previously required hours of hand calculation could now be assigned with realistic numbers, and students could explore sensitivity analyses interactively. Business professors in quantitative fields became early and enthusiastic adopters of spreadsheet software, integrating it into coursework by the mid-1980s. Statistical packages (SPSS, SAS, and later Stata) became standard in doctoral programs and research. The PC also made desktop publishing of course materials and research manuscripts dramatically more efficient.
Effect on the workThe spreadsheet-and-PC era reinforced the demand for business faculty by expanding the richness of quantitative business education. MBA enrollment surged: the number of business bachelor's degrees grew from 200,521 (1980-81) to 249,165 (1990-91) (NCES). The boom drew industry practitioners into adjunct teaching on a large scale, creating the part-time faculty tier that would grow throughout the 1990s.
Learning Management Systems and online delivery (Blackboard 1998, WebCT, later Canvas)
Blackboard launched in 1997-98 and became the dominant LMS in US higher education within a few years, giving business professors a centralized platform for posting syllabi, slides, assignments, and grades. The LMS shifted administrative interaction from in-person office hours and paper handouts to asynchronous digital channels. The bigger disruption came with online and for-profit degree programs: the University of Phoenix (founded 1976, rapid online expansion in the late 1990s) and later Coursera, edX, and other platforms created a large market for online business instruction that expanded the adjunct teaching workforce while putting downward pressure on instruction costs and, by implication, on the bargaining power of non-tenure-track business faculty.
Effect on the workContingent faculty in US higher education grew from roughly 47% of all instructors in 1987 to 68% in 2021 (AAUP). Business programs, which had always used industry practitioners as adjuncts, were among the heaviest users of the contingent model. The LMS made it operationally easier to manage large adjunct faculty populations across multiple course sections.
Generative AI in business education (ChatGPT Edu, Gradescope AI grading, NotebookLM)
ChatGPT's public release in November 2022 arrived as a direct challenge to traditional business school assessment. Within weeks, faculty discovered that essays, case write-ups, and take-home exams that constituted the bulk of MBA assessment could be produced competently by a language model. The field's response, documented by AACSB in its May 2026 Insights report on new teaching methods, has been twofold: redesigning assessments toward in-class presentations, oral defenses, simulations, and live role plays that cannot be delegated to AI; and adopting AI tools as teaching aids. Gradescope's AI-assisted answer grouping reduces grading time for large-cohort quantitative courses per problem set. ChatGPT Edu was deployed system-wide at the California State University system in February 2025 (460,000 students, 63,000 faculty and staff across many campuses). NotebookLM allows faculty to synthesize a semester's reading list in minutes for lecture preparation.
Effect on the workGenerative AI is augmenting business faculty productivity significantly in preparation, grading, and research-synthesis tasks, but the core live-facilitation and mentoring functions that define high-quality business education remain human. The AACSB (May 2026) framing: AI can handle 75% of routine student questions via a course chatbot but cannot replicate the judgment, credibility, and contextual coaching of an experienced business professor in a live case discussion.
See the same long-arc view for your own profession.
Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.
Browse all rolesBusiness Teachers, Postsecondary employment and pay by year
View all 28 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
| Year | US employment | Annual pay (median unless marked) | Source | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920 | 1,500 | n/a | Est., NCES Digest of Education Statistics Researched context | Report |
| 1950 | 12,000 | n/a | Est., NCES Digest of Education Statistics Researched context | Report |
| 1970 | 45,000 | $12,000 | Est., NCES Digest of Education Statistics (employment) Researched contextEst., AAUP Faculty Compensation Survey (pay) Researched context | Report |
| 1990 | 72,000 | $48,000 | Est., NCES Digest of Education Statistics (employment) Researched contextEst., AAUP 2005-06 Report on the Economic… (pay) Researched context | Report |
| 2000 | 82,000 | n/a | Est., NCES Digest of Education Statistics Researched context | Report |
| 2003 | 68,260 | $55,510 | BLS OEWS May 2003 Official statistic | Report |
| 2004 | 68,340 | $57,210 | BLS OEWS May 2004 Official statistic | Report |
| 2005 | 67,420 | $59,210 | BLS OEWS May 2005 Official statistic | Report |
| 2006 | 67,390 | $62,040 | BLS OEWS May 2006 Official statistic | Report |
| 2007 | 67,700 | $64,900 | BLS OEWS May 2007 Official statistic | Report |
| 2008 | 69,690 | $68,000 | BLS OEWS May 2008 Official statistic | Report |
| 2009 | 73,790 | $73,320 | BLS OEWS May 2009 Official statistic | Report |
| 2010 | 79,070 | $73,760 | BLS OEWS May 2010 Official statistic | Report |
| 2011 | 82,090 | $74,770 | BLS OEWS May 2011 Official statistic | Report |
| 2012 | 82,460 | $73,660 | BLS OEWS May 2012 Official statistic | Report |
| 2013 | 85,220 | $75,120 | BLS OEWS May 2013 Official statistic | Report |
| 2014 | 85,030 | $74,090 | BLS OEWS May 2014 Official statistic | Report |
| 2015 | 84,890 | $75,370 | BLS OEWS May 2015 Official statistic | Report |
| 2016 | 83,030 | $77,490 | BLS OEWS May 2016 Official statistic | Report |
| 2017 | 84,340 | $80,300 | BLS OEWS May 2017 Official statistic | Report |
| 2018 | 84,230 | $83,960 | BLS OEWS May 2018 Official statistic | Report |
| 2019 | 83,920 | $87,200 | BLS OEWS May 2019 Official statistic | Report |
| 2020 | 79,810 | $88,010 | BLS OEWS May 2020 Official statistic | Report |
| 2021 | 79,640 | $94,360 | BLS OEWS May 2021 Official statistic | Report |
| 2022 | 78,410 | $88,790 | BLS OEWS May 2022 Official statistic | Report |
| 2023 | 82,980 | $97,130 | BLS OEWS May 2023 Official statistic | Report |
| 2024 | 81,780 | $97,270 | BLS OEWS May 2024 Official statistic | Report |
| 2025 | 82,150 | $99,080 | BLS OEWS May 2025 Official statistic | Report |
More in Education
- Elementary School Teachers, Except Special Education
- Secondary School Teachers
- Middle School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education
- Substitute Teachers, Short-Term
- Preschool Teachers, Except Special Education
- Self-Enrichment Teachers
- Special Education Teachers, Elementary School
- Instructional Coordinators
- Health Specialties Teachers, Postsecondary
- Tutors