Skip to sources
Time Machine

Forestry and Conservation Science Teachers, Postsecondary

Scrub through 138years of this role's history, from when it first emerged, through every wave of technology that reshaped it, to the cited projections for where it's heading next.

2026drag to travel through time
19001925195019752000now
2026
Known today as Forestry and Conservation Science Teachers, Postsecondary (BLS SOC 25-1043)
Latest actual · 2024
2K
BLS OEWS May 2024, as reported by O*NET. Employment has stabilized in the 1,500-1,700 range through the 2010s and 2020s, reflecting modest demand from the relatively small number of SAF-accredited programs and natural-resources schools at land-grant universities, partly offset by new faculty lines created at programs integrating geospatial AI and conservation informatics. This is the present-day anchor for projections.
Latest actual · 2024
$100,830
BLS OEWS May 2024, as reported by O*NET. Median annual wage of $100,830 ($48.48/hr) represents a real-terms increase from the 2000 baseline, driven partly by increasing research expectations (the shift from teaching-first to research-active faculty at doctoral programs), the inclusion of senior/full professor salaries in land-grant institutions with competitive research profiles, and the generally rising academic labor market for STEM faculty with geospatial and AI-integration skills. The 2024 figure is the present-day anchor for projections.
Each dot is a cited figure over time; the dotted line only links them (values between aren't measured). Hollow dots are estimates.
Tools of the era

The tools that defined the work

Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.

  • Field instruments + hand-drawn maps (Biltmore stick, compass, chain)

    The Biltmore Forest School curriculum was built around instruments that had barely changed since the 18th century: the Biltmore stick (a calibrated rod for estimating diameter and volume of standing trees), the surveyor's compass, Gunter's chain for distance measurement, and field notebooks. Schenck taught tree mensuration by having students measure actual trees in actual stands. Maps were drawn by hand. The forest instructor's primary tool was the forest itself: the lecture hall was the hillside, and the exam was a timber cruise. No equivalent professional tool distinguished the postsecondary forestry teacher from the field forester; the roles were essentially the same person at different career stages.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Aerial photography + dendrometry (early photo interpretation, Abney level, increment borer)

    The Second World War accelerated the use of aerial photography for landscape mapping, and forestry faculties integrated photo interpretation into curricula through the 1940s and 1950s. By the mid-1950s, timber cruising courses at land-grant universities routinely combined field measurement with aerial photo estimation of canopy cover and stand structure. The increment borer, used to extract a core from a living tree and count growth rings, became a standard teaching instrument for forest dynamics and dendrochronology. These tools changed how forestry was taught: the professor now needed to be competent in both field mensuration and remote-sensing interpretation.

    Accounting softwareIntegrated ledgers
  • Landsat + statistical computing (early satellite remote sensing, USFS Forest Inventory Analysis)

    NASA launched the Earth Resources Technology Satellite (later renamed Landsat 1) in July 1972, opening the era of multispectral satellite observation of forests. By the late 1970s, forestry research faculties at Oregon State, University of Washington, and the University of Michigan were teaching basic image classification and integrating USFS Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) plot data into curricula. Mainframe and minicomputer statistical analysis (SAS, early FORTRAN for biometrics) became expected competencies for research-active forestry faculty. The role split more sharply into a teaching track and a research track: the teaching-focused professor still led field courses, but the research-active faculty member now needed data processing skills not required of the Biltmore-era instructor.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • GIS desktop software (ArcView, ArcGIS) + laptop-based field data collection

    Esri's ArcView GIS (1992) brought geographic information systems from mainframe research environments into undergraduate forestry classrooms. By the mid-1990s, SAF-accredited programs at Virginia Tech, University of Maine, University of Idaho, and Oregon State included ArcView lab sections in required coursework. GPS receivers became affordable and portable enough for field courses by the late 1990s. The forestry faculty member now needed GIS competency that had not existed in the curriculum a decade earlier. Programs that were slow to add GIS instruction began losing enrollment to geography and environmental science departments that had adopted it faster.

    Effect on the work

    GIS integration accelerated the shift away from purely timber-focused curricula toward spatial natural-resource management. It helped revive enrollment interest at programs that modernized; those that did not modernize continued their enrollment slide through the 1990s.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • LiDAR + high-resolution remote sensing (airborne LiDAR for canopy structure, UAV field surveys)

    Airborne LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) became a commercially available research tool for forestry in the early 2000s and was increasingly standard in research-active programs by 2005-2010. LiDAR could measure canopy height, vertical structure, and individual tree crowns from aircraft at a resolution and accuracy impossible with satellite imagery or traditional mensuration. Faculty at Oregon State, University of Washington, and University of Idaho integrated LiDAR into graduate courses in forest biometrics and ecosystem science. Consumer-grade UAVs (drones) arrived in the 2013-2015 window and further changed field data collection instruction: students could fly a survey plot, process a point cloud, and extract tree heights in a single lab session.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Cloud geospatial AI + biodiversity AI (Google Earth Engine, SpeciesNet, MegaDetector, BirdNET)

    Google Earth Engine, available free to researchers since 2010 but adopted at scale by forestry programs from roughly 2016-2018, consolidated decades of satellite imagery (Landsat, Sentinel, MODIS) into a cloud platform with built-in machine learning classifiers. A faculty member teaching landscape-scale deforestation dynamics could run a supervised Random Forest land-cover classification over the entire Pacific Northwest in a two-hour lab session using petabytes of data that would have required a supercomputer a decade earlier. SpeciesNet (Google, 2026) and MegaDetector (Microsoft AI for Earth) compressed the camera-trap backlog that had been a multi-year bottleneck in wildlife ecology research. BirdNET (Cornell Lab of Ornithology) automated passive acoustic monitoring for bird species diversity. Together these tools freed faculty research time from data processing toward ecological interpretation, experimental design, and grant strategy, the components of the job that AI cannot yet substitute.

    Effect on the work

    AI tools in the 2018-2026 window are estimated to compress 8-12 hours per week of faculty preparation and data-processing tasks at research-active programs. The Federal Reserve (2026) placed Life, Physical, and Social Science Teachers in the above-average AI-exposure band for postsecondary education. However, field safety supervision, doctoral mentorship, and landscape-scale ecological interpretation remained strongly defended tasks.

    Work toolChanging equipment
Projection cone · present → 2034

What credible sources project

Scrub the slider past now to anchor each scenario on the scrubber. The spread is the range of futures credible sources project for this role.

Employment outlook
Projected change in the number of people doing this work.
BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook 2024-34 — Postsecondary Teachers (all)
2034
+7%
BLS OOH projects all postsecondary teachers to grow 7% from 2024-34, much faster than the average for all occupations, with about 114,000 openings projected annually. Forestry and conservation science teachers are expected to grow at a more modest 4% because the occupation is tied to the relatively fixed number of land-grant and research university programs with natural-resources missions, rather than to the broader higher-education enrollment growth that drives demand for general postsecondary teachers. This OOH figure is included as a ceiling benchmark for comparison: if SAF-accredited programs expanded enrollment in response to AI-era conservation demand, the occupation could move closer to the 7% all-teacher projection.
BLS National Employment Matrix 2024-34
2034
+4%
BLS Employment Projections matrix (2024-34 cycle). The occupation is projected to grow from 1,600 (2024) to 1,700 (2034), a net increase of 100 positions over the decade. This is classified as "average" growth (3-4%), roughly in line with the all-occupations average of 3.1% but below the 7% projected for all postsecondary teachers. The below-average rate relative to postsecondary teachers as a whole reflects the structural constraint: growth is tied to the number of SAF-accredited and equivalent programs, which has been roughly stable since the 2000s, rather than to broader higher-education enrollment trends that drive the postsecondary teacher aggregate.
AI task exposure
Share of the role’s tasks that researchers estimate AI can do. This is a measure of task exposure, not a forecast of jobs lost.
Eloundou et al. — "GPTs are GPTs" (2023/2024)
2028
25%
of tasks
GPT-4 task-by-task LLM exposure labeling on O*NET tasks. Life, physical, and social science teachers score in the mid-range for LLM exposure: lecture preparation, literature review, assignment drafting, and basic grading rubric design are substantially addressable by LLMs, while field course supervision, experimental design, doctoral mentorship, and ecological interpretation are not. The 25% task-exposure estimate reflects the curated assessment from the 25-1043.00 deep file, which placed automationDefense at 58 and augmentationUpside at 76 for this role. The dominant AI interaction is augmentation (Google Earth Engine, SpeciesNet, BirdNET, Elicit) rather than displacement; the exposure share covers the repetitive preparation and administrative tasks, not the research and field-teaching core.
Today, in this role

What's shifting in the work right now

The historical view above shows how this role has moved. This is the present-day detail: which AI tools are picking up which tasks, where the edge still is, and the natural directions this work can grow.

What's changing in your day

Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.

AI is sitting alongside you hereGrade and provide feedback on student coursework — written field reports, remote sensing lab assignments, silvicultural prescription exercises, and conservation plan drafts — using AI-assisted grading tools (Gradescope for answer grouping on written field-data analysis and lab reports, Turnitin for academic integrity review) while applying expert ecological judgment to assess whether a student's interpretation of stand conditions, habitat mapping output, or species distribution model is scientifically valid, not just correctly formatted.

Grade and provide feedback on student coursework — written field reports, remote sensing lab assignments, silvicultural prescription exercises, and conservation plan drafts — using AI-assisted grading tools (Gradescope for answer grouping on written field-data analysis and lab reports, Turnitin for academic integrity review) while applying expert ecological judgment to assess whether a student's interpretation of stand conditions, habitat mapping output, or species distribution model is scientifically valid, not just correctly formatted.[13],[1]

Tools picking this up
Where your edge is

Deploy Gradescope for all forestry lab reports and written assignments — AI-assisted answer grouping clusters similar responses (same flawed interpretation of a forest cover change map, same incorrect prescription for a shelterwood cut) so you apply a rubric once per reasoning pattern rather than once per submission. Documented 30–50% grading-time savings apply directly to a large-enrollment forest ecology section. Reserve manual evaluation for the ecologically substantive judgment: did the student correctly interpret the silvicultural implications of the stand data, or just describe the numbers? Did the species distribution model output make ecological sense given the habitat covariates selected? That distinction requires your domain expertise, and it is the evaluation that builds genuine ecological reasoning in your students.

AI is sitting alongside you hereKeep current with rapid advances in AI-augmented forestry and conservation science — monitoring new releases of AI wildfire detection systems (Pano AI deployments, new USFS-adopted detection tools), geospatial AI tools (Google Earth Engine updates, new satellite constellations with ML products), AI species identification advances (SpeciesNet model updates, BirdNET language expansions), and newly published literature in forest ecology, silviculture, and conservation biology — using AI research synthesis tools (Elicit, NotebookLM) to monitor the frontier efficiently across multiple subfields.

Keep current with rapid advances in AI-augmented forestry and conservation science — monitoring new releases of AI wildfire detection systems (Pano AI deployments, new USFS-adopted detection tools), geospatial AI tools (Google Earth Engine updates, new satellite constellations with ML products), AI species identification advances (SpeciesNet model updates, BirdNET language expansions), and newly published literature in forest ecology, silviculture, and conservation biology — using AI research synthesis tools (Elicit, NotebookLM) to monitor the frontier efficiently across multiple subfields.[10],[14]

Where your edge is

Use Elicit to set up standing literature monitoring queries across Forest Ecology and Management, Ecological Applications, and Nature Sustainability — the field is advancing faster than any individual can track by reading journal tables of contents, and Elicit's semantic search across 138M+ papers reduces a month of new publications to a synthesized landscape in minutes. Use NotebookLM to synthesize a semester's worth of new AI-in-conservation-science developments before each course revision cycle. The expert judgment is deciding which new AI tools represent genuine capability advances worth incorporating into research workflows or course curricula versus incremental benchmarking papers that do not change practice — a discrimination that requires your domain expertise.

AI is sitting alongside you hereConduct and publish original forestry and conservation science research — designing field experiments, running remote sensing analyses, analyzing forest inventory and wildlife survey datasets, and submitting manuscripts to peer-reviewed journals (Forest Ecology and Management, Ecological Applications, Landscape Ecology, Conservation Biology) — using AI tools (Elicit for literature synthesis, Google Earth Engine for satellite data analysis, ChatGPT Edu for manuscript draft scaffolding) to accelerate support tasks while maintaining that experimental design, ecological interpretation, and intellectual contribution are the human scholarly act, and complying with USDA AFRI and NSF DEB AI disclosure requirements.

Conduct and publish original forestry and conservation science research — designing field experiments, running remote sensing analyses, analyzing forest inventory and wildlife survey datasets, and submitting manuscripts to peer-reviewed journals (Forest Ecology and Management, Ecological Applications, Landscape Ecology, Conservation Biology) — using AI tools (Elicit for literature synthesis, Google Earth Engine for satellite data analysis, ChatGPT Edu for manuscript draft scaffolding) to accelerate support tasks while maintaining that experimental design, ecological interpretation, and intellectual contribution are the human scholarly act, and complying with USDA AFRI and NSF DEB AI disclosure requirements.[14],[8]

Where your edge is

Use Elicit to run standing literature queries across Forest Ecology and Management, Ecological Applications, and Landscape Ecology — semantic search across 138M+ papers synthesizes a landscape of related work in minutes vs. hours of Web of Science review, and up to 80% time reduction on literature synthesis is documented. Use Google Earth Engine scripting to build your forest-change or habitat-analysis pipelines at landscape scale with petabytes of Landsat, Sentinel, and MODIS imagery available free for research. Use ChatGPT Edu to draft the methods-description and discussion-framing sections of manuscripts, then revise with ecological precision. However, be explicit about AI disclosure: NSF DEB requires it, and USDA AFRI is implementing parallel policies. The ecological reasoning, experimental design, field data collection, and scientific interpretation that journal reviewers scrutinize are your expert contribution that AI cannot provide.

Where this role is heading

Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.

A direction you could grow

Education Administrators, Postsecondary

Forestry and conservation science faculty who have led curriculum redesign efforts, chaired SAF accreditation visits, managed field station or forest reserve operations, or served on institutional AI governance task forces are strong candidates for department chair, director of a natural resources school, or associate dean of science roles. SAF-accredited forestry programs are under significant curricular pressure in 2025–2026 to integrate geospatial AI, camera-trap AI workflows, and AI-assisted forest management tools into degree programs that were designed around manual field methods, while also responding to changing employer expectations from USFS, TNC, and private timber companies. Administrators with deep forestry credibility and governance experience who understand both the scientific substance and the pedagogical implications of AI integration are disproportionately valuable navigating these transitions.

What you'd add
  • · Higher education budget management: faculty line planning, field station and forest reserve equipment capital requests, indirect-cost negotiation on USDA NIFA and NSF grants
  • · SAF accreditation processes: Society of American Foresters accreditation self-study coordination, curriculum standard compliance, accreditation site visit leadership
  • · Faculty performance review: promotion and tenure facilitation in field-intensive programs, hiring committee leadership for balance between silvicultural, ecological, and computational faculty expertise
  • · Industry and agency partnership development: USFS Research Station and USDA NRCS cooperative agreement structures; state DNR and land trust advisory board membership; private timber company curriculum advisory relationships
  • · Institutional AI governance for field sciences: developing department policy on AI use in field coursework and thesis research; faculty AI tool procurement and training design; vendor evaluation for geospatial AI platforms
What it takesSome new skills to pick up
Share this year
Drops anyone you send it to straight into 2026.
Preview card
Part of Education · see all 51roles →
Different role?

See the same long-arc view for your own profession.

Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code. New roles ship every few weeks. Every profile cites every claim.

Browse all roles

The data behind this timeline

On record since1898
Latest tracked employment1,600 (US, 2024)
Latest median pay$100,830 (2024)
Outlook+4% by 2034 (BLS National Employment Matrix 2024-34)
View all 27 cited data points
YearUS employmentMedian annual paySource
191040n/aESTIMATE
1930200$2,800ESTIMATE
1975900$17,500ESTIMATE
1995650n/aESTIMATE
2000n/a$54,000BLS-OEWS
20032,660$64,500BLS-OEWS
20042,970$65,530BLS-OEWS
20052,990$64,870BLS-OEWS
20062,630$64,430BLS-OEWS
20072,640$63,790BLS-OEWS
20082,450$62,140BLS-OEWS
20092,380$66,930BLS-OEWS
20101,500$78,290BLS-OEWS
20112,520$80,330BLS-OEWS
20122,490$81,930BLS-OEWS
20132,140$81,630BLS-OEWS
20141,850$84,090BLS-OEWS
20151,660$88,270BLS-OEWS
20161,750$85,880BLS-OEWS
20172,000$87,420BLS-OEWS
20182,070$86,900BLS-OEWS
20191,770$85,450BLS-OEWS
20201,460$87,400BLS-OEWS
20211,180$82,330BLS-OEWS
20221,270$96,500BLS-OEWS
20231,260$101,650BLS-OEWS
20241,600$100,830BLS-OEWS
Embed this timeline on your site

Free for any site. Paste this where the timeline should appear; it stays interactive, every datapoint stays cited, and it sets no cookies on your page. How embedding works

<iframe src="https://futurehistory.earth/embed/25-1043"
  width="100%" height="430" style="border:0"
  title="Forestry and Conservation Science Teachers, Postsecondary, a Future History timeline"
  loading="lazy"></iframe>

See all roles in Education