Skip to sources
Time Machine

Environmental Science Teachers, Postsecondary

Scrub through 66years of this role's history, from when it first emerged, through every wave of technology that reshaped it, to the cited projections for where it's heading next.

2026drag to travel through time
19752000now
2026
Known today as Environmental Science Teachers, Postsecondary (BLS SOC 25-1053)
Latest actual · 2024
9K
BLS OEWS May 2024 employment estimate for 25-1053, as reflected in O*NET. Employment is projected to grow 2.9% to 9,300 by 2034 according to the BLS National Employment Matrix. The occupation has grown roughly 50% from the early-2000s base of approximately 6,000, driven by expanding sustainability and environmental science enrollments and growing employer demand from EPA, USGS, consulting firms, and NGOs for graduates with environmental field and AI-tool competencies.
Latest actual · 2024
$87,710
BLS OEWS May 2024 median annual wage for 25-1053 as reported via O*NET. This is the present-day anchor for wage projections. The wage is substantially above the all-occupations median ($63,070 in 2024) but below the broad postsecondary teacher median ($87,120 in 2024 for the full SOC 25-1000 group), reflecting that environmental science faculty are concentrated at regional comprehensive universities and liberal arts colleges rather than primarily at high-salary research-intensive doctoral institutions.
Each dot is a cited figure over time; the dotted line only links them (values between aren't measured). Hollow dots are estimates.
Tools of the era

The tools that defined the work

Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.

  • Field notebooks, glass chemistry, and slide rules (pre-digital environmental analysis)

    The first environmental science faculty operated with the same instruments ecologists and chemists had used for decades: field notebooks, hand-drawn topographic overlays, wet-chemistry analysis in a lab, and mechanical calculations. Teaching a water quality course meant students titrated water samples by hand, calculated dissolved oxygen from Winkler method tables, and read spectrometer dial gauges. Environmental sampling protocols were manual: grab samples in glass bottles, chain of custody on paper forms, gas chromatography results read from paper strip charts. The pedagogical challenge was translating the emerging regulatory language of NEPA and the Clean Air Act into scientific practice using instruments designed for other questions.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Personal computer + early GIS (Arc/INFO 1982, ArcView 1991, EPA-approved analytical software)

    ESRI shipped Arc/INFO for workstations in 1982 and ArcView for desktop PCs in 1991, giving environmental science faculty their first accessible geographic information system. For the first time, a faculty member could show students a spatially explicit map of a pollution plume, model watershed boundaries, or overlay land-use change against habitat data in a classroom setting. EPA and state agencies began requiring GIS-formatted deliverables for Environmental Impact Statements and remediation plans during this period, which pulled GIS into environmental science curricula as a near-required competency. Simultaneously, EPA-certified analytical chemistry software (for gas chromatography data reduction, toxicity modeling via MINTEQ and WASP) replaced paper calculation entirely. This era is when the computer screen replaced the slide rule as the central instrument in environmental science education.

    Effect on the work

    GIS adoption increased the analytical scope of what a single faculty member could teach: courses that previously required large institutional computing resources became teachable on desktop workstations, lowering the barrier for regional universities to offer competitive environmental science programs.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Remote sensing satellites + internet data access (Landsat, MODIS; EPA ECHO, EPA STORET, USGS StreamStats)

    Free access to Landsat imagery expanded radically after the USGS opened the archive in 2008. MODIS (operational from 2000) and Landsat gave environmental science courses continuous global satellite coverage at no cost. Simultaneously, EPA's ECHO compliance database, STORET water quality portal, and USGS StreamStats opened decades of environmental monitoring data to students with a web browser. A land-cover change analysis that previously required a federal grant and a mainframe became an undergraduate homework assignment. Remote sensing replaced the purely local orientation of earlier environmental science courses: students could now analyze deforestation in the Amazon or bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef from a desktop in Ohio. Faculty who mastered remote sensing analysis became more competitive for NSF and EPA grants that required landscape-scale analysis.

    Effect on the work

    Open satellite archives and online regulatory databases substantially raised the expected analytical sophistication of environmental science coursework, increasing the premium on faculty with remote sensing and geospatial skills and creating a widening competency gap between research-active and teaching-only faculty.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Cloud GIS + real-time sensor networks (Google Earth Engine 2010, ArcGIS Online, EPA AQS API, USGS NWIS)

    Google Earth Engine (launched 2010 for research and education) moved environmental data analysis from installed software on departmental servers to a browser-accessible cloud platform hosting petabytes of satellite imagery and pre-built machine learning classifiers. A faculty member in a classroom could now run a random forest land-cover classifier over ten years of Landsat imagery in minutes, live, with students watching. ArcGIS Online extended desktop GIS to collaborative cloud workflows. Real-time sensor network APIs (EPA AQS for air quality, USGS NWIS for streamflow and water quality) made live environmental data a routine course input rather than a special project. Environmental science pedagogy shifted from analyzing historical datasets toward teaching students to work with continuously streaming environmental monitoring data and to evaluate the uncertainty in automated sensor outputs.

    Effect on the work

    Cloud GIS dramatically reduced the infrastructure cost of running a competitive environmental analysis course, enabling smaller regional universities to offer curriculum that matched research-intensive institutions. Faculty who had not transitioned from desktop GIS to cloud-based workflows began to fall behind in both teaching effectiveness and grant competitiveness.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • AI environmental foundation models (ClimaX, NeuralGCM, Microsoft Aurora) + AI-assisted research and teaching (Elicit, Gradescope, Google Earth Engine ML classifiers)

    From 2020 onward, a cluster of AI environmental tools shifted the methodological baseline for environmental science research and education. Google Earth Engine added deep learning classifiers (semantic segmentation, change detection) directly into its cloud platform, making AI-derived land-cover and water-quality analysis routine in undergraduate courses. Microsoft Research published ClimaX in 2023 (ICML), the first foundation model for weather and climate pre-trained on the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble: for the first time students could run climate scenario comparisons without HPC access. Google DeepMind published NeuralGCM in Nature (2024), a hybrid neural-physics climate model capable of both 15-day weather forecasts and multidecadal projections. Microsoft Aurora (arXiv:2405.13063, May 2024) became a fine-tuneable atmospheric foundation model for air quality forecasts. These tools transformed the environmental science faculty role: the new core competency is not just running the tools but teaching students when AI-derived environmental outputs are physically plausible, properly uncertainty-quantified, and appropriate for regulatory or policy decisions. Simultaneously, Elicit (138M+ papers) compressed literature review by up to 80%, Gradescope reduced lab-report grading time by 30-50%, and ChatGPT Edu (deployed system-wide at CSU in February 2025, 460,000+ users) handled first-draft lecture scaffolding on topics from biogeochemical cycling to CERCLA liability frameworks.

    Effect on the work

    The Federal Reserve (February 2026) placed life, physical, and social science teachers in the above-average AI-exposure band for postsecondary education, reflecting real erosion of lecture-preparation, report-grading, and literature-monitoring tasks. Faculty who integrate the AI tool stack can redirect 8-12 hours per week toward field research, mentorship, and the high-value work of teaching students to critically evaluate AI environmental outputs.

    Work toolChanging equipment
Projection cone · present → 2034

What credible sources project

Scrub the slider past now to anchor each scenario on the scrubber. The spread is the range of futures credible sources project for this role.

Employment outlook
Projected change in the number of people doing this work.
BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook — Postsecondary Teachers (broad)
2034
+7%
The BLS OOH projects 7% growth for postsecondary teachers overall (SOC 25-1000) from 2024 to 2034, or approximately 114,000 annual openings including replacement needs. This broader projection is the context frame for the 25-1053 sub-occupation: environmental science teaching is growing more slowly than the average for all postsecondary instructors, reflecting the maturation of traditional environmental science program enrollments even as sustainability and climate-adjacent programs grow. Reported here as a ceiling-of-context for the 25-1053 specific projection.
BLS National Employment Matrix 2024-34
2034
+2.9%
BLS National Employment Matrix projects employment of 25-1053 growing from 9,000 (2024) to approximately 9,300 (2034), a 2.9% increase, classified as average growth. The BLS methodology uses industry-occupation matrices and labor productivity assumptions. For postsecondary teachers broadly, projected growth is 7% for 2024-34; environmental science teachers grow more slowly because enrollment growth is concentrated in sustainability and data science hybrid programs rather than traditional environmental science majors, and because non-tenure-track part-time instructors are absorbing a growing fraction of new teaching demand without appearing fully in the 25-1053 count.
AI task exposure
Share of the role’s tasks that researchers estimate AI can do. This is a measure of task exposure, not a forecast of jobs lost.
Federal Reserve Board — "Educational Exposure to Generative AI" (2026)
2030
40%
of tasks
Federal Reserve FEDS Notes (February 2026) analyzed occupational AI exposure for postsecondary instructors by field, placing life, physical, and social science teachers in the above-average exposure band, with an estimated 38-42% of task-hours carrying meaningful generative-AI exposure. The primary exposed tasks are course material preparation (lecture slides, syllabi, problem sets), report and essay grading, and environmental literature synthesis, all of which are being substantially restructured by tools like ChatGPT Edu, Gradescope, and Elicit. The note explicitly distinguishes task exposure from employment displacement: high task exposure at this career stage primarily reshapes time allocation rather than eliminating positions.
Eloundou et al. — "GPTs are GPTs" (2023)
2030
35%
of tasks
GPT-4 task-by-task LLM exposure labeling on O*NET tasks for postsecondary science teachers. Environmental science teachers score in the moderate-to-high LLM exposure range for their preparatory and administrative tasks (lecture preparation, assignment design, grading, literature synthesis) and low exposure for their irreplaceable field-supervision and AI-model-critique responsibilities. The 35% figure represents the share of task-hours estimated to carry meaningful LLM exposure, concentrated in writing-intensive and information-synthesis tasks rather than the physical, relational, and expert-judgment core. Eloundou's framework measures LLM-specific exposure, not general automation; the primary AI risk for this role is indirect (AI-assisted product discovery reducing the perceived need for formal education) rather than direct task automation.
Today, in this role

What's shifting in the work right now

The historical view above shows how this role has moved. This is the present-day detail: which AI tools are picking up which tasks, where the edge still is, and the natural directions this work can grow.

What's changing in your day

Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.

AI is sitting alongside you hereGrade and provide feedback on student coursework — environmental impact assessment reports, field lab notebooks, policy analysis papers, and examinations — using Gradescope AI-assisted answer grouping for structured submissions, while applying expert scientific and regulatory judgment to evaluate whether a student's environmental risk assessment, pollutant fate-and-transport analysis, or environmental policy argument reflects sound scientific reasoning and compliance with EPA or IPCC methodology standards.

Grade and provide feedback on student coursework — environmental impact assessment reports, field lab notebooks, policy analysis papers, and examinations — using Gradescope AI-assisted answer grouping for structured submissions, while applying expert scientific and regulatory judgment to evaluate whether a student's environmental risk assessment, pollutant fate-and-transport analysis, or environmental policy argument reflects sound scientific reasoning and compliance with EPA or IPCC methodology standards.[12],[1]

Tools picking this up
Where your edge is

Deploy Gradescope for environmental lab reports and structured exam questions — AI-assisted answer grouping clusters similar reasoning strategies (same flawed fate-and-transport calculation, same misapplication of the CERCLA liability standard) so you apply a rubric once per pattern rather than once per submission, yielding the documented 30–50% time savings. Run Turnitin AI detection on environmental impact assessment and policy papers — these are the assignment types most vulnerable to AI generation. Reserve manual evaluation for the scientifically substantive judgment: does this student's risk characterization correctly apply EPA risk assessment guidelines? Does this water-budget calculation account for evapotranspiration correctly? These are the questions that distinguish scientific environmental understanding from AI-generated plausibility.

AI is sitting alongside you herePrepare course materials — syllabi, lecture slides, lab procedures, environmental impact assessment templates, and policy analysis frameworks on topics including environmental regulations (CERCLA, RCRA, CWA, CAA), climate science, toxicology, and ecological risk assessment — using AI tools (ChatGPT Edu, NotebookLM) to generate first drafts and synthesize background literature, then editing with domain expertise to ensure scientific and regulatory accuracy and alignment with current EPA guidance and IPCC findings.

Prepare course materials — syllabi, lecture slides, lab procedures, environmental impact assessment templates, and policy analysis frameworks on topics including environmental regulations (CERCLA, RCRA, CWA, CAA), climate science, toxicology, and ecological risk assessment — using AI tools (ChatGPT Edu, NotebookLM) to generate first drafts and synthesize background literature, then editing with domain expertise to ensure scientific and regulatory accuracy and alignment with current EPA guidance and IPCC findings.[11],[1]

Where your edge is

Use ChatGPT Edu to generate a first-draft lecture on remediation technologies for contaminated sites or a problem set on fate-and-transport of persistent organic pollutants — it produces reasonable structure and standard content. Invest expert effort in verifying regulatory accuracy (AI frequently misattributes cleanup standards, confuses CERCLA and RCRA liability frameworks, or cites outdated EPA risk assessment factors), adding current case studies, and incorporating AI-tool exercises. Use NotebookLM to upload the latest IPCC AR6 Working Group reports or EPA risk assessment guidelines and synthesize them into course-specific background sections — particularly effective for rapidly evolving topics like AI-derived environmental monitoring regulations.

AI is sitting alongside you hereKeep current with rapid advances in AI-augmented environmental science — monitoring new releases of CMIP6 ML emulators (ClimaX updates, NeuralGCM climate scenario releases), AI-assisted eDNA monitoring tools, Google Earth Engine new ML capabilities, EPA guidance on AI in environmental compliance, and fast-moving literature on AI for environmental justice and chemical exposure modeling — using AI research synthesis tools (Elicit, Consensus) to monitor high-velocity literature across ecology, atmospheric science, and environmental engineering simultaneously.

Keep current with rapid advances in AI-augmented environmental science — monitoring new releases of CMIP6 ML emulators (ClimaX updates, NeuralGCM climate scenario releases), AI-assisted eDNA monitoring tools, Google Earth Engine new ML capabilities, EPA guidance on AI in environmental compliance, and fast-moving literature on AI for environmental justice and chemical exposure modeling — using AI research synthesis tools (Elicit, Consensus) to monitor high-velocity literature across ecology, atmospheric science, and environmental engineering simultaneously.[13],[6]

Where your edge is

Use Elicit to set up standing literature monitoring queries across Environmental Science & Technology, Global Change Biology, Nature Climate Change, and the EPA Science Inventory — the AI-environmental-science literature is advancing faster than any individual can track. Use Consensus to quickly evaluate whether a new preprint's AI-derived deforestation alert claim is consistent with ground-truth validation studies before updating course materials. Use NotebookLM to synthesize a semester's worth of new IPCC or EPA guidance into course revision input before each term. The key expert judgment is deciding which new AI environmental tools represent genuine capability advances worth incorporating into research workflows or curriculum versus incremental benchmark papers — a discrimination that requires your domain expertise.

Where this role is heading

Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.

A direction you could grow

Education Administrators, Postsecondary

Environmental science faculty who have demonstrated leadership in curriculum redesign, interdisciplinary sustainability program development, field program management, or environmental accreditation review are strong candidates for department chair, associate dean of science, or director of sustainability research center roles. These programs are under significant pressure in 2025–2026 to integrate AI geospatial tools, climate ML, and eDNA metagenomics into degree curricula while responding to growing demand from EPA, consulting, and NGO employers for graduates with these competencies — and to the curriculum integrity challenge that AI-generated environmental impact assessment papers pose. Administrators with both environmental science credibility and governance experience are disproportionately valuable navigating these transitions. The CRI increase reflects that postsecondary education administration is growing (+7% BLS 2024–2034) and that sustainability and environmental science programs are seeing increased enrollment as climate risk drives employer and student demand.

What you'd add
  • · Higher education budget management: faculty line planning, field equipment capital requests (sampling equipment, GIS workstations, field vehicles), NSF and EPA center grant indirect-cost administration, external advisory board management
  • · STEM accreditation processes: ABET accreditation for environmental engineering programs, regional accreditation self-study coordination, NAAEE environmental education standards, program review for interdisciplinary sustainability degrees
  • · Faculty performance review: promotion/tenure facilitation in field-intensive and interdisciplinary environmental programs, hiring committee leadership for computational vs. field-science balance in the faculty portfolio
  • · Industry and agency partnership development: relationships with EPA regional offices, state environmental agencies, NOAA, USGS, and environmental consulting firms for student internship pipelines and sponsored research; corporate sustainability advisory boards
  • · Institutional AI governance for environmental science: developing department policies on AI use in environmental impact assessment coursework, research data management, and graduate thesis writing; evaluating geospatial AI platforms for departmental licensing
What it takesSome new skills to pick up
Share this year
Drops anyone you send it to straight into 2026.
Preview card
Part of Education · see all 51roles →
Different role?

See the same long-arc view for your own profession.

Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code. New roles ship every few weeks. Every profile cites every claim.

Browse all roles

The data behind this timeline

On record since1970
Latest tracked employment9,000 (US, 2024)
Latest median pay$87,710 (2024)
Outlook+2.9% by 2034 (BLS National Employment Matrix 2024-34)
View all 27 cited data points
YearUS employmentMedian annual paySource
19751,800n/aESTIMATE
1980n/a$20,400ESTIMATE
19853,500n/aESTIMATE
19935,000$42,000ESTIMATE
20006,200n/aESTIMATE
20033,620$57,830BLS-OEWS
20043,860$62,330BLS-OEWS
20054,340$60,880BLS-OEWS
20064,310$64,780BLS-OEWS
20074,470$64,850BLS-OEWS
20084,870$65,130BLS-OEWS
20094,820$65,540BLS-OEWS
20105,090$71,020BLS-OEWS
20114,990$75,050BLS-OEWS
20124,990$77,320BLS-OEWS
20135,130$78,490BLS-OEWS
20145,300$77,470BLS-OEWS
20155,540$78,770BLS-OEWS
20165,520$78,340BLS-OEWS
20175,990$76,360BLS-OEWS
20186,040$79,910BLS-OEWS
20196,060$82,430BLS-OEWS
20205,860$84,740BLS-OEWS
20215,440$81,980BLS-OEWS
20226,240$83,040BLS-OEWS
20237,120$88,410BLS-OEWS
20249,000$87,710BLS-OEWS
Embed this timeline on your site

Free for any site. Paste this where the timeline should appear; it stays interactive, every datapoint stays cited, and it sets no cookies on your page. How embedding works

<iframe src="https://futurehistory.earth/embed/25-1053"
  width="100%" height="430" style="border:0"
  title="Environmental Science Teachers, Postsecondary, a Future History timeline"
  loading="lazy"></iframe>

See all roles in Education