Skip to sources
Time Machine

Oral and maxillofacial surgeons

Also called Oral surgeon, OMS, OMFS, Maxillofacial surgeon, Oral and maxillofacial surgery

In brief

In May 2025, BLS counted 4,910 US oral and maxillofacial surgeons, with median pay of $352,220 a year. Of the BLS counts since 2021, the highest was 5,330, in May 2021. The earliest figure here is an estimate of 5,188 from 1991, not measured the same way as today's count. The last full technology era for oral and maxillofacial surgeons: Cone beam CT + digital planning software, 1998 to 2020.

What the sources say

Official outlook

BLS projects employment to grow 5.6% from 2025 to 2035.

BLS Employment Projections 2025-35

AI exposure studies

  • 0.0036 estimated probability that the whole occupation could be computerised, over an unspecified number of years. Not a forecast of job losses. Frey and Osborne, 2013

Since the 2013 prediction

In 2013, Frey and Osborne put this job's probability of computerisation at 0.0036. BLS counted 5,280 of these jobs in May 2013 and 4,910 in May 2025. The count moved sharply in one step, May 2020 to May 2021, when BLS changed how it estimates these counts, so no change is derived here.

Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. BLS publishes these counts as yearly survey snapshots and cautions against reading them as a precise trend. In May 2021 BLS changed how it estimates these counts (a model-based method using three years of survey data) and moved fully to the 2018 occupation codes, so part of a change across 2021 can come from the method rather than the work.

Last updated .

Cite this page
APA

Future History. (2026, October 11). Oral and maxillofacial surgeons: jobs and pay since 1975 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/29-1022

Chicago

Future History. "Oral and maxillofacial surgeons: jobs and pay since 1975." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 11, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/29-1022.

BibTeX

@misc{futurehistory_29_1022, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Oral and maxillofacial surgeons: jobs and pay since 1975}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/29-1022}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-11. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }

The access date is today's date on your device.

drag to travel through time
1850187519001925195019752000now
2026
Known then as Oral Surgeon / Dental Surgeon (pre-specialty era)
Known then as Oral Surgeon / Exodontist (American Society of Oral Surgeons era)
Known then as Oral Surgeon (integrated residency, pre-maxillofacial title)
Known then as Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon (OMS / OMFS)
Known today as Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon (OMS / OMFS)
Projected to still be called Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon (OMS / OMFS)
Data from the May 2025 survey
US Employment
5K
Est.

Stated in source: BLS OEWS

Official statistic
Report an error
Median Annual Wage
$352,220
Est.

≈ $343,190 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)

Official statistic
Report an error
Beat · 1849

Simon P. Hullihen, MD, DDS, publishes the world's first scientific paper on an orthognathic procedure in the American Journal of Dental Science: "Case of Elongation of the Underjaw and Distortion of the Face and Neck, Caused by a Burn, Successfully Treated." The paper describes a mandibular osteotomy he performed in Wheeling, Virginia (now West Virginia) without reliable anesthesia to correct a jaw deformity from burn scar contracture. Hullihen dies in 1857 at age 46 from typhoid pneumonia, having performed approximately 1,100 jaw operations, 100 cleft lip repairs, and 50 cleft palate procedures. His Wheeling Hospital houses the first hospital-based dental clinic in the United States.

Beat · 1869

James E. Garretson of Philadelphia publishes "A System of Oral Surgery," the first comprehensive textbook to define the scope of oral and maxillofacial surgery and give the discipline its name. Garretson is recognized as the founder of the specialty in the United States. The text establishes that oral surgery is a distinct discipline encompassing diseases and surgery of the mouth, jaws, and associated parts, not merely the extraction specialty that general dentists practiced.

Beat · 1918

August 6, 1918: Dr. Menifee Howard organizes 29 dental surgeons in Chicago at the National Dental Association's annual meeting to form the American Society of Exodontists. The meeting is a direct consequence of World War I, in which American dentists without a recognized Dental Corps found themselves treating thousands of soldiers with shattered mandibles, midface fractures, and facial burns. Varaztad Kazanjian, a dental surgeon from Harvard, becomes the most decorated American soldier in World War I for his maxillofacial reconstruction work. Robert H. Ivy develops the Ivy loop, a wire fixation technique for jaw fracture stabilization that becomes a wartime and peacetime standard of care.

Beat · 1946

The American Board of Oral Surgery is incorporated under the laws of the state of Illinois, following authorization at the 1945 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Oral Surgeons. This establishes board certification as a credential distinguishing trained oral surgeons from general dentists performing occasional extractions. The board certification structure creates the legal and institutional basis for the hospital privileges and independent general anesthesia authority that OMS will hold in all fifty states.

Beat · 1965

Per-Ingvar Branemark places the first titanium dental implant in a human patient, initiating the osseointegration era. Dental implants require surgical bone management, grafting, and staged prosthetic planning that align naturally with OMS residency training, making oral and maxillofacial surgeons the primary implant placement specialists as the market expands through the 1980s and 1990s. Implant dentistry becomes one of the major revenue drivers of private OMS practice and a significant factor in the specialty's workforce growth through the early 2000s.

Beat · 1978

The American Society of Oral Surgeons adopts its current name, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS), reflecting the expanded scope of the specialty beyond tooth extraction. The American Board of Oral Surgery is simultaneously renamed the American Board of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (ABOMS). The 1978 name change marks the formal recognition that the specialty includes facial trauma reconstruction, orthognathic surgery, pathology management, cleft and craniofacial surgery, temporomandibular joint surgery, and facial cosmetic surgery, not just oral procedures.

Beat · 2025

Pearl becomes the first dental AI company with FDA clearance for both 2D and 3D imaging when its Second Opinion 3D platform receives 510(k) clearance in May 2025. The tool performs automated anatomical segmentation of cone beam CT scans, identifying the inferior alveolar canal, maxillary sinus, nasal space, airway, and maxillofacial bony anatomy in color-coded 3D models. This is the most significant regulatory milestone in AI adoption for OMS workflows to date, establishing FDA-cleared AI as a standard-of-care option for the CBCT interpretation task that precedes third molar risk assessment, implant planning, and lesion screening.

How to read this number

OEWS is a point-in-time survey snapshot, not a continuous time series; BLS advises against using it for year-over-year trend comparison.

Each dot is a cited figure over time; the dotted line only links them (values between aren't measured). Hollow dots are estimates.

Official statistic: Copied by a script from a statistics agency table or a published study's table, not retyped by hand. BLS figures and the forecast and exposure tables are also re-checked against that table on every data run. Researched context: Researched from the cited source rather than copied from it by a script, so it is not machine-checked yet. Spot a mistake? Each figure has a “Report an error” link.

Cited forecasts · present → 2035

Will AI replace oral and maxillofacial surgeons? What the research says

Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.

Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.

What published forecasts say
Forecast change in the number of people doing this work, as published by each named source. Bars share one scale on every role, centred on zero and reaching the end at ±30%. Grey marks a small change, 3% or less either way.
BLS Employment Projections 2025-35
→ 2035
+5.6%
BLS National Employment Matrix, 2025-35 cycle, line for SOC 29-1022 (Oral and maxillofacial surgeons): 5.6 thousand jobs in 2025, projected 5.9 thousand in 2035, a change of +0.3 thousand (+5.6%). Matrix employment counts all jobs in the occupation, including self-employed workers (12.3% of this occupation in 2025). The average for all occupations in this cycle is +3.5%.
Official statisticReport an error
How exposed is this work to AI (research measures)
Scores as published by each study. Each row says what it measures. These measure what AI could technically do, not forecasts of jobs lost.
Frey & Osborne (2013), "The Future of Employment"
2013 study · Probability of computerisation (2013 model)
0.4%
probability
What this measures

Published appendix value for SOC 2010 29-1022 Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons: probability of computerisation 0.0036, rank 9 of 702 (rank 1 is least computerisable). Frey and Osborne estimated in 2013, with a Gaussian-process classifier on O*NET variables, how likely the whole occupation is to be technically automatable over "some unspecified number of years, perhaps a decade or two". It is a probability for the occupation, not a share of tasks and not a forecast of jobs lost.

Official statisticReport an error
Today, in this role

What's changing day to day for oral and maxillofacial surgeons

Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.

AI is sitting alongside you hereGenerate and review AI-assisted operative notes and clinical documentation, dictating or reviewing Nuance DAX Copilot or Suki AI-generated surgical encounter notes including procedure description, anesthesia record, implant/hardware lot numbers, and post-operative instructions

Generate and review AI-assisted operative notes and clinical documentation, dictating or reviewing Nuance DAX Copilot or Suki AI-generated surgical encounter notes including procedure description, anesthesia record, implant/hardware lot numbers, and post-operative instructions; ensuring operative notes meet hospital credentialing, insurer, and medical-legal documentation standards; signing the finalized note as the attending OMS of record.[3],[14]

Where your edge is

OMS generates complex multi-procedure operative notes: a single surgical session may combine general anesthesia administration, third molar extractions, alveolar bone grafting, and implant placement, each requiring separate procedural documentation with lot numbers, anesthesia records, and technique descriptions. Ambient AI documentation (Nuance DAX Copilot for hospital-based OMFS departments; Suki for office-based practices) listens to the surgical encounter and generates structured notes saving several minutes per patient encounter according to JCM 2026 review data. Your expert review task is to ensure the operative note accurately captures the specific technique, implant/hardware identifiers, anesthesia events, and any intraoperative complications or deviations from plan: these details are load-bearing for both malpractice defense and implant traceability recall compliance. Shift your documentation time from dictation mechanics to expert verification.

AI is sitting alongside you herePerform AI-assisted CBCT interpretation for surgical case planning, importing CBCT scan data into Pearl Second Opinion 3D or Diagnocat AI for automated anatomical segmentation (inferior alveolar canal, maxillary sinus, airway, maxillofacial bony anatomy)

Perform AI-assisted CBCT interpretation for surgical case planning, importing CBCT scan data into Pearl Second Opinion 3D or Diagnocat AI for automated anatomical segmentation (inferior alveolar canal, maxillary sinus, airway, maxillofacial bony anatomy); reviewing color-coded 3D segmentation outputs for proximity of surgical targets to critical structures; identifying cysts, lesions, or asymmetries flagged by the AI; and synthesizing AI outputs with clinical examination findings to formulate the surgical plan.[15],[7]

Where your edge is

Your value is in the diagnostic synthesis: the AI segments anatomy, but you determine which finding is clinically significant, which case needs specialist referral, and what the surgical implications are for the specific patient. Develop a systematic protocol for reviewing AI-generated 3D segmentations: inspect inferior alveolar canal proximity on every mandibular case, verify maxillary sinus floor on every upper implant case, and check the AI-flagged pathology list before finalizing your treatment plan. Pearl Second Opinion 3D specifically identifies "asymmetries, lesions, and anomalies that warrant referral": use this as your pathology screen on every CBCT, not just implant cases.

AI is sitting alongside you hereEvaluate panoramic and periapical radiographs using AI-assisted analysis for pathology detection, reviewing AI-generated annotations on panoramic radiographs identifying cysts, tumors, periapical lesions, bone defects, calcifications, and tooth-root anomalies

Evaluate panoramic and periapical radiographs using AI-assisted analysis for pathology detection, reviewing AI-generated annotations on panoramic radiographs identifying cysts, tumors, periapical lesions, bone defects, calcifications, and tooth-root anomalies; correlating AI-flagged findings with clinical examination, symptoms, and history; determining which findings require biopsy, further imaging (CBCT), specialist referral, or observation; and documenting diagnostic conclusions with the OMS as the diagnosing clinician of record.[11],[3]

Where your edge is

AI deep learning achieves >90% sensitivity for detecting jaw cysts, tumors, and precancerous lesions on panoramic radiographs and CBCT scans in peer-reviewed 2025 validation literature. For an OMS whose scope explicitly includes biopsy, tumor resection, and pathology management, this means AI can function as a systematic second-read on every panoramic, catching the incidental periapical lesion or early ameloblastoma that a fatigued eye might deprioritize. Your diagnostic moat is the clinical decision that follows: is this cyst growth pattern consistent with OKC or dentigerous cyst? Does this periapical lesion warrant root canal vs. apicectomy vs. extraction? Does the bone pattern suggest fibrous dysplasia vs. chronic osteomyelitis? AI provides the detection flag; OMS pathology training provides the diagnosis. Use AI panoramic analysis as your systematic first-pass quality screen before every new patient exam.

Where oral and maxillofacial surgeons go next

Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.

What each move takes

A direction you could grow

Medical and Health Services Managers

OMS with group practice or ASC ownership experience are well-positioned to transition into healthcare operations leadership: surgical group practice director, OMFS program director at an academic medical center, or dental DSO medical director. The surgical credentialing, anesthesia program management, and interdisciplinary coordination skills of senior OMS translate directly to healthcare administration. AI-driven practice analytics (scheduling optimization, outcomes tracking, quality metrics) are increasingly central to these roles, rewarding OMS who have developed fluency with digital workflow tools during clinical practice.

What you'd add
  • · Healthcare financial management and surgical practice P&L analysis
  • · AAOMS and CMS regulatory compliance for ambulatory surgical centers
  • · Healthcare AI governance, evaluating VSP and imaging AI tools for institutional deployment
  • · Physician leadership and interdisciplinary team management
  • · Population health metrics and surgical outcomes reporting
What it takesSome new skills to pick up
Tools of the era

How has the work of oral and maxillofacial surgeons changed since 1849?

The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.

  • Pre-anesthesia manual surgery (forceps, lancets, bone saws)

    Simon Hullihen performed over 1,100 jaw operations before reliable anesthesia existed, relying entirely on physical restraint, speed, and patient endurance. The instruments were adapted from general surgery: bone saws, chisels, and forceps derived from barber-surgeons' tradition. The limiting factor was not surgical skill but the absence of anesthesia: a procedure that took three minutes was survivable; one that took thirty was not. William Morton's 1846 ether demonstration at Massachusetts General Hospital initiated the transition, but ether adoption into oral surgery was gradual through the 1850s-1880s. This era defines the technical floor of the specialty: everything that followed represents augmentation of what was already technically possible with unaided human hands.

    Effect on the work

    Restricted the OMS workforce to a handful of exceptional physicians-dentists who could operate with speed and anatomical precision under conditions of patient consciousness. The total US practitioner count before formal residency programs was measured in dozens, not thousands.

  • X-ray diagnosis + general anesthesia (ether, nitrous oxide, chloroform)

    Wilhelm Roentgen's X-ray discovery in 1895 arrived in dental practice within months and transformed oral and maxillofacial surgical planning: for the first time a surgeon could see bone structure before incising. Combined with the widespread availability of general anesthesia (ether, nitrous oxide, and later chloroform) by the 1880s-1890s, these two technologies made planned, deliberate jaw surgery possible rather than emergency improvisation. The World War I and World War II maxillofacial injury crises accelerated adoption of both technologies in field settings: American and British oral surgeons treating thousands of soldiers with shattered mandibles and midface fractures developed new reduction and fixation techniques that would have been impossible without X-ray guidance and reliable anesthesia. Robert H. Ivy's wire fixation technique (the Ivy loop) became a standard of care for jaw fracture stabilization during and after World War I.

    Effect on the work

    The combination of X-ray diagnosis and reliable anesthesia expanded the practical scope of oral and maxillofacial surgery from emergency extractions and simple bone work to planned reconstructive procedures on the full facial skeleton, justifying the formation of the specialty's first professional society in 1918.

  • Board certification + integrated residency training (ABOMS 1946; 4-year hospital programs)

    The incorporation of the American Board of Oral Surgery in 1946 (authorized at the 1945 ASOS Annual Meeting) established the first formal credential separating trained oral surgeons from general dentists performing occasional extractions. By the 1950s-1960s, academic medical centers including Baylor University Medical Center were running formal residency programs: Baylor's first resident completed its program in 1963. This era transformed OMS from an informal specialty into a credentialed surgical discipline with standardized training, hospital privileges, and the legal right to administer general anesthesia, creating the structural moat that protects the profession today.

  • Osseointegrated implants (Branemark 1965; commercial adoption 1980s)

    Per-Ingvar Branemark placed the first titanium dental implant in a human patient in 1965, launching what would become a major new procedural domain for oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Osseointegrated implants required alveolar bone surgery, grafting, and staged prosthetic planning, all of which aligned naturally with OMS training. Commercial implant systems reached mainstream US adoption in the 1980s, and implant dentistry became one of the primary revenue drivers for OMS private practices by the 1990s. The implant era also drove adoption of panoramic radiography and, later, cone beam CT (CBCT) as standard diagnostic tools, since implant placement required 3D visualization of bone height, width, and proximity to the inferior alveolar canal and maxillary sinus.

  • Cone beam CT (CBCT) + digital planning software

    Cone beam computed tomography entered dental and oral surgical practice in the late 1990s and was commercially available in the US by 2001 (i-CAT, NewTom). CBCT provided three-dimensional bone visualization at a radiation dose far below conventional medical CT, enabling OMS to assess inferior alveolar canal proximity, maxillary sinus anatomy, and bone volume for implants, third molars, and reconstructive planning in a way that was previously impossible in the office setting. Digital treatment planning software followed: by the mid-2000s, implant planning platforms such as SimPlant and NobelGuide generated surgical guide templates from CBCT data. CBCT adoption transformed the diagnostic standard of care for third molar risk assessment, implant planning, and orthognathic surgery preparation, and created the imaging data foundation on which AI analysis tools would later operate.

  • AI virtual surgical planning + deep learning imaging analysis (2010s-present)

    Materialise ProPlan CMF and KLS Martin IPS CaseDesigner introduced AI-assisted virtual surgical planning for orthognathic and craniomaxillofacial surgery in the early 2010s, compressing planning time from six to eight hours of traditional model surgery and cephalometric tracing to fifteen to twenty minutes of AI-assisted digital simulation, with close concordance versus post-operative outcomes in prospective validation. Simultaneously, deep learning models applied to CBCT and panoramic radiographs achieved accuracy above 90% for jaw cyst, tumor, and lesion detection by the mid-2020s. In May 2025, Pearl became the first dental AI company with FDA clearance for both 2D and 3D imaging (Pearl Second Opinion 3D), enabling automated anatomical segmentation of the entire maxillofacial skeleton including the inferior alveolar canal, maxillary sinus, and airway from a CBCT scan in minutes. A 2023 FDA clearance had previously been issued for an AI tool generating patient-specific surgical guides and implant plans from CT scans for jaw trauma and reconstruction. Ambient AI documentation (Nuance DAX, Suki) saves several minutes per surgical encounter. These tools do not automate surgical execution; they automate the cognitive and diagnostic sub-tasks that precede and follow surgery, leaving the physical procedure, the anesthesia authority, and the clinical judgment on the operating surgeon.

    Effect on the work

    No measurable displacement of OMS headcount from AI tool adoption as of 2024-26. Productivity gains from virtual surgical planning and AI CBCT analysis are absorbed into expanded case complexity and volume rather than workforce reduction, consistent with the specialty's supply-constrained demand dynamics.

Part of Healthcare · see all 69 roles →
Different role?

See the same long-arc view for your own profession.

Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.

Browse all roles

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons employment and pay by year

On record since1849
Latest US employment4,910 (May 2025)Source: BLS OEWS May 2025Official statisticReport an error
Latest US median pay$352,220 (May 2025)Source: BLS OEWS May 2025Official statisticReport an error
Outlook+5.6% by 2035Source: BLS Employment Projections 2025-35Official statisticReport an error
View all 25 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
YearUS employmentAnnual pay (median unless marked)SourceReport
1975n/a$61,300Est., PMC4192917 Researched contextReport
19915,188n/aEst., J Oral Maxillofac Surg Researched contextReport
2000n/a$310,000Est., ADA Survey of Dental Practice Researched contextReport
20044,950n/aBLS OEWS May 2004 Official statisticReport
20055,120n/aBLS OEWS May 2005 Official statisticReport
20065,320n/aBLS OEWS May 2006 Official statisticReport
20075,040n/aBLS OEWS May 2007 Official statisticReport
20084,760n/aBLS OEWS May 2008 Official statisticReport
20095,390n/aBLS OEWS May 2009 Official statisticReport
20105,330n/aBLS OEWS May 2010 Official statisticReport
20115,800n/aBLS OEWS May 2011 Official statisticReport
20124,990n/aBLS OEWS May 2012 Official statisticReport
20135,280n/aBLS OEWS May 2013 Official statisticReport
20145,120n/aBLS OEWS May 2014 Official statisticReport
20155,000n/aBLS OEWS May 2015 Official statisticReport
20165,380n/aBLS OEWS May 2016 Official statisticReport
20174,800n/aBLS OEWS May 2017 Official statisticReport
20184,830n/aBLS OEWS May 2018 Official statisticReport
20194,650n/aBLS OEWS May 2019 Official statisticReport
20204,120n/aBLS OEWS May 2020 Official statisticReport
20215,330n/aBLS OEWS May 2021 Official statisticReport
20224,290$445,120BLS OEWS May 2022 (employment) Official statisticEst., ADA Health Policy Institute / Statista (pay) Researched contextReport
20234,160n/aBLS OEWS May 2023 Official statisticReport
20245,330n/aBLS OEWS May 2024 Official statisticReport
20254,910$352,220BLS OEWS May 2025 Official statisticReport
Embed this timeline on your site

Free for any site. Paste this where the timeline should appear; it stays interactive, every datapoint stays cited, and it sets no cookies on your page. How embedding works

<iframe src="https://futurehistory.earth/embed/29-1022"
  width="100%" height="430" style="border:0"
  title="Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, a Future History timeline"
  loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:13px;margin:4px 0 0"><a href="https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/29-1022">Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons: jobs and pay over time</a>, from Future History</p>

See all roles in Healthcare