Welding machine operators
Official title Welding, Soldering, and Brazing Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders (SOC 51-4122)
In brief
In May 2025, BLS counted 31,600 US welding machine operators, with median pay of $47,920 a year. Of the BLS counts since 2003, the highest was 55,360, in May 2014. The earliest figure here is an estimate of 200,000 from 1959, not measured the same way as today's count. The last full technology era for welding machine operators: Programmable robotic welding cells in automotive and job-shop manufacturing, 1985 to 2010.
Official statistic: latest count and pay, highest count.Researched context: earliest figure.
What the sources say
Official outlook
BLS projects employment to decline 8.9% from 2025 to 2035.
BLS Employment Projections 2025-35
Official statistic
Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. BLS publishes these counts as yearly survey snapshots and cautions against reading them as a precise trend. In May 2021 BLS changed how it estimates these counts (a model-based method using three years of survey data) and moved fully to the 2018 occupation codes, so part of a change across 2021 can come from the method rather than the work.
Last updated .
Cite this page
Future History. (2026, November 1). Welding machine operators: jobs and pay since 1959 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/51-4122
Future History. "Welding machine operators: jobs and pay since 1959." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified November 1, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/51-4122.
@misc{futurehistory_51_4122, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Welding machine operators: jobs and pay since 1959}, year = {2026}, month = nov, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/51-4122}}, note = {Last updated 2026-11-01. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }
The access date is today's date on your device.
≈ $46,691 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)
Elihu Thomson patents the electric resistance welding process and builds the first demonstration machine. His apparatus presses two metal pieces together while a current runs through the joint, creating heat at the contact point through resistance. Thomson holds over 700 patents; this one proves among the most consequential for manufacturing employment. The first commercial resistance welder enters production at Roebling Iron Works in Trenton, New Jersey in 1888, joining wire at a speed no hand technique can match.
Edward G. Budd of Philadelphia builds the first all-steel automobile body using resistance spot welding, replacing wood-frame-and-fabric construction. The Budd Company goes on to supply steel bodies to Dodge, Citroën, and eventually most major automakers. Within fifteen years, all-steel construction is the industry standard, and resistance spot welding becomes the backbone of automobile assembly, creating the occupational mass that will define welding machine operators for the next half-century.
The Unimate robot, the world's first industrial robot, is installed at General Motors' Inland Fisher Guide Plant in Ewing Township, New Jersey. Invented by George Devol and commercialized by Joseph Engelberger's Unimation company, the 4,000-pound hydraulic arm initially handles die castings and performs welding on car bodies. GM later deploys 66 Unimates for spot welding at its Lordstown, Ohio plant. The first sale is made at a $35,000 loss; within a decade the technology is profitable and the race to automate automotive spot welding is underway.
KUKA introduces the Famulus, the world's first six-axis articulated industrial robot with all-electric actuation, breaking from the hydraulic design of the Unimate. The six-axis design gives the robot a range of motion far closer to a human arm, enabling more complex weld paths. FANUC and Yaskawa both enter robot manufacturing in Japan in 1974. The three companies -- KUKA, FANUC, Motoman -- become the dominant suppliers of automotive welding robots for the next half-century. Automotive machine-operator employment begins its steepest decline from this peak.
FANUC enters a joint venture with General Motors to produce and market robots in the United States, accelerating the diffusion of robotic welding across the US automotive supply chain. By 1980 there are several thousand welding robots globally, with 65 percent used for spot welding. The human welding machine operator in an automotive plant is by now a maintenance and setup figure rather than an active production operator: the robot does the welding, the human keeps the robot running.
Universal Robots, founded in Odense, Denmark in 2005, ships its first commercial collaborative robot (cobot) in 2008. Unlike industrial robots, cobots are lightweight, can operate without safety cages, and can be programmed by guiding the arm through a motion rather than writing code. The first cobot welder is demonstrated in North America at FABTECH 2017. By 2025 cobots are extending automated welding to small and mid-sized manufacturers that were previously too small to justify a robotic welding cell, creating a new wave of displacement pressure for welding machine operators in job shops and contract manufacturers.
Will AI replace welding machine operators? What the research says
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.
- BLS Employment Projections 2025-35Target year 2035
What's changing day to day for welding machine operators
Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.
AI is sitting alongside you here Read blueprints, work orders…
, or production schedules to determine product or job instructions or specifications.[2]
AI is sitting alongside you here Select torch tips, alloys, flux, coil, tubing, or wire…
, according to metal types or thicknesses, data charts, or records.[2]
AI is sitting alongside you here Lay out, fit, or connect parts to be bonded…
, calculating production measurements, as necessary.[2]
How has the work of welding machine operators changed since 1888?
The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.
Thomson electric resistance welder (early commercial machines, 1888)
Elihu Thomson's first commercial resistance welder entered production at Roebling Iron Works in Trenton in 1888, and within a decade the machines had spread to bicycle manufacturing, wire joining, and the nascent automobile parts industry. The operator's role in this era was essentially a machine attendant: position the work pieces, close the electrodes with a foot pedal or hand lever, and pull the finished part. Setup was the skilled part, requiring correct electrode selection, tip dressing, and adjustment of weld time and pressure. The machines were mechanically simple but electrically demanding, and early operators had to develop an intuitive sense of the weld quality from the sound, the flash, and the feel of the part. This era created the occupational template that would persist for decades.
All-steel auto body spot welding (Edward Budd 1912, mass-production scale-up through 1950s)
Edward G. Budd of Philadelphia built the first all-steel automobile body using resistance spot welding in 1912, replacing the wood-frame-and-fabric bodies that had dominated the industry. By the 1920s Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler had all committed to all-steel construction, creating enormous demand for welding machine operators on their assembly lines. Automobile manufacturers developed special multi-gun machines that performed dozens of spot welds simultaneously, but someone still had to load the stamped body panels, align them in the fixture, trigger the weld cycle, and inspect the result. World War II amplified the workforce further: aircraft frames, tank hulls, and military vehicles all required resistance welding at scale. By the late 1950s, BLS estimates placed welding machine operators at approximately 200,000, more than half of all welding workers in the country. This was the occupation's golden age, and it lasted almost exactly until the first industrial robot.
Effect on the workThe mass production of all-steel auto bodies drove welding machine operator employment to a peak of approximately 200,000 by 1959. The occupation was heavily concentrated in the Midwest, particularly in Michigan and Ohio, and heavily unionized (UAW). Average hourly wages in automotive metalworking in the 1950s tracked closely with other UAW-represented production occupations.
Unimate and first-generation industrial robots (GM 1961, KUKA Famulus 1973, Fanuc 1974)
The Unimate robot, invented by George Devol and commercialized by Joseph Engelberger's Unimation company, was installed at General Motors' Inland Fisher Guide Plant in Ewing Township, New Jersey in 1961, initially for die-casting handling and welding on car bodies. Three years later GM deployed the technology for spot welding at its Lordstown, Ohio plant. KUKA introduced the Famulus in 1973, the first six-axis articulated industrial robot, and FANUC and Yaskawa both entered robot manufacturing in Japan in 1974. The robots could be reprogrammed for different car models without expensive retooling, eliminating the need for extensive changeover labor and reducing the operator-to-machine ratio dramatically. By 1980 there were several thousand welding robots in the global car industry; a large share of them were performing spot welding, directly displacing the machine operators who had previously done this work. The automotive machine-operator workforce fell by close to 90 percent from its 1973 peak even as vehicle output grew.
Effect on the workWelding machine operator employment fell between 1959 and 1980, a decline in two decades driven almost entirely by robotic spot welding in automotive plants. Manual welders (51-4121) experienced far smaller employment declines over the same period, confirming that the flexibility of hand welding was a meaningful barrier to robot substitution that machine-tender work did not share.
Programmable robotic welding cells (FANUC, KUKA, Motoman, ABB) in automotive and job-shop manufacturing
Through the 1980s, robotic welding spread from the pioneering Detroit assembly plants to a broader set of manufacturers: farm equipment, appliances, construction machinery, HVAC components, and aerospace subassembly. The new welding machine operators who remained in manufacturing were no longer simply tending a fixed-purpose resistance welder; they were setting up and monitoring programmable robotic cells, loading and unloading parts, inspecting weld quality with gauges and dye-penetrant tests, and performing preventive maintenance on the robots themselves. The job title began shifting toward "robotic welding technician" in some plants, reflecting a higher-skill profile. Simultaneously, laser welding entered manufacturing in the 1980s and 1990s, first in aerospace and electronics, offering precision that neither resistance welding nor conventional MIG could provide. Machine operators tending laser welding systems in circuit-board assembly and medical device manufacturing represented a distinct and better-paid sub-specialty within 51-4122.
Cobot welding cells and autonomous welding systems (Universal Robots 2008, cobot welders at FABTECH 2017)
Universal Robots introduced the first commercially viable collaborative robot (cobot) in 2008, a lightweight arm designed to work safely alongside humans without a protective cage. The first cobot welder was demonstrated at FABTECH in North America in 2017, performing straight MIG welds. By 2025 collaborative robots from Universal Robots, ABB, Fanuc, and others had extended automated welding to small and medium-sized manufacturers that could not justify the capital cost of a traditional robotic cell. Cobots handle arc welding, TIG, MIG, laser, and even spot welding in flexible job-shop environments. For the machine operator, this represents both a new tool to tend and a further substitution pressure: a cobot welder on a table-top fixture requires less floor space, less safety infrastructure, and less programming expertise than a traditional robotic cell, and some cobots can be trained by physically guiding the arm through the weld path rather than writing code. The occupation is contracting slowly but persistently as this technology diffuses into the long tail of manufacturers that previously required human machine operators.
Effect on the workBLS projects employment of 51-4122 to decline between 2024 and 2034, a 9 percent decline, as cobot welding cells and advanced robotic systems absorb the remaining machine-tending work. This is a slow decline compared to the 1960s-1980s collapse, reflecting the saturation of easy robotic substitution and the concentration of remaining employment in high-mix, low-volume, or precision applications.
See the same long-arc view for your own profession.
Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.
Browse all rolesWelding, Soldering, and Brazing Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders employment and pay by year
View all 24 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
| Year | US employment | Annual pay (median unless marked) | Source | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1959 | 200,000 | n/a | Est., Construction Physics (Brian Potter)[1] Researched context | Report |
| 2003 | 53,750 | $29,110 | BLS OEWS May 2003[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2004 | 47,210 | $29,780 | BLS OEWS May 2004[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2005 | 45,220 | $30,430 | BLS OEWS May 2005[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2006 | 48,770 | $30,980 | BLS OEWS May 2006[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2007 | 50,820 | $30,980 | BLS OEWS May 2007[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2008 | 51,840 | $31,610 | BLS OEWS May 2008[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2009 | 41,580 | $32,750 | BLS OEWS May 2009[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2010 | 38,530 | $33,810 | BLS OEWS May 2010[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2011 | 40,350 | $34,770 | BLS OEWS May 2011[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2012 | 49,430 | $34,720 | BLS OEWS May 2012[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2013 | 50,860 | $34,410 | BLS OEWS May 2013[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2014 | 55,360 | $35,180 | BLS OEWS May 2014[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2015 | 53,080 | $36,150 | BLS OEWS May 2015[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2016 | 46,920 | $36,980 | BLS OEWS May 2016[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2017 | 38,750 | $37,190 | BLS OEWS May 2017[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2018 | 35,080 | $37,670 | BLS OEWS May 2018[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2019 | 35,110 | $38,310 | BLS OEWS May 2019[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2020 | 33,150 | $39,410 | BLS OEWS May 2020[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2021 | 29,980 | $38,580 | BLS OEWS May 2021[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2022 | 30,940 | $44,920 | BLS OEWS May 2022[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2023 | 33,020 | $45,350 | BLS OEWS May 2023[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2024 | 36,290 | $47,060 | BLS OEWS May 2024[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2025 | 31,600 | $47,920 | BLS OEWS May 2025[2] Official statistic | Report |