Community health workers
In brief
In May 2025, BLS counted 61,660 US community health workers, with median pay of $51,850 a year. Of the BLS counts since 2012, the May 2025 count is the highest. The earliest figure here is an estimate of 86,000 from 2000, not measured the same way as today's count. The last full technology era for community health workers: Electronic Health Records integration + care coordination platforms, 2010 to 2020.
Official statistic: latest count and pay, highest count.Researched context: earliest figure.
What the sources say
Official outlook
BLS projects employment to grow 12.7% from 2025 to 2035.
BLS Employment Projections 2025-35
Official statistic
AI exposure studies
- 34.7% of this job's tasks are exposed to large language models. Not a forecast of job losses. Eloundou and others, 2023 Official statistic
Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. BLS publishes these counts as yearly survey snapshots and cautions against reading them as a precise trend. In May 2021 BLS changed how it estimates these counts (a model-based method using three years of survey data) and moved fully to the 2018 occupation codes, so part of a change across 2021 can come from the method rather than the work.
Last updated .
Cite this page
Future History. (2026, October 11). Community health workers: jobs and pay since 2000 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/21-1094
Future History. "Community health workers: jobs and pay since 2000." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 11, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/21-1094.
@misc{futurehistory_21_1094, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Community health workers: jobs and pay since 2000}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/21-1094}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-11. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }
The access date is today's date on your device.
≈ $50,521 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)
June 1965: The Office of Economic Opportunity approves the first two neighborhood health centers under the Great Society programs: Columbia Point Health Center in South Boston, Massachusetts, and the Tufts-Delta Health Center in Mound Bayou, Mississippi. By December 1965, the Columbia Point center opens in twelve converted apartments inside the Columbia Point housing project, employing physicians, nurses, social workers, and community health aides. The Tufts-Delta center in the Mississippi Delta explicitly trains Black community members as health aides, addressing a rural population where Jim Crow had severed the connection between formal medicine and daily life. These two centers are the prototype for what will become a nationwide network of Federally Qualified Health Centers and the institutional home of the modern CHW role.
Congress establishes the Indian Health Service Community Health Representative (CHR) program, the first congressionally funded community health worker initiative in US history. The CHR program responds to the expressed needs of American Indian and Alaska Native tribal governments for a community outreach component that can meet specific tribal health needs. CHRs provide outreach, education, informal counseling, social support, and referral coordination. The program will grow into one of the most long-standing CHW models in the country, directly inspiring subsequent civilian and Medicaid-funded programs. At its peak the CHR program supports CHWs across every federally recognized tribe in the lower 48 states and in Alaska Native villages.
September 6-12, 1978: The International Conference on Primary Health Care convenes in Alma-Ata (now Almaty, Kazakhstan), bringing together 134 countries and 67 international organizations. The resulting Declaration of Alma-Ata places community health workers at the center of a primary healthcare vision for global health equity, stating that the approach "relies, at local and referral levels, on health workers, including physicians, nurses, midwives, auxiliaries and community workers." The declaration's slogan, "Health for All by the Year 2000," galvanizes CHW programs worldwide. In the United States, the declaration reinforces advocacy for CHW expansion at a time when the federal neighborhood health center program was under budget pressure from the Ford and then Carter administrations. The global frame begins appearing in US academic literature on CHWs through the 1980s.
HRSA's Bureau of Health Professions publishes the first national Community Health Worker Workforce Study, estimating 120,000 CHWs in active practice in the United States as of 2005. The study is the most comprehensive workforce data available before BLS creates a formal SOC code. It documents that CHW programs range from small, grant-funded community initiatives to large Medicaid-funded programs, and that the lack of uniform title or training standards makes the workforce nearly impossible to count from administrative data alone. The study will not be replicated at the same scale, leaving the field reliant on BLS OEWS estimates (which almost certainly undercount CHWs working under adjacent job titles) and periodic state-level surveys.
Two events in 2010 together mark the CHW field's transition from informal practice to formal profession. First, the Bureau of Labor Statistics assigns SOC code 21-1094 to Community Health Workers in the 2010 Standard Occupational Classification, the first time the role has its own distinct category in the national occupational taxonomy. Second, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is signed into law on March 23, 2010; it mentions CHWs fourteen times, designates them as a recognized healthcare profession, and authorizes CDC grants (Section 5313) to fund CHW programs promoting health behaviors in underserved communities. The ACA also enables Medicaid reimbursement for CHW services, accelerating a policy that Minnesota had pioneered in 2007. BLS will publish the first OEWS estimates for 21-1094 in May 2012.
March 28, 2020: The Department of Homeland Security designates community health workers as essential infrastructure workers, weeks into the COVID-19 pandemic, citing their critical role in healthcare system resilience. CHWs pivot rapidly to phone and video outreach, translating pandemic guidance into the languages and communication styles of the communities they serve. The 2021 vaccination campaign against COVID-19 places CHWs at the center of trusted outreach in Black, Latino, and Native communities with historically founded hesitancy toward government health programs. The American Rescue Plan Act, signed March 11, 2021, allocates $225 million for a national CHW training initiative, the largest single federal investment in the field's history, with a stated goal of training at least 13,000 new CHWs.
Will AI replace community health workers? What the research says
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.
- BLS Employment Projections 2025-35Target year 2035
- Eloundou et al. (2023), "GPTs are GPTs"2023 study · Share of tasks exposed to LLMs (β, human-rated)34.7%of tasks
What's changing day to day for community health workers
Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.
AI is sitting alongside you here Advise clients or community groups on issues…
related to improving general health, such as diet or exercise.[2]
AI is sitting alongside you here Maintain updated client records with plans, notes…
, appropriate forms, or related information.[2]
AI is sitting alongside you here Identify or contact members of high-risk or otherwise targeted…
groups, such as members of minority populations, low-income populations, or pregnant women.[2]
How has the work of community health workers changed since 1920?
The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.
Oral tradition + handwritten records (pre-formalization era)
The early lay health aide worked almost entirely without institutional tools. Health education was delivered verbally, drawing on shared language, cultural reference, and trust. Case records, if kept at all, were handwritten notes. The physical toolkit was minimal: a blood pressure cuff, a thermometer, a growth chart, and the knowledge to use them. The defining competency was relational, not technical: the ability to walk into a home where a clinic could not go and translate both the language and the values of public health into terms the household could accept.
Standardized health education curricula + community health center infrastructure
The neighborhood health centers funded by the Office of Economic Opportunity from 1965 onward gave CHWs an institutional anchor: a building, a records system, a supervising clinical staff, and standardized educational materials. The Indian Health Service developed training curricula for its Community Health Representatives by the late 1960s that combined basic clinical competencies (blood pressure measurement, wound care, referral protocols) with community organizing skills. This era established the template: CHWs are trained, supervised, and embedded in a health-system infrastructure while still being drawn from and accountable to the community. The tools were paper-based and the training was brief, but the model was coherent.
Paper-based case management forms + basic screening equipment
Through the 1990s, CHWs worked primarily with paper: intake forms, referral checklists, appointment reminder cards, and health education brochures printed in Spanish or Hmong or Somali. The basic clinical screening tools (glucometers for diabetes outreach, portable blood pressure monitors, peak flow meters for asthma, OraQuick for rapid HIV testing) expanded the scope of what a trained non-clinician could deliver in a home visit or community setting. Minnesota passed the first state legislation standardizing a CHW curriculum in 2003, and in 2007 the Minnesota legislature authorized Medicaid reimbursement for trained CHW services: the first state to treat CHW work as a billable clinical service rather than a grant-funded supplement.
Electronic Health Records integration + care coordination platforms (Epic, Cerner referral modules)
The Affordable Care Act of 2010 named CHWs as a recognized healthcare workforce and funded their inclusion in team-based care models. As health systems absorbed CHW programs (hospitals and health systems led a sizeable share of CHW programs by the mid-2010s), CHWs gained access to Electronic Health Records: they could look up whether a patient had upcoming appointments, document a home visit in a shared chart, flag care gaps, and close referral loops that previously disappeared into a fax machine. Epic and Cerner added CHW workflow modules; care coordination platforms (Healthify, Unite Us) emerged specifically to connect clinical referrals to social service providers via CHW intermediaries. The shift from paper to EHR integration was uneven: smaller nonprofits and county health departments still operated on paper, while hospital-employed CHWs navigated the same massive systems as clinical staff.
Mobile health apps + telehealth + AI-assisted care navigation tools
The COVID-19 pandemic of 2020-21 simultaneously proved the CHW model and stress-tested its tools. CHWs were declared essential infrastructure workers by the Department of Homeland Security in March 2020. They shifted rapidly to phone and video outreach, using Zoom, WhatsApp, and telehealth platforms to maintain contact with clients who could not safely leave home. Vaccination campaigns in 2021 relied heavily on CHWs for trusted community outreach, particularly in Black, Latino, and Native communities where vaccine hesitancy was highest. The American Rescue Plan allocated $225 million in 2021 for a national CHW training initiative. The post-pandemic period brought integration with mobile health apps for remote monitoring (blood pressure cuffs that sync to apps, glucose monitors with mobile logging), AI-assisted care navigation tools for identifying high-risk patients from claims data, and community health information systems for documenting social determinants of health. As of 2025-26, the mainstream daily-driver tools are: a smartphone with a telehealth-capable app, an EHR access module (often via browser or dedicated app), and a care coordination platform connecting social service referrals. The role's value proposition, bridging system and community, is precisely what neither AI chatbots nor automated patient portals can replicate without a trusted human present.
See the same long-arc view for your own profession.
Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.
Browse all rolesCommunity Health Workers employment and pay by year
View all 15 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
| Year | US employment | Annual pay (median unless marked) | Source | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 86,000 | n/a | Est., Malcarney et al. (2017)[1] Researched context | Report |
| 2012 | 38,020 | $34,620 | BLS OEWS May 2012[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2013 | 45,800 | $34,610 | BLS OEWS May 2013[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2014 | 47,880 | $34,870 | BLS OEWS May 2014[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2015 | 48,130 | $36,300 | BLS OEWS May 2015[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2016 | 51,900 | $37,330 | BLS OEWS May 2016[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2017 | 54,760 | $38,370 | BLS OEWS May 2017[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2018 | 56,130 | $39,540 | BLS OEWS May 2018[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2019 | 58,950 | $40,360 | BLS OEWS May 2019[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2020 | 58,670 | $42,000 | BLS OEWS May 2020[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2021 | 61,010 | $46,590 | BLS OEWS May 2021[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2022 | 61,300 | $46,190 | BLS OEWS May 2022[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2023 | 58,550 | $48,200 | BLS OEWS May 2023[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2024 | 60,730 | $51,030 | BLS OEWS May 2024[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2025 | 61,660 | $51,850 | BLS OEWS May 2025[2] Official statistic | Report |