Skip to sources
Time Machine

Earth science professors

Official title Atmospheric, Earth, Marine, and Space Sciences Teachers, Postsecondary (SOC 25-1051)

Also called Geology professor, Meteorology professor, Oceanography professor, Astronomy professor, Atmospheric sciences professor

In brief

In May 2025, BLS counted 9,900 US earth science professors, with median pay of $103,170 a year. Of the BLS counts since 2021, the highest was 11,770, in May 2023. The earliest figure here is an estimate of 800 from 1900, not measured the same way as today's count. The last full technology era for earth science professors: Cloud geoscience platforms, 2003 to 2020.

What the sources say

Official outlook

BLS projects employment to grow 2.4% from 2025 to 2035.

BLS Employment Projections 2025-35

AI exposure studies

Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. BLS publishes these counts as yearly survey snapshots and cautions against reading them as a precise trend.

Last updated .

Cite this page
APA

Future History. (2026, October 11). Earth science professors: jobs and pay since 1900 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/25-1051

Chicago

Future History. "Earth science professors: jobs and pay since 1900." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 11, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/25-1051.

BibTeX

@misc{futurehistory_25_1051, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Earth science professors: jobs and pay since 1900}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/25-1051}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-11. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }

The access date is today's date on your device.

drag to travel through time
1850187519001925195019752000now
2026
Known then as Professor of Natural Philosophy / Professor of Natural History (pre-disciplinary era)
Known then as Professor of Geology / Professor of Astronomy / Instructor in Meteorology (departmentalized era)
Known then as Professor of Geology, Meteorology, Oceanography, or Astronomy (discipline-specific era)
Known then as Geosciences Faculty / Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Professor (consolidation era)
Known then as Atmospheric, Earth, Marine, and Space Sciences Teachers, Postsecondary (BLS SOC 25-1051)
Known today as Atmospheric, Earth, Marine, and Space Sciences Teachers, Postsecondary (BLS SOC 25-1051)
Projected to still be called Atmospheric, Earth, Marine, and Space Sciences Teachers, Postsecondary (BLS SOC 25-1051)
Data from the May 2025 survey
US Employment
10K
Est.

Stated in source: BLS OEWS

Official statistic
Report an error
Median Annual Wage
$103,170
Est.

≈ $100,525 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)

Official statistic
Report an error
Beat · 1847

Harvard's Lawrence Scientific School opens with professorships in geology and natural history -- among the first formally titled science faculty positions at an American university outside of natural philosophy. The school was designed to train practitioners in applied science and drew its faculty from the emerging community of professional American scientists rather than from natural philosophy generalists. By 1847, similar distinct professorships in mineralogy and geology existed at Yale (Silliman, from 1813) and at several land-grant institutions founded after the 1862 Morrill Act.

Beat · 1895

Florence Bascom founds the geology department at Bryn Mawr College after receiving her PhD from Johns Hopkins in 1893 -- the first PhD awarded to a woman by that institution in any field, and the second geology PhD awarded to an American woman. Bascom's department became one of the most rigorous geology programs in the country; by 1937, eleven women employed by the USGS had been trained by her. Her dual career as a faculty member and as the first woman geologist hired by the USGS (1896) established the template for the research-teaching faculty identity that characterizes earth science professors to this day.

Beat · 1919

The American Meteorological Society is founded on December 29, 1919, at a meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in St. Louis, by Charles Franklin Brooks of the Blue Hill Observatory in Milton, Massachusetts. Initial membership was drawn primarily from the US Signal Corps and Weather Bureau, not academia. University-based meteorology teaching was still rare: it would take World War II to force the creation of university meteorology departments at scale.

Beat · 1942

Penn State grants its first Bachelor's degrees in Meteorology -- the program had begun in 1940 as an expansion of the Geology curriculum, and the wartime need for trained meteorologists turned it into a standalone discipline. The World War II meteorology training programs created at Penn State, MIT, UCLA, and the University of Chicago represented the first large-scale hiring of university meteorology faculty in the United States. C.-G. Rossby, one of the founders of modern dynamic meteorology, served as AMS president in 1944-45 and established the Journal of Meteorology, which later split into the two current AMS flagship journals.

Beat · 1950

The Scripps Institution of Oceanography was awarding the only oceanography degrees in the country as of 1950 -- a striking illustration of how recently marine science had existed as an academic teaching discipline. The 1929 F.R. Lillie report to the National Academy of Sciences had noted that an oceanographer of that era "must today be largely self-taught in the basic aspects of his subject"; it was the establishment of the Office of Naval Research in 1946 and the National Science Foundation in 1950 that funded the graduate programs that changed this picture. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (founded 1930) began its educational partnership with MIT after World War II.

Beat · 1958

The National Defense Education Act becomes law, directly responding to the Soviet Sputnik launch of October 4, 1957. NSF appropriations rise from $34 million (1957) to $134 million (1959). The NDEA funded fellowships, equipment, and curriculum development across all science disciplines, and earth and atmospheric science departments at universities received a sustained hiring surge through the 1960s. The University of Oklahoma School of Meteorology (established 1960) and the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR, established 1960) were both products of this investment wave.

Beat · 1990

April 24, 1990: the Hubble Space Telescope launches aboard Space Shuttle Discovery's STS-31 mission. After the mirror correction in 1993, Hubble became the most productive astronomical research instrument in history -- with its archive freely accessible to university astronomers and students. The same year, Keck I telescope achieved first light at Mauna Kea; Keck II followed in 1996. These instruments created a generation of astronomy faculty who could assign genuine research projects using real Hubble and SDSS data to undergraduate students, transforming pedagogy from demonstration to participation.

Beat · 2023

Google DeepMind publishes GraphCast in Science (December 2023): a graph neural network weather forecast model that outperforms ECMWF IFS on 90% of 1,380 test variables at 3-10 day lead times. In the same year, Huawei's Pangu-Weather is published in Nature, and NVIDIA's FourCastNet generates global forecasts in under two seconds. Microsoft Research's Aurora (May 2024) becomes the first single AI model fine-tuneable across weather, air quality, cyclone intensity, solar wind, and ocean waves. These four models arrive within 18 months of each other and together represent the most significant transformation in atmospheric science's tool environment since the ENIAC first numerical forecast of 1950. For faculty in this occupation, the question is no longer whether AI can forecast the weather -- it clearly can -- but how to teach students to know when and why the AI is physically wrong.

How to read this number

OEWS is a point-in-time survey snapshot, not a continuous time series; BLS advises against using it for year-over-year trend comparison.

Each dot is a cited figure over time; the dotted line only links them (values between aren't measured). Hollow dots are estimates.

Official statistic: Copied by a script from a statistics agency table or a published study's table, not retyped by hand. BLS figures and the forecast and exposure tables are also re-checked against that table on every data run. Researched context: Researched from the cited source rather than copied from it by a script, so it is not machine-checked yet. Spot a mistake? Each figure has a “Report an error” link.

Cited forecasts · present → 2035

Will AI replace earth science professors? What the research says

Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.

Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.

What published forecasts say
Forecast change in the number of people doing this work, as published by each named source. Bars share one scale on every role, centred on zero and reaching the end at ±30%. Grey marks a small change, 3% or less either way.
BLS Employment Projections 2025-35
→ 2035
+2.4%
BLS National Employment Matrix, 2025-35 cycle, line for SOC 25-1051 (Atmospheric, earth, marine, and space sciences teachers, postsecondary): 12.0 thousand jobs in 2025, projected 12.3 thousand in 2035, a change of +0.3 thousand (+2.4%). Matrix employment counts all jobs in the occupation, including self-employed workers. The average for all occupations in this cycle is +3.5%.
Official statisticReport an error
How exposed is this work to AI (research measures)
Scores as published by each study. Each row says what it measures. These measure what AI could technically do, not forecasts of jobs lost.
Eloundou et al. (2023), "GPTs are GPTs"
2023 study · Share of tasks exposed to LLMs (β, human-rated)
40%
of tasks
What this measures

Published occupation-level exposure from the paper's occ_level.csv for O*NET-SOC 25-1051.00 Atmospheric, Earth, Marine, and Space Sciences Teachers, Postsecondary. Shown: human-rated β = 0.4, the share of the occupation's tasks an LLM could do in at least half the time at equal quality, counting tasks that need LLM-powered software at half weight (β = E1 + 0.5 × E2). Other published measures for this occupation: human-rated α (LLM alone) 0.15 and γ (all LLM-assisted) 0.65; GPT-4-rated β 0.475. This measures how much of the work an LLM could touch, not how many jobs disappear.

Official statisticReport an error
Today, in this role

What's changing day to day for earth science professors

Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.

AI is sitting alongside you hereGrade and provide feedback on student work (problem sets on atmospheric dynamics, geology lab reports, oceanographic data analysis assignments, and astronomy observation logs) using Gradescope AI-assisted answer grouping for structured short-answer and quantitative submissions, then applying domain expertise to evaluate whether student interpretations of geophysical data, model outputs, or field observations reflect genuine scientific reasoning.

Grade and provide feedback on student work (problem sets on atmospheric dynamics, geology lab reports, oceanographic data analysis assignments, and astronomy observation logs) using Gradescope AI-assisted answer grouping for structured short-answer and quantitative submissions, then applying domain expertise to evaluate whether student interpretations of geophysical data, model outputs, or field observations reflect genuine scientific reasoning.[14],[1]

Tools picking this up
Where your edge is

Deploy Gradescope for all earth-science assignments that have deterministic or semi-deterministic answers: atmospheric pressure calculations, seismic arrival time picks, ocean current vectors, stellar magnitude analysis. AI-assisted answer grouping clusters similar approaches so you apply a rubric once per solution strategy rather than once per submission, yielding the documented 30–50% grading time savings. Reserve expert evaluation for the judgment-intensive submissions: does this student's interpretation of the pressure gradient force correctly account for Coriolis? Does this geological cross-section interpretation make physical sense given the dip angles observed? These are the questions that distinguish scientific understanding from AI-generated plausibility, and they require your domain expertise to assess.

AI is sitting alongside you herePrepare course materials (syllabi, lecture slides, lab procedures, problem sets on structural geology, micrometeorology, ocean biogeochemistry, or planetary science) using AI tools (ChatGPT Edu, NotebookLM) to generate first-draft slides and synthesize background literature, then editing with domain expertise to ensure scientific accuracy, appropriate treatment of uncertainty, and alignment with current research practice in a field where AI tools are themselves part of the curriculum.

Prepare course materials (syllabi, lecture slides, lab procedures, problem sets on structural geology, micrometeorology, ocean biogeochemistry, or planetary science) using AI tools (ChatGPT Edu, NotebookLM) to generate first-draft slides and synthesize background literature, then editing with domain expertise to ensure scientific accuracy, appropriate treatment of uncertainty, and alignment with current research practice in a field where AI tools are themselves part of the curriculum.[1],[16]

Where your edge is

Use ChatGPT Edu to generate a first-draft 40-slide lecture on ocean thermohaline circulation or a problem set on seismic wave travel times: it will produce reasonable structure and standard content. Invest your expert effort in verifying physical accuracy (AI frequently confuses geostrophic balance conditions, misses Coriolis sign conventions in the Southern Hemisphere, or invents plausible-sounding but incorrect paleoclimate data), adding current research examples, and incorporating the AI-tool exercises that make your curriculum distinctive. NotebookLM is particularly effective for synthesizing many recent AGU or AMS papers into a coherent background section before writing a lecture on a fast-moving topic like AI-augmented numerical weather prediction.

AI is sitting alongside you hereKeep current with rapid advances in AI-augmented geoscience (monitoring new releases of foundation models for atmospheric prediction [GraphCast updates, Aurora fine-tuning results], AI-assisted exoplanet detection pipelines, AI ocean state analysis products from Copernicus Marine Service, and ML seismology tools) using AI research synthesis tools (Elicit, Consensus) to monitor high-velocity literature across multiple subfields simultaneously.

Keep current with rapid advances in AI-augmented geoscience (monitoring new releases of foundation models for atmospheric prediction [GraphCast updates, Aurora fine-tuning results], AI-assisted exoplanet detection pipelines, AI ocean state analysis products from Copernicus Marine Service, and ML seismology tools) using AI research synthesis tools (Elicit, Consensus) to monitor high-velocity literature across multiple subfields simultaneously.[15],[7]

Where your edge is

Use Elicit to set up standing literature monitoring queries across AGU, AMS, AAS, and Nature Geoscience publications: the field is advancing faster than any individual can track by reading journal tables of contents. Use Consensus to quickly evaluate whether a new preprint's AI weather model claim (e.g., "our model outperforms GraphCast on 10-day forecasts") is consistent with the broader benchmark literature before updating your course materials. Use NotebookLM to synthesize a semester's worth of new AI-in-geoscience developments before each course revision cycle. The key expert judgment is deciding which new AI tools represent genuine capability advances worth incorporating into research workflows or curriculum, versus incremental benchmarking papers that don't change practice: a discrimination that requires your domain expertise to make.

Where earth science professors go next

Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.

What each move takes

A direction you could grow

Education Administrators, Postsecondary

Atmospheric, earth, marine, and space science faculty who have demonstrated leadership in curriculum redesign, field program development, geoscience accreditation review, or interdisciplinary Earth-system science center management are strong candidates for department chair, associate dean of science, or director of geoscience research center roles. These departments are under significant pressure in 2025–2026 to integrate AI weather forecasting, remote sensing ML, and computational geoscience into degree programs, while also responding to the career disruption that AI is creating in operational meteorology and the growing demand for climate science graduates in the climate tech sector. Administrators with both deep geoscience credibility and governance experience are disproportionately valuable navigating these transitions. The CRI increase reflects that postsecondary education administration is growing (+7% BLS 2024–2034) and that climate/geoscience programs specifically are seeing increased enrollment as climate change drives demand.

What you'd add
  • · Higher education budget management: faculty line planning, observatory/field equipment capital requests, NOAA and NSF center grant indirect-cost administration, external advisory board management
  • · STEM accreditation processes: AGI (American Geosciences Institute) accreditation standards for geoscience BS programs, regional accreditation self-study coordination, AMS and AAS education program review
  • · Faculty performance review: promotion/tenure facilitation in field-intensive and cross-disciplinary programs, hiring committee leadership for computational vs. observational geoscience balance in the faculty portfolio
  • · Climate science and industry partnership development: relationships with NOAA, NASA, USGS, EPA for student internship pipelines; climate tech industry advisory boards; industry affiliate program structuring
  • · Institutional AI governance for STEM: developing department policies on AI use in coursework, research, and thesis writing; faculty AI tool procurement and training program design; vendor evaluation for geoscience-specific AI platforms
What it takesSome new skills to pick up
Tools of the era

How has the work of earth science professors changed since 1845?

The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.

  • Field notebook, hand lens, and transit (geological survey era)

    The equipment of the 19th-century earth-science professor was the same as the working geologist or astronomer: a Brunton compass, hand lens, rock hammer, field notebook, and for the astronomer, a transit telescope with attached chronograph. Course content was delivered by lecture and demonstration; laboratories were collections of minerals, fossils, and astronomical charts. Fieldwork was central from the start -- professors like Florence Bascom led students into the field, and field mapping was taught as a graduate skill from the 1890s onward.

  • Radiosonde and upper-air sounding networks (synoptic meteorology era)

    The radiosonde -- a balloon-borne instrument package transmitting temperature, pressure, and humidity data -- was developed in Europe in the early 1930s and adopted systematically by the U.S. Weather Bureau from 1937 onward. By World War II, a network of upper-air sounding stations covered the United States, and the data was the foundation for synoptic meteorology education. Penn State granted its first meteorology Bachelor's degrees in 1942 using weather chart analysis, radiosonde data, and surface observation records as the primary instructional materials. The professorships created in WWII-era training programs were built around teaching students to read these charts and soundings -- a skill that transformed atmospheric science from a vocation for weather hobbyists into a university discipline.

  • Mainframe numerical weather prediction (IBM 701, ENIAC first forecast 1950)

    On April 5, 1950, Jule Charney and colleagues at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton ran the first successful numerical weather prediction on the ENIAC computer -- a round-the-clock forecast computed in a day of machine time. This moment marks the origin of numerical weather prediction (NWP) as a computational discipline, and it transformed the theoretical content of atmospheric science education. By the late 1950s, university professors of meteorology were teaching mathematical models of atmospheric dynamics rather than (or alongside) empirical chart analysis. The IBM 701 became available to universities through the late 1950s, and facilities like NCAR (National Center for Atmospheric Research, founded 1960) gave faculty access to machines capable of research-grade forecasting. Earth science faculty gained access to similar large-scale computing for seismic modeling and oceanographic circulation modeling through the 1960s.

    Effect on the work

    The arrival of computing fundamentally changed the hiring profile for atmospheric and earth science faculty: a PhD in mathematical modeling became increasingly valued alongside traditional observational expertise, and departments began hiring dual-track faculties of field scientists and modelers.

  • Weather satellites and GOES system (Sputnik era; GOES-1 launched 1975)

    The Sputnik launch on October 4, 1957, shocked the US science establishment and directly precipitated the National Defense Education Act of 1958, which expanded NSF funding from $34 million (1957) to $134 million (1959). Earth and atmospheric science departments benefited substantially: new professorships were created, facilities were built, and the satellite observation era began. The TIROS-1 weather satellite launched in April 1960 returned the first photographs of cloud patterns from orbit. GOES-1 (Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite) launched in 1975 and began providing continuous, real-time satellite imagery of North America -- data that became core curriculum in meteorology and earth science courses. Faculty now had genuinely global observational data for teaching, a transformation as significant for atmospheric science as the telescope had been for astronomy three centuries earlier.

    Effect on the work

    Satellite data fundamentally expanded the scope and complexity of earth-science teaching: ocean surface temperature, land cover change, volcanic plumes, and storm systems became directly observable phenomena in real time rather than reconstructed from sparse surface observations. This expanded the research scope of faculty and drove hiring across all four subdisciplines in the 1960s and 1970s.

  • Workstations, GIS, and personal computing (NCAR Graphics, ArcInfo, seismic analysis software)

    The arrival of Unix workstations (Sun Microsystems, early 1980s) and the Macintosh (1984) put scientific computing directly on faculty desktops. NCAR developed a suite of scientific graphics and analysis software through the 1970s and 1980s that became standard in atmospheric science courses. ArcInfo (1982) launched the era of desktop GIS, transforming the way geology and earth science courses taught spatial analysis. Seismic analysis software (XSEED, SAC -- Seismic Analysis Code, developed at Lawrence Livermore in the 1980s) gave seismology faculty the ability to process waveform data on desktop machines rather than through centralized computing facilities. The Doppler weather radar network (NEXRAD, completed 1997) gave atmospheric faculty access to high-resolution precipitation and wind data for the first time. By the mid-1990s, internet access to real-time data (model output, satellite imagery, seismic streams) became available through UNIDATA (an Ucar program established 1983), restructuring how faculty designed observational exercises.

  • Hubble Space Telescope and large-aperture ground observatories (Keck 1990-1996, SDSS 2000)

    The Hubble Space Telescope launched April 24, 1990, and after the mirror correction in 1993, became the most productive astronomical research instrument in history. Keck I achieved first light in 1990 and Keck II in 1996 -- together they were the largest telescopes on Earth and accessible to university astronomers through telescope time allocation. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) launched in 2000 and produced the largest systematic redshift survey of galaxies, making a flood of standardized optical data freely available to faculty and students. These tools created a generation of observational astronomy faculty who could assign research projects using real SDSS data to undergraduate students -- a fundamental change in pedagogy, moving from demonstration to genuine research participation. The Hubble archive and SDSS data portals are now standard teaching tools in university astronomy courses worldwide.

  • Cloud geoscience platforms (Google Earth Engine 2010, Copernicus Open Access 2014)

    Google Earth Engine, launched in 2010, placed petabytes of satellite imagery and ML classifiers in a cloud environment freely accessible to university researchers and students in more than a hundred countries. The Copernicus programme (European Space Agency and EU) from 2014 onward made continuous high-resolution land, ocean, and atmosphere data openly available, fundamentally lowering the cost of incorporating real satellite data into earth science courses. Planet Labs (founded 2010) began providing daily global satellite imagery with AI-assisted change detection layers, used in marine and earth science research courses. PhaseNet (2018), a deep-learning seismic phase picker developed at Stanford and SCEC, compressed weeks of manual seismograph review to hours and became freely available for teaching datasets. These tools restructured the faculty role from gatekeeper of scarce data to guide of abundant, AI-processed data flows.

  • AI weather and earth-system foundation models (GraphCast, Microsoft Aurora, FourCastNet, Pangu-Weather)

    In December 2023, Google DeepMind published GraphCast in Science -- a graph neural network weather forecast model that outperforms ECMWF IFS (the previous global NWP benchmark) on 90% of 1,380 test variables across lead times. NVIDIA's FourCastNet generates a global 0.25-degree forecast in seconds. Huawei's Pangu-Weather, published in Nature (2023), matches ECMWF IFS at up to lead times, 10,000 times faster. Microsoft Research's Aurora (May 2024, arXiv), a 1.3-billion-parameter atmospheric foundation model, outperforms GraphCast and Pangu-Weather on multiple benchmarks and can be fine-tuned for weather, air quality, tropical cyclone intensity, solar wind, and ocean waves. For atmospheric, earth, marine, and space science faculty, these tools have arrived simultaneously as research accelerators (accessible without supercomputer access), as course content (teaching students to evaluate when and why AI forecast models fail requires the exact physical intuition the course exists to develop), and as a new professional competency to impart. The Federal Reserve (February 2026) places Life, Physical, and Social Science Teachers in the above-average exposure band for postsecondary AI impact, consistent with the observation that routine lecture preparation, question-bank generation, and structured grading have become substantially compressible -- while field supervision, AI-model critique, and graduate research mentorship remain irreducibly human.

    Effect on the work

    AI earth-science tools are augmenting rather than displacing faculty, but the reorientation is significant: the defining faculty advantage is now the ability to explain why an AI weather model is physically wrong, which requires the same geophysical intuition these courses have always aimed to develop -- but now with AI model critique as the explicit pedagogical objective.

Part of Education · see all 51 roles →
Different role?

See the same long-arc view for your own profession.

Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.

Browse all roles

Atmospheric, Earth, Marine, and Space Sciences Teachers, Postsecondary employment and pay by year

On record since1845
Latest US employment9,900 (May 2025)Source: BLS OEWS May 2025Official statisticReport an error
Latest US median pay$103,170 (May 2025)Source: BLS OEWS May 2025Official statisticReport an error
Outlook+2.4% by 2035Source: BLS Employment Projections 2025-35Official statisticReport an error
View all 31 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
YearUS employmentAnnual pay (median unless marked)SourceReport
1900800n/aEst., Bryn Mawr College Researched contextReport
19201,400n/aEst., American Meteorological Society Researched contextReport
19503,200n/aEst., National Academies Press Researched contextReport
1960n/a$7,200Est., University of Missouri Libraries Researched contextReport
19707,000n/aEst., U.S. Senate Researched contextReport
1980n/a$25,000Est., University of Missouri Libraries Researched contextReport
199010,500n/aEst., NASA Researched contextReport
200011,800$60,000Est., O*NET 25-1051.00 Researched contextReport
20038,420$63,310BLS OEWS May 2003 Official statisticReport
20048,660$65,350BLS OEWS May 2004 Official statisticReport
20058,810$65,720BLS OEWS May 2005 Official statisticReport
20068,670$69,300BLS OEWS May 2006 Official statisticReport
20079,030$73,280BLS OEWS May 2007 Official statisticReport
20089,650$76,050BLS OEWS May 2008 Official statisticReport
20099,900$78,660BLS OEWS May 2009 Official statisticReport
201010,680$82,840BLS OEWS May 2010 Official statisticReport
201110,660$83,140BLS OEWS May 2011 Official statisticReport
201210,930$82,180BLS OEWS May 2012 Official statisticReport
201310,690$81,640BLS OEWS May 2013 Official statisticReport
201410,890$81,780BLS OEWS May 2014 Official statisticReport
201510,890$83,150BLS OEWS May 2015 Official statisticReport
201610,850$85,410BLS OEWS May 2016 Official statisticReport
201710,730$87,380BLS OEWS May 2017 Official statisticReport
201811,020$90,860BLS OEWS May 2018 Official statisticReport
201911,020$92,040BLS OEWS May 2019 Official statisticReport
202011,750$94,520BLS OEWS May 2020 Official statisticReport
202110,250$98,070BLS OEWS May 2021 Official statisticReport
202211,150$97,770BLS OEWS May 2022 Official statisticReport
202311,770$100,690BLS OEWS May 2023 Official statisticReport
202411,480$101,390BLS OEWS May 2024 Official statisticReport
20259,900$103,170BLS OEWS May 2025 Official statisticReport
Embed this timeline on your site

Free for any site. Paste this where the timeline should appear; it stays interactive, every datapoint stays cited, and it sets no cookies on your page. How embedding works

<iframe src="https://futurehistory.earth/embed/25-1051"
  width="100%" height="430" style="border:0"
  title="Atmospheric, Earth, Marine, and Space Sciences Teachers, Postsecondary, a Future History timeline"
  loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:13px;margin:4px 0 0"><a href="https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/25-1051">Atmospheric, Earth, Marine, and Space Sciences Teachers, Postsecondary: jobs and pay over time</a>, from Future History</p>

See all roles in Education