Skip to sources
Time Machine

Social work professors

Official title Social Work Teachers, Postsecondary (SOC 25-1113)

Also called MSW professor, BSW professor, Social work faculty, Social work lecturer, Social work instructor

In brief

In May 2025, BLS counted 12,610 US social work professors, with median pay of $77,570 a year. Of the BLS counts since 2003, the highest was 13,640, in May 2019. The earliest figure here is an estimate of 2,200 from 1950, not measured the same way as today's count. The last full technology era for social work professors: Online MSW programs, 2005 to 2020.

What the sources say

Official outlook

BLS projects employment to grow 2.6% from 2025 to 2035.

BLS Employment Projections 2025-35

AI exposure studies

Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. BLS publishes these counts as yearly survey snapshots and cautions against reading them as a precise trend. In May 2021 BLS changed how it estimates these counts (a model-based method using three years of survey data) and moved fully to the 2018 occupation codes, so part of a change across 2021 can come from the method rather than the work.

Last updated .

Cite this page
APA

Future History. (2026, October 11). Social work professors: jobs and pay since 1950 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/25-1113

Chicago

Future History. "Social work professors: jobs and pay since 1950." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 11, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/25-1113.

BibTeX

@misc{futurehistory_25_1113, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Social work professors: jobs and pay since 1950}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/25-1113}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-11. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }

The access date is today's date on your device.

drag to travel through time
19001925195019752000now
2026
Known then as Summer School Instructor / Charity Training Lecturer (philanthropic training era)
Known then as Social Work Instructor / Social Welfare Professor (pre-accreditation university era)
Known then as Social Work Professor / MSW Program Faculty (CSWE accreditation, graduate-only era)
Known then as Social Work Professor / BSW and MSW Faculty (BSW accreditation expansion era)
Known then as Social Work Faculty / Social Work Educator (adjunctification era)
Known then as Social Work Teachers, Postsecondary (BLS SOC 25-1113)
Known today as Social Work Teachers, Postsecondary (BLS SOC 25-1113)
Projected to still be called Social Work Teachers, Postsecondary (BLS SOC 25-1113)
Data from the May 2025 survey
US Employment
13K
Est.

Stated in source: BLS OEWS

Official statistic
Report an error
Median Annual Wage
$77,570
Est.

≈ $75,581 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)

Official statistic
Report an error
Beat · 1898

The first Summer School in Philanthropic Work opens at 105 East 22nd Street, New York City, organized by the New York Charity Organization Society. Twenty-five students attend a six-week program combining formal lectures from experienced charity workers with supervised field visits to settlements, hospitals, and relief agencies. Mary Richmond had argued the year before that the field needed systematic training rather than informal apprenticeship. The instructors are practice professionals -- not academic faculty in the modern sense -- but they are the first people to hold the role of teaching social work to others in a formal institutional setting.

Beat · 1917

Mary Richmond publishes "Social Diagnosis" -- the first systematically organized social work textbook. The book synthesizes the casework method across charity organization, medical social work, and child welfare practice, establishing the core intellectual content that social work educators would teach for the next forty years. The case study method, borrowed from law, becomes the defining pedagogy of social work education: faculty teach from real cases, anonymized and reproduced in course packets.

Beat · 1935

Columbia University School of Social Work faculty assist Frances Perkins in drafting the Social Security Act. The connection between social work education and federal social policy becomes institutionally concrete: faculty are not only teachers but active architects of the welfare state. This dual identity -- academic expert and policy practitioner -- remains a distinguishing feature of senior social work faculty into the 2000s.

Beat · 1952

CSWE is formally constituted in January 1952, unifying the American Association of Schools of Social Work (AASSW) and the National Association of Schools of Social Administration (NASSA) into a single accreditation body. Helen R. Wright, dean of the University of Chicago's School of Social Service Administration, is named CSWE's first president; Katherine A. Kendall becomes CSWE's executive secretary. The founding creates the institutional infrastructure -- accreditation standards, curriculum requirements, faculty qualification rules -- that transforms social work teaching from an informal practice into a defined occupation.

Beat · 1964

The Economic Opportunity Act (1964) and the Social Security Amendments creating Medicare and Medicaid (1965) dramatically expand the demand for trained social workers in federal programs. This Great Society wave is the largest single expansion driver in the history of social work faculty employment: new community mental health centers, Head Start programs, AFDC caseworker requirements, and Medicaid-funded social services all required MSW-trained workers, generating demand for the programs that train them -- and for the faculty who teach in those programs.

Beat · 1974

The National Commission on Accrediting formally authorizes CSWE to accredit baccalaureate social work (BSW) programs. CSWE had issued BSW accreditation standards in 1973; the 1974 formal authorization opened the floodgates: approximately 151 undergraduate programs received BSW accreditation approval in the first wave. Every new BSW program required faculty -- typically 4-6 full-time positions. The BSW accreditation expansion of 1974-1985 is the fastest period of faculty employment growth in the occupation's history.

Beat · 1991

Columbia University School of Social Work establishes its first fully endowed professorship in 1991, reflecting the belated arrival of major philanthropy in a discipline whose research base had long been funded primarily through government grants rather than donor endowments. The endowed chair era marks social work's gradual movement toward the academic prestige structures of other professional schools -- though it came decades later than law, medicine, or business.

Beat · 2022

CSWE's Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards (EPAS 2022) takes effect, introducing technology competency as a core practice behavior for the first time: "Social workers understand the use of technology in the delivery of social work practice, including the ethical use of technology in data collection, outcomes measurement, service delivery, and administrative functions." This is a curriculum mandate, not a suggestion -- every CSWE-accredited program must demonstrate that its curriculum addresses technology competency, which in practice means social work faculty are now required to teach content about algorithmic tools, AI decision-support systems, and data privacy that most did not train for in their own MSW programs.

How to read this number

OEWS is a point-in-time survey snapshot, not a continuous time series; BLS advises against using it for year-over-year trend comparison.

Each dot is a cited figure over time; the dotted line only links them (values between aren't measured). Hollow dots are estimates.

Official statistic: Copied by a script from a statistics agency table or a published study's table, not retyped by hand. BLS figures and the forecast and exposure tables are also re-checked against that table on every data run. Researched context: Researched from the cited source rather than copied from it by a script, so it is not machine-checked yet. Spot a mistake? Each figure has a “Report an error” link.

Cited forecasts · present → 2035

Will AI replace social work professors? What the research says

Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.

Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.

What published forecasts say
Forecast change in the number of people doing this work, as published by each named source. Bars share one scale on every role, centred on zero and reaching the end at ±30%. Grey marks a small change, 3% or less either way.
BLS Employment Projections 2025-35
→ 2035
+2.6%
BLS National Employment Matrix, 2025-35 cycle, line for SOC 25-1113 (Social work teachers, postsecondary): 16.0 thousand jobs in 2025, projected 16.4 thousand in 2035, a change of +0.4 thousand (+2.6%). Matrix employment counts all jobs in the occupation, including self-employed workers. The average for all occupations in this cycle is +3.5%.
Official statisticReport an error
How exposed is this work to AI (research measures)
Scores as published by each study. Each row says what it measures. These measure what AI could technically do, not forecasts of jobs lost.
Eloundou et al. (2023), "GPTs are GPTs"
2023 study · Share of tasks exposed to LLMs (β, human-rated)
51.1%
of tasks
What this measures

Published occupation-level exposure from the paper's occ_level.csv for O*NET-SOC 25-1113.00 Social Work Teachers, Postsecondary. Shown: human-rated β = 0.511, the share of the occupation's tasks an LLM could do in at least half the time at equal quality, counting tasks that need LLM-powered software at half weight (β = E1 + 0.5 × E2). Other published measures for this occupation: human-rated α (LLM alone) 0.295 and γ (all LLM-assisted) 0.727; GPT-4-rated β 0.42. This measures how much of the work an LLM could touch, not how many jobs disappear.

Official statisticReport an error
Today, in this role

What's changing day to day for social work professors

Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.

AI is sitting alongside you hereEvaluate and grade student assessments: using Gradescope AI-assisted answer grouping for structured-knowledge assessments in large-enrollment BSW foundation courses (Social Welfare Policy, HBSE, Social Work Research Methods) to batch short-answer and multiple-choice responses for efficient grading, running written assignments through Turnitin AI detection as a flag for further scrutiny of process recordings and case analyses that may reflect AI generation rather than authentic clinical reasoning, and applying expert clinical judgment for all evaluations of process recordings, reflective journals, and clinical case analyses that require assessment of developing professional identity and practice skill.

Evaluate and grade student assessments: using Gradescope AI-assisted answer grouping for structured-knowledge assessments in large-enrollment BSW foundation courses (Social Welfare Policy, HBSE, Social Work Research Methods) to batch short-answer and multiple-choice responses for efficient grading, running written assignments through Turnitin AI detection as a flag for further scrutiny of process recordings and case analyses that may reflect AI generation rather than authentic clinical reasoning, and applying expert clinical judgment for all evaluations of process recordings, reflective journals, and clinical case analyses that require assessment of developing professional identity and practice skill.[12],[5]

Tools picking this up
Where your edge is

Large-enrollment BSW foundation courses (Social Policy, HBSE) at regional universities and R1 programs often have about a hundred students per section: Gradescope's AI-assisted answer grouping is directly applicable for the structured-knowledge components (policy timeline matching, ethical principle identification, DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria). The faculty-irreplaceable grading work is in the clinical sequence: process recordings, critical reflection journals, and clinical case analyses cannot be reliably AI-graded because they require assessment of clinical reasoning quality, not surface correctness. The Turnitin AI detection flag is most useful here precisely because a high AI probability score on a process recording is clinically significant: it may mean the student did not actually conduct the session they documented, which is a professional conduct concern, not just an academic integrity issue. Use Gradescope to recover time on rote-knowledge grading; invest that time in detailed feedback on clinical reasoning in process recordings.

AI is sitting alongside you hereDesign and deliver lectures on social work theory, policy, and practice: using ChatGPT Edu to generate first-draft lecture scaffolds (case vignettes illustrating micro/macro practice tensions, policy timeline summaries, HBSE developmental milestone tables) for courses in social welfare policy, human behavior and the social environment, social work research methods, and practice skills, then substantively revising AI output for disciplinary accuracy, CSWE EPAS 2022 competency alignment, and cultural humility in case example representation before delivery

Design and deliver lectures on social work theory, policy, and practice: using ChatGPT Edu to generate first-draft lecture scaffolds (case vignettes illustrating micro/macro practice tensions, policy timeline summaries, HBSE developmental milestone tables) for courses in social welfare policy, human behavior and the social environment, social work research methods, and practice skills, then substantively revising AI output for disciplinary accuracy, CSWE EPAS 2022 competency alignment, and cultural humility in case example representation before delivery; embedding AI ethics content (algorithmic bias in child welfare tools, NASW Code of Ethics on technology use) as required curriculum across relevant course content areas.[5],[3]

Where your edge is

ChatGPT Edu can scaffold a competent lecture outline on the Social Security Act amendments, a case vignette illustrating strengths-based assessment, or a summary of motivational interviewing stages in under two minutes: the structural scaffolding is genuinely useful. The faculty contribution that AI cannot replace: situating AI-generated examples in the lived realities of marginalized populations (does this vignette center the client's perspective or reinscribe deficit framing?), integrating the most current NASW AI ethics guidance and CSWE competency language, and building lecture content around algorithmic bias tools (the AFST, Eckerd RFD, Virginia FART suspension) that are now required curriculum per JSWE (2025) and NASW (2025). Use ChatGPT Edu to draft; invest recaptured time in updating examples for cultural specificity and in designing in-class case analyses of real-world AI decision tools that students will encounter in their field placements.

AI is sitting alongside you hereTrain BSW and MSW students in AI-assisted clinical documentation tools, teaching the use of ambient session note-drafting tools (Eleos Health, Upheal) as a required clinical skills competency in MSW clinical concentration courses

Train BSW and MSW students in AI-assisted clinical documentation tools, teaching the use of ambient session note-drafting tools (Eleos Health, Upheal) as a required clinical skills competency in MSW clinical concentration courses; reviewing HIPAA and NASW Code of Ethics requirements for AI documentation tools in field placement settings; supervising student documentation of clinical contacts in AI-assisted systems during practicum; evaluating whether AI-drafted notes accurately capture the student's clinical reasoning, not just the session content; and ensuring students understand that attestation to AI-generated documentation is a personal professional responsibility under their eventual license.[6],[10],[4]

Tools picking this up
Where your edge is

Social Work Today (2025) identifies documentation AI training as the single most requested curriculum gap by field supervisors in MSW programs: students are arriving at clinical placements in behavioral health agencies where Eleos Health and similar tools are already in use, and faculty have not yet trained them to use these tools with appropriate professional judgment. The training function is straightforward: teach students how ambient documentation AI works, what it captures and what it misses (tone, client affect, the clinical significance of what was not said), and how to review and attest to AI-drafted notes as a licensed professional. The faculty-irreplaceable judgment is in evaluation: a student's Eleos-drafted note may be grammatically correct and HIPAA-compliant while failing to document the clinical reasoning behind an intervention choice, identifying that gap requires a faculty member with clinical expertise who understands what belongs in a social work clinical record.

Where social work professors go next

Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.

What each move takes

A direction you could grow

Social and Community Service Managers

Social work faculty (particularly those who have led MSW or BSW program administration, directed field education offices, or managed CSWE accreditation self-study processes) are natural candidates for leadership roles in social services agencies, nonprofit organizations, and government social programs. The CRI increase reflects that social and community service managers (+7% BLS growth 2024-2034) have a higher augmentationUpside ceiling than faculty in the 2025-2026 AI environment, with AI-powered case management platforms (Casebook, Penelope, Bonterra) being deployed at their agencies. Social work faculty bring accreditation governance experience (CSWE self-study preparation is directly analogous to agency compliance audit preparation), curriculum and program development skills (program design for agency training is structurally similar to academic program design), research and outcomes measurement literacy (grant reporting, program evaluation), and algorithmic bias expertise that is increasingly required as agencies adopt AI decision-support tools. For faculty seeking to exit the academic job market while remaining in social work, agency leadership offers competitive salaries with more predictable advancement than the tenure track.

What you'd add
  • · Nonprofit financial management, reading and presenting organizational budgets to boards; grant compliance reporting for federal (SAMHSA, Children's Bureau Title IV-E, HUD) and foundation funders; cost center management and personnel budgeting
  • · Agency AI governance, developing organizational policies for responsible AI tool use; evaluating case management AI platforms (Casebook, Penelope) for bias and equity; maintaining staff training on AI tools and override obligations per CWLA (2024) and NASW (2025) standards
  • · Program evaluation and outcomes measurement: logic model development; performance measure alignment with funder reporting requirements; data visualization for board presentations; using agency data infrastructure (Apricot, Social Solutions, Efforts to Outcomes) for outcomes tracking
  • · Human resources management in social services: social work licensure supervision in agency settings (providing documented LCSW-level supervision for LMSW candidates); agency staff retention in a high-turnover sector (22-30% annual CPS turnover per Children's Bureau 2025); burnout prevention and trauma-informed supervision practices
  • · Regulatory compliance and accreditation: CARF or COA accreditation standards for behavioral health and social services agencies; state licensing requirements for residential programs, child welfare agencies, and outpatient mental health clinics; HIPAA compliance audits and documentation standards for AI-assisted clinical records
What it takesSome new skills to pick up
Tools of the era

How has the work of social work professors changed since 1898?

The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.

  • Chalk, mimeograph, and casebook (pre-accreditation, charity-training era)

    The first social work teachers worked with the same technology as any educator of the era: chalk on a blackboard, printed pamphlets and reform tracts, and eventually carbon-paper duplicated case studies. The "casebook method" -- using detailed written case studies of family situations as the primary teaching vehicle, borrowed from law -- became the signature pedagogy of social work education in the 1920s and 1930s. Mary Richmond's "Social Diagnosis" (1917) became the first canonical social work textbook and established the case record as the field's core teaching document. By the 1940s, mimeograph machines allowed instructors to duplicate field notes, agency intake forms, and case vignettes for classroom use -- the social work equivalent of the law school casebook, reproduced at scale for a fraction of the cost.

  • CSWE accreditation standards + overhead projector (professionalization era)

    The founding of CSWE in January 1952 transformed social work teaching from charity-worker instruction into an accreditation-governed academic discipline. CSWE's Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards (EPAS) introduced curriculum requirements that shaped what faculty were required to teach: social casework, group work, community organization, social policy, and research methods. The overhead projector, which became standard in US university classrooms through the 1950s and 1960s, was the era's primary visual presentation technology -- social work faculty used it to project policy diagrams, organizational charts of social service systems, and case record excerpts enlarged for classroom discussion. The accreditation structure was the more significant "technology": it imposed a curriculum template that created consistent demand for a trained faculty corps and set minimum faculty-to-student ratios that became a floor on faculty employment.

  • Photocopier + word processor (BSW expansion and documentation era)

    The photocopier displaced the mimeograph in most US university classrooms through the late 1960s and 1970s, and for social work faculty it unlocked something specific: the ability to reproduce real case records, agency intake forms, and field supervision logs for classroom case analysis. Social work education had always been document-intensive -- the process recording, the psychosocial assessment, the service plan -- and the photocopier made it feasible to build course packets from anonymized agency documents at scale. The 1974 formal authorization by the National Commission on Accrediting for CSWE to accredit BSW programs created a large new market for social work faculty at the undergraduate level; the photocopier was the administrative infrastructure that made the rapid program expansion operationally possible. Wang and IBM word processors arrived in faculty offices in the early 1980s, allowing faculty to produce syllabi, course materials, and scholarly manuscripts without typist support for the first time.

    Effect on the work

    BSW accreditation (1974) roughly doubled the addressable market for social work faculty by adding undergraduate programs to the existing MSW program base. Employment grew substantially through the late 1970s and early 1980s as hundreds of BSW programs achieved CSWE accreditation approval.

  • Email, the Internet, and course management systems (LMS era)

    Email arrived in faculty offices at most US universities by the early 1990s and transformed the student-faculty advising relationship almost immediately: faculty could now be reached outside office hours, clinical supervision questions could be answered between sessions, and field placement coordination with agency supervisors became asynchronous. Blackboard launched its course management system in 1998; Web CT was already in use at many schools by 1996. For social work faculty, course management systems mattered particularly for field education administration -- tracking student hours, uploading process recordings for faculty review, and managing the large administrative load of field liaison responsibilities. The Internet also unlocked a new resource for social work courses: government data sources (Social Security Administration, Census Bureau poverty statistics, CDC health disparities data) became directly accessible for policy analysis assignments, replacing the library card-catalog hunt that had previously consumed significant student research time.

  • Online MSW programs (USC, Fordham, Michigan, then proliferation to 200+ programs)

    The University of Southern California's Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work launched one of the first large-scale online MSW programs in the mid-2000s; Fordham and the University of Michigan followed. By 2015, online MSW programs had proliferated to many accredited options; by 2020, hundreds of CSWE-accredited programs offered fully online or hybrid MSW degrees. The effect on social work faculty was profound and mixed: online programs created substantial new demand for faculty (particularly clinical-sequence adjuncts and field education coordinators), but the business model relied heavily on part-time and clinical affiliate faculty rather than tenured lines. The ratio of adjunct to full-time social work faculty grew sharply through the 2010s. Synchronous online class sessions via Zoom (widely adopted by 2018) replaced weekend intensive face-to-face formats at many programs, reshaping the social work classroom from a physical gathering into a distributed video environment. The online MSW boom is the primary driver of the employment growth in 25-1113 between 2000 and 2024.

    Effect on the work

    Online MSW enrollment grew between 2005 and 2020, creating demand for several thousand additional social work faculty positions -- but disproportionately filled by clinical adjuncts at below-median wages rather than tenured faculty lines. The overall employment count grew substantially while the share of contingent faculty in the occupation also grew.

  • Pandemic pivot: Zoom, Mursion AI simulation, and telehealth practice integration

    In March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic forced virtually every social work program to shift overnight to fully remote delivery. For residential programs that had resisted the online format, this was a crash course in videoconferencing, virtual field supervision, and the practical limits of teaching empathic communication skills on a screen. CSWE issued emergency accreditation guidance permitting telepractice field placements for the first time -- a decision that permanently changed what counts as acceptable field education. AI simulation platforms (Mursion, Avatarize) that had been piloted at a handful of programs before the pandemic became suddenly attractive as a way to provide clinical practice experience when in-person role-play was impossible. The Frontiers in Education study (2021) documented that social work students in distance learning reported increased workloads and socialization difficulties, while faculty reported particular stress in maintaining the relational quality of clinical supervision over video. The pandemic cohort's experience has since been analyzed in multiple JSWE papers (2022-2024) as a natural experiment in which modality best develops clinical competence -- with results suggesting hybrid is preferable to fully remote for skills-intensive clinical sequences.

  • AI client simulation (Mursion) + AI documentation training (Eleos Health) + generative AI course scaffolding (ChatGPT Edu)

    Three distinct AI tool classes entered the social work classroom in 2023-2025, each reshaping a different part of the faculty role. First: AI client simulation (Mursion) allows faculty to deploy unlimited pre-practicum skills-practice sessions with AI-facilitated standardized clients -- domestic violence disclosures, crisis intervention, motivational interviewing -- scaling practice opportunities that previously required live role-play coordination. JSWE (2025) systematic review of eight programs documented significant pre-post improvements in student self-efficacy for difficult conversations. Second: AI ambient documentation tools (Eleos Health, Upheal) arrived in the field placements where students train; Social Work Today (March 2025) identified documentation AI training as the single most requested curriculum gap among field supervisors. Third: generative AI course-prep tools (ChatGPT Edu, NotebookLM) compressed the time required to scaffold a social policy lecture, generate case vignettes, or draft a syllabus -- JSWE (2024) found that 62% of social work faculty already used AI tools for course preparation. None of these tools replaces the accreditation-mandated human functions (licensed faculty of record for clinical sequences, field liaison site visits, process recording evaluation); each reshapes what the human faculty member does with recovered time.

Part of Education · see all 51 roles →
Different role?

See the same long-arc view for your own profession.

Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.

Browse all roles

Social Work Teachers, Postsecondary employment and pay by year

On record since1898
Latest US employment12,610 (May 2025)Source: BLS OEWS May 2025Official statisticReport an error
Latest US median pay$77,570 (May 2025)Source: BLS OEWS May 2025Official statisticReport an error
Outlook+2.6% by 2035Source: BLS Employment Projections 2025-35Official statisticReport an error
View all 28 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
YearUS employmentAnnual pay (median unless marked)SourceReport
19502,200n/aEst., CSWE Researched contextReport
19705,500n/aEst., Council on Social Work Education Researched contextReport
1975n/a$15,200Est., AAUP Faculty Compensation Survey… Researched contextReport
19908,500n/aEst., CSWE Researched contextReport
200010,200$47,000Est., O*NET 25-1113.00 (employment) Researched contextEst., AAUP Faculty Compensation Survey… (pay) Researched contextReport
20036,470$51,360BLS OEWS May 2003 Official statisticReport
20046,670$51,960BLS OEWS May 2004 Official statisticReport
20057,440$52,660BLS OEWS May 2005 Official statisticReport
20067,860$54,340BLS OEWS May 2006 Official statisticReport
20077,510$56,240BLS OEWS May 2007 Official statisticReport
20087,930$59,140BLS OEWS May 2008 Official statisticReport
20098,290$61,010BLS OEWS May 2009 Official statisticReport
20109,370$63,090BLS OEWS May 2010 Official statisticReport
20119,970$63,480BLS OEWS May 2011 Official statisticReport
20129,810$63,250BLS OEWS May 2012 Official statisticReport
201310,780$64,280BLS OEWS May 2013 Official statisticReport
201410,970$62,440BLS OEWS May 2014 Official statisticReport
201511,740$63,390BLS OEWS May 2015 Official statisticReport
201611,860$64,030BLS OEWS May 2016 Official statisticReport
201712,430$64,370BLS OEWS May 2017 Official statisticReport
201812,620$68,300BLS OEWS May 2018 Official statisticReport
201913,640$72,070BLS OEWS May 2019 Official statisticReport
202013,580$71,570BLS OEWS May 2020 Official statisticReport
202112,280$71,010BLS OEWS May 2021 Official statisticReport
202212,050$66,510BLS OEWS May 2022 Official statisticReport
202311,730$75,020BLS OEWS May 2023 Official statisticReport
202413,350$76,210BLS OEWS May 2024 Official statisticReport
202512,610$77,570BLS OEWS May 2025 Official statisticReport
Embed this timeline on your site

Free for any site. Paste this where the timeline should appear; it stays interactive, every datapoint stays cited, and it sets no cookies on your page. How embedding works

<iframe src="https://futurehistory.earth/embed/25-1113"
  width="100%" height="430" style="border:0"
  title="Social Work Teachers, Postsecondary, a Future History timeline"
  loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:13px;margin:4px 0 0"><a href="https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/25-1113">Social Work Teachers, Postsecondary: jobs and pay over time</a>, from Future History</p>

See all roles in Education