Skip to sources
Time Machine

Communications Teachers, Postsecondary

Scrub through 157years of this role's history, from when it first emerged, through every wave of technology that reshaped it, to the cited projections for where it's heading next.

2026drag to travel through time
19001925195019752000now
2026
Known today as Communications Teachers, Postsecondary (BLS SOC 25-1122 / NCA era)
Latest actual · 2024
36K
BLS OEWS May 2024, sourced from O*NET which reflects the same BLS establishment-survey figure. Employment has been broadly stable across the 2010s-2020s after the post-2008 hiring contraction at many universities; the 35,800 figure is the present-day anchor for projections. Note: the curated file for this role (25-1122.00.ts) cites a higher BLS OES May 2025 figure of approximately 68,450 with a median wage of $80,840; that figure includes all postsecondary communication teachers across all employment categories, while the O*NET 2024 OEWS figure of 35,800 may reflect a narrower base-year estimate. The backfill script will resolve this against the full OEWS 2024 flat-file figure.
Latest actual · 2024
$77,800
O*NET / BLS OEWS May 2024 median annual wage for Communications Teachers, Postsecondary (25-1122). The curated file for 25-1122.00 cites BLS OES May 2025 median of $80,840, consistent with continued modest growth. Communication faculty wages have grown in nominal terms over the 2000s-2020s but remain below the postsecondary teacher all-discipline median of $83,980 (May 2024), reflecting the discipline's position in the lower-wage tier of arts and humanities faculty versus STEM and professional school disciplines.
Each dot is a cited figure over time; the dotted line only links them (values between aren't measured). Hollow dots are estimates.
Beat · 2025

AEJMC's 2025 AI Task Force Report found that 73% of journalism and communication faculty had already revised course learning outcomes to address generative AI, the highest discipline-specific revision rate found in any academic survey of that period. The report identified three curricular imperatives that communications faculty were uniquely positioned to address: teaching synthetic media literacy and deepfake detection as professional competencies; redesigning assessment to prioritize the process of source verification and original reporting over the production of polished text artifacts; and re-grounding media ethics pedagogy in live cases where the ethical obligations of journalism and communication in an AI-generated information environment are still being actively debated.

Tools of the era

The tools that defined the work

Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.

  • Elocution manuals and the speaking body (pre-electronic pedagogy)

    The founding technology of the communications teaching profession was the printed elocution manual combined with the professor's own body as demonstration instrument. Texts like Samuel Silas Curry's "The Province of Expression" (1891) and James Rush's earlier "The Philosophy of the Human Voice" (1827) gave instructors a written foundation; the classroom was a space for vocal drills, gesture training, and the performance of set pieces. The blackboard was the only classroom technology. Teaching was entirely experiential: you watched the professor demonstrate a rhetorical figure, you practiced it, you were critiqued. Assessment was public recitation. The professor's primary qualification was mastery of the performing arts of oratory and elocution.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Radio broadcasting and the first mass media lab (KDKA 1920 through early TV era)

    Commercial radio broadcasting launched with KDKA Pittsburgh on November 2, 1920, and within a decade universities with communication programs were running on-campus broadcast studios for teaching purposes. The University of Wisconsin's WHA Radio (1917, licensed 1922) was among the first. For communications faculty, radio introduced a genuinely new pedagogical object: students had to learn not just to speak persuasively in person but to perform for an invisible, distributed audience, projecting personality and information through a microphone. The Wisconsin faculty (whose Department of Public Speaking became the Department of Speech in 1920) were among the first to integrate broadcast media into a speech curriculum. By the late 1940s, with television beginning its commercial expansion, communications programs were adding broadcast production to their course offerings and confronting the question of what it meant to teach visual media alongside oral performance.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Social science research methods and the "four founders" model (Lazarsfeld, Lewin, Hovland, Lasswell)

    The institutionalization of communication as an empirical social science was driven by four scholars whose wartime work transformed how the discipline understood itself. Paul Lazarsfeld (Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia, 1944), Kurt Lewin (group dynamics), Carl Hovland (persuasion research), and Harold Lasswell (political communication) collectively introduced survey research, content analysis, and experimental methodology into communication departments alongside the older speech pedagogy tradition. Wilbur Schramm founded the Institute for Communications Research at Illinois in 1947, the model for subsequent academic research centers. For communications faculty, this era introduced a profound identity division: were they training practitioners (speech teachers, journalists, broadcasters) or conducting social scientific research? The departmental name changes of the era (from "Speech" toward "Speech Communication" or "Journalism and Communication") reflected this ambivalence. Faculty hired in this era needed both rhetorical knowledge and social science methods.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Video production suites and the journalism lab (professional-grade cameras, editing bays)

    The 1970s broadcast television expansion created massive demand for trained journalists, producers, and PR professionals, and communications programs responded by building professional-grade campus newsrooms and broadcast labs. Facilities with ENG (electronic news gathering) cameras, editing suites, and student-run campus TV stations became the defining capital investment of a communications program's credibility in this era. The Missouri Method, with its student newspaper and later its broadcast station, became the template many programs followed: teach through professional production, not just classroom theory. For faculty, this meant that a research publication record was no longer sufficient preparation for teaching broadcast production courses; the dual-track hiring pattern (research faculty versus industry-professional lecturers) became common in journalism and broadcast programs and has persisted to the present.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • World Wide Web and digital newsroom tools (Mosaic 1993, online journalism labs, HTML/CMS platforms)

    The introduction of Mosaic in 1993 and the subsequent explosive growth of the commercial web forced communications faculty to add digital media literacy to a curriculum that was already carrying speech, journalism, broadcasting, and public relations. The first "online journalism" courses appeared at major programs in the mid-1990s; by the early 2000s most journalism programs had added a digital reporting track alongside print and broadcast. Content management systems (WordPress launched 2003), blogging, and the collapse of the traditional news business model (accelerated by Craigslist's disruption of newspaper classified advertising from about 2000) created a period of intense curricular pressure and existential debate. The Chronicle of Higher Education covered this era as "the death of the journalism school"; in practice, programs expanded rather than contracted because communication as an undergraduate major grew during the internet era, even as journalism program enrollment fell.

    Effect on the work

    Communication programs experienced divergent enrollment trends in this era: journalism programs saw enrollment declines as students questioned the career prospects in a contracting newspaper industry, while communication studies, PR, and media studies programs grew strongly. Total bachelor's degrees in communication and journalism grew from roughly 50,000 per year in 1993 to over 65,000 by 2010 (NCES).

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Social media and mobile platforms (Facebook 2004, Twitter 2006, iPhone 2007, Instagram 2010)

    The smartphone and social media era transformed communications pedagogy more comprehensively than any prior technology. Every sub-field of the discipline was affected: journalism faculty added social media reporting and verification to syllabi; PR faculty added social media strategy and crisis communication on digital platforms; speech communication faculty added digital self-presentation and online persuasion; organizational communication faculty added computer-mediated communication theory. Yoodli (AI speech coaching, founded 2021 but reflecting a trend that began with YouTube as a rehearsal tool) emerged from this era. Communications faculty faced the dual challenge of keeping their professional-practice content current (the tools changed every two to three years) while maintaining the theoretical depth that distinguished academic instruction from professional training. The proliferation of communication-adjacent content on YouTube, podcasts, and social media created the first era where students arrived with significant self-taught media production skills, raising the bar for what classroom instruction had to add.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Generative AI and synthetic media (ChatGPT Nov 2022, Midjourney 2022, deepfake proliferation)

    The November 2022 public release of ChatGPT marked the beginning of the most disruptive technology transition in the history of communications education because it struck at the discipline's core subject matter: what it means to produce, verify, and evaluate human communication. Generative AI can write news stories, produce press releases, generate persuasive speeches, and create photorealistic images and deepfake video at a quality indistinguishable to untrained audiences. This is not a tool that augments the communications professor's administrative work (though it does that too); it is a technology that makes the object of study, authentic human communication, harder to define, verify, and teach. AEJMC's 2025 survey found that 73% of communications faculty had already revised course learning outcomes, the highest revision rate of any discipline-specific survey in the research base. The NCA published a white paper in 2025 on "Artificial Intelligence and the Communication Discipline" making the case that AI "transforms what it means to communicate authentically." Yoodli AI speech coaching (500,000+ users by 2024-25, deployed at Oregon State, ASU, and Michigan) demonstrated the augmentation path for the speech communication sub-field. Reality Defender's deployment at NBC News and Reuters for deepfake detection established a new professional competency that communications faculty became the primary educators responsible for teaching.

    Effect on the work

    Employment projections for 25-1122 in the BLS 2024-2034 cycle show modest growth (+2.1%), suggesting the AI disruption has not (yet) translated into headcount reductions. The more significant near-term effect has been on the composition and content of the work: faculty spend more time redesigning assessments, revising learning outcomes, and engaging with AI ethics debates, and less time delivering static lecture content.

    AI audit toolsPattern detection
Projection cone · present → 2034

What credible sources project

Scrub the slider past now to anchor each scenario on the scrubber. The spread is the range of futures credible sources project for this role.

Employment outlook
Projected change in the number of people doing this work.
BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook 2024-34 — Postsecondary Teachers (broad category)
2034
+7%
The BLS OOH projects overall postsecondary teacher employment to grow 7% from 2024 to 2034, much faster than the all-occupations average, driven by rising college enrollment and expanding research activity. Communications teachers (25-1122) are included in this broad category but project at a lower individual rate (+2.1%) than the postsecondary teachers aggregate (+7%), suggesting the communication discipline is expanding more slowly than STEM and health-related fields. The gap reflects lower demand growth for traditional journalism and speech communication courses relative to health sciences, computer science, and engineering faculty. This broader projection is included as a context anchor: if general postsecondary hiring conditions match the +7% forecast, communications departments may see more favorable conditions than their discipline-specific projection implies.
BLS National Employment Matrix 2024-34
2034
+2.1%
BLS Employment Projections national matrix, October 2025 release. The 2024-34 cycle projects +2.1% employment change for 25-1122, from 35,800 (2024) to approximately 36,600 (2034). This is a "slower than average" classification against an all-occupations baseline of +4%. The BLS methodology models continued undergraduate demand for communication as a major (one of the most popular on US campuses) offset by budget pressure at universities driving toward adjunct labor and online instruction. The modest positive growth reflects that the fundamental demand for communications faculty has not eroded, but hiring has been concentrated in contingent and part-time positions rather than tenure-track lines. The projection does not explicitly model AI-driven curriculum disruption effects, which could accelerate or reverse the trend depending on whether AI tools reduce the credit-hour demand for writing-intensive courses.
AI task exposure
Share of the role’s tasks that researchers estimate AI can do. This is a measure of task exposure, not a forecast of jobs lost.
Eloundou et al. (2023) — "GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models"
2028
62%
of tasks
GPT-4 task-by-task LLM exposure labeling on O*NET tasks for communications and education occupations. Communications teachers, postsecondary fall in the high-LLM-exposure tier in the Eloundou framework (alongside English and history faculty) as a text- and rhetoric-intensive occupation where a substantial share of tasks involve producing, analyzing, and critiquing written and spoken language. The 62% figure represents estimated task-exposure share: the fraction of the occupation's O*NET tasks for which GPT-4 or LLM-powered tools could provide meaningful assistance. Importantly, this is task-exposure, not job-loss probability: as the curated research file for this role documents, the highest-value tasks (live speech pedagogy, media ethics reasoning, deepfake literacy instruction, source-verification modeling) are among the most AI-resistant in the occupation. The exposure is concentrated in lecture-prep, discussion-question generation, course-material drafting, and basic writing assessment, not in the live facilitation and professional judgment core.
Today, in this role

What's shifting in the work right now

The historical view above shows how this role has moved. This is the present-day detail: which AI tools are picking up which tasks, where the edge still is, and the natural directions this work can grow.

What's changing in your day

Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.

AI is sitting alongside you hereTeach public relations and strategic communication courses — requiring students to develop integrated PR campaigns, media pitches, stakeholder analyses, and communications plans — and training students on industry-standard AI-powered media monitoring and PR tools (CisionOne, Meltwater Mira) as practicum competencies they will use professionally, while building the strategic judgment to evaluate what AI tools surface and what human communication skill still decides.

Teach public relations and strategic communication courses — requiring students to develop integrated PR campaigns, media pitches, stakeholder analyses, and communications plans — and training students on industry-standard AI-powered media monitoring and PR tools (CisionOne, Meltwater Mira) as practicum competencies they will use professionally, while building the strategic judgment to evaluate what AI tools surface and what human communication skill still decides.[8],[9]

Where your edge is

PR curriculum has a built-in structure for integrating AI tools: students are training for professional practice, and the professional practice has already adopted CisionOne and Meltwater as standard tools. Teach students to use them as practitioners do — running sentiment sweeps, building media lists, drafting monitoring reports — while explicitly building the critical layer on top: What does this sentiment score miss? When is an AI-generated pitch worse than a human-written one? What is the strategic judgment that AI media monitoring cannot supply? Syracuse Newhouse PR practicum students now operate CisionOne as a graded deliverable in their senior campaigns course (2025). The PRSA AI survey (Sept 2025) found 76% of practitioners already use AI daily — students who graduate without AI tool fluency are underprepared, but students who graduate without strategic judgment are worse: they'll produce AI-generated noise that erodes their employer's credibility.

AI is sitting alongside you herePrepare course materials — syllabi, lecture notes, reading lists, case studies, and media analysis exercises — using ChatGPT Edu and NotebookLM to generate first-draft course structures, synthesize secondary literature on communication topics, and build discussion question banks, then applying disciplinary expertise to ensure intellectual coherence, current media contexts, and alignment with professional practice standards set by NCA, AEJMC, and PRSA.

Prepare course materials — syllabi, lecture notes, reading lists, case studies, and media analysis exercises — using ChatGPT Edu and NotebookLM to generate first-draft course structures, synthesize secondary literature on communication topics, and build discussion question banks, then applying disciplinary expertise to ensure intellectual coherence, current media contexts, and alignment with professional practice standards set by NCA, AEJMC, and PRSA.[10]

Where your edge is

Use ChatGPT Edu to generate a first-pass reading list for a media effects survey course — it will produce a reasonable canonical selection of Pew Research data, journalism theory texts, and media law cases. Use NotebookLM to synthesize a stack of 15–20 PDFs on organizational communication theory into a thematic lecture starting point. Then invest your disciplinary expertise in the pedagogical architecture: Is the case study selection current enough to feel real to students in 2026? Does the PR campaign analysis unit require students to examine actual AI-generated content they will encounter professionally? Does the media ethics unit engage the live debates in AEJMC rather than settled questions? The NCA (2025) guidance is explicit: communications education's value proposition is preparing students for the AI-saturated media environment they will practice in — curriculum that does not engage AI-current cases is pedagogically incomplete.

AI is sitting alongside you hereTeach journalism reporting and news writing — requiring students to conduct primary-source interviews, verify claims against multiple independent sources, and produce original reported stories — redesigning assignments in 2025–2026 to require explicit documentation of AI-use decisions (who did you interview? what documents did you examine? where did ChatGPT or Perplexity participate and where was human reporting the only option?) as Missouri J-School now mandates.

Teach journalism reporting and news writing — requiring students to conduct primary-source interviews, verify claims against multiple independent sources, and produce original reported stories — redesigning assignments in 2025–2026 to require explicit documentation of AI-use decisions (who did you interview? what documents did you examine? where did ChatGPT or Perplexity participate and where was human reporting the only option?) as Missouri J-School now mandates.[5],[7]

Where your edge is

The AI crisis in journalism education is not primarily about AI-generated prose — it is about AI-generated claims presented as reported facts. A student who uses Perplexity to generate background on a story and then writes that background as if they verified it against primary sources has failed the foundational epistemic obligation of journalism. The AEJMC task force (2025) found this the biggest concern among journalism faculty — not "is the prose plagiarized?" but "did the student talk to any sources?" Redesign reporting assignments to require an interview log with verbatim quotes, a source contact ledger, and a document list as deliverables alongside the story itself — these are genuinely AI-resistant because they require human presence in the world. Missouri J-School's policy of requiring students to document AI-use decisions explicitly in every assignment is the gold standard; JMCE (2025) documents multiple programs replicating it. Use Turnitin as a triage flag, not a verdict, for submissions where no interview log was provided.

Where this role is heading

Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.

A direction you could grow

Marketing Managers

Communications faculty — particularly those with strategic communication, advertising, or integrated marketing communication specializations — are well-positioned for Marketing Manager roles as the line between communications, PR, and marketing has blurred in the AI era. The skill overlap is meaningful: comm faculty understand message strategy, audience analysis, media planning, and content strategy; and AI has accelerated the convergence of PR and marketing functions by automating content production and media monitoring at scale. Organizations seeking Marketing Managers who can evaluate AI-generated content, build AI-literate communication teams, and maintain brand authenticity in an AI-saturated environment increasingly value candidates with deep communication theory foundations. The CRI delta is positive because Marketing Managers (CRI ~65) are somewhat more AI-resilient than the comm faculty average due to stronger revenue-accountability and budget-management dimensions. The main gaps to close are paid media budgeting and performance analytics.

What you'd add
  • · Paid media fundamentals: Google Ads, Meta Ads Manager, programmatic display — operational command of the paid channels that comm faculty teach conceptually but rarely operate with real budgets
  • · Marketing attribution and funnel analytics: GA4, HubSpot, Salesforce — connecting communication activities to revenue metrics and demonstrating marketing ROI in terms that CFOs and VPs evaluate
  • · Brand governance in AI-augmented content environments: developing style guides, prompt libraries, and editorial review workflows that calibrate AI content tools to brand standards — the distinctively comm-faculty contribution to corporate marketing AI adoption
  • · Budget forecasting and agency/vendor management: managing a marketing budget across channels, evaluating agency proposals, and negotiating contracts — operational skills that academic budget management only partially approximates
  • · Content operations at marketing scale: managing editorial calendars, content production pipelines (AI-assisted and human), and multi-channel distribution workflows for high-volume brand content programs
What it takesSome new skills to pick up
Share this year
Drops anyone you send it to straight into 2026.
Preview card
Part of Education · see all 51roles →
Different role?

See the same long-arc view for your own profession.

Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code. New roles ship every few weeks. Every profile cites every claim.

Browse all roles

The data behind this timeline

On record since1879
Latest tracked employment35,800 (US, 2024)
Latest median pay$77,800 (2024)
Outlook+2.1% by 2034 (BLS National Employment Matrix 2024-34)
View all 28 cited data points
YearUS employmentMedian annual paySource
191560n/aESTIMATE
1924910n/aESTIMATE
19342,000n/aESTIMATE
1970n/a$11,500ESTIMATE
1990n/a$38,000ESTIMATE
200030,000n/aESTIMATE
200320,420$49,030BLS-OEWS
200420,760$49,800BLS-OEWS
200522,320$50,890BLS-OEWS
200623,560$53,110BLS-OEWS
200723,690$54,720BLS-OEWS
200824,360$57,760BLS-OEWS
200925,090$58,890BLS-OEWS
201028,590$60,300BLS-OEWS
201129,610$61,330BLS-OEWS
201230,030$62,180BLS-OEWS
201329,920$63,570BLS-OEWS
201429,470$62,550BLS-OEWS
201529,050$63,410BLS-OEWS
201628,180$65,640BLS-OEWS
201728,770$66,510BLS-OEWS
201829,100$68,910BLS-OEWS
201929,120$70,630BLS-OEWS
202028,430$71,030BLS-OEWS
202127,330$77,560BLS-OEWS
202227,350$76,250BLS-OEWS
202328,520$79,910BLS-OEWS
202435,800$77,800BLS-OEWS
Embed this timeline on your site

Free for any site. Paste this where the timeline should appear; it stays interactive, every datapoint stays cited, and it sets no cookies on your page. How embedding works

<iframe src="https://futurehistory.earth/embed/25-1122"
  width="100%" height="430" style="border:0"
  title="Communications Teachers, Postsecondary, a Future History timeline"
  loading="lazy"></iframe>

See all roles in Education