Nuclear medicine technologists
Also called Nuclear med tech, NMT, CNMT, PET technologist, PET-CT technologist
In brief
In May 2025, BLS counted 17,080 US nuclear medicine technologists, with median pay of $101,370 a year. Of the BLS counts since 2003, the highest was 21,670, in May 2009. BLS counts here go back to May 2003, when there were 17,550 jobs. The last full technology era for nuclear medicine technologists: SPECT-CT consolidation and quantitative PET, 2015 to 2023.
What the sources say
Official outlook
BLS projects employment to grow 4.4% from 2025 to 2035.
AI exposure studies
- 25.8% of this job's tasks are exposed to large language models. Not a forecast of job losses. Eloundou and others, 2023
Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. BLS publishes these counts as yearly survey snapshots and cautions against reading them as a precise trend. In May 2021 BLS changed how it estimates these counts (a model-based method using three years of survey data) and moved fully to the 2018 occupation codes, so part of a change across 2021 can come from the method rather than the work.
Last updated .
Cite this page
Future History. (2026, October 11). Nuclear medicine technologists: jobs and pay since 1993 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/29-2033
Future History. "Nuclear medicine technologists: jobs and pay since 1993." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 11, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/29-2033.
@misc{futurehistory_29_2033, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Nuclear medicine technologists: jobs and pay since 1993}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/29-2033}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-11. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }
The access date is today's date on your device.
≈ $98,771 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)
March 31, 1941: Saul Hertz administers the first human dose of radioactive iodine I-131 to a patient with hyperthyroidism at Massachusetts General Hospital, using isotope produced at MIT. This is the founding clinical act of nuclear medicine. The person assisting with the dose preparation and administration was not yet called a nuclear medicine technologist, but the core competency -- measuring radioactive activity, preparing a patient-specific dose, and administering it safely -- is unchanged in its essentials today.
Radioiodine I-131 becomes widely available following Oak Ridge National Laboratory's isotope distribution program through the Atomic Energy Commission. Hertz and Roberts publish their landmark report of 29 hyperthyroid patients treated with radioiodine. The success publicizes clinical radioisotope therapy and diagnostic use across the country. I-131 remains one of the most widely used radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine today.
June 1971: The Society of Nuclear Medicine holds the first business meeting of its newly created Technologist Section at its annual meeting in Los Angeles. Applications from 737 prospective charter members are approved. This is the founding moment of nuclear medicine technology as an organized profession: the first elected leadership, the first formal committee structure, and the first budget (a generous $1,000). The JNMT is launched two years later, in 1973, giving the profession its own peer-reviewed publication.
September 15, 1978: The NMTCB administers its inaugural nuclear medicine examination to 652 candidates at 22 test sites across the United States. The NMTCB received its charter on June 17, 1977, following a 1976 SNM-TS motion to create an independent credentialing board. The CNMT (Certified Nuclear Medicine Technologist) credential completes the profession's transformation from on-the-job-trained technician to formally credentialed allied health professional. The ARRT had offered nuclear medicine credentials since the late 1960s; the NMTCB provided a second independent credential pathway.
FDA approves technetium-99m sestamibi (Cardiolite) for myocardial perfusion imaging, completing the transition from thallium-201 to Tc-99m-based cardiac SPECT. Sestamibi's superior imaging characteristics and 6-hour half-life (vs. thallium-201's 73 hours) allow same-day rest/stress protocols and substantially lower patient radiation dose. Cardiac SPECT rapidly becomes the highest-volume procedure in most nuclear medicine departments, creating persistent demand for NMTs with stress lab experience and cardiac SPECT processing skills.
GE introduces the Discovery LS, the first commercial PET-CT scanner, in 2001. By 2004, PET-CT has so thoroughly replaced standalone PET that more than 95% of all PET scanners sold are PET-CT systems. The PET-CT transition is the largest single technical transition in nuclear medicine history: it requires NMTs to learn CT scanning basics, PET attenuation correction workflows, and FDG preparation from generator-independent cyclotron-produced doses. Nuclear medicine departments at cancer centers and academic medical centers accelerate hiring of PET-experienced NMTs, creating a salary premium that persists through the 2000s.
January 2018: FDA approves lutetium-177 DOTATATE (NETSPOT) for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, the first approved targeted radionuclide therapy in the United States. FDA approval of Lu-177 PSMA-617 (Pluvicto) for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer follows in 2022. These approvals create an entirely new category of NMT work: theranostics, where the technologist prepares and administers therapeutic-level radioactive doses to patients across multiple treatment cycles. Theranostics requires NRC radiation safety competencies beyond standard diagnostic nuclear medicine, and demand for experienced theranostics NMTs at cancer centers substantially outpaces the supply in 2024-2026.
Will AI replace nuclear medicine technologists? What the research says
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.
What's changing day to day for nuclear medicine technologists
Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.
AI is sitting alongside you hereProcess and reconstruct nuclear medicine images using AI-assisted quantitative analysis, initiating AI reconstruction pipelines (GE AIR Recon DL, Siemens AI-Rad Companion PET/CT) that perform automated attenuation correction, scatter correction, and image noise reduction
Process and reconstruct nuclear medicine images using AI-assisted quantitative analysis, initiating AI reconstruction pipelines (GE AIR Recon DL, Siemens AI-Rad Companion PET/CT) that perform automated attenuation correction, scatter correction, and image noise reduction; reviewing AI-generated quantitative outputs (SUVmax, SUVmean, total metabolic tumor volume, standardized uptake value ratios) before releasing the study to the nuclear medicine physician or radiologist for interpretation.[7],[9]
AI quantitative PET (Siemens AI-Rad Companion, Cedars-Sinai QPS AI) is the most directly impactful AI automation for NMTs today: it replaces manual SUV measurement and lesion segmentation that NMTs and nuclear medicine physicians previously performed using PACS contouring tools. Your value shifts from manual measurement to quality oversight: reviewing AI-generated SUVmax values and TMTV estimates for accuracy on technically challenging studies (high background activity, small lesions near bladder, bone marrow involvement), understanding the failure modes of specific AI quantification tools, and flagging systematic AI errors to the nuclear medicine physician. Develop expertise in AI quantification parameters: NMTs who can configure AI reconstruction presets and validate AI quantification outputs against manual reads are positioned for nuclear medicine quality coordinator and PET program manager roles.
AI is sitting alongside you hereProcess cardiac nuclear medicine studies, acquiring and processing gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) studies using Tc-99m sestamibi or tetrofosmin protocols (rest and stress), processing data through cardiac analysis software (Cedars-Sinai QPS, Emory Cardiac Toolbox) that now includes AI-assisted myocardial perfusion quantification and ejection fraction computation, reviewing AI-generated perfusion polar maps and functional parameters, and releasing the processed study for nuclear cardiologist interpretation.
Process cardiac nuclear medicine studies, acquiring and processing gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) studies using Tc-99m sestamibi or tetrofosmin protocols (rest and stress), processing data through cardiac analysis software (Cedars-Sinai QPS, Emory Cardiac Toolbox) that now includes AI-assisted myocardial perfusion quantification and ejection fraction computation, reviewing AI-generated perfusion polar maps and functional parameters, and releasing the processed study for nuclear cardiologist interpretation.[14],[9]
Cardiac SPECT MPI processing is the task with the highest AI exposure in the NMT role: Cedars-Sinai QPS AI and Emory Cardiac Toolbox have FDA-cleared AI modules that automatically quantify myocardial perfusion, compute left ventricular ejection fraction, and classify perfusion defects on standard gated SPECT acquisitions with expert-equivalent accuracy on typical studies (JNM 2025). Your value shifts to quality oversight of the AI output: validating AI-generated polar maps against direct visual review of the raw SPECT slices, flagging attenuation artifacts (breast attenuation, diaphragmatic attenuation) that cause AI classification errors, and identifying acquisition quality problems (patient motion, low count density) that degrade AI reliability. Develop a systematic SPECT quality review habit that complements AI-generated outputs rather than simply releasing AI results without visual verification.
AI is sitting alongside you hereComplete nuclear medicine procedure documentation, recording radiopharmaceutical lot numbers, calibration times, administered doses, patient identification, imaging protocol, and any adverse events in the nuclear medicine department logbook and electronic health record per NRC and SNMMI documentation requirements
Complete nuclear medicine procedure documentation, recording radiopharmaceutical lot numbers, calibration times, administered doses, patient identification, imaging protocol, and any adverse events in the nuclear medicine department logbook and electronic health record per NRC and SNMMI documentation requirements; using AI-assisted voice dictation (Dragon Medical One) to complete preliminary technical findings notes and department worksheet fields hands-free following image acquisition.[15],[16]
Nuclear medicine procedure documentation carries NRC regulatory weight: dose administration records, patient release criteria assessments, and adverse event documentation are legally required under 10 CFR Part 35 and must be maintained by the authorized user and NMT. AI-assisted voice dictation (Dragon Medical One) is reducing time spent on technical findings notes and worksheet completion, which is a genuine efficiency gain for a small NMT team managing multiple concurrent acquisition sessions. The non-automatable core is the NRC-mandated dose log: administered activity (measured in the dose calibrator), administered time, and the attestation that the radiopharmaceutical was prepared and administered by an authorized nuclear medicine technologist, this is a signed regulatory record that AI cannot generate autonomously.
Where nuclear medicine technologists go next
Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.
- Medical and Health Services Managers
- US median pay
- $123,860 (May 2025)
- BLS outlook 2025-35
- +24.2%
- Radiation Therapists
- US median pay
- $105,310 (May 2025)
- BLS outlook 2025-35
- +2.8%
- Radiologic Technologists and Technicians
- US median pay
- $80,110 (May 2025)
- BLS outlook 2025-35
- +5%
What each move takes
Medical and Health Services Managers
Senior NMTs with lead tech or charge tech experience at high-volume PET-CT and theranostics programs are well-positioned for nuclear medicine manager, PET program director, and molecular imaging administrator roles, tracked under Medical and Health Services Managers (11-9111.00). As nuclear medicine departments deploy AI reconstruction tools, theranostics platforms, and quantitative PET workflows, health systems need department managers who understand the clinical, regulatory (NRC), and vendor dimensions of responsible AI and radiopharmaceutical program management. The NRC compliance dimension (radioactive material license management, dosimetry program oversight, vendor audit) is a specific management responsibility that NMTs are uniquely qualified for compared to general healthcare managers. AHRA Certified Radiology Administrator (CRA) or SNMMI-endorsed nuclear medicine leadership training provides the management credentialing bridge.
- · AHRA Certified Radiology Administrator (CRA) examination: standard credential for imaging department management; covers healthcare finance, regulatory compliance, operations, and human resources
- · NRC radioactive material license management: radioactive material license amendment processes, inspection preparation, radiation safety program administration; the nuclear-specific management competency that differentiates NMTs from general imaging managers
- · Healthcare finance for nuclear medicine: CPT/HCPCS coding for PET-CT and theranostics procedures, radiopharmaceutical cost management, Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement for targeted radionuclide therapy (Lu-177 DOTATATE, Lu-177 PSMA)
- · Theranostics program development: building multidisciplinary theranostics programs from diagnostic eligibility imaging through therapy administration and post-therapy follow-up; the highest-growth management opportunity in nuclear medicine 2025-2026
- · AI vendor management for nuclear medicine: evaluating AI PET reconstruction and quantification platforms, managing deployment agreements, monitoring AI algorithm performance post-deployment
How has the work of nuclear medicine technologists changed since 1941?
The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.
Radioisotope counting equipment and Geiger-Muller detectors (pre-imaging era)
In the earliest years of clinical nuclear medicine, the NMT's predecessor operated Geiger-Muller counters, scintillation probes, and dot-scan counters to measure radiotracer uptake in organs. There was no imaging in the modern sense: a physician might hold a probe over the patient's thyroid to count iodine uptake, or a technician might drive a single detector back and forth across a liver to produce a crude dot-matrix printout. The primary tools were counting chambers, well counters for radiochemical purity testing, and primitive dose calibrators. Radiopharmaceutical preparation was ad hoc, drawing on laboratory chemistry skills rather than any defined nuclear medicine protocol.
Rectilinear scanner (Benedict Cassen, 1951)
Benedict Cassen at UCLA developed the first automated rectilinear scanner in 1951 and reported it at the 1952 Society of Nuclear Medicine meeting. The rectilinear scanner drove a scintillation detector mechanically back and forth across the patient in parallel lines, printing radiotracer distribution onto paper as a dot matrix. For the first time, nuclear medicine produced something that looked like an image. The technician's job was to set up the scanner geometry, position the patient, select the scan speed and count-rate settings, and manage the printout. It required patience and pattern recognition: a bone or thyroid scan took up to an hour of continuous scanning. The rectilinear scanner defined nuclear medicine practice for fifteen years, until the Anger camera made it obsolete.
Anger gamma camera and Tc-99m generator (clinical standard era)
Hal Anger reported his scintillation camera in 1957; by 1963 commercial versions were entering hospitals. The gamma camera replaced the slow mechanical scan with instantaneous two-dimensional imaging: a large sodium iodide crystal detected gamma rays from an entire organ simultaneously, producing a planar image in seconds rather than an hour. At the same time, the technetium-99m generator became commercially available. Tc-99m, a Mo-99 fission product with a six-hour half-life and ideal 140 keV gamma emission, could be eluted fresh each morning from a hospital-based generator. The nuclear medicine technologist's role crystallized around this pairing: eluting the generator, preparing radiopharmaceutical kits (bone agents, liver/spleen agents, lung ventilation/perfusion agents, thyroid agents), performing radiochemical purity testing, administering the tracer, positioning the patient under the gamma camera, and acquiring the image. The job required radiochemistry, radiation physics, patient care, and equipment operation -- a combination that justified a distinct credential.
Effect on the workThe Anger camera and Tc-99m generator together drove the expansion of the nuclear medicine department from a research novelty to a standard hospital imaging service. The number of nuclear medicine procedures performed annually in the US grew from fewer than 100,000 in 1963 to over 10 million by the early 1980s, and the NMT workforce expanded proportionally.
SPECT (single-photon emission computed tomography) and nuclear cardiology era
SPECT technology, which rotates the gamma camera around the patient to reconstruct three-dimensional radiotracer distributions, entered clinical practice in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Cardiac SPECT became the dominant nuclear medicine procedure by volume: thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging was introduced in the 1970s, and the FDA approval of technetium-99m sestamibi in 1990 made stress/rest cardiac SPECT the most common nuclear medicine procedure in the United States for over two decades. The NMT's role expanded to include treadmill stress testing support, pharmacologic stress management (adenosine, dobutamine), and SPECT reconstruction parameter selection. The formation of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology in 1993 signaled how far the clinical volume had shifted toward cardiac applications.
Effect on the workCardiac SPECT drove a sustained increase in nuclear medicine department volume through the 1980s and 1990s. By the mid-2000s, cardiac nuclear medicine accounted for over half of all nuclear medicine procedures performed in the US. This volume growth created persistent demand for NMTs and contributed to the workforce shortage reported in 1993.
PET-CT (hybrid positron emission tomography/CT, first commercial scanner 2001)
The first commercial PET-CT scanner, the GE Discovery LS, reached the market in 2001 following the landmark David Townsend and Ronald Nutt prototype installed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center in 1998. By 2004, over 400 PET-CT systems were installed worldwide; by 2006, practically all stand-alone PET scanners had been replaced by PET-CT. FDA approval of FDG-PET clinical indications in oncology in 2000 drove this adoption. The PET-CT era required NMTs to learn an entirely new suite of skills: 18F-FDG preparation from a cyclotron-produced radiopharmaceutical (rather than a generator), attenuation correction using CT data, 60-minute patient uptake management, whole-body imaging protocols, and CT technical knowledge. PET-CT technologists commanded salary premiums and became the most sought-after NMT subspecialists in the early 2000s. Reimbursement expansion drove major growth in PET-CT installations at academic medical centers and dedicated cancer imaging centers.
Effect on the workPET-CT did not displace existing NMTs but did require substantial retraining. Hospitals that added PET-CT programs typically hired additional NMTs or redeployed SPECT-experienced staff through manufacturer-supported training programs. The total NMT workforce remained roughly stable in the 2000s, reflecting consolidation of nuclear medicine procedures into fewer sites offset by PET-CT volume growth.
SPECT-CT consolidation and quantitative PET (digital PET, total-body PET)
The 2010s brought digital detector technology to both SPECT and PET, replacing analog photomultiplier tubes with silicon photomultipliers (SiPM). Digital SPECT cameras (Siemens Symbia Intevo, GE NM/CT 870) delivered dramatically improved count sensitivity and spatial resolution, making shorter acquisition times and lower radiotracer doses clinically viable. Digital PET-CT (Philips Vereos, GE Discovery MI, Siemens Biograph Vision) further improved image quality and enabled quantitative PET at a level of precision not previously possible. Total-body PET (uEXPLORER, PennPET), introduced commercially after 2018, can image the entire body simultaneously, opening new research and clinical applications. NMTs at programs with digital equipment gained new protocol optimization responsibilities: lower-activity protocols that reduce patient radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality, and quantitative imaging workflows that require more rigorous dose calibrator calibration and time-activity curve management.
AI image reconstruction and theranostics workflow platforms (GE AIR Recon DL, SubtlePET, Lu-177 therapy era)
Two technology developments arrived together in the late 2010s and accelerated through the early 2020s. First, deep learning PET reconstruction (GE AIR Recon DL for PET, Subtle Medical SubtlePET) brought FDA-cleared AI to the scanner console: NMTs now select AI reconstruction presets that deliver diagnostic-quality images at 20-50% lower injected dose or shorter acquisition time compared to conventional iterative reconstruction. Second, the FDA approvals of Lu-177 DOTATATE (NETSPOT, 2018) and Lu-177 PSMA-617 (Pluvicto, 2022) created an entirely new category of NMT work: targeted radionuclide therapy. NMTs at cancer centers performing theranostics prepare and administer high-activity therapeutic doses of lutetium-177 under strict NRC and institutional radiation safety protocols, manage post-therapy dosimetry imaging, and coordinate multi-cycle patient care using theranostics workflow platforms like GE OmniLink. AI quantitative PET (Siemens AI-Rad Companion, Cedars-Sinai QPS AI) automates the SUVmax, lesion segmentation, and TMTV computation that NMTs and physicians previously performed manually. The AI automation is concentrated in post-acquisition processing; radiotracer preparation, patient administration, and radiation safety remain entirely human-performed and legally non-delegable.
Effect on the workTheranostics is the primary driver of NMT demand growth at academic medical centers and cancer centers in 2024-2026. BLS aggregate growth figures (flat to +1%) mask this qualitative shift: community hospital nuclear medicine volume is static or declining, while theranostics demand at specialized centers is creating persistent job openings for experienced NMTs who cannot be replaced by credentialing a new graduate in a few months. AI reconstruction and quantification tools are force multipliers for small NMT teams, not displacement agents.
See the same long-arc view for your own profession.
Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.
Browse all rolesNuclear Medicine Technologists employment and pay by year
View all 24 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
| Year | US employment | Annual pay (median unless marked) | Source | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | n/a | $29,600 | Est., PubMed Researched context | Report |
| 2003 | 17,550 | $51,560 | BLS OEWS May 2003 Official statistic | Report |
| 2004 | 17,520 | $56,450 | BLS OEWS May 2004 Official statistic | Report |
| 2005 | 18,280 | $59,670 | BLS OEWS May 2005 Official statistic | Report |
| 2006 | 19,270 | $62,300 | BLS OEWS May 2006 Official statistic | Report |
| 2007 | 20,410 | $64,670 | BLS OEWS May 2007 Official statistic | Report |
| 2008 | 21,200 | $66,660 | BLS OEWS May 2008 Official statistic | Report |
| 2009 | 21,670 | $67,910 | BLS OEWS May 2009 Official statistic | Report |
| 2010 | 21,600 | $68,560 | BLS OEWS May 2010 Official statistic | Report |
| 2011 | 21,200 | $69,450 | BLS OEWS May 2011 Official statistic | Report |
| 2012 | 20,480 | $70,180 | BLS OEWS May 2012 Official statistic | Report |
| 2013 | 20,020 | $71,120 | BLS OEWS May 2013 Official statistic | Report |
| 2014 | 20,320 | $72,100 | BLS OEWS May 2014 Official statistic | Report |
| 2015 | 19,740 | $73,360 | BLS OEWS May 2015 Official statistic | Report |
| 2016 | 19,650 | $74,350 | BLS OEWS May 2016 Official statistic | Report |
| 2017 | 18,930 | $75,660 | BLS OEWS May 2017 Official statistic | Report |
| 2018 | 18,810 | $76,820 | BLS OEWS May 2018 Official statistic | Report |
| 2019 | 18,110 | $77,950 | BLS OEWS May 2019 Official statistic | Report |
| 2020 | 17,510 | $79,590 | BLS OEWS May 2020 Official statistic | Report |
| 2021 | 17,140 | $78,760 | BLS OEWS May 2021 Official statistic | Report |
| 2022 | 16,910 | $85,300 | BLS OEWS May 2022 Official statistic | Report |
| 2023 | 16,560 | $92,500 | BLS OEWS May 2023 Official statistic | Report |
| 2024 | 16,960 | $97,020 | BLS OEWS May 2024 Official statistic | Report |
| 2025 | 17,080 | $101,370 | BLS OEWS May 2025 Official statistic | Report |