Tree trimmers and pruners
In brief
In May 2025, BLS counted 55,160 US tree trimmers and pruners, with median pay of $50,960 a year. The earliest figure here is an estimate of 1,500 from 1928, not measured the same way as today's count. The current technology era for tree trimmers and pruners: Drone canopy assessment, GIS vegetation management, and arborist mobile apps, since 2015.
Official statistic: latest count and pay.Researched context: earliest figure.
What the sources say
Official outlook
BLS projects employment to grow 4.2% from 2025 to 2035.
BLS Employment Projections 2025-35
Official statistic
Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35.
Last updated .
Cite this page
Future History. (2026, October 11). Tree trimmers and pruners: jobs and pay since 1928 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/37-3013
Future History. "Tree trimmers and pruners: jobs and pay since 1928." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 11, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/37-3013.
@misc{futurehistory_37_3013, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Tree trimmers and pruners: jobs and pay since 1928}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/37-3013}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-11. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }
The access date is today's date on your device.
≈ $49,653 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)
John Davey conceives of tree surgery as a systematic profession in Warren, Ohio, after observing the decline of landscape trees and concluding they could be treated with the same methodical care as patients in a hospital. His 1901 book "The Tree Doctor" codifies the emerging science. The Davey Tree Expert Company is incorporated in 1909, and the Davey Institute of Tree Sciences opens that year to train the first generation of professional arborists.
Francis A. Bartlett, a 1905 Massachusetts Agricultural College graduate, founds the F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company in Stamford, Connecticut. Bartlett is the first commercial arborist to use power spray equipment to manage landscape pests and the first to develop practical cabling and bracing methods for structurally weak trees. The company remains family-owned for four generations and grows into one of the world's largest scientific tree care companies.
The National Shade Tree Conference is convened on June 5, 1924, at F.A. Bartlett's office in Stamford, Connecticut, organized by the Connecticut Tree Protective Association. Just 36 participants attend. The Conference becomes the International Shade Tree Conference in 1961 (when Canada objected to "national" in the name) and is formally chartered as the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) on January 1, 1976, to mark the US Bicentennial. The ISA's 1924 founding is cited in arboriculture as the formal beginning of organized professional tree care in North America.
On August 28, 1928, brothers Griffith, Lester, and Carl Asplundh found the Asplundh Tree Expert Company in Pennsylvania, initially to finance their educations after their father's death. Griffith brought arboriculture expertise, Lester electrical engineering, and Carl finance. Their first major contract, with the Philadelphia Electric Company in 1929, establishes the line-clearance model: specialized crews dedicated entirely to trimming vegetation away from utility lines. By 1994 Asplundh becomes the largest US firm in utility line clearance; by 2021 it employs 34,000 workers and generates $4.7 billion in revenue.
Dutch elm disease arrives in the United States in 1930 via elm logs imported from Europe for veneer manufacturing, arriving through at least four ports with initial cases near New York City. The fungus Ceratocystis ulmi, transmitted by elm bark beetles, eventually kills millions of elm trees across 31 states. At peak infestation in the 1970s, hundreds of thousands of elms were lost each year. Local governments and private property owners spend many millions of dollars annually on tree removal work, creating substantial demand for tree trimming and removal crews throughout the 1940s-1970s.
On August 10, 1965, eighteen-year-old Jeffrey Hugg dies while pruning a tree after contacting a 4.8 kV overhead power line. His mother Ethel M. Hugg writes to federal and state authorities demanding safer tree trimming standards. The Z133 Committee forms on April 4, 1968, with the National Arborist Association as secretariat and the ISA as a key participant. The ANSI Z133 safety standard for arboricultural operations is unanimously adopted on July 14, 1971, and approved as an American National Standard on December 20, 1972. OSHA (enacted April 1972) later adopts portions of Z133, making it the legal baseline for the industry.
Alex Shigo, a plant pathologist with the USDA Forest Service, publishes his CODIT model (Compartmentalization of Decay in Trees) after dissecting over 10,000 trees to map how wood-decay fungi spread through wounded trees. Shigo demonstrates that trees actively compartmentalize decay rather than simply succumbing to it, and that the pruning-cut location relative to the branch collar determines whether the tree can wall off the wound or not. The research overturns the industry's longstanding "flush cut" practice and establishes the "branch collar" pruning method that ISA and ANSI standards would later codify. Shigo retires from the Forest Service in 1985 and continues publishing and teaching the science-based approach to tree care.
The International Society of Arboriculture launches the ISA Certified Arborist program, the first national credential for tree care workers, requiring three years of documented experience in arboriculture and passage of a written exam covering tree biology, diagnosis, pruning, cabling, soil management, and safety. The credential is accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) against ISO 17024. By the mid-2020s, nearly 50,000 ISA credentials have been issued. The certification does not legally restrict who can call themselves an arborist or perform tree work, but it creates a recognized professional standard that municipal government clients and large utility companies increasingly require of contractors.
Will AI replace tree trimmers and pruners? What the research says
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.
- BLS Employment Projections 2025-35Target year 2035
What's changing day to day for tree trimmers and pruners
Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.
AI is sitting alongside you here Operate shredding and chipping equipment…
, and feed limbs and brush into the machines.[2]
AI is sitting alongside you here Cut away dead and excess branches from trees…
, or clear branches around power lines, using climbing equipment or buckets of extended truck booms, or chainsaws, hooks, handsaws, shears, and clippers.[2]
AI is sitting alongside you here Clean, sharpen, and lubricate tools and equipment
Sources[2]
How has the work of tree trimmers and pruners changed since 1880?
The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.
Hand tools: pruning saws, billhooks, rope climbing (the John Davey era)
John Davey and his contemporaries worked with hand saws, pole pruners, sharp knives for cavity work, and manila rope for climbing and lowering limbs. The most advanced cavity-treatment technique involved excavating dead wood, treating the wound with paint or tar, and filling the void with concrete, a method Davey systematized and taught at his institute. Tree climbing with rope and saddle was already practiced in orchard work; commercial arborists adapted it for shade tree surgery. The tools were simple; the craft was the knowledge of how to use them without killing the tree or the worker.
Motorized spray equipment, early truck-mounted equipment, and line-clearance specialization (Asplundh era)
The founding of the Asplundh Tree Expert Company in 1928 and its first utility-line clearance contract with the Philadelphia Electric Company in 1929 inaugurated a new segment of the profession: the full-time line-clearance crew. These workers were not residential arborists tending individual trees but specialized teams with truck-mounted equipment clearing vegetation from power and telephone lines across wide rural routes. Davey Tree Expert Company simultaneously pioneered pneumatic compressor technology for cavity and fertilization work in the 1920s. Francis Bartlett was the first to use motorized power spray equipment for pest management. These adaptations meant tree crews could now cover far more territory per shift and take on contracts that hand-tool crews could not have managed at competitive cost.
Effect on the workMotorized equipment and utility contracts created the first mass employer of tree workers: Asplundh grew from a handful of brothers in 1928 to a multi-state operation with thousands of employees by the 1940s, establishing the crew-based employment model that still dominates the industry.
Single-operator gasoline chainsaw and bucket truck (the mechanization decade)
Two tools transformed tree work in the 1950s. Second, the bucket truck: hydraulic aerial lifts were developed in the 1940s and achieved widespread adoption in utility and tree work by the 1950s and 1960s. Forestry-equipped bucket trucks allowed crews to reach the upper canopy safely and quickly without the time and skill required for rope climbing. These two tools doubled or tripled effective crew productivity and reduced (though did not eliminate) the need for skilled rope climbers.
Effect on the workThe chainsaw and bucket truck are the defining productivity leap in the occupation's history. A crew that previously required skilled climbers and laborious hand-sawing could now clear a similar volume of work with fewer specialist climbers and more equipment operators. The net effect on total employment was positive (lower unit cost expanded the market), but it shifted the skill mix toward equipment operation and away from pure climbing craft.
ANSI Z133 safety standards, CODIT tree biology, and ISA credentialing (the science-based profession era)
Three developments between 1971 and 1992 remade tree work as a profession rather than a trade. First, safety: the ANSI Z133 standard for arboricultural operations was unanimously adopted on July 14, 1971, and approved as an American National Standard on December 20, 1972, after an 18-year-old tree trimmer named Jeffrey Hugg died from contact with a power line in 1965 and his mother petitioned federal authorities to force safer practices. OSHA was enacted in 1972 and adopted portions of Z133. Second, science: USDA Forest Service pathologist Alex Shigo dissected over 10,000 trees between the 1960s and 1985 and developed the CODIT (Compartmentalization of Decay in Trees) model, overturning decades of cavity-filling practice and establishing a scientific basis for pruning cuts, wound treatment, and species-specific care. Third, credentialing: the International Society of Arboriculture (formally chartered January 1, 1976) launched the ISA Certified Arborist program in 1992, the first national credential requiring proven knowledge and experience in tree care. Nearly 50,000 credentials had been issued by the mid-2020s.
Effect on the workThe combination of mandatory safety rules, science-based pruning standards, and voluntary credentialing raised the knowledge floor for commercial tree workers, reduced fatalities (though the occupation remained highly hazardous), and created a two-tier market: certified arborists commanding premium rates versus uncertified crews competing on price.
Drone canopy assessment, GIS vegetation management, and arborist mobile apps (the digital field era)
Commercial drone operations, cleared by the FAA for limited commercial use beginning in 2016, entered arboriculture primarily as a canopy inspection tool: a drone with a thermal or RGB camera can assess the crown of a large tree in minutes that would previously require a climbing inspection. GIS-based vegetation management platforms allow utility companies to model and schedule line-clearance work across entire transmission corridors using satellite and LiDAR canopy-height data, reducing the amount of time crews spend on unproductive routes. Mobile apps for field arborists (ISA's Treeval, various utility contractor platforms) allow on-site condition reporting, work-order management, and species identification from a phone. As of 2026, none of these tools have reduced crew headcount at the point of actual tree work: a drone cannot prune a branch, and a GIS model cannot run a chainsaw. The digital tools have increased planning efficiency and reduced assessment costs while leaving the physical work entirely human.
See the same long-arc view for your own profession.
Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.
Browse all rolesTree Trimmers and Pruners employment and pay by year
View all 26 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
| Year | US employment | Annual pay (median unless marked) | Source | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1928 | 1,500 | n/a | Est., Asplundh Tree Expert Company[1] Researched context | Report |
| 1950 | 15,000 | n/a | Est., Arboriculture through the ages[2] Researched context | Report |
| 1995 | 38,000 | n/a | Est., ISA Certified Arborist program history[3] Researched context | Report |
| 2003 | 40,710 | $25,630 | BLS OEWS May 2003[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2004 | 39,600 | $26,150 | BLS OEWS May 2004[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2005 | 29,790 | $27,920 | BLS OEWS May 2005[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2006 | 28,300 | $28,250 | BLS OEWS May 2006[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2007 | 30,670 | $29,800 | BLS OEWS May 2007[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2008 | 35,420 | $29,970 | BLS OEWS May 2008[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2009 | 37,830 | $30,310 | BLS OEWS May 2009[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2010 | 37,540 | $30,450 | BLS OEWS May 2010[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2011 | 38,530 | $31,320 | BLS OEWS May 2011[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2012 | 39,750 | $32,310 | BLS OEWS May 2012[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2013 | 40,720 | $32,590 | BLS OEWS May 2013[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2014 | 39,640 | $32,960 | BLS OEWS May 2014[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2015 | 40,160 | $33,500 | BLS OEWS May 2015[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2016 | 40,680 | $35,030 | BLS OEWS May 2016[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2017 | 41,140 | $36,460 | BLS OEWS May 2017[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2018 | 42,440 | $38,190 | BLS OEWS May 2018[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2019 | 47,210 | $39,980 | BLS OEWS May 2019[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2020 | 52,040 | $41,340 | BLS OEWS May 2020[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2021 | 41,920 | $46,970 | BLS OEWS May 2021[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2022 | 48,150 | $47,080 | BLS OEWS May 2022[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2023 | 50,270 | $49,070 | BLS OEWS May 2023[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2024 | 47,870 | $50,430 | BLS OEWS May 2024[4] Official statistic | Report |
| 2025 | 55,160 | $50,960 | BLS OEWS May 2025[4] Official statistic | Report |