Medical equipment repairers
In brief
In May 2025, BLS counted 65,990 US medical equipment repairers, with median pay of $61,660 a year. Of the BLS counts since 2003, the May 2025 count is the highest. The earliest figure here is an estimate of 10,000 from 1972, not measured the same way as today's count. The last full technology era for medical equipment repairers: Networked medical devices + cybersecurity tools, 2005 to 2020.
Official statistic: latest count and pay, highest count.Researched context: earliest figure.
What the sources say
Official outlook
BLS projects employment to grow 12.6% from 2025 to 2035.
BLS Employment Projections 2025-35
Official statistic
AI exposure studies
- 27.3% of this job's tasks are exposed to large language models. Not a forecast of job losses. Eloundou and others, 2023 Official statistic
Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. BLS publishes these counts as yearly survey snapshots and cautions against reading them as a precise trend. In May 2021 BLS changed how it estimates these counts (a model-based method using three years of survey data) and moved fully to the 2018 occupation codes, so part of a change across 2021 can come from the method rather than the work.
Last updated .
Cite this page
Future History. (2026, October 11). Medical equipment repairers: jobs and pay since 1972 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/49-9062
Future History. "Medical equipment repairers: jobs and pay since 1972." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 11, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/49-9062.
@misc{futurehistory_49_9062, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Medical equipment repairers: jobs and pay since 1972}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/49-9062}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-11. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }
The access date is today's date on your device.
≈ $60,079 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)
The United States Army establishes dedicated training programmes for electronics technicians to service X-ray machines, EKG machines, blood pressure apparatus, and other electromechanical medical equipment in field hospitals. This is the first formal recognition in US history of a distinct occupation for medical equipment service, separating the work from general electronics repair. These military-trained technicians are the direct occupational ancestors of the modern BMET.
The Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) is founded. AAMI was envisioned as a standards body and professional home for the emerging biomedical engineering and technician community. Over the following decades AAMI would become the primary source of US and international consensus standards for medical device safety, sterile processing, and healthcare technology management, as well as the credentialing body for the CBET exam.
Consumer advocate Ralph Nader publishes an article claiming "At least 1,200 people a year are electrocuted and many more are killed or injured in needless electrical accidents in hospitals." The assertion, drawing on work by physician Carl Walter who had been raising the alarm since 1969, triggers national attention. Many hospitals develop in-house medical equipment management programmes for the first time in direct response. The electrical safety scare of the early 1970s is widely credited by the profession as the event that moved BMET from an informal role into a recognised hospital department.
AAMI administers the first Certified Biomedical Equipment Technician (CBET) examination in 1971, and the first CBET certificates are issued in April 1972. The initial candidates were a "predominantly military group of veteran and well-accomplished BMETs." The CBET credential is the first portable, nationally recognised professional certification for medical equipment technicians in the United States, establishing a defined body of knowledge and a career identity independent of any single employer.
The Safe Medical Devices Act (SMDA) of 1990 (Public Law 101-629) is signed into law and takes effect November 28, 1991. For the first time, nursing homes, hospitals, and other healthcare facilities that use medical devices are required to report to the FDA any incident suggesting that a device probably caused or contributed to a patient's death or serious injury. The law also empowers the FDA to mandate device tracking and post-market surveillance. For BMETs, SMDA intensifies the documentation burden: service reports, incident investigations, and device histories become legally significant records, not just departmental paperwork.
The WannaCry ransomware attack (May 12-15, 2017) disrupts the UK National Health Service and affects systems in over 150 countries. Several US health systems are also impacted. The attack exploits unpatched Windows vulnerabilities in networked devices, including medical equipment running embedded Windows operating systems. For BMETs, the incident demonstrates that a device that cannot be clinically used because its embedded OS is held hostage is effectively broken, regardless of hardware condition. The attack accelerates hospital investment in medical device cybersecurity and draws BMETs into active collaboration with IT security teams for the first time at scale.
Will AI replace medical equipment repairers? What the research says
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.
- BLS Employment Projections 2025-35Target year 2035
- Eloundou et al. (2023), "GPTs are GPTs"2023 study · Share of tasks exposed to LLMs (β, human-rated)27.3%of tasks
What's changing day to day for medical equipment repairers
Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.
AI is sitting alongside you here Test or calibrate components or equipment…
, following manufacturers' manuals and troubleshooting techniques, using hand tools, power tools, or measuring devices.[2]
AI is sitting alongside you here Keep records of maintenance, repair…
, and required updates of equipment.[2]
AI is sitting alongside you here Plan and carry out work assignments, using blueprints…
, schematic drawings, technical manuals, wiring diagrams, or liquid or air flow sheets, following prescribed regulations, directives, or other instructions as required.[2]
How has the work of medical equipment repairers changed since 1942?
The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.
Vacuum-tube test equipment (oscilloscopes, voltmeters, X-ray service tools)
The earliest medical electronics technicians worked with the same bench tools used by any radio or radar repairman: vacuum-tube oscilloscopes, vacuum-tube voltmeters, signal generators, and soldering irons. Medical equipment of the 1940s and 1950s ran on vacuum tubes: X-ray machines, early electrocardiographs, electroencephalographs, and the first defibrillators used banks of glass tubes that failed regularly and needed periodic replacement. The technician's core skill was reading a circuit schematic, isolating a fault with a voltmeter, and knowing which tube to pull and test. The work was hot, time-consuming, and required meticulous attention to high-voltage safety, since a hospital X-ray generator could carry tens of thousands of volts at lethal current. The tools were generic electronics service tools; there was nothing specific to medicine in the test equipment itself.
Solid-state electronics + dedicated biomedical test instruments (electrical safety analysers, patient simulators)
The transistor revolution replaced vacuum tubes in medical equipment through the late 1950s and 1960s, and with it came an entirely new category of failure mode: semiconductor components that died silently rather than burning visibly, integrated circuits that could not be repaired to the component level, and printed circuit boards that demanded different diagnostic approaches. Simultaneously, a new category of medical-specific test equipment emerged: electrical safety analysers that measured leakage current against the emerging IEC and NFPA standards for patient-connected equipment, and patient simulators that generated realistic ECG, pulse, and respiratory waveforms so a technician could test a monitor without connecting an actual patient. The electrical safety analyser was the single most important new tool: after Ralph Nader's 1970 article and the subsequent regulatory focus on hospital electrical safety, every serviced device needed a documented safety check with a logged leakage current measurement, creating a paper trail that did not exist before and positioning the BMET as the keeper of that record.
Effect on the workThe shift to solid-state equipment drove the first meaningful growth in the BMET workforce: hospitals could no longer rely on a general handyman to replace a burned-out vacuum tube. The complexity demanded trained electronics technicians, and hospital biomedical engineering departments proliferated through the 1970s.
Computerised maintenance management systems (CMMS) + OEM-proprietary service software
From the mid-1980s onward, two parallel technology shifts changed the administrative and diagnostic landscape for BMETs. First, hospital clinical engineering departments adopted Computerised Maintenance Management Systems: database applications that tracked every device's preventive maintenance schedule, repair history, service cost, and regulatory compliance status. The CMMS transformed the BMET's job from a craft practice into a documented workflow with mandatory paper trails. Second, medical equipment manufacturers moved to proprietary service software: the diagnostic port on a ventilator or infusion pump was no longer a generic serial connection that a technician could query with standard tools but a manufacturer-locked interface requiring an OEM service laptop running proprietary code. This created the first significant tension in the profession between in-house hospital BMETs (who increasingly faced locked-out devices) and OEM field service engineers (who held the software keys). The Joint Commission's accreditation standards through the 1980s and 1990s mandated documented preventive maintenance programmes, making the CMMS not optional but a compliance tool.
Networked medical devices + cybersecurity tools (VLAN segmentation, vulnerability scanning, asset management platforms)
The 2000s brought Ethernet ports to bedside monitors, wireless infusion pumps, and DICOM-networked imaging equipment. A hospital floor in 2010 was a patchwork of Windows XP and Windows 7 embedded systems running clinical software over hospital networks, many of them unable to receive routine operating system patches because the manufacturer had not validated the patch for clinical use. For the BMET, this meant a new responsibility that had not existed a decade earlier: network troubleshooting, IP address management, and cybersecurity awareness. When ransomware hit hospital networks (WannaCry in 2017 disrupted the UK NHS and reached several US health systems), BMETs found themselves alongside IT staff in incident response, because the question "is this device still working?" could not be answered without knowing whether its embedded software had been compromised. The profession began requiring networking skills alongside the traditional electronics bench skills, and a new category of "healthcare technology management" emerged as an umbrella for BMETs who also handled IT interfaces and asset tracking.
Effect on the workThe networking era coincided with strong employment growth: BLS OEWS shows the 49-9062 headcount roughly doubling between 2000 and the mid-2010s, driven by the proliferation of connected devices each requiring qualified service.
IoT predictive maintenance platforms + AI-assisted diagnostics (remote monitoring, OEM service portals, laptop-based service tools)
The dominant tools for medical equipment service as of 2026 are a laptop running manufacturer service software (often accessed via OEM cloud portal), an asset management platform connected to hospital WiFi that surfaces real-time device alerts, and a handheld electrical safety analyser. Increasingly, devices self-report fault codes, calibration drift, and component wear to cloud dashboards that flag items for preventive attention before failure. Approximately 42% of hospitals globally have adopted some form of predictive maintenance tools for medical equipment, integrating IoT telemetry to monitor device performance continuously. For the BMET, this shifts the reactive "it's broken, fix it" call toward a proactive workflow: the asset platform generates a work order before the clinician notices a problem. Remote diagnostics allow OEM engineers to log into a networked device and perform software-level troubleshooting without visiting the site, which has changed but not eliminated the need for on-site technicians (physical component replacement, hardware calibration, and safety testing still require a person in the room). The core bench skills of electronics, safety testing, and systematic fault isolation remain load-bearing; they now layer under a software and networking competency that was optional twenty years ago.
See the same long-arc view for your own profession.
Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.
Browse all rolesMedical Equipment Repairers employment and pay by year
View all 24 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
| Year | US employment | Annual pay (median unless marked) | Source | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1972 | 10,000 | n/a | Est., AAMI[1] Researched context | Report |
| 2003 | 23,500 | $37,960 | BLS OEWS May 2003[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2004 | 23,750 | $37,220 | BLS OEWS May 2004[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2005 | 27,940 | $39,570 | BLS OEWS May 2005[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2006 | 32,100 | $40,580 | BLS OEWS May 2006[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2007 | 34,080 | $40,320 | BLS OEWS May 2007[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2008 | 34,260 | $41,520 | BLS OEWS May 2008[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2009 | 34,550 | $42,300 | BLS OEWS May 2009[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2010 | 32,980 | $44,490 | BLS OEWS May 2010[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2011 | 34,710 | $44,870 | BLS OEWS May 2011[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2012 | 35,740 | $44,570 | BLS OEWS May 2012[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2013 | 40,090 | $44,180 | BLS OEWS May 2013[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2014 | 41,430 | $45,660 | BLS OEWS May 2014[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2015 | 41,060 | $46,340 | BLS OEWS May 2015[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2016 | 43,370 | $48,070 | BLS OEWS May 2016[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2017 | 43,670 | $48,820 | BLS OEWS May 2017[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2018 | 46,320 | $49,210 | BLS OEWS May 2018[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2019 | 46,370 | $49,280 | BLS OEWS May 2019[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2020 | 48,510 | $51,610 | BLS OEWS May 2020[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2021 | 53,400 | $49,910 | BLS OEWS May 2021[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2022 | 58,830 | $57,860 | BLS OEWS May 2022[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2023 | 64,400 | $60,670 | BLS OEWS May 2023[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2024 | 60,830 | $62,630 | BLS OEWS May 2024[2] Official statistic | Report |
| 2025 | 65,990 | $61,660 | BLS OEWS May 2025[2] Official statistic | Report |