Skip to sources
Time Machine

Market Research Analysts and Marketing Specialists

Scrub through 125years of this role's history, from when it first emerged, through every wave of technology that reshaped it, to the cited projections for where it's heading next.

2026drag to travel through time
1925195019752000now
Country
2026
Known today as Market Research Analysts and Marketing Specialists (BLS SOC 13-1161, current combined code)
Latest actual · 2024
942K
BLS OEWS May 2024 -- the current combined code 13-1161 covers both Market Research Analysts and Marketing Specialists following the 2010 SOC revision. This is a substantially larger population than the pre-2010 "market research analysts only" count because it incorporates digital marketing analytics, content marketing strategists, and marketing operations specialists who were separately classified before. The 941,700 figure is directly from O*NET reflecting BLS establishment-survey data. The occupation ranks as one of the largest in the Business and Financial Operations major group.
Latest actual · 2024
$76,950
Source: BLS-OEWS
Each dot is a cited figure over time; the dotted line only links them (values between aren't measured). Hollow dots are estimates.
Beat · 2025

Qualtrics' 2025 market research industry survey finds that 62% of professional market researchers have already used AI-generated synthetic data in their work, and 71% believe synthetic data will constitute the majority of research within three years. Outset.ai raises a $30 million Series B in December 2025 to scale AI-moderated qualitative interviewing. The global market research industry reaches $140 billion in 2024, up from $102 billion in 2021 -- a 37% expansion during the same three-year period when AI adoption was most intense. The data suggest AI is, so far, expanding the market rather than contracting it.

Tools of the era

The tools that defined the work

Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.

  • Field interview + ledger tabulation (the Parlin era)

    Charles Coolidge Parlin's first market research at Curtis Publishing in 1911 used no specialized technology: researchers traveled to meet dealers, distributors, and consumers, recorded observations in notebooks, and tabulated results by hand in ledgers. The research product was a narrative report, not a statistical table. Daniel Starch perfected this manual approach with door-to-door "readership studies" that asked households whether they recalled seeing specific advertisements. The entire analytic toolbox was a pencil, a ledger, and a travel budget.

    Ledger workPaper recordkeeping
  • Scientific probability sampling + mail and telephone panels (Gallup era)

    George Gallup's American Institute of Public Opinion (1935) brought statistical sampling theory to consumer research: a properly drawn random sample of a few thousand respondents could represent the views of millions. This was a genuine methodological revolution, not just a tools upgrade. For the market research analyst, it meant that systematic survey design and statistical inference became core professional skills. Arthur Nielsen's 1936 acquisition of the Audimeter and his creation of the Nielsen Drug Index (1933) and Food Index (1934) industrialized retail measurement. The primary field instruments were the telephone interview (WATS lines from the 1940s) and the mailed questionnaire.

    Effect on the work

    Scientific sampling dramatically expanded the scope and credibility of market research, creating sustained demand for research professionals throughout the 1940s and 1950s. Large consumer goods companies built in-house research departments; independent firms like Nielsen, Gallup, Roper, and later Burke grew into significant employers.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Computer-assisted data processing + CATI (IBM mainframes and the conjoint era)

    IBM mainframe computers arrived in corporate research departments in the 1960s, transforming the analysis phase of the research cycle. Punch-card tabulation replaced hand-tabulation, reducing the time from fieldwork completion to results from weeks to days. Paul Green's development of conjoint analysis at Wharton in the early 1970s gave analysts a rigorous mathematical tool for modeling consumer preference trade-offs. Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) software, emerging in the mid-1970s, automated the interviewer's question routing, reduced data-entry error, and allowed real-time quota monitoring. By 1980, a market researcher at a major consumer goods company wielded a fundamentally different analytic toolkit than a researcher of 1960.

    Effect on the work

    Computer-aided analysis increased researcher productivity sharply, allowing smaller teams to process larger studies. It also raised the technical bar for entry: statistical fluency and some computing proficiency became expected qualifications by the mid-1970s, gradually professionalizing the occupation above its earlier roots in journalism and general business.

    Mainframe processingComputerized records
  • PC spreadsheets + SPSS / SAS (desktop statistical analysis era)

    The arrival of Lotus 1-2-3 (1983) and later Microsoft Excel, combined with desktop statistical packages like SPSS and SAS, put powerful quantitative tools on every analyst's desk. Research that had required mainframe turnaround and IT scheduling could now run on a PC overnight. Focus group facilities expanded in every major US city through the 1980s; Ernest Dichter's qualitative methodology, pioneered in the 1950s, became a standard complement to quantitative surveys. The analyst's day-to-day work shifted toward interpretation -- building crosstabs, running regressions, preparing PowerPoint presentations for brand teams -- rather than the earlier mechanical tabulation.

    Spreadsheet eraModels and analysis
  • Online surveys + internet panels (SurveyMonkey 1999, web analytics, social listening)

    SurveyMonkey launched in 1999 and within a decade had fundamentally democratized survey research: any brand manager, product manager, or startup founder could field a survey without a research firm. Online panels (Toluna, Survey Sampling International, Greenfield Online) replaced expensive telephone interviewing for most quantitative work. Web analytics tools (Omniture, Google Analytics from 2005) gave marketers behavioral data at a scale and granularity impossible via survey alone. Social media listening emerged as a category after Twitter (2006) and Facebook's growth -- platforms like Radian6 (2006) and Brandwatch (2007) let analysts monitor consumer conversation in real time. The research analyst's role bifurcated: the execution layer (programming surveys, running panels) became cheaper and more accessible, raising pressure on research agency billing rates; the insight and synthesis layer became more valuable as the data volume requiring interpretation grew.

    Effect on the work

    Online research dramatically reduced the cost and time of survey fieldwork, contributing to a structural shift away from large telephone research organizations and toward in-house corporate research teams equipped with self-service platforms. Research firm headcounts at traditional firms (Ipsos, TNS, Synovate) contracted while corporate insight teams at technology companies (Google, Facebook, Amazon) grew rapidly.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Big data + predictive analytics (behavioral data, customer data platforms, NPS systems)

    The mid-2010s brought a new source of competitive advantage for research analysts: first-party behavioral data. E-commerce companies, streaming services, and mobile apps accumulated purchase histories, clickstream records, and session logs that dwarfed anything survey research could produce. Customer data platforms (Salesforce, Adobe) and data warehouses (Snowflake, BigQuery) made behavioral data accessible to analytics teams. Fred Reichheld's Net Promoter Score, introduced in 2003, became nearly universal as a customer experience tracking metric by 2015. The research analyst role split further: quantitative specialists moved toward Python, R, and SQL; qualitative specialists moved toward ethnographic methods and customer journey mapping; a growing "insights manager" tier focused on synthesizing behavioral, survey, and qualitative data for business decisions.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Generative AI platforms (Quantilope quinn, Qualtrics Edge, Outset.ai, Brandwatch Iris AI)

    AI-powered research platforms launched in 2023-2025 compressed the execution layer of market research from weeks to hours. Quantilope's quinn AI co-pilot selects and configures advanced survey methods. Qualtrics Edge Audiences completes research that previously took weeks in minutes and cuts costs by 70%. Outset.ai conducts hundreds of simultaneous AI-moderated depth interviews in 40-plus languages. Brandwatch's Iris AI monitors 100 million-plus sources and transforms billions of data points into brand health summaries overnight. The Anthropic Economic Index (2025) places market research analysts at 64.8% LLM task exposure -- fifth-highest among white-collar roles. Despite this, BLS projects 7% employment growth through 2034, consistent with augmentation rather than displacement: the platform does the execution, the analyst owns the study design and strategic synthesis.

    Effect on the work

    AI platforms are compressing the research cycle and reducing the labor content of data collection, tabulation, and initial analysis. The occupation is bifurcating further: junior analysts whose primary role was executing surveys and producing cross-tab reports face genuine displacement pressure; senior analysts who own the research agenda, design novel methodologies, and synthesize cross-stream insights into business strategy are gaining leverage. Whether AI-driven cost compression grows the total market enough to offset displacement of execution-focused roles is the open empirical question through 2034.

    AI audit toolsPattern detection
Projection cone · present → 2034

What credible sources project

Scrub the slider past now to anchor each scenario on the scrubber. The spread is the range of futures credible sources project for this role.

Employment outlook
Projected change in the number of people doing this work.
Qualtrics Market Research AI Adoption Survey (2025)
2028
+15%
Qualtrics 2025 industry survey: 71% of market researchers believe synthetic AI-generated data will constitute the majority of research within three years; 62% have already used synthetic data. The global market research industry grew from $102 billion to $140 billion (37%) between 2021 and 2024 -- a period of intense AI adoption -- suggesting that AI is currently expanding the market rather than shrinking it. The +15% employment projection here extrapolates the industry's recent growth trajectory under the assumption that AI adoption continues to lower research costs, enabling organizations currently priced out of formal research to commission studies for the first time. This is an optimistic scenario; actual outcomes depend on how much demand expansion offsets the productivity-driven reduction in labor-hours per study.
BLS National Employment Matrix 2024-34
2034
+6.7%
BLS Employment Projections -- industry-occupation matrix plus labor productivity assumptions. The 2024-34 cycle projects 6.7% employment growth for 13-1161, equivalent to approximately 63,000 additional positions -- from 941,700 (2024) to approximately 1,004,700 (2034). BLS classifies this as "much faster than average" growth (all-occupations average: 4%). The largest employer sectors are professional, scientific, and technical services (238,000 workers in 2024), followed by finance and insurance (88,800) and information (83,600). The projection implies that AI adoption is accelerating demand for research capacity faster than it is displacing individual research roles -- consistent with the role's above-average augmentation upside from AI tools.
AI task exposure
Share of the role’s tasks that researchers estimate AI can do. This is a measure of task exposure, not a forecast of jobs lost.
Anthropic Economic Index (2025)
2030
64.8%
of tasks
Anthropic Economic Index (2025): task-by-task LLM exposure scoring across O*NET tasks using Claude usage patterns and economic output data. Market research analysts score 64.8% LLM task exposure -- fifth-highest among white-collar roles surveyed. The high exposure score reflects that survey design assistance, open-ended coding, competitive intelligence synthesis, and report generation are all tasks where LLMs demonstrably accelerate or partially substitute for analyst time. Rendered here as a task-exposure strip rather than an employment forecast. The index does not forecast job loss; it measures the share of job tasks where AI tools are already in active use or have demonstrated high impact potential.
Eloundou et al. -- "GPTs are GPTs" (2023)
2028
55%
of tasks
GPT-4 task-by-task LLM exposure labeling on O*NET tasks. Market research analysts score in the moderate-to-high exposure range: tasks such as gathering and analyzing consumer data, preparing survey instruments, and interpreting statistical findings have significant overlap with LLM capabilities. The important nuance: Eloundou measures LLM-specific exposure, not general automation. The highest-value tasks in the role -- designing novel research approaches for ambiguous business questions, moderating sensitive qualitative interviews, and synthesizing cross-stream findings into strategic recommendations -- score lower on LLM exposure because they require organizational context and interpersonal judgment. The ~55% figure here is an approximation for the combined 13-1161 code; Eloundou's published table focuses on market research analysts specifically and would differ from the broader marketing specialists portion of the combined BLS code.
Today, in this role

What's shifting in the work right now

The historical view above shows how this role has moved. This is the present-day detail: which AI tools are picking up which tasks, where the edge still is, and the natural directions this work can grow.

What's changing in your day

Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.

AI is sitting alongside you hereDirect AI-assisted open-ended response analysis using platforms like Yabble — defining the theme taxonomy and sentiment dimensions before fielding, reviewing AI-generated theme clusters and verbatim bucketing for accuracy, identifying edge-case responses that don't fit automated categories, and translating coded themes into a business-relevant insight narrative.

Direct AI-assisted open-ended response analysis using platforms like Yabble — defining the theme taxonomy and sentiment dimensions before fielding, reviewing AI-generated theme clusters and verbatim bucketing for accuracy, identifying edge-case responses that don't fit automated categories, and translating coded themes into a business-relevant insight narrative.[8],[9],[6]

Where your edge is

AI coding tools like Yabble Count work 1000x faster than human coders and have replaced the bulk of manual open-ended tabulation. Your leverage is upstream (defining the taxonomy that shapes what the AI finds) and downstream (interpreting what the clustered themes mean for the business decision). Build skills in thematic analysis and grounded theory — the frameworks that tell you whether AI-surfaced patterns are noise or signal.

AI is sitting alongside you hereManage the brand's social listening program using Brandwatch Iris AI — configuring query logic and Boolean filters for brand, competitor, and category monitoring across 100M+ sources, interpreting Iris-generated sentiment spike alerts in business context, identifying emerging consumer pain points and cultural moments from AI-surfaced conversation clusters, and translating findings into quarterly brand health reports for the marketing leadership team.

Manage the brand's social listening program using Brandwatch Iris AI — configuring query logic and Boolean filters for brand, competitor, and category monitoring across 100M+ sources, interpreting Iris-generated sentiment spike alerts in business context, identifying emerging consumer pain points and cultural moments from AI-surfaced conversation clusters, and translating findings into quarterly brand health reports for the marketing leadership team.[10],[11],[2]

Tools picking this up
Where your edge is

Iris AI now handles the continuous monitoring and anomaly alerting that once required daily manual pulls. Your leverage is in interpreting what the spikes mean: is this a real brand crisis or an isolated meme? Is this competitor sentiment shift a temporary campaign bump or a structural positioning gain? Build skills in applied discourse analysis and cultural context — the "so what" layer that distinguishes an insight from a data point.

AI is sitting alongside you hereRun the competitive intelligence program using Crayon — configuring the signal-collection scope across competitor websites, job postings, pricing pages, and press releases

Run the competitive intelligence program using Crayon — configuring the signal-collection scope across competitor websites, job postings, pricing pages, and press releases; reviewing AI-generated Sparks summaries for strategic relevance; enriching automated battlecards with proprietary context (win/loss interview data, sales team field intelligence); and translating competitive signals into quarterly positioning recommendations for the product and sales leadership teams.[12],[2]

Tools picking this up
Where your edge is

Crayon's Sparks AI now automates the collection and initial synthesis that once took analysts 2-3 days per competitor per quarter. Your differentiation is the proprietary context AI cannot access: win/loss interview themes, what sales reps hear in deals, and the organizational intelligence about why competitors are making the moves they're making. The battlecard is the commodity; the strategic interpretation is the moat.

Where this role is heading

Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.

A direction you could grow

Marketing Managers

Senior market research analysts who shape the research agenda and regularly present findings to marketing leadership already operate at the edge of this role. The pivot formalizes the shift from "supplier of intelligence" to "owner of marketing strategy" — adding budget accountability, team management, and agency/vendor oversight. Analysts who have built strong relationships with marketing stakeholders and understand how insights translate into campaign decisions are best positioned for this move. The primary skill gap is direct P&L ownership and the political navigation of cross-functional marketing leadership.

What you'd add
· Marketing performance attribution and ROI frameworks (MMM, multi-touch)
· AI marketing tool fluency: HubSpot Breeze, Adobe GenStudio, Salesforce Einstein
What it takesSome new skills to pick up
Share this year
Drops anyone you send it to straight into 2026.
Preview card
Part of Business & Finance · see all 32roles →
Different role?

See the same long-arc view for your own profession.

Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code. New roles ship every few weeks. Every profile cites every claim.

Browse all roles

The data behind this timeline

On record since1911
Latest tracked employment941,700 (US, 2024)
Latest median pay$76,950 (2024)
Outlook+15% by 2028 (Qualtrics Market Research AI Adoption Survey (2025))
View all 20 cited data points
YearUS employmentMedian annual paySource
19302,000n/aESTIMATE
195015,000$4,200ESTIMATE
197045,000$12,000ESTIMATE
1990120,000n/aESTIMATE
2000200,000$47,000ESTIMATE, BLS-OEWS
2010261,780$60,570BLS-OEWS
2011318,190$60,250BLS-OEWS
2012392,740$60,300BLS-OEWS
2013430,350$60,800BLS-OEWS
2014468,160$61,290BLS-OEWS
2015506,420$62,150BLS-OEWS
2016558,630$62,560BLS-OEWS
2017596,450$63,230BLS-OEWS
2018638,200$63,120BLS-OEWS
2019678,500$63,790BLS-OEWS
2020690,160$65,810BLS-OEWS
2021727,540$63,920BLS-OEWS
2022798,620$68,230BLS-OEWS
2023846,370$74,680BLS-OEWS
2024941,700$76,950BLS-OEWS
Embed this timeline on your site

Free for any site. Paste this where the timeline should appear; it stays interactive, every datapoint stays cited, and it sets no cookies on your page. How embedding works

<iframe src="https://futurehistory.earth/embed/13-1161"
  width="100%" height="430" style="border:0"
  title="Market Research Analysts and Marketing Specialists, a Future History timeline"
  loading="lazy"></iframe>

See all roles in Business & Finance