Skip to sources
Time Machine

Financial and Investment Analysts

Scrub through 136years of this role's history, from when it first emerged, through every wave of technology that reshaped it, to the cited projections for where it's heading next.

2026drag to travel through time
19001925195019752000now
Country
2026
Known today as Financial and Investment Analysts (BLS SOC 2018 revision)
Latest actual · 2024
369K
BLS OEWS May 2024, cited from BLS OOH and confirmed via O*NET. Employment of 368,500 reflects the 2018 SOC revision which merged the prior 13-2051 (Financial Analysts) with elements of 13-2052 (Personal Financial Advisors); the OOH continues to track the two occupational families separately, so this figure is best understood as the investment/research-oriented analyst population under the revised definition. Median annual wage was $101,350 in May 2024.
Latest actual · 2024
$101,350
BLS OEWS May 2024 median annual wage, cited from OOH and O*NET. The lowest 10 percent earned less than $62,410; the highest 10 percent earned more than $180,550. The spread reflects the wide range from corporate FP&A analysts at mid-market companies to front-office buy-side and investment banking roles at major financial institutions.
Each dot is a cited figure over time; the dotted line only links them (values between aren't measured). Hollow dots are estimates.
Beat · 2025

June 2025: Goldman Sachs deploys its GS AI Assistant to 46,500+ employees firmwide, cutting pitchbook preparation time by approximately 50 percent. Morgan Stanley's CEO reports AI tools are saving financial advisors 10 to 15 hours per week. AlphaSense Workflow Agents generate end-to-end company research arcs -- primers, competitive landscapes, sector analyses -- compressing weeks of manual analyst time into minutes. These are the first tools in the profession's history that directly automate high-value analytical outputs, not just information delivery. The profession enters 2026 with the highest AI adoption rate of any major white-collar occupational group, according to Citigroup's finance sector analysis.

Tools of the era

The tools that defined the work

Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.

  • Stock ticker tape and paper ledgers (pre-Graham era)

    The earliest securities analysts worked with manually pulled ticker tape prices, corporate annual reports obtained by mail, and hand-tabulated financial ledgers. There was no standardized income statement or balance sheet format until the SEC mandated disclosure under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 -- companies could and did report financials in whatever format served their interests. The analytical "tool" was the analyst themselves: a person with access to paper filings, the arithmetic ability to calculate yield ratios and earnings multiples by hand, and the judgment to distinguish a mismanaged company from a sound one. The work was slow, the information was incomplete, and the entire edifice of modern financial analysis had not yet been named, let alone codified.

    Ledger workPaper recordkeeping
  • Published financial statements + NFFAS research framework (Graham-Dodd era)

    The Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 imposed standardized disclosure on public companies for the first time, giving analysts a reliable and legally mandated information base. Benjamin Graham and David Dodd's Security Analysis (1934) provided the first systematic methodology: intrinsic value, margin of safety, and fundamental analysis grounded in publicly available financial statements. The New York Society of Security Analysts (1937) and the National Federation of Financial Analysts Societies (1947) gave analysts professional infrastructure -- journals, examinations, ethics standards. For the first time "financial analyst" was a describable job with a definable skill set, not just a role an intelligent person might play inside a brokerage firm.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Quotron terminal and electronic stock quotes (first financial data screen, 1960)

    In 1960, Quotron became the first company to deliver stock market prices to an electronic screen rather than a paper ticker tape. Before Quotron, a buy-side analyst who wanted the current price of a security had to call a broker or wait for the next printed tape. Quotron put prices on a screen in near-real time. Telerate (founded 1969) extended this to government bond prices; both services grew through the 1970s as institutional money management expanded. The Quotron era did not eliminate the analysis function -- it accelerated the information flow while leaving the interpretive judgment firmly with the analyst -- but it established the electronic terminal as the central tool of the investment profession, a fixture that Bloomberg and Reuters would later transform into something far more powerful.

    Effect on the work

    Quotron is estimated to have had 100,000 terminals rented by the time Citicorp acquired the company in 1986 -- roughly 60 percent of the financial data terminal market. The breadth of adoption shows how thoroughly the electronic information terminal had replaced the paper ticker tape in institutional finance within a single generation.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Electronic spreadsheet -- VisiCalc (1979) and Lotus 1-2-3 (1983)

    VisiCalc, designed by Dan Bricklin and Bob Frankston and released for the Apple II in 1979, was the first electronic spreadsheet. Lotus 1-2-3 (January 26, 1983) brought it to the IBM PC, generating $53 million in first-year revenues and tripling to $156 million in its second year. For financial analysts, the spreadsheet was the most consequential tool since the disclosure regime. Before 1979, building a three-statement financial model or a discounted cash flow analysis meant working through the arithmetic by hand or using mainframe batch jobs. The spreadsheet made it possible for a single analyst to build a model in hours that would previously have taken a team days -- and, crucially, to change one assumption and see the entire model update instantly. Investment banks built spreadsheet training into their analyst onboarding programs. The same computational capacity that enabled rigorous LBO modeling enabled the creation of mortgage-backed securities and complex derivatives that would have been analytically intractable without spreadsheet tools.

    Effect on the work

    Spreadsheet adoption did not reduce analyst employment -- the opposite: the ability to model rapidly expanded the range of problems that warranted analysis, increased the value of quantitative skills, and drove demand for analysts who could build credible financial models. By the mid-1980s, spreadsheet fluency was a baseline requirement for entry-level analyst positions at investment banks.

    Spreadsheet eraModels and analysis
  • Bloomberg Terminal (1982 commercial launch) and the integrated data era

    Michael Bloomberg left Salomon Brothers in 1981 after being bought out as a partner following the firm's acquisition by Phibro, and used his $10 million payout to build a new kind of financial data service. He signed a foundational $30 million contract with Merrill Lynch in exchange for 30 percent equity, and delivered the first terminals in 1982. What Bloomberg understood -- and what Quotron and Telerate had missed -- was that the value was not in prices alone but in the ability to compute with them: to run bond yield calculations, portfolio simulations, and comparative analytics directly on the terminal, not in a separate mainframe batch job. By the early 1990s, the Bloomberg Terminal had become the essential tool of every buy-side and sell-side analyst. A generation of analysts learned to read markets through the Bloomberg green-and-black interface; the "two-letter shortcut" fluency that Bloomberg Terminal required became a genuine hiring signal at major firms. Reuters TRITON and later Reuters Eikon competed, but Bloomberg's installed base and the network effect of the "chat" function (which connected analysts at different institutions) made the Terminal something between a tool and an infrastructure layer.

    Effect on the work

    The Bloomberg Terminal raised the productivity ceiling for individual analysts by making real-time data, news, and analytics accessible in a single interface -- and simultaneously raised the floor, because analysts who could not use it competently were effectively shut out of institutional work. It did not reduce employment; it filtered and elevated the technical bar.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Regulation FD (2000) and the Global Research Analyst Settlement (2003)

    Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure), adopted by the SEC in August 2000, prohibited companies from selectively disclosing material information to favored analysts before making it public. Before Reg FD, sell-side analysts at major banks had relied heavily on private access -- pre-earnings guidance calls, informal briefings from investor relations, and selective management meetings -- as their primary information advantage. Reg FD leveled that advantage. In 2003, the Global Research Analyst Settlement -- a $1.4 billion resolution involving ten major investment banks -- imposed structural separation between investment banking and equity research at those firms. Banks could no longer use favorable research ratings as a currency to win banking mandates, and "superstar" analysts whose optimistic dot-com ratings had earned their banks enormous IPO fees had their compensation severed from banking revenue. Average annual pay for a senior sell-side analyst fell approximately 50 percent from $1.5 million in 1999 to around $750,000 in 2004. These two regulatory events together restructured the sell-side analyst profession: smaller teams, more independent research, less leverage from information asymmetry.

    Compliance systemsControls and audit files
  • Excel-based financial modeling suites, specialized analytics platforms, and alternative data

    The post-crisis decade saw financial analysis fragment into an increasingly specialized ecosystem of tools: S&P Capital IQ and FactSet for comparable-company data; Refinitiv (formerly Thomson Reuters Eikon) for news and analytics; Morningstar Direct for fund research; PitchBook for private-company transaction data. Excel remained the universal modeling environment, but the data flowing into it was now sourced from purpose-built analytical platforms rather than manual research. "Alternative data" -- satellite imagery of parking lots, credit card transaction feeds, web-scraping of pricing -- emerged as a new information category that systematic and quantitative hedge funds pioneered, creating demand for analysts who could interpret non-traditional signals alongside traditional financial statements. MiFID II (effective January 3, 2018) imposed research unbundling across EU firms, requiring explicit pricing of sell-side research; studies found sell-side analyst coverage of smaller companies declined noticeably in the post-MiFID II period.

    Effect on the work

    A CFA Institute survey found that a negative employment effect in sell-side research followed MiFID II, with coverage of small- and mid-cap stocks declining according to 47-53% of respondents. The alternative data era simultaneously created new demand for quant analysts, data scientists, and research technologists on the buy side, partially offsetting headcount reductions in traditional sell-side research.

    Spreadsheet eraModels and analysis
  • AI-native research platforms -- AlphaSense, Hebbia, Daloopa, and enterprise LLM assistants

    AlphaSense's Generative Search (generally available January 2026), Hebbia's Matrix workspace, and Daloopa's automated SEC-filing-to-Excel extraction represent the first tools that genuinely substitute for analyst time on specific high-value tasks rather than merely accelerating data delivery. AlphaSense generates earnings tearsheets within hours of each call, compresses weeks of company research into minutes via AI-drafted primers, and runs "generative grids" across entire document sets. Hebbia processes thousands of documents simultaneously and reportedly automates up to 90 percent of manual document synthesis in due-diligence workflows. Goldman Sachs deployed its GS AI Assistant to 46,500 employees in June 2025, cutting pitchbook preparation time by approximately 50 percent. Morgan Stanley's AI Debrief tool saves financial advisors an estimated 10 to 15 hours per week. These are not marginal efficiency gains; they eliminate entire categories of junior analyst work -- the data extraction, first-draft document assembly, and routine research synthesis that have historically been the entry point for the profession. The open question the profession is actively working through is whether the time savings are reinvested in broader analytical coverage (which would grow employment) or extracted as headcount reductions (which would shrink it).

    Effect on the work

    Citigroup's 2024 "AI in Finance: Bot, Bank & Beyond" report identifies the finance sector as having the highest share of jobs with "high potential for automation" of any sector -- 54 percent. Goldman Sachs projected that AI would "intensify automation over hiring" at the junior analyst level. BLS nonetheless projects 6 percent employment growth for financial analysts from 2024 to 2034, faster than the all-occupations average, suggesting the profession's expanded scope of problems offsets the automation of individual tasks.

    AI audit toolsPattern detection
Projection cone · present → 2034

What credible sources project

Scrub the slider past now to anchor each scenario on the scrubber. The spread is the range of futures credible sources project for this role.

Employment outlook
Projected change in the number of people doing this work.
BLS National Employment Matrix 2024-34
2034
+6%
BLS Employment Projections industry-occupation matrix plus labor productivity assumptions. The 2024-34 cycle projects 6 percent employment growth for financial and investment analysts (13-2051), equivalent to approximately 22,100 additional positions over the decade. This is classified as "faster than average" against an all-occupations average of approximately 4 percent. BLS attributes the growth to: expanded investment opportunities in emerging markets; growing volumes of financial data requiring evaluation; demand from new business formation and corporate expansion. The projection does not explicitly model AI adoption rates within the occupation, which creates meaningful uncertainty in both directions: faster AI adoption could reduce headcount per unit of work analyzed; slower adoption (or reinvestment of time savings into broader coverage) could sustain or accelerate the growth path.
CFA Institute Enterprising Investor -- AI in Finance (2026)
2030
+4%
CFA Institute 2026 study of AI adoption in investment management finds that demand for human judgment in financial analysis is growing even as AI handles routine synthesis tasks. The study identifies investment committee presentations, mandate-setting, capital-allocation accountability, and client relationships as firmly human tasks insulated from AI displacement, and projects continued positive employment growth for analysts who specialize in these higher-order functions. The 4 percent estimate is the study's implied growth trajectory for the profession through the 2030s, net of headcount reductions in junior sell-side research offset by demand growth in buy-side and corporate roles requiring human judgment. Reported here as a more conservative counterpoint to the BLS 6 percent projection.
AI task exposure
Share of the role’s tasks that researchers estimate AI can do. This is a measure of task exposure, not a forecast of jobs lost.
Eloundou et al. -- "GPTs are GPTs" (2023)
2030
35%
of tasks
GPT-4 task-by-task LLM exposure labeling on O*NET tasks for financial analyst roles. Eloundou et al. (Science, 2024) find that financial analysts score in the moderate-to-high range for LLM exposure because the dominant tasks -- drafting research notes, processing earnings calls, building financial summaries, synthesizing filings -- are directly addressable by language models. The 35 percent figure represents the estimated share of financial analyst task-hours that LLMs can reduce time on by at least 50 percent; it is a task-exposure measure rather than a headcount projection. High exposure does not mechanically imply employment decline: if analysts use the freed time to expand coverage universes, the occupation could grow even as per-analyst workload on routine tasks shrinks. The contrast with routine administrative work is important: financial analysts are identified as an occupation where AI augmentation is more likely than wholesale displacement, because the judgment, mandate-setting, and client-trust tasks that anchor the role's value are explicitly non-LLM.
Today, in this role

What's shifting in the work right now

The historical view above shows how this role has moved. This is the present-day detail: which AI tools are picking up which tasks, where the edge still is, and the natural directions this work can grow.

What's changing in your day

Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.

AI is sitting alongside you hereProcess earnings calls during reporting season: use AlphaSense Smart Summaries to ingest AI-generated earnings tearsheets (available within hours of the call), extract analyst Q&A themes and management guidance deltas, then produce a same-day read-through for the portfolio team highlighting material changes vs

Process earnings calls during reporting season: use AlphaSense Smart Summaries to ingest AI-generated earnings tearsheets (available within hours of the call), extract analyst Q&A themes and management guidance deltas, then produce a same-day read-through for the portfolio team highlighting material changes vs. prior quarter.[10],[11]

Tools picking this up
Where your edge is

Focus on cross-company read-throughs and macro-signal interpretation that AI summarization cannot yet do reliably: when one company's guidance implies sector-wide margin pressure, that inference requires industry knowledge and pattern recognition that are currently human advantages.

AI is sitting alongside you hereDraft equity research notes and investment memos by directing AlphaSense Generative Search or Hebbia to synthesize earnings transcripts, 10-K/10-Q filings, and broker reports into a structured first draft

Draft equity research notes and investment memos by directing AlphaSense Generative Search or Hebbia to synthesize earnings transcripts, 10-K/10-Q filings, and broker reports into a structured first draft; then apply sector expertise and investment thesis to revise, challenge, and finalize the recommendation.[12],[13],[8]

Tools picking this up
Where your edge is

Own the investment thesis and recommendation — AI assembles facts but cannot hold a conviction or defend it to a portfolio manager. Develop a clear, disciplined framework for overriding AI-generated summaries and practice writing the key-risk section from first principles.

AI is sitting alongside you hereConduct comparable-company and precedent-transaction analyses: leverage FactSet Mercury or AlphaSense Financial Data to pull trading multiples, sector comp sets, and M&A transaction databases via natural-language queries

Conduct comparable-company and precedent-transaction analyses: leverage FactSet Mercury or AlphaSense Financial Data to pull trading multiples, sector comp sets, and M&A transaction databases via natural-language queries; validate peer group selection and assess whether AI-surfaced comps are genuinely comparable before presenting to senior analysts.[14],[15],[4]

Where your edge is

Peer-group selection and multiple adjustments for non-recurring items are where AI tools still fail on edge cases. Build expertise in bespoke industries where generic SIC-code comp sets are misleading; develop judgment for when to override the AI-surfaced peer group.

Where this role is heading

Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.

A direction you could grow

Treasurers and Controllers

Financial analysts possess the valuation, capital-markets, and financial-statement literacy that Treasurers and Controllers deploy at the enterprise level. As AI absorbs routine analysis, analysts who move into treasury and controllership roles gain broader organizational accountability, cross-functional authority, and a seat at the capital-allocation table — all of which anchor human irreplaceability. The transition is well-trodden: CFA-certified analysts often move into FP&A and then treasury/controllership as their careers mature. Goldman Sachs's projection that AI will intensify "automation over hiring" at junior levels (BusinessToday, Jan 2026) makes this an increasingly attractive exit for analysts 3–7 years in.

What you'd add
· Cash management and liquidity forecasting (bank relationship management, sweep accounts, FX hedging)
· Enterprise systems: SAP Treasury, Oracle Cash Management, or Kyriba
· Board and audit-committee reporting (financial governance and internal-controls literacy)
· Debt capital markets: bond issuance, credit facility management, covenant compliance
What it takesSome new skills to pick up
Share this year
Drops anyone you send it to straight into 2026.
Preview card
Part of Business & Finance · see all 32roles →
Different role?

See the same long-arc view for your own profession.

Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code. New roles ship every few weeks. Every profile cites every claim.

Browse all roles

The data behind this timeline

On record since1900
Latest tracked employment368,500 (US, 2024)
Latest median pay$101,350 (2024)
Outlook+4% by 2030 (CFA Institute Enterprising Investor -- AI in Finance (2026))
View all 24 cited data points
YearUS employmentMedian annual paySource
1944700n/aESTIMATE
1963284$8,000ESTIMATE
1990200,000$38,000ESTIMATE
2000221,000$55,690BLS-OEWS
2003165,420$60,050BLS-OEWS
2004177,780$61,910BLS-OEWS
2005180,910$63,860BLS-OEWS
2006196,960$66,590BLS-OEWS
2007228,300$70,400BLS-OEWS
2008236,720$73,150BLS-OEWS
2009235,240$73,670BLS-OEWS
2010220,810$74,350BLS-OEWS
2011226,340$75,650BLS-OEWS
2012239,810$76,950BLS-OEWS
2013250,670$78,380BLS-OEWS
2014262,610$78,620BLS-OEWS
2015268,360$80,310BLS-OEWS
2016281,610$81,760BLS-OEWS
2017294,110$84,300BLS-OEWS
2018306,200$85,660BLS-OEWS
2021291,880$91,580BLS-OEWS
2022291,370$95,080BLS-OEWS
2023325,220$99,010BLS-OEWS
2024368,500$101,350BLS-OEWS
Embed this timeline on your site

Free for any site. Paste this where the timeline should appear; it stays interactive, every datapoint stays cited, and it sets no cookies on your page. How embedding works

<iframe src="https://futurehistory.earth/embed/13-2051"
  width="100%" height="430" style="border:0"
  title="Financial and Investment Analysts, a Future History timeline"
  loading="lazy"></iframe>

See all roles in Business & Finance