Skip to sources
Time Machine

Film and video editors

Also called Video editor, Film editor, Post-production editor, Senior editor (film/video), Assembly editor

In brief

In May 2025, BLS counted 25,610 US film and video editors, with median pay of $75,420 a year. Of the BLS counts since 2021, the highest was 32,080, in May 2022. The earliest figure here is an estimate of 571 from 1937, not measured the same way as today's count. The last full technology era for film and video editors: Streaming platform expansion, 2013 to 2022.

What the sources say

Official outlook

BLS projects employment to grow 3.7% from 2025 to 2035.

BLS Employment Projections 2025-35

AI exposure studies

Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. BLS publishes these counts as yearly survey snapshots and cautions against reading them as a precise trend.

Last updated .

Cite this page
APA

Future History. (2026, October 11). Film and video editors: jobs and pay since 1937 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/27-4032

Chicago

Future History. "Film and video editors: jobs and pay since 1937." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 11, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/27-4032.

BibTeX

@misc{futurehistory_27_4032, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Film and video editors: jobs and pay since 1937}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/27-4032}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-11. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }

The access date is today's date on your device.

drag to travel through time
19001925195019752000now
2026
Known then as Cutter / Negative Cutter (early silent-era assembly worker)
Known then as Film Cutter / Film Editor (Griffith era, craft professionalization)
Known then as Film Editor (studio system, Moviola era, guild formation)
Known then as Film Editor / Video Editor (flatbed era, television expansion)
Known then as Film Editor / Offline Editor (Avid NLE transition era)
Known then as Film and Video Editors (BLS SOC 27-4032)
Known today as Film and Video Editors (BLS SOC 27-4032)
Projected to still be called Film and Video Editors (BLS SOC 27-4032)
Data from the May 2025 survey
US Employment
26K
Est.

Stated in source: BLS OEWS

Official statistic
Report an error
Median Annual Wage
$75,420
Est.

≈ $73,486 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)

Official statistic
Report an error
Beat · 1915

D. W. Griffith's "The Birth of a Nation" (1915) demonstrates the power of editorial grammar -- cross-cutting, parallel action, close-up insertion -- on a feature scale. Griffith and his editors Rose Smith and Jimmy Smith established the vocabulary of cuts that still governs screen language today. The film is also an important early marker of how editing can be used to control emotional response and construct a political argument: the film's racist content was delivered through deliberate editorial manipulation of audience identification and tempo. The edit, for the first time, was understood as ideology.

Beat · 1934

The 7th Academy Awards ceremony (held March 27, 1935, for films of 1934) presents the first-ever Oscar for Best Film Editing, won by Conrad A. Nervig for "Eskimo." The establishment of the award is a formal acknowledgment by the industry that editing is a creative act, not a technical one -- that it belongs in the same category as cinematography, writing, and direction as something that can distinguish one film from another. The editing Oscar becomes one of the strongest predictors of Best Picture: films that win for editing win Best Picture at a high rate.

Beat · 1937

May 20, 1937: Sound editor James Wilkinson and film editors Ben Lewis and Philip Cahn found the Society of Motion Picture Film Editors in Hollywood. By June 7, membership totals 571 -- picture and sound editors, assistants, apprentices, and librarians. First elected president is Edmund D. Hannan; Edward Dmytryk (later a director, remembered for the "Hollywood Ten" HUAC period) serves as secretary. The guild formed during the Depression when studios were imposing severe pay cuts and layoffs, catalyzed by the April 12, 1937 Supreme Court decision upholding the National Labor Relations Act. A 10% wage increase in the 1938 first contract is the guild's first concrete victory.

Beat · 1970

By 1970, women -- who had held a disproportionately large share of film editing positions in the silent era (when cutting was considered menial, like sewing) -- had been largely displaced from leading editor positions in Hollywood. The professionalization of editing and its formal guild structure in the 1930s corresponded with a systematic shift toward male editors in major studio cutting rooms. The hidden history of women film editors -- Dede Allen, Verna Fields, Thelma Schoonmaker -- is one of exceptional individuals maintaining positions in a craft from which other women had been gradually squeezed out. Schoonmaker's partnership with Martin Scorsese, which began with "Raging Bull" (1980), became one of the defining director-editor relationships in cinema history.

Beat · 1996

"The English Patient" wins the Oscar for Best Film Editing, edited by Walter Murch on Avid Media Composer -- the first major film to win the editing Oscar for work done entirely on an NLE system. Murch, who had earlier theorized the "rule of six" for cut decisions (emotion, story, rhythm, eye trace, two-dimensional plane of the screen, three-dimensional space), became the de facto philosopher-editor of the NLE transition, arguing that the Avid preserved and enhanced -- rather than degraded -- the intuitive physical rhythms of editing that editors had developed on the Moviola and flatbed.

Beat · 2023

The Writers Guild of America strike (May 2-September 27, 2023, 148 days) and the simultaneous SAG-AFTRA strike (July 14-November 9, 2023) together caused the longest combined production shutdown in Hollywood history since the Great Depression. Both strikes centered in part on AI provisions: the WGA secured language prohibiting AI from being credited as a writer and restricting use of writers' material to train AI models. The strikes cost the Los Angeles economy an estimated $6.5 billion and resulted in significant temporary unemployment for film and video editors, who are not WGA or SAG members but whose work was suspended when productions stopped. IATSE Local 700 (the Motion Picture Editors Guild) began its own AI negotiations in the 2025-2026 contract cycle, following the WGA and SAG precedents.

How to read this number

OEWS is a point-in-time survey snapshot, not a continuous time series; BLS advises against using it for year-over-year trend comparison.

Each dot is a cited figure over time; the dotted line only links them (values between aren't measured). Hollow dots are estimates.

Official statistic: Copied by a script from a statistics agency table or a published study's table, not retyped by hand. BLS figures and the forecast and exposure tables are also re-checked against that table on every data run. Researched context: Researched from the cited source rather than copied from it by a script, so it is not machine-checked yet. Spot a mistake? Each figure has a “Report an error” link.

Cited forecasts · present → 2035

Will AI replace film and video editors? What the research says

Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.

Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.

What published forecasts say
Forecast change in the number of people doing this work, as published by each named source. Bars share one scale on every role, centred on zero and reaching the end at ±30%. Grey marks a small change, 3% or less either way.
BLS Employment Projections 2025-35
→ 2035
+3.7%
BLS National Employment Matrix, 2025-35 cycle, line for SOC 27-4032 (Film and video editors): 39.4 thousand jobs in 2025, projected 40.8 thousand in 2035, a change of +1.5 thousand (+3.7%). Matrix employment counts all jobs in the occupation, including self-employed workers (35.5% of this occupation in 2025). The average for all occupations in this cycle is +3.5%.
Official statisticReport an error
How exposed is this work to AI (research measures)
Scores as published by each study. Each row says what it measures. These measure what AI could technically do, not forecasts of jobs lost.
Eloundou et al. (2023), "GPTs are GPTs"
2023 study · Share of tasks exposed to LLMs (β, human-rated)
47.2%
of tasks
What this measures

Published occupation-level exposure from the paper's occ_level.csv for O*NET-SOC 27-4032.00 Film and Video Editors. Shown: human-rated β = 0.472, the share of the occupation's tasks an LLM could do in at least half the time at equal quality, counting tasks that need LLM-powered software at half weight (β = E1 + 0.5 × E2). Other published measures for this occupation: human-rated α (LLM alone) 0.139 and γ (all LLM-assisted) 0.806; GPT-4-rated β 0.528. This measures how much of the work an LLM could touch, not how many jobs disappear.

Official statisticReport an error
Today, in this role

What's changing day to day for film and video editors

Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.

AI is sitting alongside you hereAssemble a rough cut from interview-driven or documentary footage using AI transcript-based editing, importing dailies into Descript or Adobe Premiere Pro, auto-generating accurate speaker-attributed transcripts via Speech to Text, marking selects directly in the transcript document, and exporting a timeline sequence from highlighted text

Assemble a rough cut from interview-driven or documentary footage using AI transcript-based editing, importing dailies into Descript or Adobe Premiere Pro, auto-generating accurate speaker-attributed transcripts via Speech to Text, marking selects directly in the transcript document, and exporting a timeline sequence from highlighted text; then reviewing the AI-assembled rough cut for narrative flow, tonal consistency, and the performance moments the transcript cannot surface (facial expression, pause weight, emotional subtext).[9],[10],[5]

Where your edge is

Transcript-based assembly editing has reduced the manual work of a documentary rough cut for interview-driven formats: what took a week of paper-edit review and physical assembly now takes a day. The remaining editorial work is the part AI cannot do: deciding which answer best serves the argument, identifying the performance beat where a subject's guard drops, and structuring the emotional arc across an hour of material. Build your craft specifically on the judgment layer (structure, performance, and argument) so that as AI handles the mechanical assembly, you're moving upstream into the creative decisions that justify a senior editor's day rate.

AI is sitting alongside you hereSource and integrate B-roll and insert footage using AI generative video tools: using Runway Gen-4 or Google Veo 3 to generate photorealistic cutaway shots, establishing clips, and location inserts from text prompts and reference stills when pickups are not available or practical

Source and integrate B-roll and insert footage using AI generative video tools: using Runway Gen-4 or Google Veo 3 to generate photorealistic cutaway shots, establishing clips, and location inserts from text prompts and reference stills when pickups are not available or practical; evaluating AI-generated footage against continuity requirements (lighting match, color temperature, motion consistency) before cutting it into the timeline; and identifying shots where generative artifacts (motion physics errors, face inconsistency, edge artifacts) disqualify AI footage from professional use.[6],[11],[12]

Where your edge is

Generative video B-roll is commercially viable in 2026 for many insert and cutaway applications and is entering broadcast workflows at scale (Variety, Apr 2026). The editor's value in this workflow is not generating the clips: it is knowing which AI clips are acceptable and which carry production risk: consistency failures across multiple cuts, motion physics that break under slow playback, skin tone rendering that reads as artificial on broadcast monitors, and any shot requiring a specific recognizable face or location. Build a B-roll QC protocol that tests AI footage against the worst-case delivery scenario (full-screen broadcast, large format, slow-motion review) rather than the compressed web preview where artifacts are invisible.

AI is sitting alongside you hereClean and restore production audio on the timeline before final mix handoff: using iZotope RX 11's AI-powered Dialogue Isolation, Spectral De-noise, De-click, and Breath Control modules to automatically remove set noise, mic handling artifacts, and breath sounds from recorded dialogue

Clean and restore production audio on the timeline before final mix handoff: using iZotope RX 11's AI-powered Dialogue Isolation, Spectral De-noise, De-click, and Breath Control modules to automatically remove set noise, mic handling artifacts, and breath sounds from recorded dialogue; reviewing AI-processed audio for over-processing artifacts (phoneme distortion, consonant softening, unnatural breath rhythm) that indicate the AI model applied too aggressive a setting for the scene's acoustic character.[13],[5]

Tools picking this up
Where your edge is

iZotope RX 11's AI dialogue repair is transformative for field-recorded production audio: what previously required a dedicated audio editor to manually address line-by-line can now be applied automatically at the sequence level. The quality check remains essential, however: AI noise removal set too aggressively produces a recognizable "processed" quality, consonants soften, room ambience becomes artificially uniform, and room tone transitions between shots become audible. Build a two-pass protocol: AI processing on the full sequence at a conservative setting, then manual pass for the lines where dialogue quality is critical to emotional performance. The manual pass is now a review task, not a full-sequence task.

Where film and video editors go next

Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.

What each move takes

A direction you could grow

Producers and Directors

Senior film and video editors who have made hundreds of structural decisions per project (selecting which story to tell, which performance to keep, how to sequence events to control audience expectation) have already developed the foundational skill set of a narrative director. The edit bay is one of the most common paths into directing: David Fincher, George Lucas, and numerous contemporary directors developed their visual grammar through editing. As AI tools compress the mechanical work of assembly and color correction, the "editorial eye" that drives cut decisions is increasingly indistinguishable from directorial vision. Editors who have collaborated closely with directors on multiple features are particularly well-positioned: they have observed the full production decision chain, understand how camera choices limit or enable editorial options, and can articulate visual language in the terms directors and DPs use. The transition typically starts with directing short content (branded, documentary) where editorial skills are directly applicable before scaling to larger narrative work.

What you'd add
  • · On-set direction of actors and camera crew: translating editorial instincts about what you need in the cut into set decisions about staging, coverage, and performance
  • · Pre-production skills: breaking down a script from a directing perspective (shot list, storyboards, coverage plan) rather than an editorial perspective
  • · AI pre-visualization using Runway Gen-4 or Sora to communicate visual intent to DPs and production designers before shooting
  • · Production budgeting and scheduling: understanding how directorial choices affect below-the-line costs
  • · Talent direction fundamentals: how to give performance notes in the language of acting (objective, obstacle, action) rather than result direction ("be sadder")
What it takesSome new skills to pick up
Tools of the era

How has the work of film and video editors changed since 1896?

The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.

  • Scissors, cement splicer, and light box (silent-era physical cutting)

    The earliest film editors worked with raw tools: scissors to trim individual frames, film cement to join them, and a light box or simple projector to review the result. There was no purpose-built editing machine. A "cutter" worked on a bench, holding a strip of celluloid up to the light to find the frame where a splice should go, trimming it by hand, and cementing the join. Continuity errors went unnoticed until a rough assembly was projected. The craft was defined entirely by physical dexterity and spatial memory -- the editor had to carry the shape of a scene in mind with no playback capability between bench and projection room.

  • Moviola upright editing machine (Iwan Serrurier, 1924)

    Iwan Serrurier adapted his home-projector concept into a professional upright editing machine in 1924; Douglas Fairbanks Studios received the first unit. The Moviola allowed an editor to view a moving image on a small internal screen while controlling speed and direction with a foot pedal -- for the first time, decisions about the precise cut point could be made while watching the image rather than holding film up to a light. The sound Moviola followed in 1931, allowing picture and dialogue tracks to be synchronized. The Moviola dominated US film editing for over four decades and defined the physical rhythms of the profession: the foot pedal, the upright orientation, the clicking machinery of the reel. Editors worked alone in small cutting rooms lined with trim bins holding labeled film strips -- a physical library of footage organized by the editor's own system.

    Effect on the work

    The Moviola did not reduce editorial labor but dramatically increased the precision and quality achievable per unit of time. Before the Moviola, rough-cut assembly required multiple projection-bench-projection cycles; the Moviola collapsed these into a continuous decision loop at the editing bench. It cemented editing as a skilled craft requiring dedicated tools and training, rather than a semi-clerical splicing function.

  • Horizontal flatbed editing table (KEM, Steenbeck -- European import into US)

    Flatbed editing tables -- the KEM (Kellner Electrical Mechanik) from Germany and the Steenbeck from Munich -- were developed in Europe from the 1950s and reached widespread US use in the 1960s-1970s. Unlike the upright Moviola, the flatbed ran film horizontally across a large plate, with a projection screen at eye level and a work surface that allowed the editor to spool through footage at high speed. The flatbed offered better image quality during viewing, easier multi-track synchronization, and faster long-form assembly for television and documentary work. By the late 1970s the flatbed had become the preferred tool for documentary, foreign film, and many Hollywood features -- particularly on the coasts where European-trained editors had migrated. The Moviola's upright design remained in use at many US studios through the 1980s, with notable holdouts like Michael Kahn (Spielberg's longtime editor) preferring the Moviola even into the 2000s.

  • Linear tape editing (CMX 600, 1971; CMX 300, Sony BVE editors; broadcast standard)

    Television news and production required a different workflow than theatrical film: video tape, not celluloid. The CMX 600, introduced in 1971, was the first computer-controlled video editing system -- it stored digitized black-and-white images on disk and allowed editors to assemble an edit decision list (EDL) before committing to the final tape master. The CMX 300 and its successors became the broadcast industry standard for decades. Linear tape editing required that edits be made in sequential order, from beginning to end -- changing a decision early in a cut meant re-assembling everything that came after it. This fundamental constraint shaped how broadcast and corporate video editors thought about their work: plan the cut completely before beginning the final assembly. The transition from film to tape in television newsrooms in the late 1970s created an entirely new population of video editors who had never worked with film at all.

    Effect on the work

    Linear tape editing expanded the editor population dramatically by creating a broadcast and corporate video editing workforce that operated independently from the film industry. By the 1980s, television had become the dominant employer of editors. The linear edit suite -- two or three VTR decks, a controller, a switcher -- was a capital investment that anchored editors to post-production facilities rather than the studio cutting room.

  • Avid Media Composer nonlinear editing (NLE revolution, 1989-1992 film industry adoption)

    Avid Technology announced the Media Composer at the 1989 NAB convention -- a hardware-software system on an Apple Mac IIx that digitized footage onto hard disk and allowed editors to arrange clips in any order without re-editing sequentially. The Avid Film Composer, introduced in August 1992, was the first NLE capable of capturing and editing natively at many frames per second (film standard). "Lost in Yonkers" (1993) was the first theatrical feature edited on Avid Media Composer; in 1996, "The English Patient" won the Oscar for Best Editing for Walter Murch's work on the Avid. The transition from physical film cutting to NLE was the first complete retooling of the editorial profession in decades: the Moviola trim bin, the cement splicer, and the physical library of labeled film strips disappeared from cutting rooms within a decade.

    Effect on the work

    NLE accelerated every phase of editorial workflow -- assembly, rough cut, fine cut, and delivery. Industry estimates suggest NLE reduced the calendar time for a feature-film rough cut compared to flatbed editing. The most disruptive effect was not speed but reversibility: any cut decision could be undone without re-splicing; multiple simultaneous cut versions could coexist. This opened iterative creative experimentation that was logistically impossible with physical film.

  • Desktop NLE democratization (Final Cut Pro 1999, Adobe Premiere; independent and web video explosion)

    Apple released Final Cut Pro at NAB in April 1999 at $999. Within a few years, a professional-quality nonlinear editing suite could be assembled on a standard Mac. The democratization had two effects: it massively expanded the population of people who could call themselves video editors (web content, YouTube from 2005, independent film, corporate and wedding video), and it compressed wage floors for lower-tier editing work as supply expanded. The indie film movement that produced digital features on DV cameras edited on Final Cut Pro (Sundance-era, Blair Witch Project 1999) defined a new aesthetic and a new entry path into the craft that bypassed the traditional assistant-editor apprenticeship in union facilities.

    Effect on the work

    The desktop NLE era expanded the total video editor population dramatically. The flip side was compression of entry-level wages: the editor doing YouTube content, wedding video, or corporate training video operated in a market where supply had expanded enormously.

  • Streaming platform expansion (Netflix originals 2013, Amazon, Disney+; long-form drama pipeline boom)

    Netflix released "House of Cards" in February 2013 as its first original scripted series, marking the beginning of the streaming original content era. Amazon, Hulu, Apple TV+, Disney+, HBO Max, Peacock, and Paramount+ followed within the decade. The streaming era generated an enormous volume of serialized long-form drama, documentary series, limited series, and reality competition content -- all of which required substantial editorial labor. BLS OEWS employment for film and video editors grew from 21,500 in 2012 to 32,080 by 2022, a period in which the median annual wage also rose from $51,300 to $63,520. The streaming boom validated the argument for the craft: the best-regarded streaming dramas ("The Crown," "Succession," "Fleabag," "Miniseries season-scale storytelling") were edited with as much authorial rigor as theatrical features, and the editor's role in shaping performance and pacing across several episode arcs was central to the shows' quality.

    Effect on the work

    BLS OEWS employment of film and video editors rose between 2013 and 2022, from 21,920 to 32,080. The overall volume of premium content grew faster than any other period in the profession's history. The 2023 WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes and the subsequent post-strike production correction reversed part of these gains: BLS OEWS employment fell from 32,080 (2022) to 28,860 (2024).

  • AI-assisted editing and generative video (Descript 2020, Adobe Premiere AI, DaVinci Resolve Neural Engine, Runway Gen-4)

    The current AI era in film and video editing began with Descript (launched commercially around 2020), which converts video to a speaker-attributed transcript and lets editors restructure the cut by editing the text -- a workflow that reduces interview and documentary assembly time. Adobe Premiere Pro's Speech to Text (2021), Generative Extend (2024), and Auto Reframe; DaVinci Resolve's Neural Engine magic mask and color matching; iZotope RX AI dialogue repair; Colourlab.ai reference-based color grading; and the generative video tools Runway Gen-4 and Sora (both commercially launched in 2026) together represent the deepest tooling discontinuity since Avid. Unlike NLE (which changed the physical medium and workflow but preserved every editorial decision as a human judgment), AI-assisted tools are beginning to automate some editorial decisions themselves: which take is technically acceptable, what color grade matches the reference, what insert shot fills the visual gap. The boundary between tool and decision is moving upstream.

    Effect on the work

    BLS OEWS employment fell from 32,080 (2022 peak) to 28,860 (2024) -- a 10% contraction. The drivers included the 2023 strikes and post-strike volume correction, but also the beginning of structural compression in lower-tier editing roles (unscripted TV, corporate video, social content) where AI assembly tools have measurably reduced editorial labor per hour of finished content. The 2024-34 BLS projection suggests modest net growth, with the craft contracting at the volume/assembly tier while growing at the narrative/senior tier supported by continued streaming demand.

Part of Arts & Media · see all 24 roles →
Different role?

See the same long-arc view for your own profession.

Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.

Browse all roles

Film and Video Editors employment and pay by year

On record since1896
Latest US employment25,610 (May 2025)Source: BLS OEWS May 2025Official statisticReport an error
Latest US median pay$75,420 (May 2025)Source: BLS OEWS May 2025Official statisticReport an error
Outlook+3.7% by 2035Source: BLS Employment Projections 2025-35Official statisticReport an error
View all 28 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
YearUS employmentAnnual pay (median unless marked)SourceReport
1937571n/aEst., Motion Picture Editors Guild Researched contextReport
1938n/a$2,600Est., Motion Picture Editors Guild Researched contextReport
19604,500n/aEst., Encyclopedia.com Researched contextReport
199217,000n/aEst., Avid Technology Inc Researched contextReport
200010,990$34,160BLS OEWS 2000 Official statisticReport
200315,100$40,600BLS OEWS May 2003 Official statisticReport
200415,800$43,590BLS OEWS May 2004 Official statisticReport
200515,200$46,930BLS OEWS May 2005 Official statisticReport
200617,380$46,670BLS OEWS May 2006 Official statisticReport
200717,410$47,870BLS OEWS May 2007 Official statisticReport
200818,720$50,560BLS OEWS May 2008 Official statisticReport
200917,550$50,790BLS OEWS May 2009 Official statisticReport
201019,930$50,930BLS OEWS May 2010 Official statisticReport
201120,730$52,940BLS OEWS May 2011 Official statisticReport
201221,500$51,300BLS OEWS May 2012 Official statisticReport
201321,920$54,490BLS OEWS May 2013 Official statisticReport
201424,460$57,210BLS OEWS May 2014 Official statisticReport
201527,660$61,750BLS OEWS May 2015 Official statisticReport
201629,880$62,760BLS OEWS May 2016 Official statisticReport
201730,770$61,180BLS OEWS May 2017 Official statisticReport
201828,160$62,650BLS OEWS May 2018 Official statisticReport
201927,570$63,780BLS OEWS May 2019 Official statisticReport
202022,410$67,250BLS OEWS May 2020 Official statisticReport
202128,030$62,680BLS OEWS May 2021 Official statisticReport
202232,080$63,520BLS OEWS May 2022 Official statisticReport
202329,240$66,600BLS OEWS May 2023 Official statisticReport
202428,860$70,980BLS OEWS May 2024 Official statisticReport
202525,610$75,420BLS OEWS May 2025 Official statisticReport
Embed this timeline on your site

Free for any site. Paste this where the timeline should appear; it stays interactive, every datapoint stays cited, and it sets no cookies on your page. How embedding works

<iframe src="https://futurehistory.earth/embed/27-4032"
  width="100%" height="430" style="border:0"
  title="Film and Video Editors, a Future History timeline"
  loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:13px;margin:4px 0 0"><a href="https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/27-4032">Film and Video Editors: jobs and pay over time</a>, from Future History</p>

See all roles in Arts & Media