Skip to sources
Time Machine

Loan officers

Also called Mortgage loan officer, Mortgage officer, MLO, Commercial loan officer, Consumer loan officer

In brief

In May 2025, BLS counted 274,330 US loan officers, with median pay of $76,690 a year. Of the BLS counts since 2021, the highest was 345,550, in May 2022. The earliest figure here is an estimate of 70,000 from 1950, not measured the same way as today's count. The last full technology era for loan officers: Rocket Mortgage + fintech wave, 2015 to 2022. The fintech wave coincided with the COVID-era refinancing boom (2020-2021), which drove loan officer employment temporarily up even as digital platforms were processing unprecedented volume.

What the sources say

Official outlook

BLS projects employment to grow 1.1% from 2025 to 2035.

BLS Employment Projections 2025-35

AI exposure studies

  • 64.8% of this job's tasks are exposed to large language models. Not a forecast of job losses. Eloundou and others, 2023
  • 0.98 estimated probability that the whole occupation could be computerised, over an unspecified number of years. Not a forecast of job losses. Frey and Osborne, 2013

Since the 2013 prediction

In 2013, Frey and Osborne put this job's probability of computerisation at 0.98. BLS counted 301,860 of these jobs in May 2013 and 274,330 in May 2025. The count moved sharply in one step, May 2020 to May 2021, when BLS changed how it estimates these counts, so no change is derived here.

Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. BLS publishes these counts as yearly survey snapshots and cautions against reading them as a precise trend. In May 2021 BLS changed how it estimates these counts (a model-based method using three years of survey data) and moved fully to the 2018 occupation codes, so part of a change across 2021 can come from the method rather than the work.

Last updated .

Cite this page
APA

Future History. (2026, October 11). Loan officers: jobs and pay since 1950 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/13-2072

Chicago

Future History. "Loan officers: jobs and pay since 1950." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 11, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/13-2072.

BibTeX

@misc{futurehistory_13_2072, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Loan officers: jobs and pay since 1950}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/13-2072}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-11. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }

The access date is today's date on your device.

drag to travel through time
180018251850187519001925195019752000now
2026
Known then as Bank Cashier / Loan Clerk (no distinct occupational title)
Known then as Bank Examiner / Credit Officer / Loan Clerk
Known then as Mortgage Loan Officer / Credit Analyst (pre-ECOA era)
Known then as Loan Officer / Mortgage Banker / Consumer Lending Officer
Known then as Loan Officers (BLS SOC 13-2072)
Known today as Loan Officers (BLS SOC 13-2072)
Projected to still be called Loan Officers (BLS SOC 13-2072)
Data from the May 2025 survey
US Employment
274K
Est.

Stated in source: BLS OEWS

Official statistic
Report an error
Median Annual Wage
$76,690

≈ $74,724 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)

Official statistic
Report an error
Beat · 1782

January 7, 1782: The Bank of North America opens in Philadelphia, the first chartered bank in the United States, authorized by Congress on May 26, 1781 with Robert Morris, Alexander Hamilton, and William Bingham among its founders. Its central function from day one is credit: deciding who among the merchants and landowners of the new republic is creditworthy. The men making those decisions have no title for it yet (they are cashiers, directors, officers of the bank) but the occupation of loan underwriting is born in this building on Chestnut Street.

Beat · 1863

Congress passes the National Banking Act, creating a system of federally chartered national banks regulated by the Comptroller of the Currency. For the first time, loan decisions at national banks are subject to federal examination: the implicit judgment of a bank officer is now embedded in a system accountable to Washington. The Act establishes the dual federal-state banking structure that still defines American banking in 2026.

Beat · 1938

Fannie Mae is established as a New Deal agency authorized to purchase FHA-insured mortgages from banks, freeing up capital for more lending. This single act transforms residential mortgage lending from a local bank-holds-loan-to-maturity business into a national secondary market. The loan officer's job now includes ensuring that originated loans conform to Fannie Mae's purchasing guidelines: the first step toward the standardized underwriting templates that algorithmic systems will later execute.

Beat · 1956

Bill Fair and Earl Isaac, an engineer and a mathematician who met at the Stanford Research Institute in Menlo Park, found Fair, Isaac and Company with $400 in seed money and a proposal to sell credit scoring systems to American lenders. They spend the first two years pitching to fifty lenders. Most are skeptical: how can a formula know a customer better than the banker who has served the family for twenty years? A handful are willing to try it. The answer, it will turn out, is: usually better.

Beat · 1974

President Gerald Ford signs the Equal Credit Opportunity Act on October 28, 1974, prohibiting lenders from discriminating based on sex or marital status (later expanded to include race, religion, age, and receipt of public assistance). For the first time, loan officers face legal liability for the demographic pattern of their decisions, not just individual creditworthiness assessments. A loan officer's personal judgment, however well-intentioned, can now be challenged in federal court if it systematically disadvantages a protected class.

Beat · 1989

Fair, Isaac and Company introduces the general-purpose FICO score: a single 300-850 number derived from five credit report factors, applicable to any borrower, any lender, any product. For the first time, a loan officer's credit judgment can be compared to, and eventually overridden by, a standardized algorithm. The FICO score goes public on the New York Stock Exchange (FICO IPO was July 1987; the score itself becomes industry-standard by 1989). Within six years, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will require it for all conforming mortgages.

Beat · 1995

Fannie Mae launches Desktop Underwriter and Freddie Mac launches Loan Prospector: two automated underwriting systems that accept a mortgage application, check it against agency guidelines, and return an approve/decline recommendation in seconds. For the conforming mortgage market, the loan officer's core underwriting judgment is now automated. The officer's job becomes gathering the documentation the system needs, not making the credit decision. The profession enters a long negotiation with its own irrelevance in standard lending.

Beat · 2013

Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael Osborne publish "The Future of Employment" at Oxford Martin School, rating Loan Officers at approximately 0.98 probability of computerization, placing them among the five most automatable of the 702 white-collar occupations studied. The banking industry largely ignores the paper. Meanwhile, Upstart (founded April 2012) is already building the AI underwriting model that will vindicate the core finding.

Beat · 2015

Quicken Loans launches Rocket Mortgage: a fully digital mortgage application that processes standard conforming loans in minutes without requiring borrower interaction with a human loan officer. In its first full year it funds $7 billion in closed loans. By 2018 Quicken Loans is the largest mortgage lender in the United States by origination volume. The branch-based, relationship-driven mortgage origination model that had defined the loan officer's world for 50 years is now structurally obsolete for the majority of conforming purchase and refinance transactions.

How to read this number

OEWS is a point-in-time survey snapshot, not a continuous time series; BLS advises against using it for year-over-year trend comparison.

Each dot is a cited figure over time; the dotted line only links them (values between aren't measured). Hollow dots are estimates.

Official statistic: Copied by a script from a statistics agency table or a published study's table, not retyped by hand. BLS figures and the forecast and exposure tables are also re-checked against that table on every data run. Researched context: Researched from the cited source rather than copied from it by a script, so it is not machine-checked yet. Spot a mistake? Each figure has a “Report an error” link.

Cited forecasts · present → 2035

Will AI replace loan officers? What the research says

Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.

Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.

What published forecasts say
Forecast change in the number of people doing this work, as published by each named source. Bars share one scale on every role, centred on zero and reaching the end at ±30%. Grey marks a small change, 3% or less either way.
BLS Employment Projections 2025-35
→ 2035
+1.1%
BLS National Employment Matrix, 2025-35 cycle, line for SOC 13-2072 (Loan officers): 283.0 thousand jobs in 2025, projected 286.0 thousand in 2035, a change of +3.1 thousand (+1.1%). Matrix employment counts all jobs in the occupation, including self-employed workers (1.4% of this occupation in 2025). The average for all occupations in this cycle is +3.5%.
Official statisticReport an error
How exposed is this work to AI (research measures)
Scores as published by each study. Each row says what it measures. These measure what AI could technically do, not forecasts of jobs lost.
Frey & Osborne (2013), "The Future of Employment"
2013 study · Probability of computerisation (2013 model)
98%
probability
What this measures

Published appendix value for SOC 2010 13-2072 Loan Officers: probability of computerisation 0.98, rank 686 of 702 (rank 1 is least computerisable). Frey and Osborne estimated in 2013, with a Gaussian-process classifier on O*NET variables, how likely the whole occupation is to be technically automatable over "some unspecified number of years, perhaps a decade or two". It is a probability for the occupation, not a share of tasks and not a forecast of jobs lost.

Official statisticReport an error
Eloundou et al. (2023), "GPTs are GPTs"
2023 study · Share of tasks exposed to LLMs (β, human-rated)
64.8%
of tasks
What this measures

Published occupation-level exposure from the paper's occ_level.csv for O*NET-SOC 13-2072.00 Loan Officers. Shown: human-rated β = 0.648, the share of the occupation's tasks an LLM could do in at least half the time at equal quality, counting tasks that need LLM-powered software at half weight (β = E1 + 0.5 × E2). Other published measures for this occupation: human-rated α (LLM alone) 0.341 and γ (all LLM-assisted) 0.955; GPT-4-rated β 0.591. This measures how much of the work an LLM could touch, not how many jobs disappear.

Official statisticReport an error
Today, in this role

What's changing day to day for loan officers

Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.

AI is taking this onVerify borrower income and employment automatically at point-of-sale: configure Plaid Income or Fannie Mae Day 1 Certainty integrations to pull real-time payroll, bank, and tax data

Verify borrower income and employment automatically at point-of-sale: configure Plaid Income or Fannie Mae Day 1 Certainty integrations to pull real-time payroll, bank, and tax data; review AI-generated income summaries for edge cases; manually resolve discrepancies that the automated waterfall cannot clear (gig economy income, multi-employer situations).[11],[6]

Where your edge is

Income verification for W-2 borrowers with standard payroll is now largely automated via Plaid and the GSE Day 1 Certainty programs. Your value is in the exceptions: gig workers, seasonal income, self-employment, and foreign income require manual analysis skills. Develop expertise in non-traditional income documentation and IRS transcript analysis.

AI is sitting alongside you hereManage the digital mortgage application pipeline for conforming loans: review AI-generated loan summaries from Blend or Maxwell, validate Plaid-verified income and asset data, clear automated conditions flagged for human review, and issue commitment letters, with AI handling the bulk of data assembly and borrower communication.

Manage the digital mortgage application pipeline for conforming loans: review AI-generated loan summaries from Blend or Maxwell, validate Plaid-verified income and asset data, clear automated conditions flagged for human review, and issue commitment letters, with AI handling the bulk of data assembly and borrower communication.[7],[9],[6]

Where your edge is

Shift from data-gathering to exception triage and borrower counseling: AI clears most conforming conditions without you. Master your LOS's (Blend, Maxwell, Encompass) AI condition queue: understand what triggers a human-review flag and what it takes to clear it efficiently. Volume management and pipeline hygiene through the AI dashboard become your primary daily skill.

AI is sitting alongside you hereCoordinate the appraisal and title process for residential mortgage transactions: manage appraisal orders through Reggora's AI-assisted appraisal management platform, review automated valuation model (AVM) outputs for conforming loans, escalate to full appraisal when AVM confidence scores fall below GSE thresholds, and resolve appraisal gaps in purchase transactions through value reconsideration requests.

Coordinate the appraisal and title process for residential mortgage transactions: manage appraisal orders through Reggora's AI-assisted appraisal management platform, review automated valuation model (AVM) outputs for conforming loans, escalate to full appraisal when AVM confidence scores fall below GSE thresholds, and resolve appraisal gaps in purchase transactions through value reconsideration requests.[12],[7],[5]

Where your edge is

GSE appraisal waivers and AVM acceptance rates are rising sharply: Fannie Mae accepted AVM on a large share of refinance transactions in 2024. Your value is in the escalation judgment (when to request a field appraisal) and in managing the appraisal gap conversation with borrowers and realtors in purchase transactions. Build expertise in value reconsideration processes and collateral risk assessment for declining-value markets.

Where loan officers go next

Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.

What each move takes

A direction you could grow

Accountants and Auditors

Loan officers who have spent years analyzing financial statements for credit decisions have built substantial accounting literacy, often equivalent to several years of staff accountant experience in reading P&Ls, balance sheets, and tax returns. Officers who supplement this with formal accounting coursework or a CPA can pivot into accounting and auditing roles, particularly in financial-institution audit (bank internal audit, regulatory examination) where credit-operations knowledge is highly valued. This transition is more demanding than advisory pivots but represents a meaningful CRI improvement, as the CPA credential provides regulatory-sign-off authority that anchors human irreplaceability.

What you'd add
· GAAP financial reporting: consolidation, revenue recognition, financial instrument accounting (ASC 310, ASC 326 CECL)
· CPA examination preparation (FAR and REG sections most relevant to prior lending experience)
· Audit methodology: risk-based audit planning, internal controls testing, workpaper documentation
· Bank regulatory examination processes: OCC, FDIC, Federal Reserve examination frameworks
What it takesA real upskill, but a natural one
Tools of the era

How has the work of loan officers changed since 1782?

The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.

  • Character banking: personal relationship + collateral ledger

    In the early republic, a loan decision was inseparable from a character judgment. The loan officer, typically a bank cashier or director, knew the borrower personally, assessed the value of any collateral offered, and extended credit based on a network of personal reputation and community standing. No standardized credit application existed. No income verification form existed. The ledger book recorded the loan amount and due date; the officer's memory and community knowledge supplied everything else. This was not primitive: it was appropriate for the scale of the economy. Most loans were to merchants or landowners, and default consequences in a small town were severe enough to make informal character assessment remarkably effective.

  • National Bank Act era: standardized credit forms + federal examination

    The National Banking Acts of 1863 and 1864 created a system of federally chartered banks examined by the Comptroller of the Currency: the first external check on a bank's lending practices. Loan officers began documenting decisions in standardized ledger formats auditable by federal examiners. The credit "five Cs" framework (Character, Capacity, Capital, Collateral, and Conditions) emerged as a teaching mnemonic during this era, codifying what experienced officers had always assessed informally. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 added a lender of last resort and the discount window, changing how banks priced credit risk. By the 1920s, larger commercial banks had developed written credit analysis reports for significant loans: the first proto-underwriting documentation.

  • FHA/VA standardized mortgage + Fannie Mae secondary market

    Fannie Mae was established in 1938 as part of the New Deal, authorized to purchase FHA-insured mortgages from banks and free up capital for more lending. The GI Bill (1944) created the VA loan program, financing home purchases for millions of returning veterans on standardized federal terms. For the first time, the loan officer's job included matching borrowers to federally defined underwriting templates: FHA and VA guidelines specified maximum loan-to-value ratios, minimum down payments, and allowable debt-to-income ratios. The officer still exercised substantial judgment, but within a framework that made lending portable: a loan originated in Atlanta could be sold to an investor in New York because it met national standards.

    Effect on the work

    The standardization of FHA/VA mortgage underwriting began the long process of transforming loan origination from a purely local relationship business to a scalable national market. The loan officer became, in part, a quality-control agent for federal underwriting standards rather than an autonomous credit judge.

  • Consumer credit regulation: Truth in Lending Act, ECOA, HMDA

    Three landmark laws transformed the loan officer's compliance burden in a single decade. The Truth in Lending Act (1968) required standardized APR disclosure, making the cost of credit transparent for the first time. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act (1974) prohibited discrimination based on sex, race, religion, age, or other protected characteristics, for the first time, loan officers faced legal liability for the demographic pattern of their lending decisions, not just individual default risk. The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (1975) required lenders to report loan data publicly, enabling regulators to identify redlining. Together, these laws shifted the loan officer's primary accountability from the bank's own credit culture to federal regulators who could examine every decision in aggregate. The era of purely relationship-based, undocumented lending judgment was over.

    Effect on the work

    Compliance requirements created new administrative work but did not compress employment: the lending volume of the 1970s-80s mortgage boom generated more origination activity than the regulatory load removed. The net effect was a more documentation-intensive but still human-centered underwriting process.

  • FICO score (1989): algorithmic creditworthiness replaces character judgment

    Fair, Isaac and Company, founded in 1956 by Bill Fair and Earl Isaac after they met at the Stanford Research Institute, had been selling credit scoring models to individual lenders since the late 1950s. Their 1989 general-purpose FICO score was the product that changed the industry: a single hundreds of number summarizing a consumer's credit history, derived from five factors (payment history, amounts owed, length of history, new credit, credit mix) and applicable across any lender, any product, any region. In 1995, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac first required FICO scores for all new mortgage applications: the moment the algorithm formally displaced the officer's judgment as the authoritative credit assessment for conforming mortgages. The loan officer who had once assessed creditworthiness through conversation, reputation, and intuition was now supplementing a number.

    Effect on the work

    FICO standardization did not immediately reduce loan officer employment: it took a decade of further automation to translate the score into digital origination systems. But it permanently shifted the locus of credit judgment from the officer to the algorithm. What remained of the human role was compliance verification, customer guidance, and processing, not independent credit assessment.

  • Desktop Underwriter + Loan Prospector (1995): automated mortgage approval

    Fannie Mae launched Desktop Underwriter (DU) in 1995; Freddie Mac launched Loan Prospector (LP) the same year. Both systems accepted a loan application, checked it against the agency's underwriting guidelines, and returned an automated underwriting recommendation (Approve/Eligible, Refer, or Ineligible) in seconds. For conforming conventional mortgages (the largest segment of the market), the decision was now algorithmic. The loan officer's "approve/decline" judgment, which had been the defining skill of the profession for two centuries, was eliminated for the majority of applications. What remained was gathering and verifying the documentation the system needed, counseling borrowers through the process, and handling the cases the algorithm flagged for human review. Fannie Mae later launched Custom DU (2004), allowing lenders to set custom underwriting rules for non-standard mortgage products.

    Effect on the work

    Desktop Underwriter and Loan Prospector enabled a dramatic expansion of mortgage origination volume without proportional increases in headcount: the efficiency gain that allowed the 2003-2006 origination boom to happen. A single loan officer could process far more applications in a DU/LP world than in a manual underwriting world. Employment grew during the boom, but more slowly than volume.

  • Dodd-Frank / CFPB qualified mortgage rule: human review returns

    The 2008 mortgage crisis, rooted in a decade of automated origination of loans that borrowers could not ultimately repay, triggered the most significant mortgage regulation since the New Deal. The Dodd-Frank Act (2010) created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and mandated an "ability-to-repay" standard for all residential mortgages. The CFPB's Qualified Mortgage rule, finalized in January 2013 and effective January 2014, required lenders to document and verify eight categories of borrower income and financial information for every loan. Automated systems could not satisfy the rule without documented human verification, for the first time in a decade, the loan officer's manual verification role was not just useful but legally required. Ironically, regulation reversed some of the automation the industry had pushed through the 2000s.

    Effect on the work

    Post-Dodd-Frank, loan officer employment stabilized and partially recovered from the 2009 trough. The QM rule created a permanent baseline of human documentation work regardless of how streamlined the digital origination platform. The role survived not because it won against automation but because regulators required it to exist.

  • Rocket Mortgage (2015) + fintech wave: digital origination at consumer scale

    Quicken Loans (founded 1985, rebranded as Rocket Mortgage July 2021) launched its fully digital mortgage platform in 2015, processing applications from application to approval in minutes without requiring a borrower to interact with a loan officer for standard conforming loans. In its first full year the platform funded $7 billion in closed loans. By January 2018 Quicken Loans had become the nation's largest mortgage lender overall. Simultaneously, Upstart (founded April 2012 by former Google executive Dave Girouard, IPO late 2020) was building AI underwriting models using non-traditional variables (education, employment history, field of study) to extend credit to borrowers FICO scoring would reject. Affirm (2012), SoFi (2011), and ZestFinance (2009) brought similar algorithmic underwriting to consumer lending and student loans. The fintech cohort's common theme: replace the loan officer's judgment with a statistical model trained on millions of outcomes.

    Effect on the work

    The fintech wave coincided with the COVID-era refinancing boom (2020-2021), which drove loan officer employment temporarily up even as digital platforms were processing unprecedented volume. The structural dynamic was clear by 2022: when interest rates rose and origination volume fell, employment dropped more sharply than volume, because digital platforms had absorbed the marginal origination without proportional headcount.

  • AI underwriting models: Upstart's neural network, bank LLM integrations

    By 2022-2024, the frontier of lending automation had moved from rules-based automated underwriting (Desktop Underwriter's guidelines-checklist approach) to machine-learning models trained on millions of loan outcomes. Upstart's AI underwriting models, using over 1,500 variables beyond FICO, were processing personal loans and beginning to enter auto lending and small business lending. Banks including JPMorgan Chase, Capital One, and Wells Fargo were integrating large language models into loan officer workflows for document extraction, compliance checking, and customer communication. The surviving loan officer role is concentrated on three categories that resist full automation: complex non-conforming loans (jumbo mortgages, commercial real estate, construction loans) where borrower situations are idiosyncratic; SBA loans where government program rules require human certification; and relationship banking with business clients where the credit decision is one part of a broader financial services relationship.

    Effect on the work

    BLS 2024-34 projects only +2% growth for loan officers, the flattest trajectory of any financial occupation, reflecting the consensus that algorithmic origination has absorbed the volume growth that would have previously translated into headcount growth. The 20,300 projected annual openings are replacement-need driven, not expansion-driven: people who leave the occupation are replaced, but the total number is not growing.

Part of Business & Finance · see all 32 roles →
Different role?

See the same long-arc view for your own profession.

Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.

Browse all roles

Loan Officers employment and pay by year

On record since1782
Latest US employment274,330 (May 2025)Source: BLS OEWS May 2025Official statisticReport an error
Latest US median pay$76,690 (May 2025)Source: BLS OEWS May 2025Official statisticReport an error
Outlook+1.1% by 2035Source: BLS Employment Projections 2025-35Official statisticReport an error
View all 27 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
YearUS employmentAnnual pay (median unless marked)SourceReport
195070,000n/aEst., FDIC Researched contextReport
1970140,000n/aEst., Wikipedia Researched contextReport
1990230,000n/aEst., FDIC Researched contextReport
2000203,530n/aBLS OEWS 2000 Official statisticReport
2003237,150$46,640BLS OEWS May 2003 Official statisticReport
2004278,830$48,830BLS OEWS May 2004 Official statisticReport
2005332,690$49,440BLS OEWS May 2005 Official statisticReport
2006359,260$51,760BLS OEWS May 2006 Official statisticReport
2007356,990$53,000BLS OEWS May 2007 Official statisticReport
2008321,850$54,700BLS OEWS May 2008 Official statisticReport
2009298,200$54,880BLS OEWS May 2009 Official statisticReport
2010283,330$56,490BLS OEWS May 2010 Official statisticReport
2011284,530$58,030BLS OEWS May 2011 Official statisticReport
2012286,670$59,820BLS OEWS May 2012 Official statisticReport
2013301,860$61,420BLS OEWS May 2013 Official statisticReport
2014300,580$62,620BLS OEWS May 2014 Official statisticReport
2015303,870$63,430BLS OEWS May 2015 Official statisticReport
2016305,700$63,650BLS OEWS May 2016 Official statisticReport
2017307,240$64,660BLS OEWS May 2017 Official statisticReport
2018304,950$63,040BLS OEWS May 2018 Official statisticReport
2019308,370$63,270BLS OEWS May 2019 Official statisticReport
2020308,700$63,960BLS OEWS May 2020 Official statisticReport
2021340,170$63,380BLS OEWS May 2021 Official statisticReport
2022345,550$65,740BLS OEWS May 2022 Official statisticReport
2023321,090$69,990BLS OEWS May 2023 Official statisticReport
2024290,530$74,180BLS OEWS May 2024 Official statisticReport
2025274,330$76,690BLS OEWS May 2025 Official statisticReport
Embed this timeline on your site

Free for any site. Paste this where the timeline should appear; it stays interactive, every datapoint stays cited, and it sets no cookies on your page. How embedding works

<iframe src="https://futurehistory.earth/embed/13-2072"
  width="100%" height="430" style="border:0"
  title="Loan Officers, a Future History timeline"
  loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:13px;margin:4px 0 0"><a href="https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/13-2072">Loan Officers: jobs and pay over time</a>, from Future History</p>

See all roles in Business & Finance