Orthodontists
Also called Orthodontic dentist, Orthodontic specialist, Dentofacial orthopedics specialist, Board certified orthodontist
In brief
In May 2025, BLS counted 6,210 US orthodontists, with median pay of $289,140 a year. Of the BLS counts since 2004, the highest was 6,400, in May 2023, close to the May 2025 count. The earliest figure here is an estimate of 500 from 1930, not measured the same way as today's count. The last full technology era for orthodontists: Digital intraoral scanning + CAD/CAM aligner fabrication, 2015 to 2022. Digital scanning eliminated a full appointment category (impression/pouring/trimming/shipping) and substantially reduced the lab-to-clinic turnaround time for aligner fabrication.
What the sources say
Official outlook
BLS projects employment to grow 6% from 2025 to 2035.
AI exposure studies
- 20% of this job's tasks are exposed to large language models. Not a forecast of job losses. Eloundou and others, 2023
Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. BLS publishes these counts as yearly survey snapshots and cautions against reading them as a precise trend. In May 2021 BLS changed how it estimates these counts (a model-based method using three years of survey data) and moved fully to the 2018 occupation codes, so part of a change across 2021 can come from the method rather than the work.
Last updated .
Cite this page
Future History. (2026, October 11). Orthodontists: jobs and pay since 1930 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/29-1023
Future History. "Orthodontists: jobs and pay since 1930." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 11, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/29-1023.
@misc{futurehistory_29_1023, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Orthodontists: jobs and pay since 1930}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/29-1023}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-11. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }
The access date is today's date on your device.
≈ $281,727 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)
Edward Hartley Angle publishes "Classification of Malocclusion" in Dental Cosmos (Volume 41, Issue 3, pp. 248-264), introducing the landmark typology of Class I, Class II, and Class III molar relationships. The classification system standardized orthodontic diagnosis for the first time and remains the foundational framework in clinical use today -- over 125 years after publication. Angle coined the term "malocclusion" to describe anomalies of tooth position and jaw relationship.
Edward Angle opens the Angle School of Orthodontia in St. Louis, Missouri -- the first school in the world dedicated exclusively to postgraduate orthodontic training. He simultaneously founds the American Society of Orthodontia in 1901 (the organizational predecessor to the American Association of Orthodontists), establishing the institutional infrastructure for orthodontics as a formally recognized specialty separate from general dentistry.
The American Board of Orthodontia (later renamed the American Board of Orthodontics in 1938) is founded -- the first specialty board in the entire history of American dentistry. The ABO's founding marks the formal credentialing infrastructure of the specialty: orthodontists now had a voluntary board certification pathway that distinguished trained specialists from general dentists offering occasional orthodontic treatment. The ADA's Council on Dental Education formally recognized the ABO in 1950.
B. Holly Broadbent introduces cephalometric radiography to orthodontics -- a standardized technique for taking lateral radiographs of the skull with the patient in a fixed position (the cephalometer). For the first time, orthodontists could make quantitative skeletal measurements, track craniofacial growth over time, and compare findings across patients and studies. Cephalometrics transformed orthodontics from a purely empirical clinical art into a partially quantitative science, enabling the research base that has since supported evidence-based treatment planning.
George Andreasen at the University of Iowa introduces nickel-titanium (Nitinol) alloy as an orthodontic archwire material. The alloy, originally developed for aerospace at the US Naval Ordnance Laboratory, has superelastic properties -- it can be deflected substantially and return to its original shape, delivering light, continuous forces over large ranges of tooth movement. Unitek Corporation commercializes the wire commercially that year. NiTi archwires are now used in virtually every orthodontic case during the initial leveling-and-aligning phase.
Align Technology launches Invisalign in the United States following FDA clearance in 1998. The system uses stereolithography (later updated to other 3D printing methods) to fabricate a series of clear plastic removable aligners. Consumer marketing, not professional endorsement, drives initial adoption: Align spends $31 million on television advertising in 2000, the largest consumer campaign in dental history. By 2024, Align Technology has treated over 21 million patients with Invisalign globally and trained clear-aligner competitors have proliferated, fundamentally changing the orthodontic market from a specialist-only to a partially general-dentist-accessible service.
Gayle Glenn is elected as the first female president of the American Association of Orthodontists -- a milestone that marks the broader feminization of the orthodontic workforce underway since the 1990s. Female orthodontists now represent a growing share of new residency graduates; the specialty, historically overwhelmingly male like most surgical specialties, is changing its demographic composition, which has implications for practice organization (more part-time practice, more group practice) and patient experience.
The American Dental Association counts 10,830 professionally active orthodontists in the United States at the end of 2024. OEWS, the employment series plotted here, counts only wage-and-salary jobs (5,150 in May 2024), and most orthodontists own their practices, so the OEWS figure is far below the size of the profession.
Will AI replace orthodontists? What the research says
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.
What's changing day to day for orthodontists
Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.
AI is sitting alongside you hereReview and approve AI-generated initial treatment plans from ClinCheck Live Plan, which automates the first doctor-ready Invisalign staging within 15 minutes of case submission, then modify tooth-movement staging and torque prescriptions before finalizing.
Review and approve AI-generated initial treatment plans from ClinCheck Live Plan, which automates the first doctor-ready Invisalign staging within 15 minutes of case submission, then modify tooth-movement staging and torque prescriptions before finalizing.[3],[8]
Build a personal library of approved plan modifications so you can spot-correct AI staging quickly; the AI trains on population averages: individual anatomy and patient compliance history require your override.
AI is sitting alongside you hereInterpret automated cephalometric landmark analysis from ORCA Dental AI (CephX) (including ANB angle, SNA, SNB, and Wits appraisal) then adjust any flagged deviations from clinical ground truth before constructing the treatment-planning diagnosis.
Interpret automated cephalometric landmark analysis from ORCA Dental AI (CephX) (including ANB angle, SNA, SNB, and Wits appraisal) then adjust any flagged deviations from clinical ground truth before constructing the treatment-planning diagnosis.[7],[9]
Cross-check AI ceph output against your own CBCT-based landmark read on complex skeletal Class II/III cases; current AI shows clinically acceptable individual landmark accuracy but cumulative parameter error can be substantial.
AI is sitting alongside you hereOrder and review AI-optimized SureSmile robotically bent archwires from 3D treatment plan data, then verify the custom-formed wires at chairside before ligation, replacing manual wire bending that historically required multiple appointments.
Order and review AI-optimized SureSmile robotically bent archwires from 3D treatment plan data, then verify the custom-formed wires at chairside before ligation, replacing manual wire bending that historically required multiple appointments.[6],[2]
Learn to identify the cases where robotic wire precision yields the greatest ROI: complex tooth-movement sequences and surgery-first cases; routine leveling-and-aligning cases may not justify the fee differential for every patient.
Where orthodontists go next
Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.
- Medical and Health Services Managers
- US median pay
- $123,860 (May 2025)
- BLS outlook 2025-35
- +24.2%
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
- US median pay
- $352,220 (May 2025)
- BLS outlook 2025-35
- +5.6%
- Prosthodontists
- US median pay
- $311,180 (May 2025)
- BLS outlook 2025-35
- +5.8%
What each move takes
Medical and Health Services Managers
Orthodontists who own or co-own group practices already manage clinical staff, digital platform procurement, and revenue-cycle operations; formalizing into a Dental or Medical and Health Services Director role (DSO leadership, academic program director, or health system dental chief) leverages that management experience while reducing direct chairside exposure.
- · Healthcare operations and P&L management
- · Value-based care contracting and insurance credentialing
- · EMR/practice-management system administration
- · MBA or MHA coursework (optional but common)
How has the work of orthodontists changed since 1900?
The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.
Angle appliances: expansion arch, E-arch, ribbon arch, edgewise bracket (1900-1929)
Edward Angle's career produced four successive appliance generations. His expansion arch (1900) used gold wire attached to bands on the first molars to widen the dental arch. The E-arch (1907) added more attachment points. The ribbon arch appliance (1915) was the first to slot archwire horizontally, giving more control over individual tooth movements. His edgewise appliance (1928) -- introduced the year before he died -- used a rectangular bracket slot oriented so the archwire's long dimension was horizontal, giving the clinician torque control over each tooth's angulation. The edgewise appliance is the direct ancestor of every modern fixed orthodontic system in use today, more than a century later. All of Angle's appliances used gold wire and gold bands; stainless steel was not yet available for dental use.
Stainless steel + banded appliances (pre-bonding era)
Stainless steel replaced gold as the standard archwire material during the 1930s-1950s, substantially reducing cost. The standard treatment approach of this era involved cementing metal bands around each tooth and soldering or tying brackets to the bands -- a highly technique-sensitive, labor-intensive process that required the orthodontist to take impressions, send them to a lab for band fabrication, fit and cement bands at a seating appointment, and then manage wire changes over a treatment. Cephalometric radiography, introduced to orthodontics by B. Holly Broadbent in 1931, gave clinicians a standardized lateral skull radiograph for growth analysis and treatment planning. Together with Angle's classification system, cephalometrics established the diagnostic framework that would persist through the 20th century.
Effect on the workThe banded appliance era made orthodontics reliably profitable but also reliably slow -- a full case required several chairside visits over several months. The high appointment density meant that an orthodontist's patient capacity was constrained primarily by chair time, not clinical skill.
Direct-bonded brackets + NiTi superelastic wires (1970s revolution)
Two simultaneous technology shifts in the early-to-mid 1970s transformed orthodontic practice. First: in 1972, George Andreasen at the University of Iowa recognized that nickel-titanium alloy, originally developed by William Buehler at the Naval Ordnance Laboratory for aerospace applications, could be used as an orthodontic archwire. Unitek Corporation commercialized the alloy under the trade name Nitinol for clinical use that year. NiTi wires are superelastic -- they can be deflected to a large degree and still return to their original shape, delivering light continuous forces over long distances of tooth movement. This dramatically reduced the number of archwire changes needed in the early leveling-and-aligning phase of treatment. Second: direct-bonding of brackets to enamel using acid-etch adhesive technique, pioneered in the mid-1970s, eliminated the need for metal bands on most teeth. Instead of fitting and cementing a band to every tooth -- a two-appointment process -- the orthodontist could bond a bracket directly to the enamel surface in a single visit. The combination of direct-bonded brackets and NiTi initial archwires reduced the total appointment count per case and made orthodontic treatment faster and less uncomfortable for patients. It also made treatment more accessible: lower lab costs and reduced initial seating time allowed offices to accept more patients.
Effect on the workDirect bonding and NiTi archwires are widely credited with enabling the expansion of orthodontic practice capacity in the 1970s and 1980s. Treatment time per case dropped; the adolescent braces market expanded substantially through this era.
Ceramic and aesthetic brackets + lingual orthodontics (1982-2000)
Ceramic tooth-colored brackets were introduced in the early 1980s, offering a more aesthetic alternative to metal. Lingual orthodontics -- placing brackets on the tongue-facing (lingual) surfaces of teeth so the appliance is invisible from the front -- was developed independently by two practitioners, Kinya Fujita in Japan and Craven Kurz in the United States, around 1975-1976, with commercial systems reaching the market in the early 1980s. Both innovations responded to growing adult patient demand for less visible treatment. Adult orthodontics expanded substantially through the 1980s and 1990s as the stigma of adult braces faded; by the mid-1990s adults represented a meaningful minority of the orthodontic patient population for the first time. Lingual braces added a new and technically demanding skill set: the brackets are smaller, the access is constrained, and the biomechanics of lingual systems differ significantly from labial (front-surface) systems.
Invisalign clear aligners (Align Technology, 1999 launch)
Invisalign launched commercially in 1999 after FDA clearance in 1998. Align Technology, co-founded by Zia Chishti and Kelsey Wirth, used stereolithography to fabricate a series of clear plastic removable aligners, each slightly different from the last, that collectively moved teeth toward a planned final position. The original system was limited to mild to moderate cases and was initially resisted by orthodontists -- the founders had no dental credentials, and many professionals doubted the biomechanical efficacy of plastic aligners for complex movements. The long-term effect was profound: Invisalign expanded the adult orthodontic market by making treatment more socially acceptable, accelerated the digitization of the profession (each case requires a 3D scan and computer-generated staging), and created a new class of "Invisalign doctor" general dentists who competed with specialists for mild cases.
Effect on the workInvisalign is the single biggest commercial disruption in orthodontics since the edgewise bracket. By 2024, Align Technology had treated over 21 million patients worldwide. The system expanded the total orthodontic market while also lowering the barrier for general dentists to offer limited orthodontic treatment -- a structural competitive challenge to specialists.
CBCT cone-beam CT + digital cephalometrics (3D diagnosis, from 2001)
Cone-beam computed tomography, introduced to US dentistry around 2001, gave orthodontists a 3D volumetric view of the skull, dentition, and airway at far lower radiation dose than medical CT. CBCT replaced or supplemented the traditional lateral cephalometric radiograph (a 2D flat-plate X-ray) for complex skeletal cases, surgical planning, and impacted teeth management. Cephalometric software then automated landmark detection -- identifying the anatomical reference points (ANB angle, SNA, SNB, Wits appraisal) used to classify skeletal discrepancy and plan treatment -- reducing the time from image acquisition to diagnosis. CBCT did not displace the orthodontist's judgment; it deepened the information available to inform that judgment. By 2015, CBCT was standard of care for complex cases and common in many general orthodontic practices.
Digital intraoral scanning + CAD/CAM aligner fabrication (iTero, 3Shape, SureSmile)
Intraoral digital scanners replaced plaster impressions as the standard method for capturing dental anatomy. Align Technology's iTero scanner integrated directly with ClinCheck (the treatment-planning software for Invisalign), allowing a case to be digitally submitted within minutes of the scan appointment -- eliminating the physical impression tray, bite registration material, and lab courier step. SureSmile (Dentsply Sirona) extended the digital workflow into fixed appliances: a 3D treatment plan generated from CBCT and intraoral scan data was used to robotically bend custom archwires to the planned tooth positions, reducing treatment time by up to 30% compared to conventional wire-bending sequences. By 2020 the majority of orthodontic new-patient exams in the US were captured digitally rather than by physical impression.
Effect on the workDigital scanning eliminated a full appointment category (impression/pouring/trimming/shipping) and substantially reduced the lab-to-clinic turnaround time for aligner fabrication. The net effect was increased patient throughput capacity for the same number of operators.
AI treatment planning + remote monitoring (ClinCheck Live Plan, DentalMonitoring, ORCA CephX)
The current AI era in orthodontics is characterized by three converging tools. ClinCheck Live Plan (Align Technology, launched late 2024) uses a model trained on data from over 21 million treated patients to generate an initial Invisalign staging plan within several minutes of case submission, ready for the doctor's review and modification. ORCA Dental AI's CephX system automates cephalometric landmark detection on lateral radiographs with a, replacing the manual tracing that historically took minutes per case. DentalMonitoring allows patients to capture intraoral photos with a smartphone between appointments; AI analyzes the images for aligner fit, tooth movement progress, and hygiene, surfacing alerts to the clinician and reducing routine check-in visits. Together these tools shift the orthodontist toward a supervisory and exception-handling role for a larger caseload rather than a hands-on provider for every appointment.
Effect on the workThe AI augmentation stack is enabling orthodontists to manage higher patient volumes with the same chairside time, rather than reducing headcount. The bottleneck for growth remains the number of licensed orthodontists available, not the throughput of any individual practice -- pointing toward modestly positive employment projections through 2034.
See the same long-arc view for your own profession.
Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.
Browse all rolesOrthodontists employment and pay by year
View all 27 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
| Year | US employment | Annual pay (median unless marked) | Source | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930 | 500 | n/a | Est., Edward Angle Wikipedia Researched context | Report |
| 1950 | 2,500 | n/a | Est., American Board of Orthodontics Researched context | Report |
| 1987 | 8,603 | n/a | Est., Changing number and distribution of… Researched context | Report |
| 1990 | n/a | $117,000 | Est., Statista / ADA Survey of Dental Practice Researched context | Report |
| 1995 | 8,869 | n/a | Est., Changing number and distribution of… Researched context | Report |
| 2004 | 6,190 | n/a | BLS OEWS May 2004 Official statistic | Report |
| 2005 | 4,820 | n/a | BLS OEWS May 2005 Official statistic | Report |
| 2006 | 5,200 | n/a | BLS OEWS May 2006 Official statistic | Report |
| 2007 | 5,350 | n/a | BLS OEWS May 2007 Official statistic | Report |
| 2008 | 5,500 | n/a | BLS OEWS May 2008 Official statistic | Report |
| 2009 | 5,410 | n/a | BLS OEWS May 2009 Official statistic | Report |
| 2010 | 5,580 | n/a | BLS OEWS May 2010 Official statistic | Report |
| 2011 | 5,040 | n/a | BLS OEWS May 2011 Official statistic | Report |
| 2012 | 5,530 | n/a | BLS OEWS May 2012 Official statistic | Report |
| 2013 | 5,570 | n/a | BLS OEWS May 2013 Official statistic | Report |
| 2014 | 6,190 | n/a | BLS OEWS May 2014 Official statistic | Report |
| 2015 | 5,410 | n/a | BLS OEWS May 2015 Official statistic | Report |
| 2016 | 5,200 | n/a | BLS OEWS May 2016 Official statistic | Report |
| 2017 | 5,080 | n/a | BLS OEWS May 2017 Official statistic | Report |
| 2018 | 5,350 | n/a | BLS OEWS May 2018 Official statistic | Report |
| 2019 | 5,990 | n/a | BLS OEWS May 2019 Official statistic | Report |
| 2020 | 5,040 | n/a | BLS OEWS May 2020 Official statistic | Report |
| 2021 | 5,140 | n/a | BLS OEWS May 2021 Official statistic | Report |
| 2022 | 6,310 | $174,360 | BLS OEWS May 2022 Official statistic | Report |
| 2023 | 6,400 | $286,670 | BLS OEWS May 2023 (employment) Official statisticEst., Statista / ADA Survey of Dental Practice (pay) Researched context | Report |
| 2024 | 5,150 | n/a | BLS OEWS May 2024 Official statistic | Report |
| 2025 | 6,210 | $289,140 | BLS OEWS May 2025 Official statistic | Report |