Skip to sources
Time Machine

Orthodontists

Scrub through 136years of this role's history, from when it first emerged, through every wave of technology that reshaped it, to the cited projections for where it's heading next.

2026drag to travel through time
19001925195019752000now
2026
Known today as Orthodontists (BLS SOC 29-1023 / Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics)
Latest actual · 2024
11K
ADA/KFF count of professionally active orthodontists licensed in the US as of end-of-year 2024. This figure includes self-employed practice owners and salaried practitioners. The BLS OEWS wage-and-salary count for May 2024 is approximately 5,900 -- a structural undercount because the OEWS excludes self-employed workers, and the majority of orthodontists own their practices. The ADA-sourced 10,830 is the more comprehensive measure of total workforce size. Both figures are cited here; BLS OEWS data from the backfill script will populate the 2003-2024 wage-and-salary series.
Latest actual · 2024
$239,200
BLS OEWS wage floor: orthodontists are reported at the BLS wage ceiling of $239,200+ (May 2024). The actual median annual wage exceeds this figure; BLS does not publish a more precise value at this wage level. O*NET reports the median annual wage for 29-1023.00 as "$239,200+" as sourced from BLS OEWS May 2024.
Each dot is a cited figure over time; the dotted line only links them (values between aren't measured). Hollow dots are estimates.
Tools of the era

The tools that defined the work

Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.

  • Angle appliances: expansion arch, E-arch, ribbon arch, edgewise bracket (1900-1929)

    Edward Angle's career produced four successive appliance generations. His expansion arch (1900) used gold wire attached to bands on the first molars to widen the dental arch. The E-arch (1907) added more attachment points. The ribbon arch appliance (1915) was the first to slot archwire horizontally, giving more control over individual tooth movements. His edgewise appliance (1928) -- introduced the year before he died -- used a rectangular bracket slot oriented so the archwire's long dimension was horizontal, giving the clinician torque control over each tooth's angulation. The edgewise appliance is the direct ancestor of every modern fixed orthodontic system in use today, nearly 100 years later. All of Angle's appliances used gold wire and gold bands; stainless steel was not yet available for dental use.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Stainless steel + banded appliances (pre-bonding era)

    Stainless steel replaced gold as the standard archwire material during the 1930s-1950s, substantially reducing cost. The standard treatment approach of this era involved cementing metal bands around each tooth and soldering or tying brackets to the bands -- a highly technique-sensitive, labor-intensive process that required the orthodontist to take impressions, send them to a lab for band fabrication, fit and cement bands at a seating appointment, and then manage wire changes over an 18-36 month treatment. Cephalometric radiography, introduced to orthodontics by B. Holly Broadbent in 1931, gave clinicians a standardized lateral skull radiograph for growth analysis and treatment planning. Together with Angle's classification system, cephalometrics established the diagnostic framework that would persist through the 20th century.

    Effect on the work

    The banded appliance era made orthodontics reliably profitable but also reliably slow -- a full case required 15-20 chairside visits over 18-36 months. The high appointment density meant that an orthodontist's patient capacity was constrained primarily by chair time, not clinical skill.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Direct-bonded brackets + NiTi superelastic wires (1970s revolution)

    Two simultaneous technology shifts in the early-to-mid 1970s transformed orthodontic practice. First: in 1972, George Andreasen at the University of Iowa recognized that nickel-titanium alloy, originally developed by William Buehler at the Naval Ordnance Laboratory for aerospace applications, could be used as an orthodontic archwire. Unitek Corporation commercialized the alloy under the trade name Nitinol for clinical use that year. NiTi wires are superelastic -- they can be deflected to a large degree and still return to their original shape, delivering light continuous forces over long distances of tooth movement. This dramatically reduced the number of archwire changes needed in the early leveling-and-aligning phase of treatment. Second: direct-bonding of brackets to enamel using acid-etch adhesive technique, pioneered in the mid-1970s, eliminated the need for metal bands on most teeth. Instead of fitting and cementing a band to every tooth -- a two-appointment process -- the orthodontist could bond a bracket directly to the enamel surface in a single visit. The combination of direct-bonded brackets and NiTi initial archwires reduced the total appointment count per case and made orthodontic treatment faster and less uncomfortable for patients. It also made treatment more accessible: lower lab costs and reduced initial seating time allowed offices to accept more patients.

    Effect on the work

    Direct bonding and NiTi archwires are widely credited with enabling the expansion of orthodontic practice capacity in the 1970s and 1980s. Treatment time per case dropped; the adolescent braces market expanded substantially through this era.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Ceramic and aesthetic brackets + lingual orthodontics (1982-2000)

    Ceramic tooth-colored brackets were introduced in the early 1980s, offering a more aesthetic alternative to metal. Lingual orthodontics -- placing brackets on the tongue-facing (lingual) surfaces of teeth so the appliance is invisible from the front -- was developed independently by two practitioners, Kinya Fujita in Japan and Craven Kurz in the United States, around 1975-1976, with commercial systems reaching the market in the early 1980s. Both innovations responded to growing adult patient demand for less visible treatment. Adult orthodontics expanded substantially through the 1980s and 1990s as the stigma of adult braces faded; by the mid-1990s adults represented a meaningful minority of the orthodontic patient population for the first time. Lingual braces added a new and technically demanding skill set: the brackets are smaller, the access is constrained, and the biomechanics of lingual systems differ significantly from labial (front-surface) systems.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Invisalign clear aligners (Align Technology, 1999 launch)

    Invisalign launched commercially in 1999 after FDA clearance in 1998. Align Technology, co-founded by Zia Chishti and Kelsey Wirth, used stereolithography to fabricate a series of clear plastic removable aligners, each slightly different from the last, that collectively moved teeth toward a planned final position. The original system was limited to mild to moderate cases and was initially resisted by orthodontists -- the founders had no dental credentials, and many professionals doubted the biomechanical efficacy of plastic aligners for complex movements. Consumer demand drove adoption faster than clinical endorsement: Align launched a $31 million television advertising campaign in 2000 described by the New York Times as the most aggressive promotional campaign the dental profession had ever seen, and by 2000 approximately 75% of US orthodontists had received Invisalign training. The long-term effect was profound: Invisalign expanded the adult orthodontic market by making treatment more socially acceptable, accelerated the digitization of the profession (each case requires a 3D scan and computer-generated staging), and created a new class of "Invisalign doctor" general dentists who competed with specialists for mild cases.

    Effect on the work

    Invisalign is the single biggest commercial disruption in orthodontics since the edgewise bracket. By 2024, Align Technology had treated over 21 million patients worldwide. The system expanded the total orthodontic market while also lowering the barrier for general dentists to offer limited orthodontic treatment -- a structural competitive challenge to specialists.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • CBCT cone-beam CT + digital cephalometrics (3D diagnosis, from 2001)

    Cone-beam computed tomography, introduced to US dentistry around 2001, gave orthodontists a 3D volumetric view of the skull, dentition, and airway at far lower radiation dose than medical CT. CBCT replaced or supplemented the traditional lateral cephalometric radiograph (a 2D flat-plate X-ray) for complex skeletal cases, surgical planning, and impacted teeth management. Cephalometric software then automated landmark detection -- identifying the anatomical reference points (ANB angle, SNA, SNB, Wits appraisal) used to classify skeletal discrepancy and plan treatment -- reducing the time from image acquisition to diagnosis. CBCT did not displace the orthodontist's judgment; it deepened the information available to inform that judgment. By 2015, CBCT was standard of care for complex cases and common in many general orthodontic practices.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Digital intraoral scanning + CAD/CAM aligner fabrication (iTero, 3Shape, SureSmile)

    Intraoral digital scanners replaced plaster impressions as the standard method for capturing dental anatomy. Align Technology's iTero scanner integrated directly with ClinCheck (the treatment-planning software for Invisalign), allowing a case to be digitally submitted within minutes of the scan appointment -- eliminating the physical impression tray, bite registration material, and lab courier step. SureSmile (Dentsply Sirona) extended the digital workflow into fixed appliances: a 3D treatment plan generated from CBCT and intraoral scan data was used to robotically bend custom archwires to the planned tooth positions, reducing treatment time by up to 30% compared to conventional wire-bending sequences. By 2020 the majority of orthodontic new-patient exams in the US were captured digitally rather than by physical impression.

    Effect on the work

    Digital scanning eliminated a full appointment category (impression/pouring/trimming/shipping) and substantially reduced the lab-to-clinic turnaround time for aligner fabrication. The net effect was increased patient throughput capacity for the same number of operators.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • AI treatment planning + remote monitoring (ClinCheck Live Plan, DentalMonitoring, ORCA CephX)

    The current AI era in orthodontics is characterized by three converging tools. ClinCheck Live Plan (Align Technology, launched late 2024) uses a model trained on data from over 21 million treated patients to generate an initial Invisalign staging plan within 15 minutes of case submission, ready for the doctor's review and modification. ORCA Dental AI's CephX system automates cephalometric landmark detection on lateral radiographs with a reported 98% landmark detection rate, replacing the manual tracing that historically took 20-30 minutes per case. DentalMonitoring allows patients to capture intraoral photos with a smartphone between appointments; AI analyzes the images for aligner fit, tooth movement progress, and hygiene, surfacing alerts to the clinician and reducing routine check-in visits by up to 33%. Together these tools shift the orthodontist toward a supervisory and exception-handling role for a larger caseload rather than a hands-on provider for every appointment.

    Effect on the work

    The AI augmentation stack is enabling orthodontists to manage higher patient volumes with the same chairside time, rather than reducing headcount. The bottleneck for growth remains the number of licensed orthodontists available, not the throughput of any individual practice -- pointing toward modestly positive employment projections through 2034.

    Bedside monitoringVitals at a glance
Projection cone · present → 2034

What credible sources project

Scrub the slider past now to anchor each scenario on the scrubber. The spread is the range of futures credible sources project for this role.

Employment outlook
Projected change in the number of people doing this work.
KFF / ADA Dentist Workforce Projection 2024
2034
+5%
ADA Health Policy Institute and KFF workforce modeling for the professionally-active orthodontist workforce, based on current dental school graduation rates, specialty residency program capacity, and retirement projections. The ADA estimates that roughly 10,830 orthodontists are professionally active in 2024. Residency programs graduate approximately 300-400 new orthodontists per year, offset by retirements; net growth in the specialty workforce is projected at roughly 3-6% per decade. Adult orthodontics demand and DSO/OSO (dental/orthodontic service organization) employment growth are positive tailwinds. The projection is consistent with the BLS directional signal but uses the broader professionally-active count as a base.
BLS National Employment Matrix 2024-34
2034
+4.4%
BLS Employment Projections -- industry-occupation matrix with labor productivity and demand assumptions. The 2024-34 cycle projects +4.4% employment growth for orthodontists (29-1023), equivalent to approximately +0.3 thousand wage-and-salary positions (from 5.2 thousand to 5.5 thousand). The BLS methodology models continued adult orthodontics demand, growth in the total dentist patient population, and an aging population increasingly interested in aesthetic dental work. The self-employed majority of the specialty is not fully captured in the OEWS baseline, so the absolute numbers understate total workforce change; the directional signal is reliable.
AI task exposure
Share of the role’s tasks that researchers estimate AI can do. This is a measure of task exposure, not a forecast of jobs lost.
Eloundou et al. -- GPTs are GPTs (2023, Science 2024)
2030
15%
of tasks
GPT-4 task-by-task LLM exposure labeling on O*NET tasks for the Healthcare Practitioner and Technical major group. Orthodontists score in the low-to-moderate LLM-exposure band. The dominant tasks -- placing and adjusting fixed appliances, making clinical judgments about skeletal vs. dental discrepancy, performing hands-on chairside procedures in the intraoral space -- are definitively outside the LLM capability frontier. The tasks where LLM exposure is moderate are diagnostic documentation, patient communication, and treatment plan review -- exactly the areas where ClinCheck Live Plan and AI cephalometric tools are now active. The 15% estimate is an approximate exposure share for these secondary tasks, not a forecast of job losses; the chairside manual core of the role is robust.
Today, in this role

What's shifting in the work right now

The historical view above shows how this role has moved. This is the present-day detail: which AI tools are picking up which tasks, where the edge still is, and the natural directions this work can grow.

What's changing in your day

Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.

AI is sitting alongside you hereReview and approve AI-generated initial treatment plans from ClinCheck Live Plan, which automates the first doctor-ready Invisalign staging within 15 minutes of case submission, then modify tooth-movement staging and torque prescriptions before finalizing.

Review and approve AI-generated initial treatment plans from ClinCheck Live Plan, which automates the first doctor-ready Invisalign staging within 15 minutes of case submission, then modify tooth-movement staging and torque prescriptions before finalizing.[3],[8]

Where your edge is

Build a personal library of approved plan modifications so you can spot-correct AI staging quickly; the AI trains on population averages — individual anatomy and patient compliance history require your override.

AI is sitting alongside you hereInterpret automated cephalometric landmark analysis from ORCA Dental AI (CephX) — including ANB angle, SNA, SNB, and Wits appraisal — then adjust any flagged deviations from clinical ground truth before constructing the treatment-planning diagnosis.

Interpret automated cephalometric landmark analysis from ORCA Dental AI (CephX) — including ANB angle, SNA, SNB, and Wits appraisal — then adjust any flagged deviations from clinical ground truth before constructing the treatment-planning diagnosis.[7],[9]

Tools picking this up
Where your edge is

Cross-check AI ceph output against your own CBCT-based landmark read on complex skeletal Class II/III cases; current AI shows clinically acceptable individual landmark accuracy (~98%) but cumulative parameter error can be substantial.

AI is sitting alongside you hereOrder and review AI-optimized SureSmile robotically bent archwires from 3D treatment plan data, then verify the custom-formed wires at chairside before ligation, replacing manual wire bending that historically required multiple appointments.

Order and review AI-optimized SureSmile robotically bent archwires from 3D treatment plan data, then verify the custom-formed wires at chairside before ligation, replacing manual wire bending that historically required multiple appointments.[6],[2]

Tools picking this up
Where your edge is

Learn to identify the cases where robotic wire precision yields the greatest ROI — complex tooth-movement sequences and surgery-first cases; routine leveling-and-aligning cases may not justify the fee differential for every patient.

Where this role is heading

Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.

A direction you could grow

Medical and Health Services Managers

Orthodontists who own or co-own group practices already manage clinical staff, digital platform procurement, and revenue-cycle operations; formalizing into a Dental or Medical and Health Services Director role (DSO leadership, academic program director, or health system dental chief) leverages that management experience while reducing direct chairside exposure.

What you'd add
  • · Healthcare operations and P&L management
  • · Value-based care contracting and insurance credentialing
  • · EMR/practice-management system administration
  • · MBA or MHA coursework (optional but common)
What it takesSome new skills to pick up
Share this year
Drops anyone you send it to straight into 2026.
Preview card
Part of Healthcare · see all 69roles →
Different role?

See the same long-arc view for your own profession.

Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code. New roles ship every few weeks. Every profile cites every claim.

Browse all roles

The data behind this timeline

On record since1900
Latest tracked employment10,830 (US, 2024)
Latest median pay$239,200 (2024)
Outlook+4.4% by 2034 (BLS National Employment Matrix 2024-34)
View all 26 cited data points
YearUS employmentMedian annual paySource
1930500n/aESTIMATE
19502,500n/aESTIMATE
19878,603n/aESTIMATE
1990n/a$117,000ESTIMATE
19958,869n/aESTIMATE
20046,190n/aBLS-OEWS
20054,820n/aBLS-OEWS
20065,200n/aBLS-OEWS
20075,350n/aBLS-OEWS
20085,500n/aBLS-OEWS
20095,410n/aBLS-OEWS
20105,580n/aBLS-OEWS
20115,040n/aBLS-OEWS
20125,530n/aBLS-OEWS
20135,570n/aBLS-OEWS
20146,190n/aBLS-OEWS
20155,410n/aBLS-OEWS
20165,200n/aBLS-OEWS
20175,080n/aBLS-OEWS
20185,350n/aBLS-OEWS
20195,990n/aBLS-OEWS
20205,040n/aBLS-OEWS
20215,140n/aBLS-OEWS
20226,310$174,360BLS-OEWS
20236,400$286,670BLS-OEWS, ESTIMATE
202410,830$239,200ESTIMATE, BLS-OEWS
Embed this timeline on your site

Free for any site. Paste this where the timeline should appear; it stays interactive, every datapoint stays cited, and it sets no cookies on your page. How embedding works

<iframe src="https://futurehistory.earth/embed/29-1023"
  width="100%" height="430" style="border:0"
  title="Orthodontists, a Future History timeline"
  loading="lazy"></iframe>

See all roles in Healthcare