Occupational therapy assistants
In brief
In May 2025, BLS counted 51,290 US occupational therapy assistants, with median pay of $72,300 a year. Of the BLS counts since 2012, the May 2025 count is the highest. The earliest figure here is an estimate of 1,200 from 1965, not measured the same way as today's count. The last full technology era for occupational therapy assistants: Electronic health records and software-based billing, 2005 to 2018.
Official statistic: latest count and pay, highest count.Researched context: earliest figure.
What the sources say
Official outlook
BLS projects employment to grow 21.5% from 2025 to 2035.
BLS Employment Projections 2025-35
Official statistic
AI exposure studies
- 23.3% of this job's tasks are exposed to large language models. Not a forecast of job losses. Eloundou and others, 2023 Official statistic
Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. BLS publishes these counts as yearly survey snapshots and cautions against reading them as a precise trend. In May 2021 BLS changed how it estimates these counts (a model-based method using three years of survey data) and moved fully to the 2018 occupation codes, so part of a change across 2021 can come from the method rather than the work.
Last updated .
Cite this page
Future History. (2026, October 11). Occupational therapy assistants: jobs and pay since 1965 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/31-2011
Future History. "Occupational therapy assistants: jobs and pay since 1965." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 11, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/31-2011.
@misc{futurehistory_31_2011, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Occupational therapy assistants: jobs and pay since 1965}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/31-2011}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-11. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }
The access date is today's date on your device.
≈ $70,446 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)
March 15-17, 1917: six founders gather in Clifton Springs, New York and establish the National Society for the Promotion of Occupational Therapy (NSPOT). The founding vision states: "The advancement of occupation as a therapeutic measure; for the study of the effect of occupation upon the human being; and for the scientific dispensation of this knowledge." No assistant credential exists yet; the entire profession is unified under the single title of occupational therapist. NSPOT formally renames itself the American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA) in 1921.
1951: AOTA adopts "Personnel Policies for Occupational Therapists," the first formal recognition that non-professional assistants are working alongside credentialed OTs and that their roles need policy definition. The document references "charges for services by OTs, non-professional assistants, and facilities," an early acknowledgment that aides and helpers are performing meaningful clinical-support tasks in practice even before any formal training standard exists.
1958: AOTA adopts formal educational standards for the Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant and approves the first OTA training programs, specifically designed for psychiatric hospital settings. AOTA president Ruth Robinson had spent three years advocating for this credential, arguing that a well-defined assistant role could safely relieve the severe OT shortage in state psychiatric institutions without compromising patient care. The first programs are hospital-based 12-week certificates, not college degree programs.
1964: The Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA) credential is formally established. St. Catherine University (then the College of St. Catherine) opens what is cited as the first college-based OTA program in the country. The move from hospital-based certificates to accredited college programs signals a shift from emergency workforce stopgap to recognized profession with entry-level educational standards. St. Mary's Junior College offers the first externally approved college program in 1965.
1965: Medicare is enacted (P.L. 89-97), creating the federal reimbursement framework that will drive the largest expansion of OT services in history over the following five decades. Occupational therapy is included as a covered service under Medicare Part B for outpatient settings and under the skilled nursing facility benefit. Without this reimbursement anchor, the massive SNF-sector OTA workforce of the 1980s and 1990s could not have developed. Medicare reimbursement policy will subsequently shape the profession's headcount at each turn: the SNF PPS boom of the 1990s, the Balanced Budget Act cuts of 1997, and the 2022 OTA payment differential all ripple through BLS employment figures.
1973: AOTA establishes the COTA Career Mobility Program, which formally creates pathways for OTAs to advance their credentials and eventually qualify as registered occupational therapists (OTRs) through bridge coursework. The same year, AOTA formally delineates the roles of OTs and COTAs, clarifying which clinical tasks can be delegated to an assistant under OT supervision. This role delineation document becomes the foundation for state practice acts over the following decade.
1975: The Education for All Handicapped Children Act (P.L. 94-142) is signed into law, specifically identifying occupational therapy as a "related service" that school districts must provide to eligible students with disabilities. This opens an entirely new OTA practice setting: the public school. School-based OT positions grow steadily through the late 1970s and 1980s, eventually accounting for a meaningful share of the COTA workforce alongside the SNF-dominant segment. Florida and New York pass the first state OT licensure laws the same year, signaling the beginning of a state-by-state credentialing regime that will encompass all 50 states by the 1990s.
1976: COTAs gain full voting rights within AOTA and become eligible for election to the AOTA Executive Board. This is a significant marker of professional recognition: OTAs are no longer merely a workforce tier supervised by "real" therapists but full members of the professional community. The 1978 creation of a Roster of Honor to recognize COTA contributions to professional development reinforces the integration.
1997: The Balanced Budget Act establishes annual per-beneficiary Medicare spending limits ("therapy caps") for outpatient occupational therapy services under Part B. Research published in the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation would later find that the BBA did not actually reduce OT utilization among Medicare beneficiaries, but the policy uncertainty and reimbursement changes slowed SNF hiring of OTAs in the late 1990s. The caps would be implemented in 1999, moratoriums would suspend them repeatedly through the mid-2000s, and they would finally be permanently repealed in 2018 -- but the 1997-2018 cap era cast a persistent shadow over SNF-sector OT staffing decisions.
Circa 2000: the COTA credential completes a full transition from hospital-based 12-week certificate programs to accredited associate-degree programs. The Cottrell (2000) historical review in the American Journal of Occupational Therapy documents the trajectory from 2 hospital-based programs in 1958 to 162 accredited 2-year college degree or professional certificate programs by 2000. The workforce expansion from the hundreds to the tens of thousands tracked the program expansion almost directly.
January 1, 2022: the Medicare 15% OTA payment differential takes effect under Section 53107 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018. CMS now requires a CO modifier on any occupational therapy claim where an OTA provided the service in whole or in part; attaching that modifier triggers a 15% payment reduction relative to what an OT would receive for the same service. AOTA has lobbied continuously for repeal. The policy creates a structural incentive for employers to prefer OTs over OTAs for Medicare Part B billing -- a tension that affects hiring patterns and wage negotiations across the profession without reducing patient demand for OTA services.
Will AI replace occupational therapy assistants? What the research says
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.
- BLS Employment Projections 2025-35Target year 2035
- Eloundou et al. (2023), "GPTs are GPTs"2023 study · Share of tasks exposed to LLMs (β, human-rated)23.3%of tasks
What's changing day to day for occupational therapy assistants
Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.
AI is sitting alongside you here Instruct, or assist in instructing…
, patients and families in home programs, basic living skills, or the care and use of adaptive equipment.[2]
AI is sitting alongside you here Maintain and promote a positive attitude toward clients…
and their treatment programs.[2]
AI is sitting alongside you here Report to supervisors, verbally or in writing…
, on patients' progress, attitudes, and behavior.[2]
How has the work of occupational therapy assistants changed since 1917?
The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.
Craft and occupational media (basketry, weaving, woodworking, gardening)
The founding of the National Society for the Promotion of Occupational Therapy in 1917 institutionalized the use of purposeful activity as a therapeutic medium. Early practitioners prescribed crafts -- basket weaving, chair caning, brush making, weaving, and woodworking -- not as diversionary hobbies but as structured interventions intended to restore motor function, cognitive engagement, and psychological equilibrium. OT educator Louis J. Haas catalogued many craft types available for patients in 1921, of which many remained in active therapeutic use. Tools were workshop-grade hand implements: looms, crochet hooks, hand saws, pottery wheels, and garden trowels. The 1912 textbook by Susan Edith Tracy, "Studies in Invalid Occupation," served as the practical training manual. These craft media remained the primary therapeutic tool well into the 1950s and shaped what assistants in the earliest programs were trained to teach and guide.
Adaptive equipment and ADL training (reachers, dressing aids, orthotics, splinting)
As occupational therapy professionalized and the assistant credential took form, the tool kit expanded from craft media toward adaptive equipment and activities-of-daily-living (ADL) training. The physical rehabilitation era, accelerated by the mass care of World War II veterans and the polio epidemics of the 1940s and 1950s, established a new clinical vocabulary: dressing sticks, button hooks, long-handled reachers, universal cuffs, orthotic splints. OTAs trained in the new hospital-based programs learned to fabricate low-temperature thermoplastic splints by hand and to guide patients through systematic ADL retraining. A. Jean Ayres published her foundational work on sensory integration in the early 1970s, opening a new practice area and a new set of clinical tools: weighted vests, tactile brushing protocols, and sensory obstacle courses. The 1975 Education for All Handicapped Children Act (P.L. 94-142) created a school-based OT market for which sensory integration and motor development tools became standard equipment.
Paper-based documentation, goniometers, and manual functional assessments
Through the 1970s, 1980s, and into the early 2000s, OTA clinical work was documented entirely on paper: handwritten SOAP notes, manual goniometer readings for joint range-of-motion, hand-grip dynamometer measurements, and standardized paper-and-pencil assessments such as the Allen Cognitive Level Screen. The paper documentation era imposed a significant administrative load: every treatment session required a narrative note, and billing relied on manually typed encounter forms submitted to payers. The goniometer -- a simple, low-cost angle-measurement device -- was the most universal clinical instrument, used across every OTA practice setting. Physical measure tools like the pinch gauge and the nine-hole peg test required no electricity and could be administered by an OTA under supervision in any environment. The discipline of documentation itself was codified: AOTA adopted "Uniform Terminology for Occupational Therapy" in 1979, creating a shared clinical vocabulary that the paper record organized.
Electronic health records (EHR) and software-based billing (e.g., ReDoc, Net Health, Therasoft)
The HITECH Act of 2009 and subsequent CMS incentive programs for meaningful use of electronic health records accelerated EHR adoption across all healthcare settings, including the outpatient rehabilitation and SNF environments where most OTAs work. Specialty OT practice management software -- ReDoc, Net Health, Therasoft, WebPT -- replaced paper SOAP notes with templated electronic documentation, automated CPT code selection, and direct electronic billing to payers. For OTAs, the shift was significant: the documentation component of each session became software-mediated, requiring competency with a keyboard and EHR interface rather than pen-and-paper. Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education (ACOTE) standards began formally requiring EHR instruction in OTA programs, a recognition codified in the literature around 2008. The transition also introduced a new compliance burden: electronic records are auditable, and Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement now depended on documentation specificity that paper notes had allowed to be more informal.
Telehealth platforms, tablet-based assessment apps, and AI documentation assistants
The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically accelerated telehealth adoption in occupational therapy: state waiver programs and CMS emergency rules allowed OTAs to deliver services by video for the first time in most jurisdictions. Tools like Zoom Health, Doxy.me, and purpose-built rehab telehealth platforms entered OTA clinical practice rapidly after March 2020. Simultaneously, tablet-based assessment apps (Motion Analysis apps, the virtual Nine-Hole Peg Test, computerized cognitive screening) began supplementing or replacing paper instruments, particularly in pediatric and school-based settings. AI-assisted documentation tools, which transcribe and draft clinical notes from ambient audio or structured prompts, began entering the OT practice management ecosystem from around 2023. These tools reduce the documentation burden but also raise questions about clinical specificity and compliance that professional associations and payers are still resolving. The mainstream daily-driver tool for an OTA in 2025-26 is an integrated EHR platform (Net Health, Casamba, or similar) accessed via a shared clinic tablet or desktop, supplemented by an expanding set of app-based assessment instruments.
See the same long-arc view for your own profession.
Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.
Browse all rolesOccupational Therapy Assistants employment and pay by year
View all 25 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
| Year | US employment | Annual pay (median unless marked) | Source | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 1,200 | n/a | Est., St. Kate's OTA Online[1] Researched context | Report |
| 1976 | 6,000 | n/a | Est., OT Centennial Project[2] Researched context | Report |
| 2003 | 18,940 | $37,400 | BLS OEWS May 2003[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2004 | 20,880 | $38,430 | BLS OEWS May 2004[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2005 | 22,160 | $39,750 | BLS OEWS May 2005[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2006 | 23,700 | $42,060 | BLS OEWS May 2006[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2007 | 25,130 | $45,050 | BLS OEWS May 2007[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2008 | 25,610 | $48,230 | BLS OEWS May 2008[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2009 | 26,680 | $50,250 | BLS OEWS May 2009[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2010 | 27,720 | $51,010 | BLS OEWS May 2010[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2011 | 29,130 | $52,040 | BLS OEWS May 2011[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2012 | 29,500 | $53,240 | BLS OEWS May 2012[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2013 | 30,450 | $55,270 | BLS OEWS May 2013[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2014 | 32,230 | $56,950 | BLS OEWS May 2014[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2015 | 35,460 | $57,870 | BLS OEWS May 2015[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2016 | 38,170 | $59,010 | BLS OEWS May 2016[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2017 | 41,650 | $59,310 | BLS OEWS May 2017[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2018 | 42,660 | $60,220 | BLS OEWS May 2018[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2019 | 44,990 | $61,510 | BLS OEWS May 2019[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2020 | 42,750 | $62,940 | BLS OEWS May 2020[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2021 | 41,980 | $61,730 | BLS OEWS May 2021[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2022 | 43,810 | $64,250 | BLS OEWS May 2022[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2023 | 46,090 | $67,010 | BLS OEWS May 2023[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2024 | 47,910 | $68,340 | BLS OEWS May 2024[3] Official statistic | Report |
| 2025 | 51,290 | $72,300 | BLS OEWS May 2025[3] Official statistic | Report |