Non-restaurant food servers
Official title Food Servers, Nonrestaurant (SOC 35-3041)
Also called Dietary aide, Hospital food service worker, Patient dining associate, Tray line worker, Cafeteria server
In brief
In May 2025, BLS counted 293,900 US non-restaurant food servers, with median pay of $35,360 a year. Of the BLS counts since 2003, the May 2025 count is the highest. The earliest figure here is an estimate of 500 from 1924, not measured the same way as today's count. The last full technology era for non-restaurant food servers: Barcode tray verification and EHR-integrated diet orders, 2005 to 2020.
What the sources say
Official outlook
BLS projects employment to grow 4.5% from 2025 to 2035.
AI exposure studies
- 11.1% of this job's tasks are exposed to large language models. Not a forecast of job losses. Eloundou and others, 2023
Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. BLS publishes these counts as yearly survey snapshots and cautions against reading them as a precise trend. In May 2021 BLS changed how it estimates these counts (a model-based method using three years of survey data) and moved fully to the 2018 occupation codes, so part of a change across 2021 can come from the method rather than the work.
Last updated .
Cite this page
Future History. (2026, October 11). Non-restaurant food servers: jobs and pay since 1924 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/35-3041
Future History. "Non-restaurant food servers: jobs and pay since 1924." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 11, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/35-3041.
@misc{futurehistory_35_3041, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Non-restaurant food servers: jobs and pay since 1924}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/35-3041}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-11. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }
The access date is today's date on your device.
≈ $34,453 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)
September 1921: Jesse G. Kirby and Dr. Reuben W. Jackson open Kirby's Pig Stand on the Fort Worth Pike in Dallas, Texas. Young male workers they called carhops run out to cars before they stop, hop onto running boards, take orders, and return with plates of barbecue pork sandwich. By 1924 the company is selling 50,000 sandwiches a week from ten Dallas locations and has expanded into six states. The Pig Stand is the first drive-in restaurant in the United States and the point of origin of the carhop as a distinct occupation.
During World War II, female carhops largely replace male carhops at drive-in restaurants as men enlist. Restaurant owners discover that women workers increase sales; the all-female carhop staff becomes the standard at most drive-ins by the mid-1940s. The gender shift mirrors a broader wartime recomposition of the American service workforce. After the war, returning men reclaim some drive-in positions, but the occupation remains substantially female through its peak years in the early 1950s.
Dieticians at Barnes Hospital in St. Louis document in a 1949 report the central unsolved problem of hospital food service: "One of the age-old complaints of hospital patients is that the hot foods [they are served] are not hot and that the cold foods are not cold." This becomes the animating problem for the next two decades of hospital foodservice innovation, leading to insulated tray systems, rethermalization technology, and eventually room-service-on-demand models that allow patients to order hot food prepared to order rather than receiving a tray assembled hours earlier.
Troy Smith opens the Top Hat Drive-In in Shawnee, Oklahoma, which will become Sonic Drive-In. Using two-way intercoms installed between parking stalls and the kitchen, Smith creates a system where customers order without a carhop approaching the car, then the carhop delivers on skates. Sonic's innovation is the intercom order-taking technology: the carhop's role shifts from order-taking and social engagement to pure delivery. Sonic goes national through the 1960s and becomes the sole major chain to preserve the carhop model after drive-throughs eliminate it at competitors.
Medicare and Medicaid are signed into law on July 30, 1965, by President Lyndon B. Johnson. The legislation rapidly expands the nursing home and long-term care sector in the United States, as federal reimbursement makes institutional elder care economically viable for a much larger population. Nursing home employment roughly doubles between 1965 and 1975. The dietary aide and food server roles within long-term care facilities grow proportionately, becoming a major component of the nonrestaurant food server occupation category. This expansion more than compensates for the contraction of the carhop sub-category as drive-throughs displace in-car service.
Aethon's TUG autonomous mobile robots begin commercial deployment in US hospitals, primarily for medication delivery and linen transport. Hospitals including UCSF Mission Bay and Upstate University Hospital begin using TUGs for meal cart transport as well. UCSF's fleet of 25 TUGs travels approximately 100 miles per day and makes over 160,000 deliveries per year across all categories. In the food service application, TUGs absorb the corridor transport leg of the food server role, which had been among the most physically injurious tasks: pushing a 400-600 pound loaded cart repeatedly across 8 or 12-hour shifts contributed significantly to musculoskeletal injury rates in this occupation.
The COVID-19 pandemic creates acute operational pressure on hospital food service. Infection control protocols require contact minimization; contactless meal delivery becomes mandatory in many facilities. Bear Robotics' Servi robots and Aethon TUGs are rapidly deployed at hospitals where they had not been adopted before, partly for infection control reasons. Simultaneously, the pandemic exposes the chronic understaffing and low pay of healthcare food service workers: facilities with high COVID patient loads struggle to maintain dietary service continuity as workers fall ill or leave for higher-paying positions in other sectors. The pandemic accelerates both robotic adoption and wage increases for this occupation.
Will AI replace non-restaurant food servers? What the research says
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.
What's changing day to day for non-restaurant food servers
Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.
AI is sitting alongside you hereOversee or partner with autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) tasked with bulk tray transport between kitchen and patient floors, loading and unloading cargo bays and handling the bedside interaction the robots cannot perform.
Oversee or partner with autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) tasked with bulk tray transport between kitchen and patient floors, loading and unloading cargo bays and handling the bedside interaction the robots cannot perform.[6],[7]
As AMRs absorb transport legwork, shift focus to the bedside handoff and patient interaction that robots are not certified to perform; advocate for training in human-factors and de-escalation.
AI is sitting alongside you hereOperate digital point-of-sale or self-service kiosk systems for cafeteria or retail dining service, processing transactions and providing menu guidance in healthcare facilities where self-order technology handles initial order capture.
Operate digital point-of-sale or self-service kiosk systems for cafeteria or retail dining service, processing transactions and providing menu guidance in healthcare facilities where self-order technology handles initial order capture.[8],[9]
Position yourself as the face of service at the kiosk station: troubleshoot device errors, assist visitors unfamiliar with digital ordering, and handle the edge cases the kiosk cannot.
AI is sitting alongside you herePrepare simple menu items (sandwiches, salads, beverages, hot cereals) and stock service stations following AI-generated production schedules and demand-forecast output from kitchen management software.
Prepare simple menu items (sandwiches, salads, beverages, hot cereals) and stock service stations following AI-generated production schedules and demand-forecast output from kitchen management software.[8],[1]
Use the demand-forecast printout at the start of each shift to prep the right quantities; note and report when actual demand consistently diverges from the forecast so the system can be tuned.
Where non-restaurant food servers go next
Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.
- Social and Human Service Assistants
- US median pay
- $45,930 (May 2025)
- BLS outlook 2025-35
- +7.4%
- Nursing Assistants
- US median pay
- $42,260 (May 2025)
- BLS outlook 2025-35
- +2.6%
- Dining Room and Cafeteria Attendants and Bartender Helpers
- US median pay
- $33,980 (May 2025)
- BLS outlook 2025-35
- +5.3%
What each move takes
Social and Human Service Assistants
Food servers in long-term care and assisted living regularly assist residents with activities of daily living and notice social or emotional changes at mealtimes, building informal skills that align with social and human service assistant roles. An associate degree or certificate in human services formalizes this experience into a more resilient and better-paid position.
- · Human services certificate or associate degree (community college, typically 1-2 years)
- · Case documentation and care-plan contribution
- · Community resources navigation and benefits counseling basics
- · De-escalation and mental health first aid
How has the work of non-restaurant food servers changed since 1921?
The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.
Running board and tray hook (carhop hand-carry era)
The original carhop carried orders by hand, often running at speed to cars that had barely stopped, balancing plates and drinks with no mechanical assistance. The aluminum tray with a hook that clipped to a half-lowered car window, still in use at Sonic today, was the only technology of the trade. Food quality depended entirely on the worker's speed and balance. A good carhop in peak 1940s drive-in culture could manage six to eight cars simultaneously, memorizing orders without writing them down, earning tips that supplemented a base wage near the minimum. The job required physical agility, social fluency, and an ability to work in weather: rain, summer heat, and winter cold all fell on the carhop, not the customer.
Hospital centralized tray assembly line (bulk-cart service era)
As American hospitals grew beyond the ward-kitchen model of the early 20th century, dietary departments centralized food production. By the 1940s the standard hospital food service model assembled patient trays on a conveyor or tray line in a central kitchen: workers positioned at stations added each component (protein, vegetable, bread, beverage, condiment) as the tray moved past, following a diet card prepared by the dietitian. The tray was then loaded onto a bulk stainless steel cart and pushed to the patient floor by a dietary aide. Critically, the cart kept nothing at proper temperature: hot foods arrived warm at best, cold foods arrived lukewarm, a complaint documented by Barnes Hospital dieticians as early as 1949. The work was physically demanding, repetitive, and governed by strict timing, but required no technology beyond the cart itself.
Effect on the workThe centralized tray line was a labor-intensive format that required large dietary departments. A hospital in this era typically employed many food service workers across day and evening meal shifts. The role was among the lowest-paid in the hospital hierarchy, typically female, and racially segregated in Southern institutions until the Civil Rights era.
Roller skates (carhop skating era)
The roller-skating carhop is the most culturally iconic version of the nonrestaurant food server, fixed in the popular imagination by films including American Graffiti (1973) and the television series Happy Days. In practice, roller-skating carhops were a regional novelty, never universal. Sonic Drive-In, founded in 1953 as Top Hat Drive-In in Shawnee, Oklahoma, popularized the skating carhop at some of its franchises. Skating allowed a carhop to cover the lot faster in good weather, handling more cars per shift. The decline of drive-in culture in the mid-1960s as drive-through windows spread ended skating carhop employment at most operators; Sonic retained it as a brand identity feature, though today only a portion of its locations use skates.
Drive-through window (carhop displacement technology)
The drive-through window was, from the perspective of the carhop, the most consequential technology in this occupation's history. Rather than a server coming out to the car, the car came to a window and received its order from a fixed service point requiring one worker instead of several. McDonald's opened its first drive-through in 1975 at a Sierra Vista, Arizona location near Fort Huachuca (designed for soldiers unable to get out of their vehicles in uniform). By the 1980s, drive-through accounted for over half of fast-food sales. Drive-in operators who added drive-through windows simultaneously eliminated most of their carhop positions. The carhop form of nonrestaurant food service contracted sharply and has remained confined to Sonic Drive-In and a small number of independent operators ever since.
Effect on the workThe drive-through window eliminated the majority of carhop positions at American drive-in restaurants between roughly 1965 and 1985. Employment in the carhop sub-category of this occupation declined over this period. The institutional food service component (hospital and long-term care) was not affected by this shift and continued growing.
Insulated tray systems and rethermalization carts (hospital food quality era)
The temperature problem documented by Barnes Hospital in 1949 was solved through the development of insulated tray systems and rethermalization (cook-chill-reheat) technology. The Ganymede Tray system, developed in the US in the late 1950s, used pre-heated or pre-chilled pallets and insulated bowls to maintain temperature from kitchen to bedside. By the 1970s and 1980s, hospitals were investing in rethermalization carts, which allowed food to be plated cold, held safely, and heated to serving temperature at the cart just before delivery. For the dietary aide, the rethermalization cart shifted work from speed (racing a hot tray to the floor before it cooled) to accuracy (loading the cart correctly, operating the heating controls, verifying tray contents). The pace of delivery became less frantic; the precision requirement increased.
Barcode tray verification and EHR-integrated diet orders (patient safety era)
The intersection of electronic health records and barcode scanning technology created a patient safety revolution in hospital food service. Previously, the dietary aide matched a tray to a room number and diet card from a paper printout; errors delivered the wrong therapeutic diet to a patient, sometimes with clinically significant consequences (a diabetic patient receiving a high-sugar tray, or a renally impaired patient receiving a high-potassium meal). With barcode tray verification (products such as Vision Software's TYW system), the worker scans the patient's ID bracelet and the tray ticket at bedside; the system flags mismatches before the tray is accepted. Simultaneously, EHR integration allowed diet orders entered by physicians and dietitians to flow directly into foodservice software, eliminating the transcription step that had introduced errors at every shift change. For the food server, these tools added a technology layer to a previously paper-based role, requiring comfort with handheld scanners, tablet-based systems, and alert protocols.
Autonomous mobile robots (AMR corridor transport era)
Aethon's TUG robot, commercially deployed in hospitals from around 2010 and increasingly common by 2015, navigates hospital corridors autonomously to transport bulk meal carts from the kitchen to patient floors, then returns soiled tray carts to the kitchen. At Kwong Wai Shiu Hospital, TUG robots have logged over 31,000 meal deliveries and halved delivery time. By 2022, more than a hundred US hospitals were operating TUG robots or equivalent AMRs from competitors including Bear Robotics. The labor implication is redistribution rather than displacement: AMRs absorb the heavy, repetitive transport leg (pushing a fully loaded cart weighing hundreds of pounds down a corridor is among the most physically injurious tasks in the occupation), freeing the food server to concentrate on the bedside interaction that robots cannot perform. A hospital that added six TUGs at UCSF Mission Bay hired many fewer workers during the expansion, but the existing workforce was redeployed toward patient-facing tasks rather than terminated.
Effect on the workAMR adoption in hospital food service is projected to avoid creating net job losses in the near term: the BLS 2024-2034 projection for this occupation is growth despite widespread AMR deployment. The aging patient population and staffing shortages in long-term care generate demand that exceeds the labor freed by robotics. The long-term outlook beyond 2034 is less certain.
See the same long-arc view for your own profession.
Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.
Browse all rolesFood Servers, Nonrestaurant employment and pay by year
View all 28 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
| Year | US employment | Annual pay (median unless marked) | Source | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1924 | 500 | n/a | Est., Kirby's Pig Stand Researched context | Report |
| 1950 | 80,000 | n/a | Est., American Hospital Association Researched context | Report |
| 1955 | n/a | $1,900 | Est., US Department of Labor Researched context | Report |
| 1970 | 180,000 | n/a | Est., BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook Researched context | Report |
| 2000 | 199,600 | $14,710 | BLS OEWS 2000 Official statistic | Report |
| 2003 | 194,260 | $15,910 | BLS OEWS May 2003 Official statistic | Report |
| 2004 | 186,770 | $16,540 | BLS OEWS May 2004 Official statistic | Report |
| 2005 | 188,750 | $17,210 | BLS OEWS May 2005 Official statistic | Report |
| 2006 | 183,700 | $18,090 | BLS OEWS May 2006 Official statistic | Report |
| 2007 | 185,530 | $18,850 | BLS OEWS May 2007 Official statistic | Report |
| 2008 | 188,390 | $19,380 | BLS OEWS May 2008 Official statistic | Report |
| 2009 | 194,950 | $19,590 | BLS OEWS May 2009 Official statistic | Report |
| 2010 | 205,330 | $19,430 | BLS OEWS May 2010 Official statistic | Report |
| 2011 | 221,000 | $19,550 | BLS OEWS May 2011 Official statistic | Report |
| 2012 | 237,740 | $19,640 | BLS OEWS May 2012 Official statistic | Report |
| 2013 | 244,820 | $19,920 | BLS OEWS May 2013 Official statistic | Report |
| 2014 | 250,840 | $19,900 | BLS OEWS May 2014 Official statistic | Report |
| 2015 | 257,070 | $20,420 | BLS OEWS May 2015 Official statistic | Report |
| 2016 | 261,520 | $21,240 | BLS OEWS May 2016 Official statistic | Report |
| 2017 | 264,630 | $22,320 | BLS OEWS May 2017 Official statistic | Report |
| 2018 | 266,190 | $23,290 | BLS OEWS May 2018 Official statistic | Report |
| 2019 | 277,580 | $24,430 | BLS OEWS May 2019 Official statistic | Report |
| 2020 | 254,650 | $25,910 | BLS OEWS May 2020 Official statistic | Report |
| 2021 | 243,030 | $28,730 | BLS OEWS May 2021 Official statistic | Report |
| 2022 | 248,870 | $30,300 | BLS OEWS May 2022 Official statistic | Report |
| 2023 | 267,840 | $33,110 | BLS OEWS May 2023 Official statistic | Report |
| 2024 | 271,780 | $34,460 | BLS OEWS May 2024 Official statistic | Report |
| 2025 | 293,900 | $35,360 | BLS OEWS May 2025 Official statistic | Report |