Skip to sources
Time Machine

Hairstylists and cosmetologists

Official title Hairdressers, Hairstylists, and Cosmetologists (SOC 39-5012)

Also called Hairstylist, Hair colorist, Cosmetologist, Hair salon stylist, Master stylist

In brief

In May 2025, BLS counted 305,710 US hairstylists and cosmetologists, with median pay of $35,790 a year. Of the BLS counts since 2021, the May 2025 count is the highest. The earliest figure here is an estimate of 65,000 from 1900, not measured the same way as today's count. The last full technology era for hairstylists and cosmetologists: Digital booking platforms, 2009 to 2019. Digital booking and social media marketing reduced the structural advantage of working inside a large salon chain, accelerating the shift toward independent contractor arrangements.

What the sources say

Official outlook

BLS projects employment to grow 7.7% from 2025 to 2035.

BLS Employment Projections 2025-35

AI exposure studies

  • 5.3% of this job's tasks are exposed to large language models. Not a forecast of job losses. Eloundou and others, 2023
  • 0.11 estimated probability that the whole occupation could be computerised, over an unspecified number of years. Not a forecast of job losses. Frey and Osborne, 2013

Since the 2013 prediction

In 2013, Frey and Osborne put this job's probability of computerisation at 0.11. BLS counted 351,960 of these jobs in May 2013 and 305,710 in May 2025 (-13%, a change derived by Future History).

Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. BLS publishes these counts as yearly survey snapshots and cautions against reading them as a precise trend. In May 2021 BLS changed how it estimates these counts (a model-based method using three years of survey data) and moved fully to the 2018 occupation codes, so part of a change across 2021 can come from the method rather than the work.

Last updated .

Cite this page
APA

Future History. (2026, October 11). Hairstylists and cosmetologists: jobs and pay since 1900 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/39-5012

Chicago

Future History. "Hairstylists and cosmetologists: jobs and pay since 1900." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 11, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/39-5012.

BibTeX

@misc{futurehistory_39_5012, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Hairstylists and cosmetologists: jobs and pay since 1900}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/39-5012}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-11. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }

The access date is today's date on your device.

drag to travel through time
1775180018251850187519001925195019752000now
Country
2026
Known then as Hairdresser / perruquier / friseur (court and domestic)
Known then as Hairdresser / hair culturist (itinerant house-call model)
Known then as Hairdresser / beauty culturist / hair parlor operator
Known then as Beauty operator / cosmetician / permanent wave specialist
Known then as Beauty operator / cosmetologist / licensed cosmetician
Known then as Cosmetologist / hairstylist / booth renter
Known then as Hairdressers, Hairstylists, and Cosmetologists (BLS SOC 39-5012)
Known today as Hairdressers, Hairstylists, and Cosmetologists (BLS SOC 39-5012)
Projected to still be called Hairdressers, Hairstylists, and Cosmetologists (BLS SOC 39-5012)
Data from the May 2025 survey
US Employment
306K
Est.

Stated in source: BLS OEWS

Official statistic
Report an error
Median Annual Wage
$35,790
Est.

≈ $34,872 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)

Official statistic
Report an error
Beat · 1888

Martha Matilda Harper opens her first hair parlor in Rochester, New York with her life savings of $360. A former domestic servant who had spent decades as a household worker, Harper introduces the reclining shampoo chair, still standard salon equipment 135 years later, and the concept of the fixed-location beauty parlor as a destination rather than a house-call service. In 1891 she launches the first retail franchise system in the United States, deliberately recruiting other low-income women and former domestic servants as franchisees. At its peak, the Harper system operates more than 500 locations. The modern American hair salon is essentially Martha Harper's invention.

Beat · 1908

Madam C.J. Walker opens Lelia College in Pittsburgh: among the first formal training programs for hairdressers in the United States. By 1917, the Walker Company has trained nearly 20,000 women as beauty culturists and sales representatives, building what Walker describes as "hair culture" rather than domestic service. The Walker enterprise operates a manufacturing plant in Indianapolis, a national sales network, and a beauty college that trains Black women systematically excluded from white-owned beauty parlors. At her death in 1919, Walker is recognized as the first Black female self-made millionaire in America.

Beat · 1938

Arnold F. Willat patents the cold wave: a permanent wave process using ammonium thioglycolate chemistry that requires no heat machine, no six-hour session, no specialized electrical equipment. A cold-chemistry perm takes 20 minutes of processing and works with inexpensive rods and solutions available to any licensed cosmetologist. The cold wave democratizes the perm: previously available only in well-equipped salons with expensive permanent wave machines, the service now becomes part of every cosmetologist's basic repertoire. Concurrently, state cosmetology licensing laws have spread to most of the US; the Wisconsin 1938 licensing law and its peers have established the licensed cosmetologist as a defined occupational category with a minimum training requirement.

Beat · 1954

Vidal Sassoon opens his first salon at 108 New Bond Street in London. His approach, geometric cuts that fall into place rather than structure built with lacquer and back-combing, redefines what a hairstylist is supposed to know. Singer Georgia Brown is his first client. Sassoon opens in New York in 1965, and his wash-and-wear philosophy spreads through American salons through the late 1960s-1970s, transforming the required skill set from "how do I maintain this style for a week" to "how do I cut this shape so it maintains itself."

Beat · 2009

Vagaro launches, founded by Fred Helou. For the first time, a solo booth-renting stylist has access to a full client-management and booking platform designed specifically for the beauty industry: accessible from a smartphone, requiring no dedicated staff to operate. Booksy follows in 2014; Square Appointments launches the same year. By 2015, the paper appointment book that had governed salon scheduling since the 1880s is rapidly becoming obsolete, replaced by 24/7 online booking, automated appointment reminders, and integrated payment processing. The administrative burden of running a solo styling practice falls by roughly an order of magnitude.

Beat · 2017

The Institute for Justice publishes "License to Work," its study of occupational licensing burden across US states. Cosmetology is identified as one of the most heavily licensed occupations relative to the actual public safety risk it poses: most states require 1,500 hours of cosmetology school training, more than the training required to become an EMT in most states, and 4-5× the training required to become a dental assistant. Iowa requires 2,100 hours. The average cost of cosmetology school tuition is approximately $17,000, creating a substantial barrier to entry for a career whose median wage is well below $40,000. IJ's critique generates policy attention: multiple states have reduced cosmetology hour requirements in the 2018-2024 period.

Beat · 2020

March-May 2020: across all 50 US states, salons and barbershops are closed by public health orders responding to COVID-19 aerosol transmission risk. Approximately 95% of US salons close during the peak shutdown period in April 2020. The Professional Beauty Association reports that more than 1.2 million beauty businesses are affected. BLS CES data show personal care services employment falls by over 60% from February to April 2020: one of the steepest two-month drops ever recorded for an occupational category. The industry begins reopening in May-June 2020 under PPE and capacity restrictions. By 2024, employment has partially recovered to 295,460 (BLS OEWS), roughly 23% below the 2019 peak, representing the permanent sector contraction from salon closures and stylist career exits.

How to read this number

OEWS is a point-in-time survey snapshot, not a continuous time series; BLS advises against using it for year-over-year trend comparison.

Each dot is a cited figure over time; the dotted line only links them (values between aren't measured). Hollow dots are estimates.

Official statistic: Copied by a script from a statistics agency table or a published study's table, not retyped by hand. BLS figures and the forecast and exposure tables are also re-checked against that table on every data run. Researched context: Researched from the cited source rather than copied from it by a script, so it is not machine-checked yet. Spot a mistake? Each figure has a “Report an error” link.

Cited forecasts · present → 2035

Will AI replace hairstylists and cosmetologists? What the research says

Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.

Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.

What published forecasts say
Forecast change in the number of people doing this work, as published by each named source. Bars share one scale on every role, centred on zero and reaching the end at ±30%. Grey marks a small change, 3% or less either way.
BLS Employment Projections 2025-35
→ 2035
+7.7%
BLS National Employment Matrix, 2025-35 cycle, line for SOC 39-5012 (Hairdressers, hairstylists, and cosmetologists): 595.0 thousand jobs in 2025, projected 640.9 thousand in 2035, a change of +45.9 thousand (+7.7%). Matrix employment counts all jobs in the occupation, including self-employed workers (48.1% of this occupation in 2025). The average for all occupations in this cycle is +3.5%.
Official statisticReport an error
How exposed is this work to AI (research measures)
Scores as published by each study. Each row says what it measures. These measure what AI could technically do, not forecasts of jobs lost.
Frey & Osborne (2013), "The Future of Employment"
2013 study · Probability of computerisation (2013 model)
11%
probability
What this measures

Published appendix value for SOC 2010 39-5012 Hairdressers, Hairstylists, and Cosmetologists: probability of computerisation 0.11, rank 176 of 702 (rank 1 is least computerisable). Frey and Osborne estimated in 2013, with a Gaussian-process classifier on O*NET variables, how likely the whole occupation is to be technically automatable over "some unspecified number of years, perhaps a decade or two". It is a probability for the occupation, not a share of tasks and not a forecast of jobs lost.

Official statisticReport an error
Eloundou et al. (2023), "GPTs are GPTs"
2023 study · Share of tasks exposed to LLMs (β, human-rated)
5.3%
of tasks
What this measures

Published occupation-level exposure from the paper's occ_level.csv for O*NET-SOC 39-5012.00 Hairdressers, Hairstylists, and Cosmetologists. Shown: human-rated β = 0.053, the share of the occupation's tasks an LLM could do in at least half the time at equal quality, counting tasks that need LLM-powered software at half weight (β = E1 + 0.5 × E2). Other published measures for this occupation: human-rated α (LLM alone) 0 and γ (all LLM-assisted) 0.105; GPT-4-rated β 0.079. This measures how much of the work an LLM could touch, not how many jobs disappear.

Official statisticReport an error
Today, in this role

What's changing day to day for hairstylists and cosmetologists

Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.

AI is taking this onManage client appointments, send automated reminders, maintain service history records, and prompt clients to rebook

Manage client appointments, send automated reminders, maintain service history records, and prompt clients to rebook; configure AI scheduling software to fill gaps, reduce no-shows, and surface clients due for color refresh or trims.[10],[11],[5]

Tools picking this up
Where your edge is

Hand off the mechanical scheduling tasks to AI platforms so your time goes entirely to chair-side work. The stylists who grew their books fastest in 2024-2025 used AI rebooking prompts and automated gap-fill notifications rather than manually chasing clients.

AI is sitting alongside you herePhotograph completed work and curate a social media portfolio to attract new clients

Photograph completed work and curate a social media portfolio to attract new clients; use AI trend-analysis and content tools to identify trending styles, write captions, and optimize posting cadence on Instagram and TikTok.[5],[12]

Tools picking this up
Where your edge is

Treat your social portfolio as a marketing channel with the same discipline you bring to your technical skills. AI tools can surface what color trends are gaining traction before they peak, giving you a window to position yourself as the local expert in that look.

AI is sitting alongside you hereRecommend and demonstrate professional retail products (shampoo, conditioner, heat protectant, styling aids) matched to the client's hair type, color history, and styling routine

Recommend and demonstrate professional retail products (shampoo, conditioner, heat protectant, styling aids) matched to the client's hair type, color history, and styling routine; use AI-powered product recommendation prompts in salon software to surface the right add-ons at checkout.[11],[3]

Tools picking this up
Where your edge is

Build genuine product knowledge: know the ingredient science behind what you recommend. Clients can buy shampoo anywhere; they buy from you because they trust your expertise. An AI prompt can surface the right product, but your explanation of why it works is what closes the sale.

Where hairstylists and cosmetologists go next

Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.

What each move takes

Experienced stylists who understand client flow, booking rhythms, and service quality are natural candidates for salon management. The pivot typically happens organically -- a lead stylist role, then assistant manager, then manager. AI salon management platforms (Zenoti, Vagaro) have reduced the operational burden of running a salon floor, making the management layer more about culture, training, and client experience than manual scheduling. The salary premium over a chair-side role is significant in high-volume salons.

What you'd add
  • · Salon business operations: P&L basics, payroll, retail margin management
  • · Staff coaching and performance review for service workers
  • · AI-powered salon management software administration (Zenoti, Boulevard)
  • · Employment law basics for small service businesses
What it takesSome new skills to pick up
Tools of the era

How has the work of hairstylists and cosmetologists changed since 1765?

The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.

  • Hand tools + heated curling tongs + pomade (court and house-call era)

    The 18th-century hairdresser worked entirely by hand: rat-tail combs, wooden-handled brushes, scissors, and heated curling tongs warmed in a small brazier. The key consumable was pomade, rendered animal fat scented with lavender or rosewater, which provided the hold needed for the architectural powder-wig styles of the French aristocracy and the ringlet styles popular through the early 19th century. Marcel Grateau's development of the flat marcelling iron in the 1870s (demonstrated publicly in 1872-75) introduced a tong design with two ridged barrels that produced a flowing wave in hair rather than a tight curl: a technique that would define women's hairstyling from the 1880s through the 1930s and remained a staple service through the 1950s. There was no electricity, no chemistry beyond pomade and simple rinses. The skill was entirely manual: the ability to sense the hair's texture and moisture through the fingers, the timing of the heated iron, the geometry of the parting and curl placement.

    Effect on the work

    The house-call model required individual clientele relationships and no capital investment beyond a kit of tools; this was the era of the itinerant hairdresser. Fixed-location establishments existed (barber shops, some urban hair parlors) but were not the norm for women's services.

  • Fixed-location beauty parlor + reclining shampoo chair (Harper, 1888) + Madam Walker's training system

    Martha Matilda Harper's 1888 Rochester salon introduced the reclining shampoo chair, still standard equipment, and the concept of the fixed-location beauty salon as a space that women visited rather than a service that came to them. Her 1891 franchise model was the first in the US retail industry, predating McDonald's. Concurrently, Madam C.J. Walker's 1905-1919 enterprise built the training infrastructure for Black beauty culturists: Lelia College (1908), the Walker System of hair care, and a national network of 20,000 trained agents. The "beauty culture" framing Walker insisted on (skilled, professional, scientifically grounded) directly challenged the domestic-service framing that white-owned trade groups applied to the occupation. The electric hair dryer (introduced commercially in the 1890s, broadly adopted in salons by the 1910s) and the first electric permanent wave machine (Karl Nessler, 1905) began transforming the salon from a place for combing and curling to a place for chemical and electrical treatments.

    Effect on the work

    The shift from house-call to fixed-location work required capital investment in equipment and rent, which restructured who could enter the trade. Harper's franchise model lowered that barrier for women, deliberately recruiting former domestic servants, while Walker's model created economic independence for Black women systematically excluded from white-owned salons.

  • Permanent wave machine + chemical wave solutions + cold wave (1938)

    Karl Nessler's permanent wave machine reached commercial maturity in the 1920s. By 1930 the permanent wave was "well-established," with middle-class American women visiting salons every three months for a perm and weekly for set and comb-out. The machine itself (a six-hour ordeal involving heated rods, chemical solutions, and an elaborate cabling apparatus) required trained operators and substantial capital equipment, anchoring the perm firmly in the licensed salon. The cold wave, introduced in 1938 by Arnold F. Willat using ammonium thioglycolate chemistry, eliminated the heat machines entirely: a cold-chemistry perm that took minutes of processing rather than six hours and could be done with inexpensive equipment. Cold waves democratized salon perms, reduced the per-service time dramatically, and, combined with the electric hood dryer that had become standard in salons by the 1940s, defined the service menu of the postwar beauty shop.

    Effect on the work

    The perm was the single most financially important service in the 20th-century salon: high-skill, high-chemical-cost, high-price, and requiring a return visit every few months. Its dominance from the 1920s through the 1980s structured the economics of the entire occupation.

  • Precision cutting + wash-and-wear geometry (Vidal Sassoon, London 1954)

    On a Tuesday afternoon in 1954, a young East End hairdresser named Vidal Sassoon opened his first salon at 108 New Bond Street in London. His client base was initially modest and his method was startling: rather than building structure with lacquer and back-combing, Sassoon cut geometric shapes that fell into place on their own when the client shook her head, "drip-dry" hair, as his clients described it. The five-point cut, the Nancy Kwan, the angular bob: each was a mathematical problem solved in the hair itself rather than a sculpture built with product on top of it. The method required a new kind of precision (angles, sections, and tension rather than feel and intuition) and it required hair-washing before the cut rather than after, which was a radical departure from salon practice at the time. Sassoon opened his New York salon in 1965 and his product line (shampoos formulated for frequently washed hair) shortly afterward. By the mid-1970s, the wash-and-wear cut had replaced the weekly set-and-comb-out as the aspirational standard in American salons, and the skill set required of a hairstylist had shifted from "how do I maintain this style for a week" to "how do I cut this shape to be self-maintaining."

    Effect on the work

    The shift to precision cutting raised the technical and educational bar for hairstylists (a well-executed geometric cut required geometric thinking, not just practice) while simultaneously reducing the frequency of return visits needed for maintenance. This began the long transition from the weekly-client model to the every-4-to-8-weeks model that characterizes the modern salon.

  • Booth rental / chair rental + national salon chains + synthetic hair color

    The booth-rental model (in which a stylist rents a chair or station from a salon owner and works as an independent contractor, keeping all revenue above the fixed weekly rent) emerged in California salons in the late 1960s to early 1970s and spread nationally through the 1980s. By the mid-1990s, industry estimates placed a large share of working hairstylists in some form of independent-contractor arrangement rather than W-2 employment. Simultaneously, national salon chains (Supercuts 1975, Great Clips 1982, Sport Clips 1993, thousands of mall-based Regis Corporation salons) created a W-2 employment path at the price-sensitive end of the market, standardizing technical training and service menus. L'Oréal's professional color lines, Goldwell, Wella, and Redken developed increasingly sophisticated permanent hair color systems through this era: color services grew from a small supplement to the single most revenue-generating category in the modern salon by the 1990s.

    Effect on the work

    Booth rental fragmented the occupation into two parallel tracks: the independent-contractor solo stylist building a personal clientele vs. the chain-salon employee executing a standardized service menu.

  • Digital booking platforms: Vagaro (2009), StyleSeat (2011), Booksy (2014), Square Appointments (2014)

    The paper appointment book, a physical ledger of penciled names and times that a salon receptionist managed and that clients booked by phone, survived in beauty salons long after most other service industries had moved to digital scheduling. Vagaro launched in 2009, founded by Fred Helou, as a booking and business-management platform specifically built for salons and spas. StyleSeat followed in 2011. Booksy launched in 2014 (Poland, immediate US focus). Square Appointments launched in 2014. Within five years, digital booking had become standard for solo stylists and small salon owners. The consequences were structural: a solo booth renter with hundreds of active clients and a Vagaro account had the client-management infrastructure that had previously required a salon with a front-desk receptionist. Instagram (launched 2010) and then TikTok (US 2018) created a marketing channel that bypassed the walk-in-location model entirely: a stylist who posted compelling hair transformation videos could build a clientele from scratch without a prime storefront location. The combination of digital booking + social media marketing + booth rental completed the atomization of the occupation into a gig-economy independent professional structure.

    Effect on the work

    Digital booking and social media marketing reduced the structural advantage of working inside a large salon chain, accelerating the shift toward independent contractor arrangements.

  • Post-COVID: suite rental model + social commerce + AI color formulation tools

    The COVID-19 pandemic restructured the occupation in ways that persist five years later. When salons reopened in 2020-21, many stylists who had built Instagram followings during the closure period found they could re-open as independent suite renters rather than returning to salon employment: the pandemic had broken the inertia that kept them in their previous arrangements. The suite rental companies (Sola Salons operates hundreds of locations in the US; Suite Studios and others operate hundreds more) became the fastest-growing segment of the beauty real estate market. Color formulation software (tools like Formulyst, Vish [waste-tracking and formulation AI for salons], and brand-specific apps from L'Oréal and Wella) began automating the calculation of color mixing ratios, reducing formula errors and product waste. Instagram and TikTok hair content became a legitimate business development channel: stylists with large followings commanded premium pricing and waitlists. The AI tools that arrived in the early 2020s improved the administrative burden (scheduling, client communication, formula recall) but did not affect the core physical service at all: you still have to put your hands on someone's head.

    Effect on the work

    BLS projects 5.6% employment growth 2024-34 (607,400 by 2034 from a 575,200 baseline), reflecting steady demographic demand recovery and the occupational resilience that Frey & Osborne's automation probability predicted. The permanent sector contraction from COVID (roughly 20% below 2019 levels in 2024) is likely a floor, not a continuing decline.

Part of Personal Care · see all 14 roles →
Different role?

See the same long-arc view for your own profession.

Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.

Browse all roles

Hairdressers, Hairstylists, and Cosmetologists employment and pay by year

On record since1765
Latest US employment305,710 (May 2025)Source: BLS OEWS May 2025Official statisticReport an error
Latest US median pay$35,790 (May 2025)Source: BLS OEWS May 2025Official statisticReport an error
Outlook+7.7% by 2035Source: BLS Employment Projections 2025-35Official statisticReport an error

In other countries

The latest figure each country's statistics agency publishes for this job. Each uses its own occupation definition, survey basis and currency, so the numbers are not directly comparable with each other or with the US figures.

  • Canada (NOC 63210)

    Employment, 2020
    86,365, Statistics Canada Census 2021 Official statistic Report an errorStatistics Canada Census of Population 2021: number of persons with employment income in NOC 63210 Hairstylists and barbers, Canada, reference year 2020. A recipients basis (anyone with employment income during the year), slightly broader than a point-in-time employed count. Statistics Canada Open Licence.
    Median pay, 2020
    C$18,800, Statistics Canada Census 2021 Official statistic Report an errorStatistics Canada Census of Population 2021 (Table 98-10-0586): median employment income for NOC 63210 Hairstylists and barbers, Canada, reference year 2020, full-year full-time workers (the basis comparable to the US OEWS full-time median). Statistics Canada Open Licence.
View all 29 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
YearUS employmentAnnual pay (median unless marked)SourceReport
190065,000n/aEst., IPUMS USA Researched contextReport
1920180,000n/aEst., Encyclopedia Britannica Researched contextReport
1940250,000n/aEst., Professional Beauty Association Researched contextReport
1960390,000n/aEst., BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook Researched contextReport
1980520,000$10,500Est., BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook Researched contextReport
2000327,140$17,660BLS OEWS 2000 Official statisticReport
2003335,860$18,700BLS OEWS May 2003 Official statisticReport
2004331,260$19,800BLS OEWS May 2004 Official statisticReport
2005338,910$20,610BLS OEWS May 2005 Official statisticReport
2006344,900$21,320BLS OEWS May 2006 Official statisticReport
2007343,320$22,210BLS OEWS May 2007 Official statisticReport
2008355,990$23,140BLS OEWS May 2008 Official statisticReport
2009349,210$23,330BLS OEWS May 2009 Official statisticReport
2010349,420$22,760BLS OEWS May 2010 Official statisticReport
2011357,030$22,570BLS OEWS May 2011 Official statisticReport
2012355,910$22,700BLS OEWS May 2012 Official statisticReport
2013351,960$23,140BLS OEWS May 2013 Official statisticReport
2014343,140$23,120BLS OEWS May 2014 Official statisticReport
2015348,010$23,660BLS OEWS May 2015 Official statisticReport
2016352,380$24,260BLS OEWS May 2016 Official statisticReport
2017351,910$24,850BLS OEWS May 2017 Official statisticReport
2018377,210$24,730BLS OEWS May 2018 Official statisticReport
2019385,960$26,090BLS OEWS May 2019 Official statisticReport
2020302,410$27,380BLS OEWS May 2020 Official statisticReport
2021285,980$29,670BLS OEWS May 2021 Official statisticReport
2022298,050$33,290BLS OEWS May 2022 Official statisticReport
2023294,840$34,970BLS OEWS May 2023 Official statisticReport
2024295,460$35,250BLS OEWS May 2024 Official statisticReport
2025305,710$35,790BLS OEWS May 2025 Official statisticReport
Embed this timeline on your site

Free for any site. Paste this where the timeline should appear; it stays interactive, every datapoint stays cited, and it sets no cookies on your page. How embedding works

<iframe src="https://futurehistory.earth/embed/39-5012"
  width="100%" height="430" style="border:0"
  title="Hairdressers, Hairstylists, and Cosmetologists, a Future History timeline"
  loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:13px;margin:4px 0 0"><a href="https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/39-5012">Hairdressers, Hairstylists, and Cosmetologists: jobs and pay over time</a>, from Future History</p>

See all roles in Personal Care