Hairstylists and cosmetologists
Official title Hairdressers, Hairstylists, and Cosmetologists (SOC 39-5012)
Also called Hairstylist, Hair colorist, Cosmetologist, Hair salon stylist, Master stylist
In brief
In May 2025, BLS counted 305,710 US hairstylists and cosmetologists, with median pay of $35,790 a year. Of the BLS counts since 2021, the May 2025 count is the highest. The earliest figure here is an estimate of 65,000 from 1900, not measured the same way as today's count. The last full technology era for hairstylists and cosmetologists: Digital booking platforms, 2009 to 2019. Digital booking and social media marketing reduced the structural advantage of working inside a large salon chain, accelerating the shift toward independent contractor arrangements.
What the sources say
Official outlook
BLS projects employment to grow 7.7% from 2025 to 2035.
AI exposure studies
- 5.3% of this job's tasks are exposed to large language models. Not a forecast of job losses. Eloundou and others, 2023
- 0.11 estimated probability that the whole occupation could be computerised, over an unspecified number of years. Not a forecast of job losses. Frey and Osborne, 2013
Since the 2013 prediction
In 2013, Frey and Osborne put this job's probability of computerisation at 0.11. BLS counted 351,960 of these jobs in May 2013 and 305,710 in May 2025 (-13%, a change derived by Future History).
Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. BLS publishes these counts as yearly survey snapshots and cautions against reading them as a precise trend. In May 2021 BLS changed how it estimates these counts (a model-based method using three years of survey data) and moved fully to the 2018 occupation codes, so part of a change across 2021 can come from the method rather than the work.
Last updated .
Cite this page
Future History. (2026, October 11). Hairstylists and cosmetologists: jobs and pay since 1900 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/39-5012
Future History. "Hairstylists and cosmetologists: jobs and pay since 1900." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 11, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/39-5012.
@misc{futurehistory_39_5012, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Hairstylists and cosmetologists: jobs and pay since 1900}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/39-5012}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-11. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }
The access date is today's date on your device.
≈ $34,872 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)
Martha Matilda Harper opens her first hair parlor in Rochester, New York with her life savings of $360. A former domestic servant who had spent decades as a household worker, Harper introduces the reclining shampoo chair, still standard salon equipment 135 years later, and the concept of the fixed-location beauty parlor as a destination rather than a house-call service. In 1891 she launches the first retail franchise system in the United States, deliberately recruiting other low-income women and former domestic servants as franchisees. At its peak, the Harper system operates more than 500 locations. The modern American hair salon is essentially Martha Harper's invention.
Madam C.J. Walker opens Lelia College in Pittsburgh: among the first formal training programs for hairdressers in the United States. By 1917, the Walker Company has trained nearly 20,000 women as beauty culturists and sales representatives, building what Walker describes as "hair culture" rather than domestic service. The Walker enterprise operates a manufacturing plant in Indianapolis, a national sales network, and a beauty college that trains Black women systematically excluded from white-owned beauty parlors. At her death in 1919, Walker is recognized as the first Black female self-made millionaire in America.
Arnold F. Willat patents the cold wave: a permanent wave process using ammonium thioglycolate chemistry that requires no heat machine, no six-hour session, no specialized electrical equipment. A cold-chemistry perm takes 20 minutes of processing and works with inexpensive rods and solutions available to any licensed cosmetologist. The cold wave democratizes the perm: previously available only in well-equipped salons with expensive permanent wave machines, the service now becomes part of every cosmetologist's basic repertoire. Concurrently, state cosmetology licensing laws have spread to most of the US; the Wisconsin 1938 licensing law and its peers have established the licensed cosmetologist as a defined occupational category with a minimum training requirement.
Vidal Sassoon opens his first salon at 108 New Bond Street in London. His approach, geometric cuts that fall into place rather than structure built with lacquer and back-combing, redefines what a hairstylist is supposed to know. Singer Georgia Brown is his first client. Sassoon opens in New York in 1965, and his wash-and-wear philosophy spreads through American salons through the late 1960s-1970s, transforming the required skill set from "how do I maintain this style for a week" to "how do I cut this shape so it maintains itself."
Vagaro launches, founded by Fred Helou. For the first time, a solo booth-renting stylist has access to a full client-management and booking platform designed specifically for the beauty industry: accessible from a smartphone, requiring no dedicated staff to operate. Booksy follows in 2014; Square Appointments launches the same year. By 2015, the paper appointment book that had governed salon scheduling since the 1880s is rapidly becoming obsolete, replaced by 24/7 online booking, automated appointment reminders, and integrated payment processing. The administrative burden of running a solo styling practice falls by roughly an order of magnitude.
The Institute for Justice publishes "License to Work," its study of occupational licensing burden across US states. Cosmetology is identified as one of the most heavily licensed occupations relative to the actual public safety risk it poses: most states require 1,500 hours of cosmetology school training, more than the training required to become an EMT in most states, and 4-5× the training required to become a dental assistant. Iowa requires 2,100 hours. The average cost of cosmetology school tuition is approximately $17,000, creating a substantial barrier to entry for a career whose median wage is well below $40,000. IJ's critique generates policy attention: multiple states have reduced cosmetology hour requirements in the 2018-2024 period.
March-May 2020: across all 50 US states, salons and barbershops are closed by public health orders responding to COVID-19 aerosol transmission risk. Approximately 95% of US salons close during the peak shutdown period in April 2020. The Professional Beauty Association reports that more than 1.2 million beauty businesses are affected. BLS CES data show personal care services employment falls by over 60% from February to April 2020: one of the steepest two-month drops ever recorded for an occupational category. The industry begins reopening in May-June 2020 under PPE and capacity restrictions. By 2024, employment has partially recovered to 295,460 (BLS OEWS), roughly 23% below the 2019 peak, representing the permanent sector contraction from salon closures and stylist career exits.
Will AI replace hairstylists and cosmetologists? What the research says
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.
What's changing day to day for hairstylists and cosmetologists
Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.
AI is taking this onManage client appointments, send automated reminders, maintain service history records, and prompt clients to rebook
Manage client appointments, send automated reminders, maintain service history records, and prompt clients to rebook; configure AI scheduling software to fill gaps, reduce no-shows, and surface clients due for color refresh or trims.[10],[11],[5]
Hand off the mechanical scheduling tasks to AI platforms so your time goes entirely to chair-side work. The stylists who grew their books fastest in 2024-2025 used AI rebooking prompts and automated gap-fill notifications rather than manually chasing clients.
AI is sitting alongside you herePhotograph completed work and curate a social media portfolio to attract new clients
Photograph completed work and curate a social media portfolio to attract new clients; use AI trend-analysis and content tools to identify trending styles, write captions, and optimize posting cadence on Instagram and TikTok.[5],[12]
Treat your social portfolio as a marketing channel with the same discipline you bring to your technical skills. AI tools can surface what color trends are gaining traction before they peak, giving you a window to position yourself as the local expert in that look.
AI is sitting alongside you hereRecommend and demonstrate professional retail products (shampoo, conditioner, heat protectant, styling aids) matched to the client's hair type, color history, and styling routine
Recommend and demonstrate professional retail products (shampoo, conditioner, heat protectant, styling aids) matched to the client's hair type, color history, and styling routine; use AI-powered product recommendation prompts in salon software to surface the right add-ons at checkout.[11],[3]
Build genuine product knowledge: know the ingredient science behind what you recommend. Clients can buy shampoo anywhere; they buy from you because they trust your expertise. An AI prompt can surface the right product, but your explanation of why it works is what closes the sale.
Where hairstylists and cosmetologists go next
Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.
- First-Line Supervisors of Personal Service Workers
- US median pay
- $48,590 (May 2025)
- BLS outlook 2025-35
- +6.3%
- Skincare Specialists
- US median pay
- $45,330 (May 2025)
- BLS outlook 2025-35
- +8.8%
What each move takes
First-Line Supervisors of Personal Service Workers
Experienced stylists who understand client flow, booking rhythms, and service quality are natural candidates for salon management. The pivot typically happens organically -- a lead stylist role, then assistant manager, then manager. AI salon management platforms (Zenoti, Vagaro) have reduced the operational burden of running a salon floor, making the management layer more about culture, training, and client experience than manual scheduling. The salary premium over a chair-side role is significant in high-volume salons.
- · Salon business operations: P&L basics, payroll, retail margin management
- · Staff coaching and performance review for service workers
- · AI-powered salon management software administration (Zenoti, Boulevard)
- · Employment law basics for small service businesses
How has the work of hairstylists and cosmetologists changed since 1765?
The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.
Hand tools + heated curling tongs + pomade (court and house-call era)
The 18th-century hairdresser worked entirely by hand: rat-tail combs, wooden-handled brushes, scissors, and heated curling tongs warmed in a small brazier. The key consumable was pomade, rendered animal fat scented with lavender or rosewater, which provided the hold needed for the architectural powder-wig styles of the French aristocracy and the ringlet styles popular through the early 19th century. Marcel Grateau's development of the flat marcelling iron in the 1870s (demonstrated publicly in 1872-75) introduced a tong design with two ridged barrels that produced a flowing wave in hair rather than a tight curl: a technique that would define women's hairstyling from the 1880s through the 1930s and remained a staple service through the 1950s. There was no electricity, no chemistry beyond pomade and simple rinses. The skill was entirely manual: the ability to sense the hair's texture and moisture through the fingers, the timing of the heated iron, the geometry of the parting and curl placement.
Effect on the workThe house-call model required individual clientele relationships and no capital investment beyond a kit of tools; this was the era of the itinerant hairdresser. Fixed-location establishments existed (barber shops, some urban hair parlors) but were not the norm for women's services.
Fixed-location beauty parlor + reclining shampoo chair (Harper, 1888) + Madam Walker's training system
Martha Matilda Harper's 1888 Rochester salon introduced the reclining shampoo chair, still standard equipment, and the concept of the fixed-location beauty salon as a space that women visited rather than a service that came to them. Her 1891 franchise model was the first in the US retail industry, predating McDonald's. Concurrently, Madam C.J. Walker's 1905-1919 enterprise built the training infrastructure for Black beauty culturists: Lelia College (1908), the Walker System of hair care, and a national network of 20,000 trained agents. The "beauty culture" framing Walker insisted on (skilled, professional, scientifically grounded) directly challenged the domestic-service framing that white-owned trade groups applied to the occupation. The electric hair dryer (introduced commercially in the 1890s, broadly adopted in salons by the 1910s) and the first electric permanent wave machine (Karl Nessler, 1905) began transforming the salon from a place for combing and curling to a place for chemical and electrical treatments.
Effect on the workThe shift from house-call to fixed-location work required capital investment in equipment and rent, which restructured who could enter the trade. Harper's franchise model lowered that barrier for women, deliberately recruiting former domestic servants, while Walker's model created economic independence for Black women systematically excluded from white-owned salons.
Permanent wave machine + chemical wave solutions + cold wave (1938)
Karl Nessler's permanent wave machine reached commercial maturity in the 1920s. By 1930 the permanent wave was "well-established," with middle-class American women visiting salons every three months for a perm and weekly for set and comb-out. The machine itself (a six-hour ordeal involving heated rods, chemical solutions, and an elaborate cabling apparatus) required trained operators and substantial capital equipment, anchoring the perm firmly in the licensed salon. The cold wave, introduced in 1938 by Arnold F. Willat using ammonium thioglycolate chemistry, eliminated the heat machines entirely: a cold-chemistry perm that took minutes of processing rather than six hours and could be done with inexpensive equipment. Cold waves democratized salon perms, reduced the per-service time dramatically, and, combined with the electric hood dryer that had become standard in salons by the 1940s, defined the service menu of the postwar beauty shop.
Effect on the workThe perm was the single most financially important service in the 20th-century salon: high-skill, high-chemical-cost, high-price, and requiring a return visit every few months. Its dominance from the 1920s through the 1980s structured the economics of the entire occupation.
Precision cutting + wash-and-wear geometry (Vidal Sassoon, London 1954)
On a Tuesday afternoon in 1954, a young East End hairdresser named Vidal Sassoon opened his first salon at 108 New Bond Street in London. His client base was initially modest and his method was startling: rather than building structure with lacquer and back-combing, Sassoon cut geometric shapes that fell into place on their own when the client shook her head, "drip-dry" hair, as his clients described it. The five-point cut, the Nancy Kwan, the angular bob: each was a mathematical problem solved in the hair itself rather than a sculpture built with product on top of it. The method required a new kind of precision (angles, sections, and tension rather than feel and intuition) and it required hair-washing before the cut rather than after, which was a radical departure from salon practice at the time. Sassoon opened his New York salon in 1965 and his product line (shampoos formulated for frequently washed hair) shortly afterward. By the mid-1970s, the wash-and-wear cut had replaced the weekly set-and-comb-out as the aspirational standard in American salons, and the skill set required of a hairstylist had shifted from "how do I maintain this style for a week" to "how do I cut this shape to be self-maintaining."
Effect on the workThe shift to precision cutting raised the technical and educational bar for hairstylists (a well-executed geometric cut required geometric thinking, not just practice) while simultaneously reducing the frequency of return visits needed for maintenance. This began the long transition from the weekly-client model to the every-4-to-8-weeks model that characterizes the modern salon.
Booth rental / chair rental + national salon chains + synthetic hair color
The booth-rental model (in which a stylist rents a chair or station from a salon owner and works as an independent contractor, keeping all revenue above the fixed weekly rent) emerged in California salons in the late 1960s to early 1970s and spread nationally through the 1980s. By the mid-1990s, industry estimates placed a large share of working hairstylists in some form of independent-contractor arrangement rather than W-2 employment. Simultaneously, national salon chains (Supercuts 1975, Great Clips 1982, Sport Clips 1993, thousands of mall-based Regis Corporation salons) created a W-2 employment path at the price-sensitive end of the market, standardizing technical training and service menus. L'Oréal's professional color lines, Goldwell, Wella, and Redken developed increasingly sophisticated permanent hair color systems through this era: color services grew from a small supplement to the single most revenue-generating category in the modern salon by the 1990s.
Effect on the workBooth rental fragmented the occupation into two parallel tracks: the independent-contractor solo stylist building a personal clientele vs. the chain-salon employee executing a standardized service menu.
Digital booking platforms: Vagaro (2009), StyleSeat (2011), Booksy (2014), Square Appointments (2014)
The paper appointment book, a physical ledger of penciled names and times that a salon receptionist managed and that clients booked by phone, survived in beauty salons long after most other service industries had moved to digital scheduling. Vagaro launched in 2009, founded by Fred Helou, as a booking and business-management platform specifically built for salons and spas. StyleSeat followed in 2011. Booksy launched in 2014 (Poland, immediate US focus). Square Appointments launched in 2014. Within five years, digital booking had become standard for solo stylists and small salon owners. The consequences were structural: a solo booth renter with hundreds of active clients and a Vagaro account had the client-management infrastructure that had previously required a salon with a front-desk receptionist. Instagram (launched 2010) and then TikTok (US 2018) created a marketing channel that bypassed the walk-in-location model entirely: a stylist who posted compelling hair transformation videos could build a clientele from scratch without a prime storefront location. The combination of digital booking + social media marketing + booth rental completed the atomization of the occupation into a gig-economy independent professional structure.
Effect on the workDigital booking and social media marketing reduced the structural advantage of working inside a large salon chain, accelerating the shift toward independent contractor arrangements.
Post-COVID: suite rental model + social commerce + AI color formulation tools
The COVID-19 pandemic restructured the occupation in ways that persist five years later. When salons reopened in 2020-21, many stylists who had built Instagram followings during the closure period found they could re-open as independent suite renters rather than returning to salon employment: the pandemic had broken the inertia that kept them in their previous arrangements. The suite rental companies (Sola Salons operates hundreds of locations in the US; Suite Studios and others operate hundreds more) became the fastest-growing segment of the beauty real estate market. Color formulation software (tools like Formulyst, Vish [waste-tracking and formulation AI for salons], and brand-specific apps from L'Oréal and Wella) began automating the calculation of color mixing ratios, reducing formula errors and product waste. Instagram and TikTok hair content became a legitimate business development channel: stylists with large followings commanded premium pricing and waitlists. The AI tools that arrived in the early 2020s improved the administrative burden (scheduling, client communication, formula recall) but did not affect the core physical service at all: you still have to put your hands on someone's head.
Effect on the workBLS projects 5.6% employment growth 2024-34 (607,400 by 2034 from a 575,200 baseline), reflecting steady demographic demand recovery and the occupational resilience that Frey & Osborne's automation probability predicted. The permanent sector contraction from COVID (roughly 20% below 2019 levels in 2024) is likely a floor, not a continuing decline.
See the same long-arc view for your own profession.
Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.
Browse all rolesHairdressers, Hairstylists, and Cosmetologists employment and pay by year
In other countries
The latest figure each country's statistics agency publishes for this job. Each uses its own occupation definition, survey basis and currency, so the numbers are not directly comparable with each other or with the US figures.
Canada (NOC 63210)
- Employment, 2020
- 86,365, Statistics Canada Census 2021 Official statistic Report an errorStatistics Canada Census of Population 2021: number of persons with employment income in NOC 63210 Hairstylists and barbers, Canada, reference year 2020. A recipients basis (anyone with employment income during the year), slightly broader than a point-in-time employed count. Statistics Canada Open Licence.
- Median pay, 2020
- C$18,800, Statistics Canada Census 2021 Official statistic Report an errorStatistics Canada Census of Population 2021 (Table 98-10-0586): median employment income for NOC 63210 Hairstylists and barbers, Canada, reference year 2020, full-year full-time workers (the basis comparable to the US OEWS full-time median). Statistics Canada Open Licence.
View all 29 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
| Year | US employment | Annual pay (median unless marked) | Source | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900 | 65,000 | n/a | Est., IPUMS USA Researched context | Report |
| 1920 | 180,000 | n/a | Est., Encyclopedia Britannica Researched context | Report |
| 1940 | 250,000 | n/a | Est., Professional Beauty Association Researched context | Report |
| 1960 | 390,000 | n/a | Est., BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook Researched context | Report |
| 1980 | 520,000 | $10,500 | Est., BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook Researched context | Report |
| 2000 | 327,140 | $17,660 | BLS OEWS 2000 Official statistic | Report |
| 2003 | 335,860 | $18,700 | BLS OEWS May 2003 Official statistic | Report |
| 2004 | 331,260 | $19,800 | BLS OEWS May 2004 Official statistic | Report |
| 2005 | 338,910 | $20,610 | BLS OEWS May 2005 Official statistic | Report |
| 2006 | 344,900 | $21,320 | BLS OEWS May 2006 Official statistic | Report |
| 2007 | 343,320 | $22,210 | BLS OEWS May 2007 Official statistic | Report |
| 2008 | 355,990 | $23,140 | BLS OEWS May 2008 Official statistic | Report |
| 2009 | 349,210 | $23,330 | BLS OEWS May 2009 Official statistic | Report |
| 2010 | 349,420 | $22,760 | BLS OEWS May 2010 Official statistic | Report |
| 2011 | 357,030 | $22,570 | BLS OEWS May 2011 Official statistic | Report |
| 2012 | 355,910 | $22,700 | BLS OEWS May 2012 Official statistic | Report |
| 2013 | 351,960 | $23,140 | BLS OEWS May 2013 Official statistic | Report |
| 2014 | 343,140 | $23,120 | BLS OEWS May 2014 Official statistic | Report |
| 2015 | 348,010 | $23,660 | BLS OEWS May 2015 Official statistic | Report |
| 2016 | 352,380 | $24,260 | BLS OEWS May 2016 Official statistic | Report |
| 2017 | 351,910 | $24,850 | BLS OEWS May 2017 Official statistic | Report |
| 2018 | 377,210 | $24,730 | BLS OEWS May 2018 Official statistic | Report |
| 2019 | 385,960 | $26,090 | BLS OEWS May 2019 Official statistic | Report |
| 2020 | 302,410 | $27,380 | BLS OEWS May 2020 Official statistic | Report |
| 2021 | 285,980 | $29,670 | BLS OEWS May 2021 Official statistic | Report |
| 2022 | 298,050 | $33,290 | BLS OEWS May 2022 Official statistic | Report |
| 2023 | 294,840 | $34,970 | BLS OEWS May 2023 Official statistic | Report |
| 2024 | 295,460 | $35,250 | BLS OEWS May 2024 Official statistic | Report |
| 2025 | 305,710 | $35,790 | BLS OEWS May 2025 Official statistic | Report |
More in Personal Care
- Childcare Workers
- Amusement and Recreation Attendants
- Recreation Workers
- Fitness Trainers and Instructors
- Animal Caretakers
- Manicurists and Pedicurists
- Ushers, Lobby Attendants, and Ticket Takers
- First-Line Supervisors of Personal Service Workers
- First-Line Supervisors of Entertainment and Recreation Workers, Except Gambling Services
- Residential Advisors