Electrical engineering technicians
Official title Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technologists and Technicians (SOC 17-3023)
Also called Electronics technician, Electronic technician, Test technician, Electronics test technician, Electrical technician
In brief
In May 2025, BLS counted 95,130 US electrical engineering technicians, with median pay of $78,190 a year. Of the BLS counts since 2021, the highest was 101,450, in May 2021. The earliest figure here is an estimate of 50,000 from 1950, not measured the same way as today's count. The last full technology era for electrical engineering technicians: Cloud-connected ATE, LXI instruments, and Python test automation, 2010 to 2023.
What the sources say
Official outlook
BLS projects employment to grow 2.4% from 2025 to 2035.
AI exposure studies
- 33% of this job's tasks are exposed to large language models. Not a forecast of job losses. Eloundou and others, 2023
Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. BLS publishes these counts as yearly survey snapshots and cautions against reading them as a precise trend.
Last updated .
Cite this page
Future History. (2026, October 11). Electrical engineering technicians: jobs and pay since 1950 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/17-3023
Future History. "Electrical engineering technicians: jobs and pay since 1950." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 11, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/17-3023.
@misc{futurehistory_17_3023, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Electrical engineering technicians: jobs and pay since 1950}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/17-3023}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-11. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }
The access date is today's date on your device.
≈ $76,185 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)
The MIT Radiation Laboratory (Rad Lab), established November 1940, grew to 3,897 employees by August 1945, the largest concentration of trained electronics technical personnel ever assembled in one place. Signal Corps and Navy training programs at MIT, Harvard, and other institutions trained tens of thousands of radar technicians during the war, creating the foundational workforce for the postwar electronics technician occupation.
The National Defense Education Act (NDEA) of 1958, passed in direct response to the Soviet launch of Sputnik on October 4, 1957, directed $60 million specifically to vocational training of technicians in defense-critical fields including electronics. The NDEA funded community college electronics labs, equipment, and curriculum development that formalized the wartime-trained technician into a credentialed peacetime occupation and drove rapid enrollment growth in two-year electronics technology programs.
The Electronics Technician Association (ETA International, originally founded 1943 as the Radio-Electronics-Television Manufacturers Association technician committee) formalized the Certified Electronics Technician (CET) examination in 1970-1973, creating the first nationally recognized credential for the occupation. CET certification became the hiring standard for consumer electronics service organizations, defense electronics contractors, and telecommunications companies through the 1970s and 1980s.
The BLS 2000 Standard Occupational Classification revision created the clean boundary between SOC 17-3023 (Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technicians) and adjacent codes (17-3024 Electro-Mechanical, 17-3025 Environmental Engineering). This was the first SOC that clearly separated electronics bench and field work from electromechanical and instrument repair. The same year marked the employment peak for the broader engineering technician workforce, at over 821,000 across all specialties.
The CHIPS and Science Act, signed August 9, 2022, authorized $52.7 billion for domestic semiconductor manufacturing with $39 billion in manufacturing incentives. Intel, TSMC, Samsung, and Micron announced combined fab investments exceeding $150 billion in Ohio, Arizona, Texas, and New York. Each new wafer fab requires approximately 2,000 technician-tier workers. If all announced fabs reach capacity by 2030, the CHIPS-driven demand signal could add 10,000-20,000 electronics technician positions, partially reversing two decades of manufacturing-driven contraction.
Will AI replace electrical engineering technicians? What the research says
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.
What's changing day to day for electrical engineering technicians
Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.
AI is sitting alongside you hereAuthor and maintain technical documentation (test procedures, calibration work instructions, assembly travelers, failure analysis reports, and field service bulletins) using AI writing assistants: draft procedure steps from bullet-point notes using ChatGPT or GitHub Copilot
Author and maintain technical documentation (test procedures, calibration work instructions, assembly travelers, failure analysis reports, and field service bulletins) using AI writing assistants: draft procedure steps from bullet-point notes using ChatGPT or GitHub Copilot; structure failure analysis reports from bench observation notes; review AI-generated procedure drafts for technical accuracy, safety warnings, and compliance with company document control format; submit for engineer review and document control approval.[12],[10]
AI writing tools compress procedure authoring from hours to minutes and produce well-structured first drafts from rough notes: a genuine time multiplier for technicians who spend a sizeable share of their week on documentation. The critical gap is that AI cannot verify technical accuracy: a ChatGPT-drafted calibration procedure that omits a warm-up time requirement or specifies the wrong input range will produce invalid calibration data. Before submitting any AI-drafted procedure for approval, walk through each step physically against the actual instrument or assembly to verify the sequence, safety notices, and measurement values are correct.
AI is sitting alongside you hereAnalyze production test data and identify yield trends, failure-mode clusters, and marginal units using MathWorks MATLAB with AI Copilot features or NI LabVIEW AI Assistant: load test log CSV or TDMS files
Analyze production test data and identify yield trends, failure-mode clusters, and marginal units using MathWorks MATLAB with AI Copilot features or NI LabVIEW AI Assistant: load test log CSV or TDMS files; use AI-assisted code generation in MATLAB Live Editor to write data import, statistical analysis, and visualization scripts; build control charts, parametric scatter plots, and failure-mode Pareto charts; present findings to the test engineer for design-margin or process-parameter corrective action.[6],[13]
MATLAB AI Copilot and LabVIEW AI Assistant dramatically compress the scripting work required to analyze production test datasets: a technician with basic MATLAB familiarity can now produce sophisticated yield-trend dashboards that previously required an engineer or data analyst. But the AI generates code for the analysis you describe; choosing the right statistical test (Cpk vs. Ppk, Anderson-Darling normality test vs. visual histogram inspection) and interpreting the results against the design margin, not just flagging outliers, requires engineering context the AI does not have. Build working MATLAB statistical toolbox fluency alongside AI-assisted code generation so you can verify the analysis is correct rather than just accepting AI-generated output.
AI is sitting alongside you hereSet up and execute automated test sequences on electronic assemblies, PCBs, and subsystems using NI TestStand or Keysight PathWave OpenTAP: build and maintain test sequences using AI-assisted sequence generation tools
Set up and execute automated test sequences on electronic assemblies, PCBs, and subsystems using NI TestStand or Keysight PathWave OpenTAP: build and maintain test sequences using AI-assisted sequence generation tools; configure instrument drivers for DMMs, oscilloscopes, power supplies, and function generators; run production test on PCB assemblies and rack-level systems; review AI-generated pass/fail logic and limit tables against engineer-provided test specifications before deploying to production.[4],[5]
NI TestStand AI and OpenTAP AI automate routine sequence scaffolding and instrument-driver boilerplate, compressing multi-day scripting tasks to hours, but the AI has no model of your specific DUT (device under test) hardware topology, RF fixture parasitics, or production test yield targets. Build deep TestStand architecture fluency (execution engine, process models, result processing callbacks) so you can verify AI-generated sequence logic correctly handles DUT initialization failures, instrument timeout recovery, and limit violations before they misclassify product in production.
Where electrical engineering technicians go next
Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.
- Industrial Production Managers
- US median pay
- $126,060 (May 2025)
- BLS outlook 2025-35
- +2.6%
- Electronics Engineers, Except Computer
- US median pay
- $130,220 (May 2025)
- BLS outlook 2025-35
- +3.7%
- Electro-Mechanical and Mechatronics Technologists and TechniciansNo timeline for this role yet
What each move takes
Industrial Production Managers
Senior electronics technicians who develop production scheduling, quality systems, and team leadership skills are well-positioned to move into Industrial Production Manager or Test Engineering Lead roles overseeing electronics manufacturing and test operations. This pivot is particularly natural for technicians who have run ATE production cells, maintained calibration programs, and trained junior technicians: they already carry the technical credibility and operational process knowledge that makes a production manager effective in an electronics manufacturing context. The transition requires adding formal production management skills (scheduling, OEE metrics, lean manufacturing tools) and people management to the strong technical foundation.
- · Production scheduling and capacity planning: MRP/ERP systems (SAP Manufacturing, Oracle Cloud Manufacturing), OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness) measurement and improvement
- · Lean manufacturing: 5S, SMED (quick changeover), value stream mapping for electronics test cell operations, waste elimination in PCB assembly and test flows
- · Quality management systems: AS9100 (aerospace), ISO 13485 (medical devices), or IATF 16949 (automotive) quality system requirements relevant to your product domain; 8D corrective action process
- · People management: training program development for technician onboarding, performance review practices, shift coordination, contractor supervision
- · Cost and budget management: production cost modeling, test yield improvement ROI analysis, capital equipment justification for ATE cell upgrades
How has the work of electrical engineering technicians changed since 1941?
The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.
Analog bench instruments: vacuum-tube voltmeters, oscilloscopes, and signal generators (postwar era)
The first generation of professional electronics technicians worked with purely analog measurement tools. The vacuum-tube voltmeter (VTVM), introduced in the late 1930s and mass-produced for military and industrial use from 1941, was the defining instrument of this era: it allowed technicians to measure voltage without loading the circuit under test, a critical capability for troubleshooting high-impedance radio circuits. The cathode-ray oscilloscope, produced at scale by Tektronix from 1947, gave technicians their first visual window into waveform shape and timing. Signal generators and RF millivoltmeters completed the bench. The diagnostic method was systematic: divide-and-conquer signal tracing from input to output, comparing measured voltages against schematic-specified values. A skilled technician carried a dog-eared copy of the relevant manufacturer service manual and could locate a faulty vacuum tube or resistor in a complex radio or television receiver in minutes.
Effect on the workThis era established the basic skill model that would persist for decades: read a schematic, set up instruments, trace a signal, isolate a fault, replace a component, verify the repair. Employment grew rapidly throughout the 1950s as television manufacturing expanded and defense electronics budgets remained high.
Solid-state instruments and early digital meters (transistor oscilloscopes, DMMs)
The transition from vacuum-tube to solid-state electronics during the 1960s transformed both the products being tested and the instruments used to test them. Tektronix released the first fully solid-state oscilloscope in 1963; Hewlett-Packard and others introduced digital voltmeters (DVMs) that replaced analog pointer instruments with numeric readouts, reducing reading errors and enabling automated data recording. The arrival of the integrated circuit (Intel 4004, 1971; 1974) added a new dimension: logic analyzers, introduced commercially by HP and Tektronix in the early 1970s, gave technicians the ability to capture and display digital signal patterns across multiple lines simultaneously. The skill requirement shifted from reading analog waveforms to interpreting digital timing diagrams. The Keithley 610C solid-state electrometer (1967) and the HP 3400A true-RMS voltmeter pushed precision measurement into new ranges. Electronics technicians who had trained on vacuum-tube circuits now had to understand transistor biasing, TTL logic levels, and the behavior of op-amps in linear circuits.
Effect on the workThe shift to solid state increased the knowledge requirement for bench technicians without yet reducing employment: more complex circuits, more specialized instruments, and the rapid proliferation of new product categories (stereo hi-fi, early computers, telecommunications switching equipment) all increased demand for skilled technicians. The engineering technician workforce grew steadily through the 1960s and 1970s.
Automated test equipment (ATE): HP 3060A, GenRad 227x, Teradyne L200 (bed-of-nails in-circuit test)
Automated test equipment transformed the production test side of electronics technician work during the late 1970s and 1980s. The ATE system replaced the bench technician who had previously performed manual point-to-point continuity and component verification checks: a human task that had taken many minutes per board could now be completed in under a minute. The technician role in ATE production environments shifted from performing the test to programming, maintaining, and troubleshooting the ATE system itself. This was the first major instance of automation reducing the labor content of a core technician task, and it drove the first structural shifts in the technician job mix away from production verification toward ATE programming and maintenance.
Effect on the workATE adoption in electronics manufacturing reduced the number of bench verification technicians required per unit of production volume, but simultaneously created demand for ATE programmers and fixture builders. The net employment effect on the overall technician workforce was modest through the 1980s because electronics manufacturing was still expanding. The structural displacement became visible only when ATE automation combined with offshore manufacturing after 2000.
PC-based test and SCPI instruments: HP BASIC, LabVIEW (1986), MATLAB (1984), GPIB/IEEE-488
The personal computer fundamentally restructured the electronics technician's relationship with test instruments. Before PC-based test, automated measurement required dedicated HP or Tektronix minicomputers running HP BASIC, typically operated only by engineers. The IEEE-488 (GPIB) instrument bus, standardized in 1975, allowed any computer to control any compatible instrument; but the real democratization came with IBM PC clones in the early 1980s and National Instruments' LabVIEW graphical programming environment, introduced in 1986. LabVIEW let technicians build automated measurement routines without formal programming skills: wire together virtual instruments on a graphical block diagram and the software generated the underlying code. MATLAB (first release 1984) entered the test lab through engineer adoption but quickly became a standard analysis tool for technicians performing production data analysis and calibration uncertainty calculations. The combination of GPIB, LabVIEW, and affordable PC hardware transformed the technician workstation from a collection of independent meters into an integrated measurement system that could log, analyze, and report data automatically. This era also introduced SCPI (Standard Commands for Programmable Instruments, 1990), which standardized the command syntax for controlling instruments over GPIB, GPIB-over-Ethernet (LXI), and later USB.
Effect on the workPC-based test increased the productivity of individual technicians substantially: tasks that had previously required a dedicated engineer or a specialist ATE programmer could now be accomplished by a technician with LabVIEW training. This partially offset the employment reduction from ATE automation by creating new, higher-skill roles. The era produced a two-tier technician workforce: those who could program LabVIEW and write MATLAB scripts earned significantly more than those limited to operating pre-programmed ATE systems.
Offshore manufacturing and the domestic technician contraction (2001-2010)
The period 2001-2010 was the most disruptive decade in the occupation's post-WWII history. The dot-com bust eliminated large segments of the semiconductor and telecommunications equipment manufacturing workforce in 2001-2002. The broader shift of consumer electronics and contract electronics manufacturing to China, Taiwan, and Southeast Asia throughout the 2000s transferred the largest single category of technician employment (production test and quality) offshore. The US electronics manufacturing workforce, which had peaked in 2000, shed hundreds of thousands of jobs between 2001 and 2010 across all occupations including technicians. For SOC 17-3023, the BLS OEWS series (starting 2003) shows the occupation declining between the early 2000s and 2013. The technician roles that survived the offshoring wave were concentrated in segments the offshore model could not easily reach: defense and aerospace electronics (ITAR-controlled, requiring cleared US personnel), medical device manufacturing (FDA 21 CFR Part 820 human verification requirements), power utility and telecommunications infrastructure field service, and high-complexity R&D lab support. These surviving segments are higher-skill, higher-wage, and more defensible than the production test roles that were lost.
Effect on the workEmployment fell between 2000 and 2013 OES measurement. This is one of the steepest sustained employment contractions in any engineering-adjacent occupation in the BLS record.
Cloud-connected ATE, LXI instruments, and Python test automation (NI TestStand, Keysight OpenTAP)
The second decade of the 2000s brought a new wave of test infrastructure modernization to the technician's bench. LXI (LAN eXtensions for Instrumentation), standardized in 2005 and widely adopted through the 2010s, replaced GPIB bus cabling with standard Ethernet, allowing instruments to be controlled from anywhere on the network and enabling remote test monitoring from a desktop. NI TestStand became the industry-standard test executive framework for structured production test, providing a GUI-based sequence editor that technicians (not just engineers) could use to build and maintain complex test programs. Python, once relegated to software engineering, entered the test lab as GitHub Copilot and similar tools made scripting accessible without a CS background: technicians writing Python for VISA/SCPI instrument control became common by the early 2020s. The cloud connection of ATE systems enabled centralized data collection and real-time yield monitoring across multiple production sites.
AI-native test tools: NI TestStand AI, MATLAB AI Copilot, GitHub Copilot for SCPI, Altium 365 AI
Beginning in 2023-2024, AI assistance became integrated into the core tools of the electronics technician workstation in ways that directly compress the highest-skill cognitive tasks. NI TestStand 2024 added AI-assisted sequence authoring that generates test sequence scaffolding, step logic, and instrument driver calls from natural-language descriptions of test requirements. MathWorks added a Copilot to MATLAB Live Editor that generates data analysis scripts from conversational prompts, enabling technicians to build production yield dashboards without deep MATLAB programming fluency. GitHub Copilot, trained on millions of Python and C# repositories including instrument control code, generates VISA/SCPI command sequences for oscilloscopes, DMMs, and signal generators with a speed and accuracy that previously required significant scripting experience. Altium 365 AI Copilot compresses first-pass PCB design review from hours to minutes. Fluke MET/CAL AI assists calibration technicians with measurement uncertainty calculations and calibration interval optimization. The net effect: the cognitive tasks that previously differentiated the top-tier from the mid-tier technician are now accessible with AI assistance; the physical bench and field tasks that AI cannot perform remotely remain the unchallenged human moat.
Effect on the workThe direction of the AI-era employment effect is compressing, not eliminating, the technician workforce. Tasks that previously required a test engineering team can now be handled by a few people using AI tools, which reduces headcount while increasing output quality. BLS projects growth 2024-2034, consistent with continued modest contraction balanced by semiconductor fab expansion and defense electronics modernization programs.
See the same long-arc view for your own profession.
Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.
Browse all rolesElectrical and Electronic Engineering Technologists and Technicians employment and pay by year
In other countries
The latest figure each country's statistics agency publishes for this job. Each uses its own occupation definition, survey basis and currency, so the numbers are not directly comparable with each other or with the US figures.
Canada (NOC 22310)
- Employment, 2020
- 44,475, Statistics Canada Census 2021 Official statistic Report an errorStatistics Canada Census of Population 2021: number of persons with employment income in NOC 22310 Electrical and electronics engineering technologists and technicians, Canada, reference year 2020. A recipients basis (anyone with employment income during the year), slightly broader than a point-in-time employed count. Statistics Canada Open Licence.
- Median pay, 2020
- C$79,500, Statistics Canada Census 2021 Official statistic Report an errorStatistics Canada Census of Population 2021 (Table 98-10-0586): median employment income for NOC 22310 Electrical and electronics engineering technologists and technicians, Canada, reference year 2020, full-year full-time workers (the basis comparable to the US OEWS full-time median). Statistics Canada Open Licence.
View all 29 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
| Year | US employment | Annual pay (median unless marked) | Source | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | 50,000 | n/a | Est., National Academies Press Researched context | Report |
| 1960 | 115,000 | n/a | Est., National Academies Press Researched context | Report |
| 1968 | n/a | $7,800 | BLS historical bulletin June 1968 Researched context | Report |
| 1971 | 157,000 | n/a | Est., National Academies Press Researched context | Report |
| 1980 | n/a | $19,500 | Est., National Academies Press Researched context | Report |
| 2000 | 287,000 | n/a | Est., National Academies Press Researched context | Report |
| 2003 | 177,940 | $43,650 | BLS OEWS May 2003 Official statistic | Report |
| 2004 | 178,560 | $46,310 | BLS OEWS May 2004 Official statistic | Report |
| 2005 | 165,850 | $48,040 | BLS OEWS May 2005 Official statistic | Report |
| 2006 | 166,340 | $50,660 | BLS OEWS May 2006 Official statistic | Report |
| 2007 | 162,460 | $52,140 | BLS OEWS May 2007 Official statistic | Report |
| 2008 | 162,330 | $53,240 | BLS OEWS May 2008 Official statistic | Report |
| 2009 | 154,050 | $54,820 | BLS OEWS May 2009 Official statistic | Report |
| 2010 | 147,750 | $56,040 | BLS OEWS May 2010 Official statistic | Report |
| 2011 | 150,020 | $56,900 | BLS OEWS May 2011 Official statistic | Report |
| 2012 | 144,460 | $57,850 | BLS OEWS May 2012 Official statistic | Report |
| 2013 | 141,150 | $58,540 | BLS OEWS May 2013 Official statistic | Report |
| 2014 | 137,040 | $59,820 | BLS OEWS May 2014 Official statistic | Report |
| 2015 | 139,080 | $61,130 | BLS OEWS May 2015 Official statistic | Report |
| 2016 | 134,870 | $62,190 | BLS OEWS May 2016 Official statistic | Report |
| 2017 | 128,320 | $63,660 | BLS OEWS May 2017 Official statistic | Report |
| 2018 | 126,950 | $64,330 | BLS OEWS May 2018 Official statistic | Report |
| 2019 | 122,550 | $65,260 | BLS OEWS May 2019 Official statistic | Report |
| 2020 | 115,270 | $67,550 | BLS OEWS May 2020 Official statistic | Report |
| 2021 | 101,450 | $63,640 | BLS OEWS May 2021 Official statistic | Report |
| 2022 | 99,050 | $66,390 | BLS OEWS May 2022 Official statistic | Report |
| 2023 | 97,420 | $72,800 | BLS OEWS May 2023 Official statistic | Report |
| 2024 | 92,710 | $77,180 | BLS OEWS May 2024 Official statistic | Report |
| 2025 | 95,130 | $78,190 | BLS OEWS May 2025 Official statistic | Report |
More in Engineering
- Civil Engineers
- Industrial Engineers
- Mechanical Engineers
- Electrical Engineers
- Architects, Except Landscape and Naval
- Architectural and Civil Drafters
- Electronics Engineers, Except Computer
- Computer Hardware Engineers
- Industrial Engineering Technologists and Technicians
- Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians