Architects
Official title Architects, Except Landscape and Naval (SOC 17-1011)
Also called Building architect, Licensed architect, Registered architect, Project architect, Design architect
In brief
In May 2025, BLS counted 106,770 US architects, with median pay of $99,280 a year. Of the BLS counts since 2003, the highest was 111,170, in May 2023, close to the May 2025 count. The earliest figure here is a Census (IPUMS) count of 10,000 from 1900, not measured the same way as today's count. The last full technology era for architects: Grasshopper for Rhino and Dynamo for Revit, 2007 to 2022.
What the sources say
Official outlook
BLS projects employment to grow 4.3% from 2025 to 2035.
AI exposure studies
- 43% of this job's tasks are exposed to large language models. Not a forecast of job losses. Eloundou and others, 2023
- 0.018 estimated probability that the whole occupation could be computerised, over an unspecified number of years. Not a forecast of job losses. Frey and Osborne, 2013
Since the 2013 prediction
In 2013, Frey and Osborne put this job's probability of computerisation at 0.018. BLS counted 84,210 of these jobs in May 2013 and 106,770 in May 2025 (+27%, a change derived by Future History).
Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. BLS publishes these counts as yearly survey snapshots and cautions against reading them as a precise trend. In May 2021 BLS changed how it estimates these counts (a model-based method using three years of survey data) and moved fully to the 2018 occupation codes, so part of a change across 2021 can come from the method rather than the work.
Last updated .
Cite this page
Future History. (2026, October 11). Architects: jobs and pay since 1900 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/17-1011
Future History. "Architects: jobs and pay since 1900." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 11, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/17-1011.
@misc{futurehistory_17_1011, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Architects: jobs and pay since 1900}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/17-1011}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-11. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }
The access date is today's date on your device.
≈ $96,735 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)
The American Institute of Architects is founded on February 23 by 13 architects at New York University, with Richard Upjohn (architect of Trinity Church, Manhattan) as its first president. The founding document explicitly aims to distinguish trained, accountable designers from unlicensed building contractors who appropriated the title "architect." AIA membership becomes the primary professional identity marker for the next four decades, before state licensing exists.
Illinois enacts the first architectural licensing law in the United States, requiring examination and registration before an individual can legally practice architecture in the state. The law is a direct response to failures in construction safety and building collapses attributed to unqualified practitioners. The pattern spreads: New Jersey and California follow in 1901; by 1915 most northeastern states have licensing laws; by 1951 all 50 states have enacted some form of architectural licensure.
The National Council of Architectural Registration Boards (NCARB) is founded in Chicago, creating a framework for reciprocal recognition of architectural licenses across state lines. Before NCARB, a registered architect in New York who moved to California had to sit an entirely new examination. NCARB's Certificate system, which later underpins the Architect Registration Examination (ARE), becomes the national credential infrastructure for the profession.
Ludwig Mies van der Rohe arrives in Chicago as director of the School of Architecture at the Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT): one of a wave of Bauhaus-trained architects who fled Nazi Germany and reshaped American architectural education. The Bauhaus influence (abstract composition, industrial materials, form-follows-function) displaces the prevailing Beaux-Arts classicism that had dominated US architecture school curricula since the 1890s. By the late 1940s the modernist vocabulary of glass curtain walls, exposed structure, and flat roofs becomes the professional mainstream.
Autodesk releases AutoCAD version 1.0 in December 1982 for the IBM PC at $1,000: the first widely affordable CAD program for personal computers. The adoption curve in architecture is steep: by the late 1980s hand drafting has essentially disappeared from larger offices, and "drafters" as a distinct support occupation begin merging into the architect role. The 1990 Census is the last major survey in which "Architectural Drafter" appears as a sizeable distinct occupation category.
Frank Gehry's Guggenheim Museum Bilbao opens in October 1997, designed using CATIA aerospace modeling software: the first major public building whose complex titanium-clad curved forms were made buildable only through digital 3D modeling. The building becomes the canonical example of how computational design tools could unlock geometrically complex architecture that would have been unbuildable with drafting-board methods. Gehry Technologies, spun off from the firm, licenses its digital project delivery platform to other practices; it is acquired by Trimble in 2014.
The 2008-09 financial crisis and construction collapse delivers the most severe employment shock in US architectural history since the Great Depression. BLS OEWS reports 106,830 architects in May 2007; by May 2012 the count falls to 82,720: a loss of roughly 23% of architect employment in five years. The AIA Firm Survey 2009 found 55% of small practices (1-4 staff) had laid off at least one person. The AIA's informal "Work-on-the-Boards" index, tracking billable hours, did not return to pre-crisis levels until 2014.
Autodesk Forma's Site Automation feature wins Architectural Record's Product of the Year 2025: the first AI-native tool to win this distinction. Simultaneously, Autodesk announces Neural CAD Buildings (Forma 2026): AI that generates floor plan layouts instantly from 3D massing models, with spatial logic maintained automatically as the exterior form changes. The RIBA AI Report 2025 records 59% of UK practices using AI tools. The AIA 2025 Architects Journey to Specification survey finds only 6% of US architects use AI regularly, documenting a sharp geographic and firm-size adoption gap.
Will AI replace architects? What the research says
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.
Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.
What's changing day to day for architects
Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.
AI is sitting alongside you hereProduce client presentation visuals using D5 Render 3.0 or Veras (EvolveLAB): apply AI-generated material treatments, lighting, and entourage directly from the Revit or SketchUp model, directing the visual narrative for design intent boards and planning submissions.
Produce client presentation visuals using D5 Render 3.0 or Veras (EvolveLAB): apply AI-generated material treatments, lighting, and entourage directly from the Revit or SketchUp model, directing the visual narrative for design intent boards and planning submissions.[11],[12]
Shift focus from rendering mechanics to visual storytelling: art direction, colour narrative, and the human story in architectural images. AI tools can generate photorealistic scenes in seconds: the architect who provides strong creative direction and can critique outputs against the design intent adds value that raw image generation cannot.
AI is sitting alongside you hereDefine programme targets and site constraints in Autodesk Forma Site Automation or TestFit, evaluate AI-generated massing and site layout options across FAR, daylight, and yield-on-cost filters, and select the highest-performing option to advance into schematic design.
Define programme targets and site constraints in Autodesk Forma Site Automation or TestFit, evaluate AI-generated massing and site layout options across FAR, daylight, and yield-on-cost filters, and select the highest-performing option to advance into schematic design.[5],[7],[10]
Develop fluency in parametric constraint-setting: the architect who defines superior programme rules (setbacks, unit mix, sustainability targets) gets better AI outputs. Use Forma's real-time wind, sun, and noise analysis to make defensible environmental arguments to planning boards: a skill AI tools support but cannot replace.
AI is sitting alongside you hereResearch building code and zoning compliance using UpCodes Copilot Intelligence: query jurisdiction-specific requirements for occupancy, egress, accessibility, and fire protection
Research building code and zoning compliance using UpCodes Copilot Intelligence: query jurisdiction-specific requirements for occupancy, egress, accessibility, and fire protection; cross-reference AI-generated compliance checklists against the current adopted code edition before submitting for permit.[8],[9]
Maintain deep command of the adopted codes in your primary jurisdictions: AI tools can misapply amendments or local amendments. Develop a relationship with plan checkers and building officials: AHJ negotiation for complex code interpretations (e.g., performance-based fire code) remains entirely human and is not searchable.
Where architects go next
Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.
- Architectural and Engineering Managers
- US median pay
- $171,270 (May 2025)
- BLS outlook 2025-35
- +5.5%
- Landscape Architects
- US median pay
- $79,870 (May 2025)
- BLS outlook 2025-35
- +4.4%
- Civil Engineers
- US median pay
- $100,840 (May 2025)
- BLS outlook 2025-35
- +6.4%
What each move takes
Architectural and Engineering Managers
Senior architects with several years of experience frequently transition into architectural and engineering management roles, overseeing multi-disciplinary project teams and managing studio P&L. As AI tools accelerate design production, firms need managers who understand both the technical outputs and the AI workflows, making experienced architects with technology fluency the most attractive candidates. The transition requires developing people management, budget control, and business development skills beyond the design craft.
- · Project financial management and earned-value tracking (Deltek Vantagepoint or similar)
- · People management: performance reviews, utilisation planning, and studio capacity forecasting
- · Business development: client relationship management, go/no-go decision frameworks
- · Contract administration at the principal-in-charge level (AIA B101 and owner-contractor agreements)
- · AI workflow governance: tool selection, prompt library maintenance, and team training protocols
How has the work of architects changed since 1800?
The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.
Drafting board, T-square, compass, and India ink on vellum
For the entire first century of organized American architecture, the physical drafting table was the primary production instrument. Architects drew in India ink on linen or vellum using T-squares, triangles, compasses, and ruling pens. A single set of working drawings for a large building could consume hundreds of drafter-hours. The introduction of translucent vellum over linen drafting cloth (widely adopted by the 1920s) was the single biggest productivity improvement before the computer era: vellum accepted pencil erasures cleanly and reproduced well under the diazo (blueprint) process.
Blueprint / cyanotype reproduction (Herschel 1842; diazo process from 1920s)
Sir John Herschel described the cyanotype photographic process in 1842; its application to architectural drawing reproduction, creating blue-on-white "blueprints" from translucent originals, was widespread in US architectural offices by the 1880s. The ammonia diazo process (blue-line prints) superseded cyanotype in the 1920s and remained the dominant reproduction method until the photocopier era of the 1970s. Blueprint reproduction meant that multiple copies of drawings could be issued to contractors for the first time: a fundamental change to how architects communicated construction intent.
Watercolor and gouache hand rendering + physical chipboard and balsa models
Throughout the pre-digital era, architect-artists produced elaborate watercolor and pen-and-ink perspective renderings to communicate design intent to clients and the public. Firms like Hugh Ferriss Associates made rendering a distinct professional specialty by the 1920s; "renderer" was a distinct job title in large practices. Physical scale models in chipboard, balsa wood, and clay ran in parallel: project models for client presentations, urban-scale massing models for planning boards. Both practices survive into the present, though AI visualization tools have displaced most rendering from commercial practice.
AutoCAD (1982): 2D digital drafting displaces the drafting table
Autodesk released AutoCAD in December 1982, the first widely affordable CAD program for personal computers. Its adoption in architectural offices was rapid: by the late 1980s it had effectively replaced hand drafting in larger practices, and by the mid-1990s it was ubiquitous across the profession. AutoCAD eliminated most manual drafting labor but also eliminated the "drafter" as a distinct profession: junior architects absorbed drafting into the normal workflow. AIA surveys from the early 1990s show that 2D CAD productivity gains reduced drawing production time versus hand drafting, though expanded project scope partially offset the savings.
Effect on the workThe transition from hand drafting to AutoCAD displaced dedicated architectural draftsmen (a distinct occupation in the 1960s-80s) into either CAD operator roles or out of the profession. The Architectural Drafters SOC (17-3011) counts declined significantly through the 1990s as the task merged into the architect role.
3D Studio, form•Z, and Rhino: 3D visualization and early parametric modeling
3D Studio (1990, later 3ds Max) brought polygon-based 3D architectural visualization to PC hardware for the first time. form•Z (1991) gave architects solid-body 3D modeling suited to complex massing and facade studies. Frank Gehry's Guggenheim Museum Bilbao (completed 1997) was modeled in CATIA (an aerospace tool), but Rhino became the accessible entry point for non-Gehry firms pursuing freeform design. These tools established the expectation that architects would produce 3D models for design exploration, not just 2D plan/section/elevation sets.
SketchUp (2000): rapid 3D massing for early-stage design
@Last Software released SketchUp in 2000; Google acquired it in 2006 and released a free version, making it the most widely used 3D modeling tool in small and medium architectural practices by the late 2000s. SketchUp's low learning curve (as opposed to the months required to master AutoCAD or Rhino) meant that even smaller firms without dedicated 3D modelers could produce client-presentation-quality massing models. It did not replace AutoCAD for construction documents but became the default massing and concept tool for schematic design.
Revit / BIM (Building Information Modeling): Autodesk acquisition 2002, mainstream by 2008
Charles River Software released Revit 1.0 in 2000; Autodesk acquired it in 2002. BIM (the practice of building a single intelligent 3D model that carries geometry, material properties, quantities, and schedule data) began displacing 2D AutoCAD workflows in larger US firms from roughly 2005 onward. The UK government mandated BIM Level 2 on all public-sector projects from 2016. The shift to BIM created a new specialist job category, BIM Manager / BIM Coordinator, inside architectural practices.
Effect on the workBIM adoption initially increased modeling labor in early design phases while reducing drawing production in later phases. Studies by Autodesk and academic researchers typically report net reduction in total construction documentation labor over a project lifetime, but the coordination benefits (clash detection, quantity takeoff) also reduced costly on-site changes.
Grasshopper for Rhino (2007) and Dynamo for Revit (2014): parametric and generative design
David Rutten released Grasshopper as a Rhino plugin in 2007 (bundled from Rhino 6 in 2018), providing a visual scripting environment for algorithmic, rule-driven geometry. For the first time, architects could encode design rules as parameters rather than drawing every option individually: changing one input cascaded through an entire facade, structural grid, or urban massing. Dynamo (open-source, 2014; integrated into Revit 2017) brought the same computational logic into the BIM production environment. Zaha Hadid Architects, BIG (Bjarke Ingels Group), and Perkins & Will became early adopters and built dedicated computational design practices. By 2020 parametric methods were taught in all major US architecture schools.
Generative AI for architectural design (Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, Veras, Maket, Autodesk Forma AI, Architechtures)
The release of Midjourney v1 (July 2022) and Stable Diffusion (August 2022) gave architects instant concept image generation from text prompts. Within months, specialized tools followed: Veras (EvolveLAB, 2023) (a generative AI rendering plugin operating directly inside Revit, SketchUp, Rhino, and Forma; Maket.ai [2022]) AI floor plan generation from room requirements. The RIBA AI Report 2025 found 59% of UK architectural practices already using AI tools; the AIA 2025 survey found 6% of US architects use AI regularly: a pattern suggesting rapid but uneven adoption across the profession.
Effect on the workThe primary labor effect to date is productivity expansion, more design iterations in the same time, rather than headcount reduction.
See the same long-arc view for your own profession.
Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.
Browse all rolesArchitects, Except Landscape and Naval employment and pay by year
In other countries
The latest figure each country's statistics agency publishes for this job. Each uses its own occupation definition, survey basis and currency, so the numbers are not directly comparable with each other or with the US figures.
Canada (NOC 21200)
- Employment, 2020
- 18,800, Statistics Canada Census 2021 Official statistic Report an errorStatistics Canada Census of Population 2021: number of persons with employment income in NOC 21200 Architects, Canada, reference year 2020. A recipients basis (anyone with employment income during the year), slightly broader than a point-in-time employed count. Statistics Canada Open Licence.
- Median pay, 2020
- C$84,000, Statistics Canada Census 2021 Official statistic Report an errorStatistics Canada Census of Population 2021 (Table 98-10-0586): median employment income for NOC 21200 Architects, Canada, reference year 2020, full-year full-time workers (the basis comparable to the US OEWS full-time median). Statistics Canada Open Licence.
View all 30 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
| Year | US employment | Annual pay (median unless marked) | Source | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900 | 10,000 | n/a | Census (IPUMS) Researched context | Report |
| 1940 | 26,000 | n/a | Census (IPUMS) Researched context | Report |
| 1950 | n/a | $5,200 | Est., ESTIMATE Researched context | Report |
| 1970 | 60,000 | n/a | Est., Bureau of Labor Statistics / HathiTrust Researched context | Report |
| 1980 | n/a | $27,800 | Est., Bureau of Labor Statistics / FRASER Researched context | Report |
| 1990 | 96,000 | n/a | Est., BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook… Researched context | Report |
| 2000 | 74,390 | $52,510 | BLS OEWS 2000 Official statistic | Report |
| 2003 | 91,010 | $57,950 | BLS OEWS May 2003 Official statistic | Report |
| 2004 | 94,280 | $60,300 | BLS OEWS May 2004 Official statistic | Report |
| 2005 | 96,740 | $62,850 | BLS OEWS May 2005 Official statistic | Report |
| 2006 | 101,010 | $64,150 | BLS OEWS May 2006 Official statistic | Report |
| 2007 | 106,830 | $67,620 | BLS OEWS May 2007 Official statistic | Report |
| 2008 | 110,990 | $70,320 | BLS OEWS May 2008 Official statistic | Report |
| 2009 | 101,630 | $72,700 | BLS OEWS May 2009 Official statistic | Report |
| 2010 | 87,700 | $72,550 | BLS OEWS May 2010 Official statistic | Report |
| 2011 | 83,590 | $73,340 | BLS OEWS May 2011 Official statistic | Report |
| 2012 | 82,720 | $73,090 | BLS OEWS May 2012 Official statistic | Report |
| 2013 | 84,210 | $74,110 | BLS OEWS May 2013 Official statistic | Report |
| 2014 | 88,900 | $74,520 | BLS OEWS May 2014 Official statistic | Report |
| 2015 | 93,720 | $76,100 | BLS OEWS May 2015 Official statistic | Report |
| 2016 | 99,860 | $76,930 | BLS OEWS May 2016 Official statistic | Report |
| 2017 | 103,110 | $78,470 | BLS OEWS May 2017 Official statistic | Report |
| 2018 | 104,360 | $79,380 | BLS OEWS May 2018 Official statistic | Report |
| 2019 | 105,850 | $80,750 | BLS OEWS May 2019 Official statistic | Report |
| 2020 | 103,900 | $82,320 | BLS OEWS May 2020 (employment) Official statisticBLS OEWS May 2020 (pay) Official statistic | Report |
| 2021 | 100,400 | $80,180 | BLS OEWS May 2021 Official statistic | Report |
| 2022 | 107,490 | $82,840 | BLS OEWS May 2022 Official statistic | Report |
| 2023 | 111,170 | $93,310 | BLS OEWS May 2023 Official statistic | Report |
| 2024 | 111,140 | $96,690 | BLS OEWS May 2024 Official statistic | Report |
| 2025 | 106,770 | $99,280 | BLS OEWS May 2025 Official statistic | Report |
More in Engineering
- Civil Engineers
- Industrial Engineers
- Mechanical Engineers
- Electrical Engineers
- Architectural and Civil Drafters
- Electronics Engineers, Except Computer
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technologists and Technicians
- Computer Hardware Engineers
- Industrial Engineering Technologists and Technicians
- Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians