Skip to sources
Time Machine

Civil engineering technicians

Official title Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians (SOC 17-3022)

In brief

In May 2025, BLS counted 68,520 US civil engineering technicians, with median pay of $64,950 a year. The earliest figure here is an estimate of 447,000 from 1971, not measured the same way as today's count. The last full technology era for civil engineering technicians: BIM + Autodesk Civil 3D + drone photogrammetry, 2008 to 2020.

Official statistic: latest count and pay.Researched context: earliest figure.

What the sources say

Official outlook

BLS projects employment to grow 3.2% from 2025 to 2035.

BLS Employment Projections 2025-35

Official statistic

AI exposure studies

  • 47.7% of this job's tasks are exposed to large language models. Not a forecast of job losses. Eloundou and others, 2023 Official statistic

Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35.

Last updated .

Cite this page
APA

Future History. (2026, October 31). Civil engineering technicians: jobs and pay since 1971 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/17-3022

Chicago

Future History. "Civil engineering technicians: jobs and pay since 1971." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 31, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/17-3022.

BibTeX

@misc{futurehistory_17_3022, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Civil engineering technicians: jobs and pay since 1971}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/17-3022}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-31. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }

The access date is today's date on your device.

drag to travel through time
View as table
187519001925195019752000now
2026
Known then as Engineering Aid / Rodman / Chain Carrier (pre-professional-era survey assistant)
Known then as Engineering Technician / Survey Technician / Instrument Man (New Deal infrastructure era)
Known then as Civil Engineering Technician / Highway Technician (Interstate era, BLS "Engineering and Science Technicians" classification)
Known then as Civil Engineering Technician / CAD Technician (AutoCAD era, 1990 SOC groups)
Known then as Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians (BLS SOC 17-3022, 2000 SOC)
Known today as Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians (BLS SOC 17-3022, 2000 SOC)
Projected to still be called Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians (BLS SOC 17-3022, 2000 SOC)
Data from the May 2025 survey
US Employment
69K
Est.

Stated in source: BLS OEWS

Official statistic
Report an error
Median Annual Wage
$64,950
Est.

≈ $63,285 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)

Official statistic
Report an error
Beat · 1956

The Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, signed by President Eisenhower on June 29, authorized the construction of approximately 41,000 miles of interstate highways and appropriated $25 billion over a decade. This was the single largest driver of civil engineering technician employment in US history. State highway departments hired thousands of survey technicians, construction inspectors, materials testing technicians, and plan preparers in the late 1950s and through the 1960s to support the design and construction of the Interstate System. The workforce buildup at departments of transportation in states such as California, Texas, Pennsylvania, and Ohio constituted the largest employer base for civil technicians in the occupation's history.

Beat · 1982

Autodesk releases AutoCAD 1.0 for the IBM PC in December 1982, priced at $1,000 per seat compared to $100,000-plus for minicomputer-based CAD systems. Within a decade, AutoCAD becomes the dominant platform for civil engineering plan production at consulting firms and government agencies alike. The "draftsman" position, which had been the traditional entry-level civil technician job since the blueprint era, begins a rapid decline. By the early 1990s, hand drafting boards have largely disappeared from engineering offices in the United States. The ASCE and ASCE affiliated organizations note this transformation as one of the most rapid technology-driven workforce restructurings in the profession's history.

Beat · 1993

Trimble Navigation releases its first commercial RTK GPS product, the Site Surveyor, in 1993, followed in March 1994 by the first RTK receiver with on-the-fly initialization. The traditional three- or four-person survey party, which had existed since the time of the canal builders, begins a multi-decade consolidation: a single technician with a GPS rover and a laptop running Trimble Business Center can accomplish what previously required a party chief, instrument man, and two rodmen. State highway departments and large engineering firms begin retiring their transit-and-tape survey equipment through the late 1990s.

Beat · 2009

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) appropriated $27.5 billion for highway and bridge investment and $8.4 billion for public transit, creating a near-term surge in demand for civil engineering technicians at state departments of transportation and consulting firms. Employment rose to approximately 69,830 by 2013, the highest recorded level for the modern 17-3022 series, before stabilizing in the 60,000-65,000 range as ARRA projects wound down and productivity tools (BIM, drones) continued to raise output per technician.

Beat · 2021

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Bipartisan Infrastructure Law) is signed on November 15, 2021, appropriating $1.2 trillion over five years including $110 billion for roads and bridges, $55 billion for water infrastructure, $65 billion for broadband, and $73 billion for power grid upgrades. For civil engineering technicians, this represents the most significant sustained federal infrastructure funding since the Interstate Highway Act. Employment of 17-3022 has held steady in the 63,000-65,000 range through 2023-2024 as infrastructure projects funded by the Act move through design and into construction.

How to read this number

OEWS is a point-in-time survey snapshot, not a continuous time series; BLS advises against using it for year-over-year trend comparison.

Each dot is a cited figure over time; the dotted line only links them (values between aren't measured). Hollow dots are estimates.

Official statistic: Copied by a script from a statistics agency table or a published study's table, not retyped by hand. BLS figures, ONS ASHE figures (UK pay and jobs) and the forecast and exposure tables are also re-checked against that table on every data run. Researched context: Researched from the cited source rather than copied from it by a script, so it is not machine-checked yet. Spot a mistake? Each figure has a “Report an error” link.

Cited forecasts · present → 2035

Will AI replace civil engineering technicians? What the research says

Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.

Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.

What published forecasts say
Forecast change in the number of people doing this work, as published by each named source. Bars share one scale on every role, centred on zero and reaching the end at ±30%. Grey marks a small change, 3% or less either way.
  • BLS Employment Projections 2025-35
    Target year 2035
    +3.2%
    BLS National Employment Matrix, 2025-35 cycle, line for SOC 17-3022 (Civil engineering technologists and technicians): 70.9 thousand jobs in 2025, projected 73.2 thousand in 2035, a change of +2.3 thousand (+3.2%). Matrix employment counts all jobs in the occupation, including self-employed workers (0.7% of this occupation in 2025). The average for all occupations in this cycle is +3.5%.
    Official statisticReport an error
How exposed is this work to AI (research measures)
Scores as published by each study. Each row says what it measures. These measure what AI could technically do, not forecasts of jobs lost.
  • Eloundou et al. (2023), "GPTs are GPTs"
    2023 study · Share of tasks exposed to LLMs (β, human-rated)
    47.7%
    of tasks
    What this measures

    Published occupation-level exposure from the paper's occ_level.csv for O*NET-SOC 17-3022.00 Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians. Shown: human-rated β = 0.477, the share of the occupation's tasks an LLM could do in at least half the time at equal quality, counting tasks that need LLM-powered software at half weight (β = E1 + 0.5 × E2). Other published measures for this occupation: human-rated α (LLM alone) 0.273 and γ (all LLM-assisted) 0.682; GPT-4-rated β 0.591. This measures how much of the work an LLM could touch, not how many jobs disappear.

    Official statisticReport an error
Today, in this role

What's changing day to day for civil engineering technicians

Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.

AI is sitting alongside you here Calculate dimensions, square footage…

, profile and component specifications, and material quantities, using calculator or computer.[2]

Where your edge is

AI is sitting alongside you here Read and review project blueprints and structural specifications…

to determine dimensions of structure or system and material requirements.[2]

Where your edge is

AI is sitting alongside you here Draft detailed dimensional drawings and design layouts…

for projects to ensure conformance to specifications.[2]

Where your edge is

Tools of the era

How has the work of civil engineering technicians changed since 1870?

The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.

  • Dumpy level, transit theodolite, Gunter's chain (field survey era)

    For the first decades of the modern civil engineering technician role, the tools were manual and analog: a Gunter's chain to measure distance; a transit or dumpy level to establish grades and alignments; a Philadelphia rod for elevation reading; and a pencil, field book, and drawing board to record and communicate results. The technician's job was primarily to be an accurate, reliable extension of the licensed engineer's calculations into three-dimensional space on the ground. Drawing reproduction was by hand copying, blueprint (cyanotype), or diazo print. These tools were well-established craft instruments. The bottleneck was human endurance and accuracy, not technology.

  • Electronic distance measurement (EDM) + blueprint/Mimeograph reproduction + Mylar drafting

    The postwar era brought the first wave of electronic augmentation. Electronic distance measurement instruments, introduced commercially in the late 1950s (Geodimeter, then Tellurometer), replaced the physical chain for long-distance measurements and dramatically improved accuracy on highway and bridge surveys. Drafting moved from hand-lettered vellum to Mylar film, which could be photographically reproduced, cutting the time to produce plan sets. Planimeters and coordinate plotters began to mechanize area calculations. The civil engineering technician workforce expanded dramatically during this period as the Interstate Highway System (authorized 1956) required thousands of survey party members, inspectors, and plan drafters at state highway departments across the country. This was the occupation's employment peak era.

    Effect on the work

    Employment of the broad engineering technician category grew between 1971 and 2000, a near-doubling driven in part by the sustained demand from highway and public works infrastructure at federal, state, and local levels.

  • AutoCAD (Autodesk 1982) and desktop CAD for civil plan production

    AutoCAD's release for the IBM PC in 1982 was the most disruptive single technology event in the history of the civil engineering technician role. Before AutoCAD, a plan set for a road project required many drafters working at drawing boards for weeks; after AutoCAD, a smaller team could produce, revise, and reproduce the same drawings in days. By the late 1980s, hand drafting had been largely displaced at engineering firms, and the "draftsman" title that had been a common entry point into civil technician work disappeared from job postings. Civil 3D, Autodesk's civil-specific design suite, arrived in the 2000s as the successor. The CAD era created a new specialization (the "CAD technician") while simultaneously reducing the headcount needed for plan production. Technicians who adapted to CAD workflows survived and thrived; those who did not faced displacement.

    Effect on the work

    The National Academies study found that the real annual earnings of engineering technicians remained remarkably stable at approximately $50,000 in 2015 dollars across four decades (1974-2015), suggesting that CAD adoption increased productivity without substantially raising or lowering individual wages. The impact was on headcount efficiency rather than per-worker compensation.

  • GPS/RTK total station + GIS (Trimble RTK commercially available 1993)

    Trimble released the first commercial Real-Time Kinematic GPS (RTK) product, the Site Surveyor system, in 1993. By 1994, on-the-fly (OTF) initialization was available, making RTK practical for routine field surveys. This replaced the traditional three- or four-person survey party (instrument man, rodman, chainman, party chief) with a system where one or two people with GPS rovers could accomplish the same work in a fraction of the time. For civil engineering technicians, the survey crew shrank but the role of the individual technician became more skilled: reading and interpreting GPS data, managing the base station, understanding datum transformations, and integrating field data into GIS databases. Simultaneously, GIS software (ArcGIS 8.0, MapInfo) enabled technicians to manage and analyze spatial data that previously required a separate cartography function.

    Effect on the work

    RTK GPS reduced the number of field technicians needed per survey project over the 1993-2010 period as three- and four-person survey parties consolidated to one- and two-person crews. This contributed to the modest employment contraction visible after the 2013 peak.

  • BIM (Building Information Modeling) + Autodesk Civil 3D + drone photogrammetry

    Building Information Modeling arrived in civil engineering in earnest after 2008, with Autodesk Civil 3D and Bentley InRoads providing 3D corridor modeling and clash detection for transportation projects. For civil technicians, BIM shifted the work from producing flat plan-and-profile sheets toward managing intelligent 3D models where the drawing is derived from the model rather than drawn independently. Drone-based photogrammetry (DJI Phantom 4 RTK, 2018; PIX4D, Pix4Dmapper) began supplementing or replacing ground-based topographic surveys for large sites, generating point clouds that technicians processed into usable terrain models. The technician who once leveled a tripod on a muddy shoulder now increasingly flies a drone over the same corridor and processes the imagery back at the office.

  • AI-assisted design + LiDAR mobile mapping + autonomous construction monitoring

    As of 2025-2026, the mainstream tools for civil engineering technicians are Autodesk Civil 3D, Esri ArcGIS Pro, Bentley OpenRoads, and Trimble Business Center for office work, plus RTK GPS rovers, drone photogrammetry, and handheld LiDAR scanners (Leica BLK2GO, Trimble SX12) for field capture. AI-assisted design tools are entering the workflow: Autodesk's generative design features can suggest alignments and grading solutions that technicians then refine. Construction-site monitoring via fixed cameras with computer-vision analysis (e.g., Buildots, DroneDeploy) is beginning to automate some of the progress-documentation tasks that technicians traditionally handled by walking the site with a clipboard. The role is not at high displacement risk from AI: the judgment required to identify a discrepancy between the drawing and the field condition, to flag a potential erosion problem before it becomes a failure, or to negotiate with a contractor about a deviation requires contextual knowledge that current AI systems cannot supply from a server room.

Different role?

See the same long-arc view for your own profession.

Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.

Browse all roles

Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians employment and pay by year

On record since1870
Latest US employment68,520 (May 2025)Source: BLS OEWS May 2025Official statisticReport an error
Latest US median pay$64,950 (May 2025)Source: BLS OEWS May 2025Official statisticReport an error
Outlook+3.2% by 2035Source: BLS Employment Projections 2025-35Official statisticReport an error
View all 26 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians in the US: employment and pay by year, with sources
YearUS employmentAnnual pay (median unless marked)SourceReport
1971447,000n/aEst., National Academies Press[1] Researched contextReport
1974n/a$10,200 (average)Est., National Academies Press[3] Researched contextReport
2000821,000n/aEst., National Academies Press[1] Researched contextReport
200390,060$38,050BLS OEWS May 2003[2] Official statisticReport
200490,000$38,480BLS OEWS May 2004[2] Official statisticReport
200590,390$39,210BLS OEWS May 2005[2] Official statisticReport
200686,730$40,560BLS OEWS May 2006[2] Official statisticReport
200788,030$42,580BLS OEWS May 2007[2] Official statisticReport
200888,140$44,290BLS OEWS May 2008[2] Official statisticReport
200982,690$45,970BLS OEWS May 2009[2] Official statisticReport
201077,050$46,290BLS OEWS May 2010[2] Official statisticReport
201171,890$46,900BLS OEWS May 2011[2] Official statisticReport
201270,790$47,560BLS OEWS May 2012[2] Official statisticReport
201369,830$47,780BLS OEWS May 2013[2] Official statisticReport
201471,300$48,340BLS OEWS May 2014[2] Official statisticReport
201571,440$49,260BLS OEWS May 2015[2] Official statisticReport
201672,150$49,980BLS OEWS May 2016[2] Official statisticReport
201771,430$51,620BLS OEWS May 2017[2] Official statisticReport
201871,150$52,580BLS OEWS May 2018[2] Official statisticReport
201968,870$53,410BLS OEWS May 2019[2] Official statisticReport
202067,270$54,080BLS OEWS May 2020[2] Official statisticReport
202164,170$58,320BLS OEWS May 2021[2] Official statisticReport
202262,350$59,630BLS OEWS May 2022[2] Official statisticReport
202363,560$60,700BLS OEWS May 2023[2] Official statisticReport
202462,130$64,200BLS OEWS May 2024[2] Official statisticReport
202568,520$64,950BLS OEWS May 2025[2] Official statisticReport
Embed this timeline on your site

Free for any site. Paste this where the timeline should appear; it stays interactive, every datapoint stays cited, and it sets no cookies on your page. How embedding works

<iframe src="https://futurehistory.earth/embed/17-3022"
  width="100%" height="430" style="border:0"
  title="Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians, a Future History timeline"
  loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:13px;margin:4px 0 0"><a href="https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/17-3022">Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians: jobs and pay since 1971</a>, from Future History</p>