Skip to sources
Time Machine

Shipping and receiving clerks

Official title Shipping, Receiving, and Inventory Clerks (SOC 43-5071)

Also called Shipping clerk, Receiving clerk, Inventory clerk, Warehouse clerk, Stock clerk

In brief

In May 2025, BLS counted 816,870 US shipping and receiving clerks, with median pay of $45,260 a year. Of the BLS counts since 2021, the highest was 857,630, in May 2024, close to the May 2025 count. The earliest figure here is an estimate of 33,000 from 1899, not measured the same way as today's count. The last full technology era for shipping and receiving clerks: RFID tagging and bulk reading, 2004 to 2020. RFID automation, combined with WMS directed workflows, began reducing the headcount of dedicated shipping and receiving clerks relative to warehouse throughput from approximately 2005 onward.

What the sources say

Official outlook

BLS projects employment to decline 7.6% from 2025 to 2035.

BLS Employment Projections 2025-35

AI exposure studies

Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. BLS publishes these counts as yearly survey snapshots and cautions against reading them as a precise trend.

Last updated .

Cite this page
APA

Future History. (2026, October 11). Shipping and receiving clerks: jobs and pay since 1899 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/43-5071

Chicago

Future History. "Shipping and receiving clerks: jobs and pay since 1899." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 11, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/43-5071.

BibTeX

@misc{futurehistory_43_5071, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Shipping and receiving clerks: jobs and pay since 1899}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/43-5071}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-11. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }

The access date is today's date on your device.

drag to travel through time
17501775180018251850187519001925195019752000now
Country
2026
Known then as Counting House Clerk / Manifest Clerk (maritime and merchant trade era)
Known then as Freight Clerk / Station Employee (railroad freight era)
Known then as Shipping and Receiving Clerk / Stock Clerk (industrial warehousing era)
Known then as Shipping and Receiving Clerk / Inventory Clerk (Census code 226, BLS era)
Known then as Shipping, Receiving, and Traffic Clerk (pre-SOC-2000 BLS classification)
Known then as Shipping, Receiving, and Inventory Clerks (BLS SOC 43-5071)
Known today as Shipping, Receiving, and Inventory Clerks (BLS SOC 43-5071)
Projected to still be called Shipping, Receiving, and Inventory Clerks (BLS SOC 43-5071)
Data from the May 2025 survey
US Employment
817K
Est.

Stated in source: BLS OEWS

Official statistic
Report an error
Median Annual Wage
$45,260
Est.

≈ $44,100 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)

Official statistic
Report an error
Beat · 1750

The bill of lading, invented in the Italian city-states of the 13th century, is the foundational document of the shipping clerk's trade. By 1750 it had been standardized across British, Dutch, and American maritime commerce as a three-function document: receipt for goods delivered to the carrier, contract with the carrier for safe delivery, and title document transferable to the buyer at the destination port. The clerk who prepared and verified bills of lading was not an administrative generalist; the bill of lading was a legally enforceable commercial instrument, and errors had real financial consequences for the merchant. This accountability structure, the clerk as the last line of verification before goods change hands, is the occupational DNA that persists today.

Beat · 1899

December 1899: 33 railroad clerks meet in Sedalia, Missouri and organize the Order of Railroad Clerks of America, which became the Brotherhood of Railway Clerks in 1904. The union expanded to include freight handlers in 1908 and by 1919 renamed itself the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees. At its peak, it was the largest single railroad organization for employees engaged primarily in clerical work. The founding in Sedalia reflects where freight clerks had grown most dense: at mid-continent junction points where the rail network's expansion had created large classes of workers processing the documentation for American goods moving coast to coast.

Beat · 1906

The Sears, Roebuck and Company catalog plant opens on the west side of Chicago on 40 acres, employing approximately 20,000 workers. The facility processed and shipped catalog orders by rail within the same day, an astonishing logistical achievement for 1906. The plant contained shipping departments where clerks verified orders against picker slips, packed merchandise, applied labels, and dispatched carloads of parcels to railroad cars waiting on the adjacent sidings. The Sears plant was the most influential early model of the large-scale distribution center and the first to require a dedicated workforce of shipping and receiving clerks at industrial scale. The template it established, order verification, packing, documentation, and rail dispatch, still describes the core workflow of the modern fulfillment center, with automated systems substituting for many of the manual steps.

Beat · 1975

J.C. Penney implements the first warehouse management system (WMS) in 1975, marking the transition from paper-based warehouse records to computer-based inventory tracking. The early WMS was a mainframe application that tracked inventory locations and generated pick lists for warehouse workers. For shipping and receiving clerks, computerized inventory meant that received goods were now entered into a system record rather than hand-posted to a card file, and discrepancies were flagged by the computer rather than discovered only at the next physical count. Manhattan Associates was founded in 1990 specifically to replace these legacy mainframe WMS systems with configurable client-server software, and by the late 1990s enterprise WMS had become a standard operating environment for large distribution centers.

Beat · 2004

Walmart issues a mandate requiring its top 100 suppliers to apply RFID tags to pallets and cases by January 2005. The mandate, backed by the Electronic Product Code (EPC) numbering system developed at the MIT Auto-ID Center, was the largest single deployment decision in RFID's commercial history. For shipping and receiving clerks at Walmart-supplying distribution centers, RFID required retraining: the physical act of scanning each item or case individually was replaced by walking a loaded pallet near a portal reader that logged the entire pallet in seconds. The clerk's role shifted from executing scans to investigating discrepancies: when the RFID count did not match the system record, it was the clerk's job to determine whether the tag had failed, the shipment was short, or the system record was wrong.

Beat · 2010

Amazon's fulfillment center network begins its rapid expansion in the 2010s, growing from a handful of facilities to over 1,300 US locations by 2024. The Amazon fulfillment model, combining high-density storage, conveyor systems, automated sorting, and (from 2014) Kiva collaborative robots, created a new variant of the shipping and receiving clerk: one working alongside autonomous mobile robots in a highly instrumented environment, scanning incoming pods, processing returns, and managing exception queues generated by the automated system. Amazon's scale means that its fulfillment workforce is statistically significant in BLS data for this occupational category, and its operational model has become a benchmark that other large-scale distribution operations have adopted.

How to read this number

OEWS is a point-in-time survey snapshot, not a continuous time series; BLS advises against using it for year-over-year trend comparison.

Each dot is a cited figure over time; the dotted line only links them (values between aren't measured). Hollow dots are estimates.

Official statistic: Copied by a script from a statistics agency table or a published study's table, not retyped by hand. BLS figures and the forecast and exposure tables are also re-checked against that table on every data run. Researched context: Researched from the cited source rather than copied from it by a script, so it is not machine-checked yet. Spot a mistake? Each figure has a “Report an error” link.

Cited forecasts · present → 2035

Will AI replace shipping and receiving clerks? What the research says

Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.

Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.

What published forecasts say
Forecast change in the number of people doing this work, as published by each named source. Bars share one scale on every role, centred on zero and reaching the end at ±30%. Grey marks a small change, 3% or less either way.
BLS Employment Projections 2025-35
→ 2035
-7.6%
BLS National Employment Matrix, 2025-35 cycle, line for SOC 43-5071 (Shipping, receiving, and inventory clerks): 827.7 thousand jobs in 2025, projected 765.0 thousand in 2035, a change of -62.8 thousand (-7.6%). Matrix employment counts all jobs in the occupation, including self-employed workers (0.9% of this occupation in 2025). The average for all occupations in this cycle is +3.5%.
Official statisticReport an error
How exposed is this work to AI (research measures)
Scores as published by each study. Each row says what it measures. These measure what AI could technically do, not forecasts of jobs lost.
Eloundou et al. (2023), "GPTs are GPTs"
2023 study · Share of tasks exposed to LLMs (β, human-rated)
35.7%
of tasks
What this measures

Published occupation-level exposure from the paper's occ_level.csv for O*NET-SOC 43-5071.00 Shipping, Receiving, and Inventory Clerks. Shown: human-rated β = 0.357, the share of the occupation's tasks an LLM could do in at least half the time at equal quality, counting tasks that need LLM-powered software at half weight (β = E1 + 0.5 × E2). Other published measures for this occupation: human-rated α (LLM alone) 0.19 and γ (all LLM-assisted) 0.524; GPT-4-rated β 0.5. This measures how much of the work an LLM could touch, not how many jobs disappear.

Official statisticReport an error
Today, in this role

What's changing day to day for shipping and receiving clerks

Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.

AI is sitting alongside you herePrepare outbound shipment documentation: verify AI-generated bills of lading, packing slips, and shipping labels against the order and physical goods

Prepare outbound shipment documentation: verify AI-generated bills of lading, packing slips, and shipping labels against the order and physical goods; confirm carrier pickup appointments; and record final shipment weights and charges in the WMS.[4],[5]

Where your edge is

Treat every AI-generated shipping document as a first draft: verify party names, addresses, Harmonized System codes for international shipments, and declared values. Customs and carrier chargebacks from bad documentation fall on the shipper, so your verification is the last line of defense.

AI is sitting alongside you hereReceive inbound shipments at the dock: verify contents against AI-processed purchase orders and advance shipping notices in the WMS, inspect for damage and count discrepancies, and escalate exceptions that the system flagged but cannot resolve automatically.

Receive inbound shipments at the dock: verify contents against AI-processed purchase orders and advance shipping notices in the WMS, inspect for damage and count discrepancies, and escalate exceptions that the system flagged but cannot resolve automatically.[5],[4],[13]

Where your edge is

Develop expertise in configuring receiving exception rules in your WMS so the system escalates the right issues rather than creating noise. Clerks who can tune AI receiving parameters reduce dock errors without adding headcount: a visible, promotable skill.

AI is sitting alongside you hereScan inbound and outbound inventory using barcode scanners or long-range RFID readers

Scan inbound and outbound inventory using barcode scanners or long-range RFID readers; reconcile physical counts against system records in real time; investigate and document count discrepancies that fall outside automated tolerance thresholds.[7],[14],[2]

Where your edge is

Learn to operate and troubleshoot RFID readers and interpret exception reports. RFID bulk-reading is faster than barcode but requires understanding why a tag read fails (orientation, interference, damaged tag). That diagnostic skill cannot be automated yet.

Where shipping and receiving clerks go next

Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.

What each move takes

Distribution managers oversee the same dock and warehouse operations that clerks execute daily, but at a systems level: labor planning, carrier contract management, budget oversight, and technology deployment decisions. The path typically runs through a warehouse supervisor or logistics coordinator role first (several years), then into management. Clerks with demonstrated WMS expertise and a track record of variance reduction are strong management candidates, especially as warehouses adopt more AI automation and need managers who understand both the technology and the physical operation.

What you'd add
  • · Warehouse supervisor experience (leading a small team, scheduling, performance coaching)
  • · P&L literacy (warehouse operating cost, labor cost per unit, freight cost per shipment)
  • · Transportation management system (TMS) familiarity alongside WMS
  • · OSHA 30-hour certification (safety compliance is a manager accountability)
  • · Leadership and conflict resolution skills for managing diverse warehouse teams
What it takesA real upskill, but a natural one
Tools of the era

How has the work of shipping and receiving clerks changed since 1750?

The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.

  • Paper manifest and bill of lading (maritime and counting house era)

    The bill of lading, developed in the Mediterranean trade of the 13th century, served as the foundational document of the shipping clerk role for five centuries before the first barcode was imagined. A clerk at a colonial American counting house or an antebellum harbor freight office spent the day reconciling paper manifests against physical cargo: counting bales of cotton, barrels of flour, or crates of dry goods against the documents a ship captain had signed at the origin port. Every discrepancy had to be documented, disputed, and resolved in writing before goods could be released. The work was entirely paper and ledger: meticulous, detail-oriented, and heavily dependent on accurate handwriting and arithmetic. This is the original form of the occupation.

  • Railroad freight documentation systems (waybill, car manifest, freight house records)

    The opening of the transcontinental railroad in 1869 did not automate the shipping clerk; it massively multiplied the scale at which clerks had to work. A freight house clerk at a major terminal now processed hundreds of incoming and outgoing carloads per day, each requiring a waybill, a car manifest, a weight ticket, and a delivery receipt. The Brotherhood of Railway Clerks, organized in 1899, grew to represent more than a hundred thousand workers by the 1920s: freight handlers, station employees, and the clerks who maintained the paperwork for one of the largest industries in the American economy. The specific tools were still paper and pen, but the volume discipline and the standardized form design of the railroad era created the template for 20th-century warehouse documentation.

    Effect on the work

    Railroad freight clerk employment grew dramatically from 1870 to 1920 as the rail network expanded. The Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks included freight handlers in its scope from 1908; the combined membership reached several hundred thousand by the 1920s, reflecting the scale of labor required to document and verify the movement of American freight.

  • Mechanical inventory systems, forklift, and adjustable pallet racking

    The 1940s through 1960s brought the first wave of physical and mechanical tools that changed warehouse work: forklift trucks (commercially deployed from the 1920s, widespread by the 1940s), adjustable pallet racking (mid-1940s), and the hand truck for moving individual units. For the shipping and receiving clerk, these changes were primarily logistical: goods now moved faster and in larger units, meaning clerk counting events were compressed in time and required keeping pace with faster dock throughput. Sears's Chicago facility, opened in 1906 with 20,000 employees processing catalog orders by rail within a single day, had by the 1950s become the model for a nationwide distribution network that required shipping and receiving clerks at every link.

  • UPC barcode scanner and early warehouse computing (inventory by scan, not by count)

    The first commercial UPC barcode scan happened on June 26, 1974, at a Marsh Supermarket in Troy, Ohio. For retail, the barcode replaced memorized price lookup at checkout. For shipping and receiving clerks, the impact was a decade later and far more transformative: by the mid-1980s, warehouses at Walmart, the US Defense Department, and major manufacturers had deployed barcode readers on the dock. A clerk could now scan an inbound carton and have its contents immediately identified in a database rather than reading a label and transcribing information by hand. J.C. Penney implemented the first warehouse management system in 1975; by the 1980s, handheld barcode scanners linked to host computers allowed clerks to record receipts in real time rather than collecting paper tickets for later batch entry. The scan-to-record workflow that this era established is still recognizable in today's dock operations, though the scanner has been replaced by RFID in the most modern facilities.

    Effect on the work

    Barcode scanning significantly accelerated dock throughput per clerk but did not immediately reduce headcount: the volume of goods flowing through American distribution centers grew faster than productivity gains. The net effect through the 1980s was faster work for roughly the same number of clerks, not replacement.

  • Enterprise WMS (Manhattan Associates, SAP, JDA), directed workflows and real-time inventory

    Manhattan Associates was founded in 1990 to replace legacy mainframe warehouse systems with configurable client-server software; its WMOS hit the market in the late 1990s. Blue Yonder (then JDA Software) was founded in 1985; SAP introduced its Extended Warehouse Management module in 2006. By the early 2000s, enterprise WMS had become the standard operating environment for large distribution centers, and the shipping and receiving clerk's workflow shifted fundamentally: rather than deciding where to put received goods or how to route outbound shipments, clerks followed directed tasks generated by the WMS. The system told you where to put it; you confirmed you did it. This "directed work" model made the clerk's role faster and more accurate but also began compressing the judgment and decision-making content of the job. The clerk's value shifted from knowing the warehouse to following the system correctly and flagging exceptions.

  • RFID tagging and bulk reading (Walmart mandate 2004, EPC standard)

    In 2004, Walmart required all its top suppliers to apply RFID tags to pallets and cases by January 2005, triggering the first broad commercial deployment of RFID in supply chain management. Where a barcode scanner required a direct line of sight and a single scan per item, an RFID reader could interrogate dozens of tags simultaneously from across a receiving dock, logging an entire pallet in seconds. The MIT Auto-ID Center, funded with support from companies including Gillette, had developed low-cost RFID tags and the Electronic Product Code (EPC) numbering system through the late 1990s, providing the standards infrastructure Walmart's mandate needed. For shipping and receiving clerks, RFID shifted the role further from physical counting toward exception investigation: when an RFID read count did not match the purchase order, the clerk's job was to find out why, not to recount one-by-one. By 2028, Zebra Technologies data indicates that 58% of warehouse leaders plan RFID deployment, completing the transition from barcode to passive RFID as the dominant inbound verification technology.

    Effect on the work

    RFID automation, combined with WMS directed workflows, began reducing the headcount of dedicated shipping and receiving clerks relative to warehouse throughput from approximately 2005 onward. The 2003-2013 period saw peak employment followed by a plateau and gradual decline as RFID and WMS efficiency gains compounded.

  • WMS AI agents and collaborative robotics (Oracle Inventory Tasking Agent, SAP EWM AI, Locus Robotics)

    The current era represents the most structurally significant technology shift the occupation has experienced since the barcode scanner. Oracle Fusion Cloud's Inventory Tasking Agent (launched 26A, April 2026) automatically assigns warehouse tasks to workers by evaluating skills, availability, and zones; its Inventory Aging Advisor identifies slow-moving stock; its Purchase Order to Sales Order Converter extracts data from PDF purchase orders to generate shipping documents without human transcription. SAP Extended Warehouse Management (2025 FPS00) processes bills of lading automatically using AI. Blue Yonder's Warehouse Ops Agent optimized over 23 million warehouse tasks in the first several months of 2025. Locus Robotics launched its Locus Array fully autonomous fulfillment system in April 2026, with 6 billion robot-assisted picks accumulated across its fleet. The tasks these systems target directly, receiving verification, document processing, putaway routing, and cycle count prioritization, are the core daily activities of the 43-5071 role. The residual human work concentrates in exception handling, vendor and carrier negotiation, hazardous materials compliance, and WMS system configuration and auditing.

    Effect on the work

    BLS projects 43-5071 employment to decline approximately 8% from 2024 to 2034, directly attributing the decline to RFID tags and collaborative robots. The WEF Future of Jobs Report 2025 lists material recording clerks among the clerical roles facing the steepest structural displacement by 2030.

Part of Admin & Office · see all 39 roles →
Different role?

See the same long-arc view for your own profession.

Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.

Browse all roles

Shipping, Receiving, and Inventory Clerks employment and pay by year

On record since1750
Latest US employment816,870 (May 2025)Source: BLS OEWS May 2025Official statisticReport an error
Latest US median pay$45,260 (May 2025)Source: BLS OEWS May 2025Official statisticReport an error
Outlook-7.6% by 2035Source: BLS Employment Projections 2025-35Official statisticReport an error

In other countries

The latest figure each country's statistics agency publishes for this job. Each uses its own occupation definition, survey basis and currency, so the numbers are not directly comparable with each other or with the US figures.

  • Canada (NOC 14400)

    Employment, 2020
    119,965, Statistics Canada Census 2021 Official statistic Report an errorStatistics Canada Census of Population 2021: number of persons with employment income in NOC 14400 Shippers and receivers, Canada, reference year 2020. A recipients basis (anyone with employment income during the year), slightly broader than a point-in-time employed count. Statistics Canada Open Licence.
    Median pay, 2020
    C$44,400, Statistics Canada Census 2021 Official statistic Report an errorStatistics Canada Census of Population 2021 (Table 98-10-0586): median employment income for NOC 14400 Shippers and receivers, Canada, reference year 2020, full-year full-time workers (the basis comparable to the US OEWS full-time median). Statistics Canada Open Licence.
  • United Kingdom (UK SOC 4133)

    Employment, 2025
    69,000, ONS ASHE 2025 Official statistic Report an errorONS Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (Table 14): employee jobs in SOC 4133 Stock control clerks and assistants, United Kingdom, 2025 (ASHE "number of jobs", thousands x1000; excludes self-employment). Open Government Licence v3.0.
    Median pay, 2025
    £28,851, ONS ASHE 2025 Official statistic Report an errorONS Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (Table 14.7a): median gross annual pay for all employee jobs in SOC 4133 Stock control clerks and assistants, United Kingdom, 2025. Open Government Licence v3.0.
  • Australia (ANZSCO 5911)

    Employment, 2025
    121,000, ABS Labour Force Survey Official statistic Report an errorABS Labour Force Survey (Detailed), table EQ08: employed persons in ANZSCO 5911 Purchasing and Supply Logistics Clerks, national (summed across sex and state/territory), annual average of 4 quarterly estimates.
    Median pay, 2025
    A$80,756, ABS Employee Earnings May 2025 Official statistic Report an errorAnnualised (x52) from A$1,553 median weekly earnings. ABS Survey of Employee Earnings and Hours, May 2025: median pay for full-time non-managerial employees paid at the adult rate, before tax. Surfaced via the Jobs and Skills Australia occupation profile.
View all 30 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
YearUS employmentAnnual pay (median unless marked)SourceReport
189933,000n/aEst., Wikipedia Researched contextReport
1940280,000n/aDecennial Census 1940 Researched contextReport
1948n/a$2,600Est., Estimated ~$2,600 median annual wage… Researched contextReport
1970560,000$7,200Est., US Census Bureau (employment) Researched contextEst., US Census Bureau (pay) Researched contextReport
1986n/a$15,400BLS CPS 1986 Researched contextReport
1999n/a$24,753Census 2000 Researched contextReport
2000890,000n/aEst., O*NET 43-5071.00 Researched contextReport
2003767,470$23,660BLS OEWS May 2003 Official statisticReport
2004747,270$24,400BLS OEWS May 2004 Official statisticReport
2005759,910$25,180BLS OEWS May 2005 Official statisticReport
2006763,350$26,070BLS OEWS May 2006 Official statisticReport
2007755,790$26,990BLS OEWS May 2007 Official statisticReport
2008760,950$27,660BLS OEWS May 2008 Official statisticReport
2009715,130$28,250BLS OEWS May 2009 Official statisticReport
2010687,850$28,370BLS OEWS May 2010 Official statisticReport
2011687,940$28,790BLS OEWS May 2011 Official statisticReport
2012690,780$29,010BLS OEWS May 2012 Official statisticReport
2013677,450$29,320BLS OEWS May 2013 Official statisticReport
2014661,530$29,930BLS OEWS May 2014 Official statisticReport
2015674,820$30,450BLS OEWS May 2015 Official statisticReport
2016676,990$31,180BLS OEWS May 2016 Official statisticReport
2017671,780$31,810BLS OEWS May 2017 Official statisticReport
2018655,590$33,030BLS OEWS May 2018 Official statisticReport
2019704,910$34,190BLS OEWS May 2019 Official statisticReport
2020727,640$35,260BLS OEWS May 2020 Official statisticReport
2021795,360$36,890BLS OEWS May 2021 Official statisticReport
2022848,240$37,760BLS OEWS May 2022 Official statisticReport
2023844,120$39,780BLS OEWS May 2023 Official statisticReport
2024857,630$43,190BLS OEWS May 2024 Official statisticReport
2025816,870$45,260BLS OEWS May 2025 Official statisticReport
Embed this timeline on your site

Free for any site. Paste this where the timeline should appear; it stays interactive, every datapoint stays cited, and it sets no cookies on your page. How embedding works

<iframe src="https://futurehistory.earth/embed/43-5071"
  width="100%" height="430" style="border:0"
  title="Shipping, Receiving, and Inventory Clerks, a Future History timeline"
  loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:13px;margin:4px 0 0"><a href="https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/43-5071">Shipping, Receiving, and Inventory Clerks: jobs and pay over time</a>, from Future History</p>

See all roles in Admin & Office