Skip to sources
Time Machine

Executive assistants

Official title Executive Secretaries and Executive Administrative Assistants (SOC 43-6011)

Also called EA, Executive administrative assistant, Executive secretary, C-suite assistant, CEO assistant

In brief

In May 2025, BLS counted 459,910 US executive assistants, with median pay of $76,590 a year. Of the BLS counts since 2012, the highest was 803,040, in May 2012. The earliest figure here is an estimate of 112,000 from 1900, not measured the same way as today's count. The last full technology era for executive assistants: Smartphone + cloud calendar, 2007 to 2020.

What the sources say

Official outlook

BLS projects little or no change in employment from 2025 to 2035 (0%).

BLS Employment Projections 2025-35

AI exposure studies

Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. BLS publishes these counts as yearly survey snapshots and cautions against reading them as a precise trend. In May 2021 BLS changed how it estimates these counts (a model-based method using three years of survey data) and moved fully to the 2018 occupation codes, so part of a change across 2021 can come from the method rather than the work.

Last updated .

Cite this page
APA

Future History. (2026, October 11). Executive assistants: jobs and pay since 1900 [Data set; data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35]. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/43-6011

Chicago

Future History. "Executive assistants: jobs and pay since 1900." Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35. Last modified October 11, 2026. https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/43-6011.

BibTeX

@misc{futurehistory_43_6011, author = {{Future History}}, title = {Executive assistants: jobs and pay since 1900}, year = {2026}, month = oct, howpublished = {\url{https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/43-6011}}, note = {Last updated 2026-10-11. Data as of BLS OEWS May 2025; BLS Employment Projections 2025-35}, }

The access date is today's date on your device.

drag to travel through time
180018251850187519001925195019752000now
Country
2026
Known then as Private Secretary / Confidential Clerk (pre-typewriter era; male-dominated)
Known then as Stenographer / Private Secretary (typewriter feminization era)
Known then as Private Secretary / Executive Secretary (corporate hierarchy formalization era)
Known then as Executive Secretary / Administrative Secretary (National Secretaries Association era)
Known then as Executive Secretary / Executive Administrative Assistant (word-processor and PC era)
Known then as Executive Secretaries and Executive Administrative Assistants (BLS SOC 43-6011)
Known today as Executive Secretaries and Executive Administrative Assistants (BLS SOC 43-6011)
Projected to still be called Executive Secretaries and Executive Administrative Assistants (BLS SOC 43-6011)
Data from the May 2025 survey
US Employment
460K
Est.

Stated in source: BLS OEWS

Official statistic
Report an error
Median Annual Wage
$76,590

≈ $74,626 in 2024 prices (derived by us, CPI-adjusted)

Official statistic
Report an error
Beat · 1837

Isaac Pitman publishes his shorthand system in Bath, England. Pitman Shorthand is adopted widely in British and American commercial circles through the 1840s-1860s as a way for clerks and private secretaries to take rapid dictation -- the predecessor technology to the Dictaphone and the foundation skill of the professional secretary for the next century. Commercial shorthand schools proliferate across the United States; by 1871, over 150 such schools are operating.

Beat · 1874

The Sholes and Glidden typewriter is sold commercially as the "Remington No. 1" beginning in 1874. In 1880, stenography and typewriting occupied only 154 people in the US, just 4% of whom were women. By 1900 the number had grown to over 100,000, with women comprising 76%+. The typewriter's introduction created a new occupation -- the "typewriter," as operators were initially called -- that had never been gendered, allowing women to enter it without the social resistance they encountered in male-coded clerical roles.

Beat · 1942

The National Secretaries Association (NSA) is founded in Kansas City, Missouri, by a group of secretaries seeking to advance the profession's status and standards. The NSA would later become Professional Secretaries International (1981) and then the International Association of Administrative Professionals (IAAP, 1998). In 1951, the NSA administers the first Certified Professional Secretaries (CPS) examination. In 1952, Secretary's Day is established -- later renamed Administrative Professionals Day. The NSA's founding reflects the moment when the secretarial occupation had grown large enough (and female enough) to organize professionally, even as its prestige was beginning to decline from the "private secretary" peak of the 1920s-1930s.

Beat · 1971

By 1971, secretary is the single largest occupation among American women -- one in three working women holds some form of secretarial job. The category had grown from a small female-dominated clerical elite in 1880 to the defining female occupation of the 20th century. Office and administrative support work now accounts for 12.7% of all US workers. But this is near the peak: the word processing revolution is four years away (Wang WPS, 1975) and the IBM PC is ten years away. The occupation that took a century to build will shed half its workforce in the following two decades.

Beat · 1984

"Secretary" is the single most common job in 31 US states in 1984. This is the all-time employment peak for the broader secretarial category. The IBM PC, introduced in August 1981, is already spreading through American offices, but its full employment effect has not yet registered. WordPerfect 3.0 is the dominant word processing software. The IBM Displaywriter -- the dedicated word processor that sparked the wave -- is still selling, but the PC running WordPerfect is already outpacing it. Within a decade, the PC and email will reduce the combined secretarial workforce by half.

Beat · 2000

Administrative Professionals Week is renamed from "Professional Secretaries Week" -- an acknowledgment that the role has shifted from the gendered "secretary" title toward a broader, more strategic "administrative professional" framing. The US Census counts 1,515,653 secretaries broadly (all types combined), down from the mid-1980s peak but still a large occupational category. BLS OEWS now tracks the executive-secretary tier (43-6011) separately from general secretaries (43-6014), reflecting the genuine functional differentiation that has emerged over the past two decades.

Beat · 2025

The Vimcal 2026 Report on the Administrative and Executive Assistant Profession (survey of 600 executive assistants, August 2025) finds that 86% of EAs believe AI enhances rather than replaces their role. ChatGPT is used by 70% of EAs for drafting, Microsoft Copilot by 43%, and Google Gemini by 20%. Scheduling and calendar management still consumes 29.3% of EA time despite AI tools. The EA who wins in the AI era is the one who can configure, govern, and strategically deploy the AI tool stack -- deciding which workflows are safe to automate and which require human judgment. Steele Recruiting (2026) reports senior EAs at Fortune 500 C-suites earning $110,000-$250,000+, with AI fluency now a screened hiring requirement.

How to read this number

OEWS is a point-in-time survey snapshot, not a continuous time series; BLS advises against using it for year-over-year trend comparison.

Each dot is a cited figure over time; the dotted line only links them (values between aren't measured). Hollow dots are estimates.

Official statistic: Copied by a script from a statistics agency table or a published study's table, not retyped by hand. BLS figures and the forecast and exposure tables are also re-checked against that table on every data run. Researched context: Researched from the cited source rather than copied from it by a script, so it is not machine-checked yet. Spot a mistake? Each figure has a “Report an error” link.

Cited forecasts · present → 2035

Will AI replace executive assistants? What the research says

Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, we show the disagreement rather than an average.

Each figure is stated by the named source; we publish no forecasts of our own. Where sources disagree, the spread is the honest signal.

What published forecasts say
Forecast change in the number of people doing this work, as published by each named source. Bars share one scale on every role, centred on zero and reaching the end at ±30%. Grey marks a small change, 3% or less either way.
BLS Employment Projections 2025-35
→ 2035
0%
BLS National Employment Matrix, 2025-35 cycle, line for SOC 43-6011 (Executive secretaries and executive administrative assistants): 489.3 thousand jobs in 2025, projected 489.2 thousand in 2035, a change of -0.1 thousand (0.0%). Matrix employment counts all jobs in the occupation, including self-employed workers (0.7% of this occupation in 2025). The average for all occupations in this cycle is +3.5%.
Official statisticReport an error
How exposed is this work to AI (research measures)
Scores as published by each study. Each row says what it measures. These measure what AI could technically do, not forecasts of jobs lost.
Eloundou et al. (2023), "GPTs are GPTs"
2023 study · Share of tasks exposed to LLMs (β, human-rated)
74.3%
of tasks
What this measures

Published occupation-level exposure from the paper's occ_level.csv for O*NET-SOC 43-6011.00 Executive Secretaries and Executive Administrative Assistants. Shown: human-rated β = 0.743, the share of the occupation's tasks an LLM could do in at least half the time at equal quality, counting tasks that need LLM-powered software at half weight (β = E1 + 0.5 × E2). Other published measures for this occupation: human-rated α (LLM alone) 0.622 and γ (all LLM-assisted) 0.865; GPT-4-rated β 0.649. This measures how much of the work an LLM could touch, not how many jobs disappear.

Official statisticReport an error
Today, in this role

What's changing day to day for executive assistants

Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.

AI is taking this onCapture meeting decisions, action items, and commitments using AI meeting agents (Otter.ai OtterPilot, Fireflies.ai, Granola) that transcribe, summarize, and distribute action items without manual note-taking, then review AI-generated summaries for accuracy, add context the transcript missed (raised eyebrows, a half-commitment that carries political weight), and route action items to the executive's project tracking system with appropriate owners and deadlines.

Capture meeting decisions, action items, and commitments using AI meeting agents (Otter.ai OtterPilot, Fireflies.ai, Granola) that transcribe, summarize, and distribute action items without manual note-taking, then review AI-generated summaries for accuracy, add context the transcript missed (raised eyebrows, a half-commitment that carries political weight), and route action items to the executive's project tracking system with appropriate owners and deadlines.[8],[9],[10]

Where your edge is

Meeting transcription and summary generation is now well-automated: Otter.ai saves hours per user each week (Forrester TEI 2025); Granola has grown to a $1.5B unicorn by capturing exec word-of-mouth. The EA's retained value is in reviewing AI summaries for what the model structurally cannot capture: a commitment given reluctantly that needs a follow-up, a relationship tension that changes how an action item should be framed, or a decision that was actually made informally before the meeting started. These judgment annotations are the difference between a transcript and institutional memory.

AI is sitting alongside you hereManage the executive's calendar using AI scheduling tools (Reclaim.ai, Microsoft 365 Copilot in Outlook) that automatically resolve conflicts, protect focus time, add travel buffers, and surface scheduling links to counterparties, while retaining human control over the judgment calls: which meetings to accept despite a full day, which requests to decline without explanation, and when to override AI recommendations based on relationship or political context the model cannot know.

Manage the executive's calendar using AI scheduling tools (Reclaim.ai, Microsoft 365 Copilot in Outlook) that automatically resolve conflicts, protect focus time, add travel buffers, and surface scheduling links to counterparties, while retaining human control over the judgment calls: which meetings to accept despite a full day, which requests to decline without explanation, and when to override AI recommendations based on relationship or political context the model cannot know.[11],[12],[3]

Where your edge is

AI tools now handle the scheduling mechanics (conflict detection, buffer insertion, availability-link generation) saving EAs 4.9 planning hours per week (Reclaim.ai data). Redirect that time to the judgment layer: curating the executive's access, shaping the week's energy distribution (deep work vs. external meetings vs. internal rituals), and maintaining the mental model of which relationships need visible attention. The "what not to put on the calendar" decision is yours alone.

AI is sitting alongside you hereTriage the executive's inbox using AI email tools (Superhuman Mail, Microsoft 365 Copilot in Outlook) that auto-label by priority category, archive marketing/cold outreach, surface threads requiring a response, and generate first-draft replies in the executive's tone, while the EA reviews AI-drafted responses for accuracy, decides which messages the executive must personally reply to, and handles communications that are confidential, relationship-sensitive, or politically nuanced.

Triage the executive's inbox using AI email tools (Superhuman Mail, Microsoft 365 Copilot in Outlook) that auto-label by priority category, archive marketing/cold outreach, surface threads requiring a response, and generate first-draft replies in the executive's tone, while the EA reviews AI-drafted responses for accuracy, decides which messages the executive must personally reply to, and handles communications that are confidential, relationship-sensitive, or politically nuanced.[13],[12],[3]

Where your edge is

Superhuman Mail auto-labels, auto-archives, and generates draft replies for 2026 inboxes receiving more than a hundred emails daily, claiming several hours saved per week. The value-add EAs must protect is the curator function: knowing which messages the executive needs to see personally (even if not categorized as urgent by AI), which require the EA to draft a response in executive voice, and which confidential communications should never pass through an AI pipeline at all. Confidentiality hygiene, deciding what AI cannot touch, is a new critical competency.

Where executive assistants go next

Natural next steps for someone with your foundation: not exits, evolutions.

What each move takes

A direction you could grow

General and Operations Managers

The Chief of Staff role, a title that sits inside 11-1021.00 for BLS purposes, is the most natural and prestigious upward path for senior EAs. A Chief of Staff runs the CEO's operating system at the organisational level: setting agenda for leadership team meetings, managing cross-functional project portfolios, handling special strategic initiatives, and serving as the executive's proxy in contexts where the EA title would limit access. EAs who already operate this way informally are one title change and one credential cycle away.

What you'd add
  • · Executive-level business acumen: P&L literacy, strategy frameworks (OKRs, MECE), and financial model reading
  • · Leadership communication: writing strategy memos, presenting to boards, and facilitating executive decision forums
  • · Organisational design basics: RACI redesign, operating-cadence structuring, and meeting-architecture design
  • · Chief of Staff Network or similar professional community: the role lacks a formal credential path; network signal matters
  • · AI governance for executive operations: configuring and auditing AI tool stacks used by the leadership team
What it takesSome new skills to pick up
Tools of the era

How has the work of executive assistants changed since 1789?

The tools that defined the work, one line per era. Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.

  • Quill and ink + shorthand (Pitman system from 1837)

    Before the typewriter, the private secretary to a powerful executive worked with quill pen, ink, and later steel-nib pen -- producing correspondence by hand, maintaining letter-books of fair copies, and often transcribing dictation using shorthand systems developed for speed. Isaac Pitman published his shorthand system in 1837, and US adoption followed over the next two decades. The private secretary of this era was the executive's memory and communication system: he (almost always he, in this period) drafted letters in longhand, kept files of incoming correspondence, managed the executive's diary, and served as the organizational intelligence backbone of the enterprise.

  • Remington typewriter (commercial launch 1874; Underwood dominance from 1900)

    The Sholes and Glidden typewriter was sold commercially as the "Remington No. 1" in 1874 -- the first commercially viable typewriter. It changed the composition of the secretarial workforce faster than almost any technology in American labor history. In 1870 there were a few people listed as "stenographers and typewriters" in the US Census; by 1900 the category had grown to 112,000; by 1920 to over 615,000. The typewriter was a new machine, defined as neither men's nor women's work, and women entered the trade freely. Remington hired women to demonstrate the machines at trade fairs; Phebe Cousins became one of the first professional "typewriter women" in 1876. The Underwood No. 5, introduced in 1900, became the dominant office machine through the 1930s. By the time Underwood had sold millions of units between 1900 and 1930, the typewriter had transformed the private secretary from an educated man of affairs to a trained woman skilled in shorthand and typing -- and had created the typing pool, a new organizational form that would define the 20th-century office.

    Effect on the work

    The typewriter created the modern secretarial occupation essentially from scratch.

  • IBM Selectric typewriter (1961) + Dictaphone wire/tape recorders (1940s-1970s)

    The IBM Selectric, introduced in July 1961, replaced the traditional type-bar mechanism with a rotating "golf ball" type element that could be swapped to change fonts -- the first office machine that gave a professional polish to typed output without the clatter and jamming of older designs. Within five years the Selectric dominated the US market. The Dictaphone and wire recorder, developed from the 1940s, formalized the executive dictation workflow: the executive recorded correspondence; the secretary transcribed it. By the early 1960s this workflow had become so standard that it defined the executive secretary's job. The combination of Selectric + Dictaphone represented the zenith of the traditional private secretary operating model: optimized shorthand and transcription, professional typing, and personal organization at the executive's right hand.

  • Dedicated word processors (Wang WPS 1975, IBM Displaywriter 1980, Lanier No Problem 1977)

    Wang Laboratories introduced the Wang Word Processing System (WPS) in 1975 -- the first practical, affordable dedicated word processing machine for business. The device replaced the linear typewriting process (type it right the first time, or start over) with edit-and-revise: text could be stored on magnetic cassette, corrected on screen, and reprinted cleanly. By 1977, Lanier had 20% of the dedicated word processor market; by 1980, IBM had entered with the Displaywriter, which sold 200,000 units in its first two years. For the executive secretary, the word processor was both a gift and a threat: it made revision far faster, reducing the mental labor of perfect-first-draft typing, but IBM explicitly positioned the Displaywriter as a machine to replace the "secretarial pool" -- an automation of the highest-volume typing work that was beginning to reduce headcount in large corporate typing departments.

    Effect on the work

    Dedicated word processors began the long displacement of the typing pool -- the lowest-tier secretarial function. They had limited initial impact on the executive secretary tier specifically, because her work included more than typing. But they established the pattern: technology would progressively automate the mechanical execution tasks, leaving the judgment tasks as the residual occupation.

  • IBM PC + WordPerfect / Microsoft Word (IBM PC August 1981; WordPerfect 1982; Word for Windows 1989)

    The IBM Personal Computer was introduced in August 1981 -- initially dismissed by corporate secretaries as an experimental curiosity. Within three years, the PC running WordPerfect or Lotus 1-2-3 was the dominant productivity device in the American office. IBM's own PROFS (Professional Office System), launched in 1981 for mainframe users, introduced networked email and shared calendars to over one million IBM employees by the late 1980s. The PC era had two simultaneous effects on executive secretaries. On the disruption side: executives began typing their own correspondence for the first time, and the typing pool -- the most labor-intensive tier of the secretarial hierarchy -- began to shrink as one person with a PC could produce the output of several typists. On the enhancement side: spreadsheets and word processors multiplied the output per executive secretary, allowing a skilled EA to produce briefing books, reports, and presentations that previously required a typing pool. The net employment effect was a gradual compression of the general secretary headcount while the executive tier held more stable.

    Effect on the work

    Office and administrative support work peaked at 12.7% of all US workers in 1980 and began declining steadily after PC adoption accelerated. The executive-tier (43-6011) did not fall as steeply.

  • Internet email + Microsoft Outlook (Outlook 97; Exchange Server; BlackBerry 1999)

    Lotus cc:Mail and Microsoft Mail were early corporate email systems, but it was Exchange Server (1996) and Microsoft Outlook 97 that standardized email as the executive's communication layer. Before corporate email, incoming correspondence flowed through the secretary's desk: she opened the mail, triaged it, prepared responses for signature, and managed the paper files. Email rewired this workflow: for the first time, executives received messages directly in their own inboxes, read them personally, and often replied without secretary involvement. The BlackBerry, launched commercially in 1999, extended this into the executive's pocket. The effect on executive secretary employment was significant: the correspondence handling and transcription functions -- the original rationale for the private secretary role -- shrank from a full-time activity to an occasional one. What survived was the scheduling, gatekeeping, travel coordination, and relationship management work that email and the BlackBerry did not automate.

    Effect on the work

    BLS OEWS counted 472,770 jobs in the executive secretary occupational class (43-6011) in 2024. The email era differentiated the occupation: general secretaries lost the correspondence and transcription functions entirely; executive secretaries retained the judgment layer that email could not replace.

  • Smartphone + cloud calendar (iPhone 2007; Google Calendar; Salesforce CRM; cloud-based scheduling)

    The iPhone, launched June 2007, and its Android competitors transformed executive communication and scheduling. Google Calendar (launched 2006) and Exchange-based mobile sync gave executives real-time access to their own calendars and the ability to accept or decline meetings without EA involvement. Cloud-based scheduling tools -- Doodle (2007), Calendly (2013) -- further disintermediated the scheduling function. For executive secretaries, this era was the second wave of functional compression after email: just as email had shrunk the correspondence function, smartphones and cloud calendars shrank the "calendar management" function from a full-time coordination role to a judgment-layer role. Executives now managed their own casual scheduling; EAs were needed for the complex, high-stakes calendar decisions that required relationship context.

  • AI scheduling, email, and meeting agents (Reclaim.ai 2020; Otter.ai; Microsoft 365 Copilot 2023; Granola 2023; Navan Edge 2026)

    The AI tool wave that began in earnest in 2020-2023 is automating the last remaining high-volume mechanical tasks in the executive secretary role. Reclaim.ai (launched 2020) saves executive assistants a few planning hours per week by auto-resolving scheduling conflicts. Otter.ai and Granola (launched 2023, $1.5B valuation) handle meeting transcription and action-item extraction that previously required active note-taking. Microsoft 365 Copilot (launched November 2023) runs in agentic mode to triage inboxes, draft replies, and reschedule 1:1s without user prompts. Navan Edge (launched March 2026) autonomously rebooks travel disruptions and calls hotels on behalf of the traveler. The Vimcal 2026 EA Report (n=600 executive assistants) found that 86% of EAs believe AI enhances rather than replaces their role -- but also that ChatGPT is already used by 70% of EAs for drafting, and that 29.3% of EA time is still spent on scheduling despite AI tools. The AI era is reshaping the executive secretary role toward its irreducible core: the judgment tasks that require institutional knowledge, relationship awareness, and trust.

    Effect on the work

    BLS projects a small decline in 43-6011 employment from 2024 to 2034. This is a gradual compression rather than a collapse -- far below the WEF projection for administrative secretaries broadly (19 million displaced globally by 2030). The premium paid for executive-tier judgment is proving more durable than the WEF's headline number implies, though the lower tier of the 43-6011 distribution (EAs supporting mid-level managers rather than C-suite) faces more acute displacement pressure from AI scheduling and email tools.

Part of Admin & Office · see all 39 roles →
Different role?

See the same long-arc view for your own profession.

Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code.

Browse all roles

Executive Secretaries and Executive Administrative Assistants employment and pay by year

On record since1789
Latest US employment459,910 (May 2025)Source: BLS OEWS May 2025Official statisticReport an error
Latest US median pay$76,590 (May 2025)Source: BLS OEWS May 2025Official statisticReport an error
Outlook+0% by 2035Source: BLS Employment Projections 2025-35Official statisticReport an error

In other countries

The latest figure each country's statistics agency publishes for this job. Each uses its own occupation definition, survey basis and currency, so the numbers are not directly comparable with each other or with the US figures.

  • Canada (NOC 12100)

    Employment, 2020
    48,125, Statistics Canada Census 2021 Official statistic Report an errorStatistics Canada Census of Population 2021: number of persons with employment income in NOC 12100 Executive assistants, Canada, reference year 2020. A recipients basis (anyone with employment income during the year), slightly broader than a point-in-time employed count. Statistics Canada Open Licence.
    Median pay, 2020
    C$66,500, Statistics Canada Census 2021 Official statistic Report an errorStatistics Canada Census of Population 2021 (Table 98-10-0586): median employment income for NOC 12100 Executive assistants, Canada, reference year 2020, full-year full-time workers (the basis comparable to the US OEWS full-time median). Statistics Canada Open Licence.
  • United Kingdom (UK SOC 4215)

    Employment, 2025
    164,000, ONS ASHE 2025 Official statistic Report an errorONS Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (Table 14): employee jobs in SOC 4215 Personal assistants and other secretaries, United Kingdom, 2025 (ASHE "number of jobs", thousands x1000; excludes self-employment). Open Government Licence v3.0.
    Median pay, 2025
    £25,233, ONS ASHE 2025 Official statistic Report an errorONS Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (Table 14.7a): median gross annual pay for all employee jobs in SOC 4215 Personal assistants and other secretaries, United Kingdom, 2025. Open Government Licence v3.0.
  • Australia (ANZSCO 5211)

    Employment, 2025
    45,400, ABS Labour Force Survey Official statistic Report an errorABS Labour Force Survey (Detailed), table EQ08: employed persons in ANZSCO 5211 Personal Assistants, national (summed across sex and state/territory), annual average of 4 quarterly estimates.
    Median pay, 2025
    A$95,264, ABS Employee Earnings May 2025 Official statistic Report an errorAnnualised (x52) from A$1,832 median weekly earnings. ABS Survey of Employee Earnings and Hours, May 2025: median pay for full-time non-managerial employees paid at the adult rate, before tax. Surfaced via the Jobs and Skills Australia occupation profile.
View all 30 years of cited US data, each linked to its source
YearUS employmentAnnual pay (median unless marked)SourceReport
1900112,000n/aEst., Strom Researched contextReport
1920615,000n/aEst., Strom Researched contextReport
1942900,000n/aEst., Wikipedia / IAAP history Researched contextReport
1970n/a$7,200BLS historical bulletin June 1970 Researched contextReport
19711,800,000n/aEst., Forked Lightning Researched contextReport
19842,200,000n/aEst., Forked Lightning Researched contextReport
20001,515,000$31,090Census (IPUMS) 2000 (employment) Researched contextBLS OEWS 2000 (pay) Official statisticReport
20031,418,640$34,080BLS OEWS May 2003 Official statisticReport
20041,422,610$34,970BLS OEWS May 2004 Official statisticReport
20051,442,040$35,960BLS OEWS May 2005 Official statisticReport
20061,487,310$37,240BLS OEWS May 2006 Official statisticReport
20071,517,410$38,640BLS OEWS May 2007 Official statisticReport
20081,491,520$40,030BLS OEWS May 2008 Official statisticReport
20091,361,170$41,650BLS OEWS May 2009 Official statisticReport
20101,132,070$43,520BLS OEWS May 2010 Official statisticReport
2011952,030$45,580BLS OEWS May 2011 Official statisticReport
2012803,040$47,500BLS OEWS May 2012 Official statisticReport
2013755,210$49,290BLS OEWS May 2013 Official statisticReport
2014713,730$51,270BLS OEWS May 2014 Official statisticReport
2015666,490$53,370BLS OEWS May 2015 Official statisticReport
2016631,610$55,860BLS OEWS May 2016 Official statisticReport
2017596,080$57,410BLS OEWS May 2017 Official statisticReport
2018570,530$59,340BLS OEWS May 2018 Official statisticReport
2019542,690$60,890BLS OEWS May 2019 Official statisticReport
2020503,390$63,110BLS OEWS May 2020 Official statisticReport
2021466,910$62,060BLS OEWS May 2021 Official statisticReport
2022475,240$65,980BLS OEWS May 2022 Official statisticReport
2023483,570$70,310BLS OEWS May 2023 Official statisticReport
2024472,770$74,260BLS OEWS May 2024 Official statisticReport
2025459,910$76,590BLS OEWS May 2025 Official statisticReport
Embed this timeline on your site

Free for any site. Paste this where the timeline should appear; it stays interactive, every datapoint stays cited, and it sets no cookies on your page. How embedding works

<iframe src="https://futurehistory.earth/embed/43-6011"
  width="100%" height="430" style="border:0"
  title="Executive Secretaries and Executive Administrative Assistants, a Future History timeline"
  loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:13px;margin:4px 0 0"><a href="https://futurehistory.earth/timeline/43-6011">Executive Secretaries and Executive Administrative Assistants: jobs and pay over time</a>, from Future History</p>

See all roles in Admin & Office